Skip to main content
×
Home

Votes for Women: Electoral Systems and Support for Female Candidates

  • Sona N. Golder (a1), Laura B. Stephenson (a2), Karine Van der Straeten (a3), André Blais (a4), Damien Bol (a5), Philipp Harfst (a6) and Jean-François Laslier (a7)...
Abstract

It is a well-established finding that proportional representation (PR) electoral systems are associated with greater legislative representation for women than single member systems. However, the degree to which different types of PR rules affect voting for female candidates has not been fully explored. The existing literature is also hampered by a reliance on cross-national data in which individual vote preferences and electoral system features are endogenous. In this study, we draw upon an experiment conducted during the 2014 European Parliament (EP) elections to isolate the effects of different PR electoral systems. Participants in the experiment were given the opportunity to vote for real EP candidates in three different electoral systems: closed list, open list, and open list with panachage and cumulation. Because voter preferences can be held constant across the three different votes, we can evaluate the extent to which female candidates were more or less advantaged by the electoral system itself. We find that voters, regardless of their gender, support female candidates, and that this support is stronger under open electoral rules.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Votes for Women: Electoral Systems and Support for Female Candidates
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Votes for Women: Electoral Systems and Support for Female Candidates
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Votes for Women: Electoral Systems and Support for Female Candidates
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Blais André. 2010. “Making Electoral Democracy Work.” Electoral Studies 29 (1): 169–70.
Blumenau Jack, Eggers Andrew, Hangartner Dominik, and Hix Simon. N.d. “Open/Closed List and Party Choice: Experimental Evidence from the UK.” Forthcoming in the British Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123415000629 (accessed December 5, 2016).
Brooks Deborah Jordan. 2013. He Runs, She Runs: Why Gender Stereotypes Do Not Harm Women Candidates. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Caul Miki. 1999. “Women's Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties.” Party Politics 5 (1): 7998.
Cheng Christine, and Tavits Margit. 2011. “Informal Influences in Selecting Female Political Candidates.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (2): 460–71.
European Parliament 2014. “2014 Post-election Survey. European Election 2014 Analytical Overview.” http://www.europarl.europa.eu/pdf/eurobarometre/2014/post/post_2014_survey_analitical_overview_en.pdf (accessed November 30, 2016).
Fortin-Rittberger Jessica, and Rittberger Berthold. 2014. “Do Electoral Rules Matter? Explaining National Differences in Women's Representation in the European Parliament.” European Union Politics 15 (4): 496520.
Fréchette Guillaume R., Maniquet François, and Morelli Massimo. 2008. “Incumbents’ Interests and Gender Quotas.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 891909.
Fulton Sarah. 2014. “When Gender Matters: Macro-dynamics and Micro-mechanisms.” Political Behavior 36 (3): 605–30.
Giger Nathalie, Maria Holli Anne, Lefkofridi Zoe, and Wass Hanna. 2014. “The Gender Gap in Same-Gender Voting: The Role of Context.” Electoral Studies 35: 303–14.
Goodyear-Grant Elizabeth, and Croskill Julie. 2011. “Gender Affinity Effects in Vote Choice in Westminster Systems: Assessing ‘Flexible’ Voters in Canada.” Politics & Gender 7 (2): 223–50.
Górecki Maciej A., and Kukołowicz Paula. 2014. “Gender Quotas, Candidate Background and the Election of Women.” Electoral Studies 36: 6580.
Holli Anna Maria, and Wass Hanna. 2010. “Gender-Based Voting in the Parliamentary Elections of 2007 in Finland.” European Journal of Political Research 49 (5): 598630.
Jones Mark P. 1998. “Gender Quotas, Electoral Laws, and the Election of Women: Lessons from the Argentine Provinces.” Comparative Political Studies 31 (1): 321.
Jones Mark P., and Navia Patricio. 1999. “Assessing the Effectiveness of Gender Quotas in Open-List Proportional Representation Electoral Systems.” Social Science Quarterly 80 (2): 341–55.
Kittilson Miki Caul. 2006. Challenging Parties, Changing Parliaments. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Kittilson Miki Caul, and Schwindt-Bayer Leslie. 2010. “Engaging Citizens: The Role of Power-Sharing Institutions.” The Journal of Politics 72 (4): 9901002.
Kittilson Miki Caul, and Schwindt-Bayer Leslie. 2012. The Gendered Effect of Electoral Institutions: Political Engagement and Participation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Krook Mona Lena. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kunovich Sheri. 2012. “Unexpected Winners: The Significance of an Open-List System on Women's Representation in Poland.” Politics & Gender 8 (2): 153–77.
Laslier Jean-François, Blais André, Bol Damien, Golder Sona N., Harfst Philipp, Stephenson Laura B., and Van der Straeten Karine. 2015. “The EuroVotePlus Experiment.” European Union Politics 16 (4): 601–15.
Lawless Jennifer L., and Pearson Kathryn. 2008. “The Primary Reasons for Women's Underrepresentation? Reevaluating the Conventional Wisdom.” The Journal of Politics 70 (1): 6782.
Luhiste Maarja. 2015. “Party Gatekeepers’ Support for Viable Female Candidacy in PR-List Systems.” Politics & Gender 11 (1): 89116.
Matland Richard. 2005. “Enhancing Women's Political Participation: Legislative Recruitment and Electoral Systems.” In Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers: A Revised Edition, ed. Ballington Julie and Karam Azza. Stockholm: International IDEA Publications, 93111.
Murray Rainbow. 2012. “Parity in France: A ‘Dual Track’ Solution to Women's Under-Representation.” West European Politics 35 (2): 343–61.
Norris Pippa, and Inglehart Ronald. 2001. “Cultural Obstacles to Equal Representation.” Journal of Democracy 12 (3): 126–40.
Paxton Pamela, and Kunovich Sheri. 2003. “Women's Political Representation: The Importance of Ideology.” Social Forces 82 (1): 87113.
Plutzer Eric, and Zipp John F.. 1996. “Identity Politics, Partisanship and Voting for Women Candidates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 60 (1): 3057.
Roberts Andrew, Seawright Jason, and Cyr Jennifer. 2013. “Do Electoral Laws Affect Women's Representation?Comparative Political Studies 46 (12): 1555–81.
Salmond Rob. 2006. “Proportional Representation and Female Parliamentarians.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 31 (2): 175204.
Sanbonmatsu Kira. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 2034.
Schmidt Gregory D. 2009. “The election of women in list PR systems: Testing the conventional wisdom.” Electoral Studies 28 (2): 190203.
Schwindt-Bayer Leslie A., Malecki Michael, and Crisp Brian F.. 2010. “Candidate Gender and Electoral Success in Single Transferable Vote Systems.” British Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 693709.
Schwindt-Bayer Leslie, and Squire Peverill. 2014. “Legislative Power and Women's Representation.” Politics & Gender 10 (4): 622–58.
Shugart Matthew S. 1994. “Minorities Represented and Unrepresented.” In Electoral Systems in Comparative Perspective, ed. Rule Wilma and Zimmerman Joseph F.. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 3141.
Taagepera Rein. 1994. “Beating the Law of Minority Attrition.” In Electoral Systems in Comparative Perspective, ed. Rule Wilma and Zimmerman Joseph F.. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 235–45.
Thames Frank C., and Williams Margaret S.. 2010. “Incentives for Personal Votes and Women's Representation in Legislatures.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (12): 1575–600.
Valdini Melody Ellis. 2013. “Electoral Institutions and the Manifestation of Bias: The Effect of the Personal Vote on the Representation of Women.” Politics & Gender 9 (1): 7692.
Welch Susan, and Studlar Donley T.. 1988. “The Effects of Candidate Gender on Voting for Local Office in England.” British Journal of Political Science 18 (2): 273–81.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Golder supplementary material
Figures A1-A2 and Tables A1-A5

 Word (357 KB)
357 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 26
Total number of PDF views: 221 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1059 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 12th January 2017 - 24th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.