Skip to main content
×
Home

A Critical Analysis of Gender Mainstreaming

  • Marsha Lyle-Gonga (a1)
Abstract

By definition, gender mainstreaming is the process by which a gendered perspective (male and female) is integrated into the fabric of our communities, institutions, and lives (United Nations 1997). We live in a society defined by our values of equality, social justice, and opportunity. In order for these values to permeate into our everyday lives, we must address issues of “separateness” that still seem to prevail in our institutions, particularly in our political science curricula. Di Stefano (1997, 204) presented gender as “a socially constructed and politically enforced notion of what it means to be male or female” and argues that this gendered lens is “political because it has the power to impose meaning and value to our activities and social relationships.” Mainstreaming is a transition from a male-defined curriculum to a more gender-balanced curriculum that better reflects the improved status of women in society.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Berheide Catherine W., and Segal Marcia T.. 1985. “Teaching Sex and Gender: A Decade of Experience.” Teaching Sociology 12 (3): 267–83.
Center for American Women and Politics. 2012. “Statistics on Women's Political Participation.” https://www.rutgers.edu/cawp (accessed January 12, 2012).
Di Stefano Christine. 1997. “Integrating Gender into Political Science Curriculum: Challenges, Pitfalls, and Opportunities.” PS: Political Science & Politics 30 (2): 204–6.
Elison Sonja. 1997. “Integrating Women into the Study of European Politics.” PS: Political Science & Politics 30 (2): 202–4.
Githens Marianne. 1994. “Teaching Against the Double Couplet of Problem/Victim.” PS: Political Science & Politics 27 (4): 721–22.
Gruberg Martin. 1994. “Incorporating a Women's Studies Dimension into Mainstream Political Science Courses.” PS: Political Science & Politics 27 (4): 717–18.
Hawthorne Susan. 2004. “The Political Uses of Obscurantism: Gender Mainstreaming and Intersectionality.” Development Bulletin 64: 8791.
Kramer Laura, and Martin George T.. 1988. “Mainstreaming Gender: Some Thoughts for the Non-Specialist.” Teaching Sociology 16 (2): 133–40.
Lublin David, and Brewer Sarah. 2003. “The Continuing Dominance of Traditional Gender Roles in Southern Elections. Social Science Quarterly 84 (2): 379–96.
Patrick John J. 1967. Political Socialization of American Youth: Implications for Secondary School Social Studies. Washington, DC: National Council for the Social Studies.
Parker E. Joyce. 1994. “Mainstreaming Gender, Race, and Sexual Orientation in Teaching: A Student's Point of View.” PS: Political Science & Politics 27 (4): 722–23.
Pearson Allen, and Rooke Patricia. 1993. “Gender Studies and Teacher Education: A Proposal.” Canadian Journal of Education 18 (4): 414–28.
Silverberg Helene. 1994. “Organizing a Course that is Attentive to Issues of Racial and Sexual Difference.” PS: Political Science & Politics 27 (4): 718–19.
United Nations. 1997. The Report of the Economic and Social Council for 1997.
Verba Sidney, Schlozman Kay L., and Brady Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 45 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 466 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.