Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Votes for Women: Electoral Systems and Support for Female Candidates

  • Sona N. Golder (a1), Laura B. Stephenson (a2), Karine Van der Straeten (a3), André Blais (a4), Damien Bol (a5), Philipp Harfst (a6) and Jean-François Laslier (a7)...
Abstract

It is a well-established finding that proportional representation (PR) electoral systems are associated with greater legislative representation for women than single member systems. However, the degree to which different types of PR rules affect voting for female candidates has not been fully explored. The existing literature is also hampered by a reliance on cross-national data in which individual vote preferences and electoral system features are endogenous. In this study, we draw upon an experiment conducted during the 2014 European Parliament (EP) elections to isolate the effects of different PR electoral systems. Participants in the experiment were given the opportunity to vote for real EP candidates in three different electoral systems: closed list, open list, and open list with panachage and cumulation. Because voter preferences can be held constant across the three different votes, we can evaluate the extent to which female candidates were more or less advantaged by the electoral system itself. We find that voters, regardless of their gender, support female candidates, and that this support is stronger under open electoral rules.

It is a well-established finding that proportional representation (PR) electoral systems are associated with greater legislative representation for women than single member systems. However, the degree to which different types of PR rules affect voting for female candidates has not been fully explored. The existing literature is also hampered by a reliance on cross-national data in which individual vote preferences and electoral system features are endogenous. In this study, we draw upon an experiment conducted during the 2014 European Parliament (EP) elections to isolate the effects of different PR electoral systems. Participants in the experiment were given the opportunity to vote for real EP candidates in three different electoral systems: closed list, open list, and open list with panachage and cumulation. Because voter preferences can be held constant across the three different votes, we can evaluate the extent to which female candidates were more or less advantaged by the electoral system itself. We find that voters, regardless of their gender, support female candidates, and that this support is stronger under open electoral rules.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

André. Blais 2010. “Making Electoral Democracy Work.” Electoral Studies 29 (1): 169–70.

Miki Caul . 1999. “Women's Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties.” Party Politics 5 (1): 7998.

Christine Cheng , and Margit Tavits . 2011. “Informal Influences in Selecting Female Political Candidates.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (2): 460–71.

Jessica Fortin-Rittberger , and Berthold Rittberger . 2014. “Do Electoral Rules Matter? Explaining National Differences in Women's Representation in the European Parliament.” European Union Politics 15 (4): 496520.

Guillaume R. Fréchette , François Maniquet , and Massimo Morelli . 2008. “Incumbents’ Interests and Gender Quotas.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 891909.

Sarah Fulton . 2014. “When Gender Matters: Macro-dynamics and Micro-mechanisms.” Political Behavior 36 (3): 605–30.

Nathalie Giger , Anne Maria Holli , Zoe Lefkofridi , and Hanna Wass . 2014. “The Gender Gap in Same-Gender Voting: The Role of Context.” Electoral Studies 35: 303–14.

Elizabeth Goodyear-Grant , and Julie Croskill . 2011. “Gender Affinity Effects in Vote Choice in Westminster Systems: Assessing ‘Flexible’ Voters in Canada.” Politics & Gender 7 (2): 223–50.

Maciej A. Górecki , and Paula Kukołowicz . 2014. “Gender Quotas, Candidate Background and the Election of Women.” Electoral Studies 36: 6580.

Anna Maria Holli , and Hanna Wass . 2010. “Gender-Based Voting in the Parliamentary Elections of 2007 in Finland.” European Journal of Political Research 49 (5): 598630.

Mark P. Jones 1998. “Gender Quotas, Electoral Laws, and the Election of Women: Lessons from the Argentine Provinces.” Comparative Political Studies 31 (1): 321.

Miki Caul Kittilson , and Leslie Schwindt-Bayer . 2010. “Engaging Citizens: The Role of Power-Sharing Institutions.” The Journal of Politics 72 (4): 9901002.

Miki Caul Kittilson , and Leslie Schwindt-Bayer . 2012. The Gendered Effect of Electoral Institutions: Political Engagement and Participation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Mona Lena Krook . 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. New York: Oxford University Press.

Sheri Kunovich . 2012. “Unexpected Winners: The Significance of an Open-List System on Women's Representation in Poland.” Politics & Gender 8 (2): 153–77.

Jean-François Laslier , André Blais , Damien Bol , Sona N. Golder , Philipp Harfst , Laura B. Stephenson , and Karine Van der Straeten . 2015. “The EuroVotePlus Experiment.” European Union Politics 16 (4): 601–15.

Jennifer L. Lawless , and Kathryn Pearson . 2008. “The Primary Reasons for Women's Underrepresentation? Reevaluating the Conventional Wisdom.” The Journal of Politics 70 (1): 6782.

Maarja Luhiste . 2015. “Party Gatekeepers’ Support for Viable Female Candidacy in PR-List Systems.” Politics & Gender 11 (1): 89116.

Rainbow Murray . 2012. “Parity in France: A ‘Dual Track’ Solution to Women's Under-Representation.” West European Politics 35 (2): 343–61.

Pippa Norris , and Ronald Inglehart . 2001. “Cultural Obstacles to Equal Representation.” Journal of Democracy 12 (3): 126–40.

Pamela Paxton , and Sheri Kunovich . 2003. “Women's Political Representation: The Importance of Ideology.” Social Forces 82 (1): 87113.

Eric Plutzer , and John F. Zipp . 1996. “Identity Politics, Partisanship and Voting for Women Candidates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 60 (1): 3057.

Andrew Roberts , Jason Seawright , and Jennifer Cyr . 2013. “Do Electoral Laws Affect Women's Representation?Comparative Political Studies 46 (12): 1555–81.

Rob Salmond . 2006. “Proportional Representation and Female Parliamentarians.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 31 (2): 175204.

Kira Sanbonmatsu . 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 2034.

Gregory D. Schmidt 2009. “The election of women in list PR systems: Testing the conventional wisdom.” Electoral Studies 28 (2): 190203.

Leslie A. Schwindt-Bayer , Michael Malecki , and Brian F. Crisp . 2010. “Candidate Gender and Electoral Success in Single Transferable Vote Systems.” British Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 693709.

Leslie Schwindt-Bayer , and Peverill Squire . 2014. “Legislative Power and Women's Representation.” Politics & Gender 10 (4): 622–58.

Frank C. Thames , and Margaret S. Williams . 2010. “Incentives for Personal Votes and Women's Representation in Legislatures.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (12): 1575–600.

Melody Ellis Valdini . 2013. “Electoral Institutions and the Manifestation of Bias: The Effect of the Personal Vote on the Representation of Women.” Politics & Gender 9 (1): 7692.

Susan Welch , and Donley T. Studlar . 1988. “The Effects of Candidate Gender on Voting for Local Office in England.” British Journal of Political Science 18 (2): 273–81.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Golder supplementary material
Figures A1-A2 and Tables A1-A5

 Word (357 KB)
357 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 15
Total number of PDF views: 123 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 640 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 12th January 2017 - 30th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.