Skip to main content

Gender Affinity Effects in Vote Choice in Westminster Systems: Assessing “Flexible” Voters in Canada

  • Elizabeth Goodyear-Grant (a1) and Julie Croskill (a2)

Under certain conditions, women are more likely than men to vote for women candidates, a phenomenon referred to as a “gender affinity effect.” Causal mechanisms connecting women voters to women candidates are gender consciousness, desire for descriptive representation, support for liberal social policy, the use of gender as a shortcut to vote choice among low-information voters, and a “party-sex overlap.” Existing work is focused on American elections, which tend to be candidate centered, so little is known about gender affinity effects between voters and candidates in other contexts. This article focuses on Westminster-style parliamentary systems, using the Canadian federal elections of 2000 and 2004 as test cases. Women in these systems have the same motivations to gravitate toward women candidates, for they are gender conscious and desire descriptive representation. But they do not have the same incentives to cast ballots for women because political institutions and practices tend to discourage candidate-based voting. The article pays particular attention to a segment of the electorate we call “flexible” voters, which is comprised of independents, leaners, and defectors. In Westminster systems, it is this group of voters who should be most sensitive to candidate-based considerations.

Hide All
Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Alexander, Deborah, and Andersen, Kristi. 1993. “Gender as a Factor in the Attribution of Leadership Traits.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (3): 527–45.
Alvarez, R. Michael, and Nagler, Jonathan. 2000. “A New Approach for Modelling Strategic Voting in Multiparty Elections.” British Journal of Political Science 30 (1): 5775.
Banducci, Susan A., and Karp, Jeffrey A.. 2000. “Gender, Leadership and Choice in Multiparty Systems.” Political Research Quarterly 53 (4): 815–48.
Bean, Clive. 1990. “The Personal Vote in Australian Federal Elections.” Political Studies 38 (2): 253–68.
Blais, André. 2002. “Why Is There So Little Strategic Voting in Canadian Plurality Rule Elections?Political Studies 50 (3): 445–54.
Blais, AndréGidengil, Elisabeth, Dobrzynska, Agnieszka, Nevitte, Neil, and Nadeau, Richard. 2003. “Does the Local Candidate Matter? Candidate Effects in the Canadian Election of 2000.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 36 (3): 657–64.
Blidook, Kelly. 2010. “Exploring the Role of 'Legislators' in Canada: Do Members of Parliament Influence Policy?Journal of Legislative Studies 16 (1): 3256.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Boef, Suzanna De, and Lin, Tse-Min. 2004. “The Dynamics of the Partisan Gender Gap.” American Political Science Review 98 (3): 515–28.
Brians, Craig L. 2005. “Women for Women? Gender and Party Bias in Voting for Female Candidates.” American Politics Research 33 (3): 357–75.
Burrell, Barbara. 1994. A Woman's Place Is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Cain, Bruce, Ferejohn, John, and Fiorina, Morris. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Carroll, Susan J. 1988. “Women's Autonomy and the Gender Gap: 1980 and 1982.” In The Politics of the Gender Gap: The Social Construction of Political Influence., ed. Mueller, Carol M.. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 236–57.
Conover, Pamela Johnston, and Sapiro, Virginia. 1993. “Gender, Feminist Consciousness, and War.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (4): 1079–99.
Cook, Elizabeth Adell. 1994. “Voter Responses to Women Candidates.” In The Year of the Woman: Myths and Realities, ed. Cook, E. A., Thomas, S., and Wilcox, C.. Boulder, CO: Westview, 217–36.
Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cox, Gary, and McCubbins, Mathew. 1993. Legislative Leviathan. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cunningham, Robert. 1971. “The Impact of the Local Candidate in Canadian Federal Elections.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 4 (2): 287–90.
Cutler, Fred. 2002. “The Simplest Shortcut of All: Sociodemographic Characteristics and Electoral Choice.” Journal of Politics 64 (2): 466–90.
Davis, Shannon N., and Greenstein, Theodore N.. 2009. “Gender Ideology: Components, Predictors, and Consequences.” Annual Review of Sociology 35: 87105.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Docherty, David C. 1997. Mr. Smith Goes to Ottawa: Life in the House of Commons. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Docherty, David C. 2003. “Can Canada Learn Some Lessons?” In Reforming Parliamentary Democracy, ed. Seidle, L F.. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 223–40.
Dolan, Kathleen A. 1998. “Voting for Women in the ‘Year of the Woman.’” American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 272–93.
Dolan, Kathleen A. 2001. “Electoral Context, Issues, and Voting for Women in the 1990s.” Women & Politics 23 (1/2): 2136.
Dolan, Kathleen A. 2004. Voting for Women: How the Public Evaluates Women Candidates. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Dolan, Kathleen A. 2008. “Is There a ‘Gender Affinity Effect’ in American Politics? Information, Affect, and Candidate Sex in U.S. House Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 61 (1): 7989.
Dolan, Kathleen A. 2010. “The Impact of Gender Stereotyped Evaluations on Support for Women Candidates.” Political Behavior 32 (1): 6988.
Erie, Steven P., and Rein, Martin. 1988. “Women and the Welfare State.” In The Politics of the Gender Gap: The Social Construction of Political Influence, ed. Mueller, C. M.. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 173–91.
Fiorina, Morris. 1976. “The Voting Decision: Instrumental and Expressive Aspects.” Journal of Politics 38 (2): 390413.
Franks, C. E. S. 1987. The Parliament of Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Fox, Richard L. 1997. Gender Dynamics in Congressional Elections. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gidengil, Elisabeth. 1995. “Economic Man—Social Woman? The Case of the Gender Gap in Support for the Canada-US Free Trade Agreement.” Comparative Political Studies 28 (3): 384408.
Gidengil, Elisabeth, Blais, André, Everitt, Joanna, Fournier, Patrick, and Nevitte, Neil. 2006. “Back to the Future? Making Sense of the 2004 Canadian Election outside Quebec.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 125.
Gidengil, Elisabeth, Blais, André, Nadeau, Richard, and Nevitte, Neil. 2003. “Women to the Left? Gender Differences in Political Beliefs and Policy Preferences.” In Gender and Electoral Representation in Canada, ed. Tremblay, M. and Trimble, L.. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 140–59.
Gidengil, Elisabeth, Hennigar, Matthew, Blais, André, and Nevitte, Neil. 2005Explaining the Gender Gap in Support for the New Right: The Case of Canada.” Comparative Political Studies 38 (10): 1171–95.
Gilens, Martin. 1988. “Gender and Support for Reagan: A Comprehensive Model of Presidential Approval.” American Journal of Political Science 32 (1): 1949.
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Goodyear-Grant, Elizabeth. 2010. “Who Votes for Women Candidates and Why?” In Voting Behaviour in Canada, ed. Anderson, C. and Stephenson, L.. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 4364.
Greenstein, Theodore N. 2000. “Economic Dependence, Gender, and the Division of Labor in the Home: A Replication and Extension.” Journal of Marriage and Family 62 (2): 322–35.
Griffin, Christine. 1989. “‘I'm Not a Women's Libber But …’: Feminism, Consciousness and Identity.” In The Social Identity of Women, ed. Skevington, S. and Baker, D.. London: Sage, 173–93.
Gurin, Patricia. 1985. “Women's Gender Consciousness.” Public Opinion Quarterly 49 (2): 143–63.
Herrnson, Paul S., Lay, J. Celeste, and Stokes, Atiya K.. 2003. “Women Running ‘as Women’: Candidate Gender, Campaign Issues, and Voter-Targeting Strategies.” Journal of Politics 65 (1): 244–55.
Hillygus, D. Sunshine, and Shields, Todd G.. 2008. The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Huddy, Leonie, and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 119–47.
Iyengar, Shanto, and Petrocik, John R.. 2000. “‘Basic Rule’ Voting: Impact of Campaigns on Party- and Approval-Based Voting.” In Crowded Airwaves: Campaign Advertising in Elections, ed. Thurber, J. A.,Nelson, C. J., and Dulio, D. A.. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 113–48.
Kamen, Paula. 1991. Feminist Fatale. New York: Donald I. Fine.
King, David, and Matland, Richard. 2003. “Sex and the Grand Old Party: An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Candidate Sex on Support for a Republican Candidate.” American Politics Research 31 (6): 595612.
Klatch, Rebecca. 1987. Women of the New Right. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Krashinsky, Michael, and Milne, William J.. 1986. “The Effect of Incumbency in the 1984 and 1985 Ontario Elections.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 19 (2): 337–43.
Krashinsky, Michael, and Milne, William J.. 1991. “Some Evidence on the Effects of Incumbency in the 1988 Canadian Federal Election.” In Issues in Party and Election Finance in Canada, ed. Seidle, F. L.. Ottawa and Toronto: Royal Commission on Electoral Reform and Party Financing and Dundurn Press.
Lau, Richard, and Redlawsk, David P.. 2001. “Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (4): 951–71.
Lawless, Jennifer. 2004. “Women, War, and Winning Elections: Gender Stereotyping in the Post-September 11th Era.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (3): 479–90.
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2001. “The Hunt for Party Discipline in Congress.” American Political Science Review 95 (3): 673687.
McCue, Clifford P., and Gopoian, J. David. 2000. “Dispositional Empathy and the Political Gender Gap.” Women and Politics 21 (2): 120.
McDermott, Monika L. 1997. “Voting Cues in Low-Information Elections: Candidate Gender as a Social Information Variable in Contemporary United States Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 270–83.
Norris, Pippa, Vallance, Elizabeth, and Lovenduski, Joni. 1992. “Do Candidates Make a Difference? Gender, Race, Ideology and Incumbency.” Parliamentary Affairs 45 (4): 496517.
Norton, Phillip, and Wood, David M.. 1990. “Constituency Service by Members of Parliament: Does It Contribute to a Personal Vote?Parliamentary Affairs 43 (2): 196208.
Norton, Phillip, and Wood, David M.. 1993. Back from Westminster: British Members of Parliament and Their Constituents. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
O'Neill, Brenda. 1998. “The Relevance of Leader Gender to Voting in the 1993 Canadian National Election.” International Journal of Canadian Studies 17 (2): 105–30.
O'Neill, Brenda. 2003. “On the Same Wavelength? Feminist Attitudes across Generations of Canadian Women.” In Women and Electoral Politics in Canada, ed. Tremblay, M.and Trimble, L.. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press, 177–91.
Paolino, Phillip. 1995. “Group-Salient Issues and Group Representation: Support for Women Candidates in the 1992 Senate Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (2): 294313.
Popkin, Samuel L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Plutzer, Eric, and Zipp, John F.. 1996. “Identity Politics, Partisanship, and Voting for Women Candidates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 60 (1): 3057.
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 2034.
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2003. “Gender-Related Political Knowledge and the Descriptive Representation of Women.” Political Behavior 25 (4): 367–88.
Savoie, Donald J. 1999. Governing from the Centre: The Concentration of Power in Canadian Politics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Schreiber, Ronnee. 2002. “Injecting a Woman's Voice: Conservative Women's Organizations, Gender Consciousness, and the Expression of Women's Policy Preferences.” Sex Roles 47 (7/8): 331–42.
Shapiro, Robert Y., and Mahajan, Harpreet. 1986. “Gender Differences in Policy Preferences: A Summary of Trends from the 1960s to the 1980s.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50 (1): 4261.
Smith, Eric R. A. N., and Fox, Richard L.. 2001. “The Electoral Fortunes of Women Candidates for Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (1): 205–21.
Studlar, Donley T., and McAllister, lan. 1994. “The Electoral Connection in Australia: Candidate Roles, Campaign Activity, and the Popular Vote.” Political Behavior 16 (3): 385410.
Studlar, Donley T., McAllister, Ian, and Hayes, Bernadette C.. 1998. “Explaining the Gender Gap in Voting: A Cross-National Analysis.” Social Science Quarterly 79 (4): 779–98.
Thompson, Seth, and Steckenrider, Janie. 1997. “The Relative Irrelevance of Candidate Sex.” Women and Politics 17 (4): 7192.
Tolleson-Rinehart, Sue. 1992. Gender Consciousness and Politics. New York: Routledge.
Welch, Susan, and Hibbing, John. 1992. “Financial Conditions, Gender, and Voting in American National Elections.” Journal of Politics 54 (1): 194213.
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York. Cambridge University Press.
Zipp, John F., and Plutzer, Eric. 1985. “Gender Differences in Voting for Female Candidates: Evidence from the 1982 Election.” Public Opinion Quarterly 49 (2): 179–97.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 19
Total number of PDF views: 201 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 672 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.