Skip to main content

(De)constructing the Masculine Blueprint: The Institutional and Discursive Consequences of Male Political Dominance

  • Natalie Galea (a1) and Barbara Gaweda (a2)

Men are overrepresented in most legislatures of the world. However, in parliaments in which women reach a “critical mass” or even approach parity with men in terms of numbers, they still must contend with and adapt to the symbolic representation of men. Using the cases of the Australian and Polish parliaments, we point to the need to deconstruct the parliamentary standard by shifting the theoretical and empirical focus from women's disadvantage in politics to problematizing men's advantage and power (Eveline 1994, 1998; Murray 2014). Rather than placing the problem and solution with women, we address the practices that maintain men's unearned power, or privilege. Privilege is the “systematically conferred advantages” that individuals enjoy by virtue of their membership of a dominant social group (Bailey 1998, 109). Institutions in the form of taken-for-granted practices and gendered discourses embed a “masculine blueprint” in political institutions that legitimizes men's place as parliamentarians and privileges men, enhancing their power and advantage in the election process. By focusing on men's dominance, it becomes evident that sustaining gender inequality through practices and discourse advantages men as a group.

Hide All
Bailey, Alison. 1998. “Privilege: Expanding on Marilyn Frye's ‘Oppression.’Journal of Social Philosophy 29 (3): 104–19.
Bellanta, Melissa. 2012. Larrikins: A History. St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press.
Chappell, Louise. 2002. “The ‘Femocrat’ Strategy: Expanding the Repertoire of Feminist Activists.” Parliamentary Affairs 55 (1): 8598.
Eveline, Joan. 1994. “The Politics of Advantage.” Australian Feminist Studies 9 (19): 129–54.
Eveline, Joan. 1998. “Heavy, Dirty and Limp Stories: Male Advantage at Work.” In Gender and Institutions: Welfare, Work and Citizenship, Gatens, Moira and Mackinnon, Alison, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 90106.
Gains, Francesca, and Lowndes, Vivien. 2014. “How Is Institutional Formation Gendered, and Does It Make a Difference? A New Conceptual Framework and a Case Study of Police and Crime Commissioners in England and Wales.” Politics & Gender 10 (4): 524–48.
Harrison, Dan. 2007. “I'm Sorry, Heffernan Tells Gillard.” Sydney Morning Herald, May 2. (accessed March 22, 2018).
Kernot, Cheryl. 2012. “Julia Gillard Hits Back at a Long History of Sexism in Parliament.” The Conversation, October 9. (accessed March 22, 2018).
Mackay, Fiona, Monro, Surya, and Waylen, Georgina. 2009. “The Feminist Potential of Sociological Institutionalism.” Politics & Gender 5 (2): 253–62.
Murray, Rainbow. 2014. “Quotas for Men: Reframing Gender Quotas as a Means of Improving Representation for All.” American Political Science Review 108 (3): 520–32.
Remeikis, Amy, and Ireland, Judith. 2017. “Vexed Liberals Move to Dump Kelly O'Dwyer While on Maternity Leave.” Sydney Morning Herald, April 22. (accessed March 22, 2018).
Simms, Robert. 2013. “A Masculinity Contest of National Proportions.” ABC News (Australia), August 22. (accessed March 22, 2018).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed