Skip to main content Accessibility help

Gender Quotas and Women's Substantive Representation: Lessons from Argentina

  • Susan Franceschet (a1) and Jennifer M. Piscopo (a2)


This article integrates the comparative literature on gender quotas with the existing body of research on women's substantive representation. Quota laws, which bring greater numbers of women into parliaments, are frequently assumed to improve women's substantive representation. We use the Argentine case, where a law mandating a 30% gender quota was adopted in 1991, to show that quotas can affect substantive representation in contradictory and unintended ways. To do so, we disaggregate women's substantive representation into two distinct concepts: substantive representation as process, where women change the legislative agenda, and substantive representation as outcome, where female legislators succeed in passing women's rights laws in the Argentine Congress. We argue that quota laws complicate both aspects of substantive representation. Quotas generate mandates for female legislators to represent women's interests, while also reinforcing negative stereotypes about women's capacities as politicians. Our case combines data from bill introduction and legislative success from 1989 to 2007 with data from 54 interviews conducted in 2005 and 2006. We use this evidence to demonstrate that representation depends on the institutional environment, which is itself shaped by quotas. Institutions and norms simultaneously facilitate and obstruct women's substantive representation.



Hide All
Archenti, Nélida, and Johnson, Niki. 2006. “Engendering the Legislative Agenda With and Without the Quota.” Sociología, Problemas e Práticas 52: 133–53.
Baldez, Lisa. 2004. “Elected Bodies: The Gender Quota Law for Legislative Candidates in Mexico.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (2): 231–58.
Baldez, Lisa. 2006. “The Pros and Cons of Gender Quotas: What Happens When You Kick Men Out and Let Women In?Politics & Gender 2 (March): 102–9.
Barón, Maria, et al. 2007. “Legislative Analysis: Argentina's National Congress: 1998–2007.” Buenos Aires: Directorio Legislativo. (August 2007).
Beckwith, Karen. 2007. “Numbers and Newness: The Descriptive and Substantive Representation of Women.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 40 (1): 2749.
Bratton, Kathleen A. 2005. “Critical Mass Theory Revisited: The Behavior and Success of Token Women in State Legislatures.” Politics and Gender 1 (March): 97125.
Bratton, Kathleen A., and Ray, Leonard P.. 2002. “Descriptive Representation, Policy Outcomes, and Municipal Day Care Coverage in Norway.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (2): 428–37.
Carroll, Susan J. 2001. “Representing Women: Women State Legislators as Agents of Policy-Related Change.” In The Impact of Women in Public Office, ed. Carroll, Susan J.. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 321.
Caul Kittilson, Miki. 2005. “In Support of Quotas: Setting New Standards, Bringing Visible Gains.” Politics & Gender 1 (December): 638–45.
Chama, Mónica. 2001. Las Mujeres y el Poder. Buenos Aires: Ciudad Argentina.
Childs, Sarah. 2004. New Labour's Women MPs: Women Representing Women. London and New York: Routledge.
Childs, Sarah. 2006. “The Complicated Relationship between Sex, Gender and the Substantive Representation of Women.” European Journal of Women's Studies 13 (1): 721.
Childs, Sarah, and Krook, Mona Lena. 2006. “Should Feminists Give Up on Critical Mass? A Contingent Yes.” Politics & Gender 2 (December): 522–30.
Chowdhury, Najma. 2002. “The Implementation of Quotas: Bangladesh Experience—Dependence and Marginality in Politics.” Paper presented at the Regional Workshop, “Implementation of Quotas: Asian Experiences,” Jakarta, Indonesia.
Coppedge, Michael. 1998. “The Dynamic Diversity of Latin American Party Systems.” Party Politics 4 (4): 547–68.
Dahlerup, Drude. 2006a. Women, Quotas, and Politics. New York and London: Routledge.
Dahlerup, Drude. 2006b. “The Story of the Theory of Critical Mass.” Politics & Gender 2 (December): 511–22.
Dahlerup, Drude, and Freidenvall, Lenita. 2005. “Quotas as a ‘Fast Track’ to Equal Representation for Women: Why Scandinavia Is No Longer the Model.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 7 (1): 2648.
Dodson, Debra L. 2006. The Impact of Women in Congress. New York: Oxford University Press.
Duerst-Lahti, Georgia. 2005. “Institutional Gendering: Theoretical Insights into the Environment of Women Officeholders.” In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, ed. Thomas, Sue and Wilcox, Clyde. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 230–43.
Grey, Sandra. 2006. “The ‘New World’? The Substantive Representation of Women in New Zealand.” In Representing Women in Parliament: A Comparative Study, ed. Sawer, Marian, Tremblay, Manon, and Trimble, Linda. London and New York: Routledge, 134–51.
Htun, Mala. 2004. “Is Gender Like Ethnicity? The Political Representation of Identity Groups.” Perspectives on Politics 2 (3): 439–58.
Htun, Mala. Forthcoming. Sex, Race, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Htun, Mala, and Timothy, J. Power. 2006. “Gender, Parties, and Support for Equal Rights in the Brazilian Congress.” Latin American Politics and Society 48 (4): 83104.
Jones, Mark P. 1997. “Legislator Gender and Legislator Policy Priorities in the Argentine Chamber of Deputies and the United States House of Representatives.” Policy Studies Journal 25 (4): 613–29.
Jones, Mark P. 2002. “Explaining the High Level of Party Discipline in the Argentine Congress.” In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Morgenstern, Scott and Nacife, Benito. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 147–84.
Jones, Mark P. 2004. “The Recruitment and Selection of Legislative Candidates in Argentina.” Paper presented at “Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Democracy in Latin America,”Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC.
Kathlene, Lyn. 1994. “Power and Influence in State Legislative Policymaking: The Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates.” American Political Science Review 88 (3): 560–76.
Krook, Mona Lena. 2005. Politicizing Representation: Campaigns for Gender Quotas Worldwide. Ph.D. diss. Colombia University.
Krook, Mona Lena. 2007. “Candidate Gender Quotas: a Framework for Analysis.” European Journal of Political Research 46 (3): 367–94.
Lubertino, María José. 2003. “Pioneering Quotas: The Argentine Experience and Beyond.” Paper presented at the Regional Workshop, “The Implementation of Quotas: The Latin American Experiences,” Lima, Peru.
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’ ” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.
Mansbridge, Jane. 2005. “Quota Problems: Combating the Dangers of Essentialism.” Politics & Gender 1 (December): 622–38.
Marx, Jutta, Borner, Jutta, and Caminotti, Mariana. 2007. Las Legisladoras: Cupos de Género y Política en Argentina y Brasil. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
Nanivadekar, Medha. 2006. “Are Quotas a Good Idea? The Indian Experience with Reserved Seats for Women.” Politics & Gender 2 (March): 119–28.
Perceval, Maria Cristina. 2001. Avis Rarae: Impacto de la Ley de Cupo en la Argentina (1991–1998). Buenos Aires: PROLEAD-BID.
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Clarendon.
Piscopo, Jennifer M. 2006. “Engineering Quotas in Latin America.” CILAS Working Paper Series, #23. San Diego: Center for Iberian and Latin American Studies, University of California.
Pitkin, Hanna. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Poggione, Sarah. 2004. “Exploring Gender Differences in State Legislators’ Policy Preferences.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (2): 305–14.
Reingold, Beth. 2000. Representing Women: Sex, Gender, and Legislative Behavior in Arizona and California. Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press.
Rodríguez, Victoria E. 2003. Women in Contemporary Mexican Politics. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Sapiro, Virginia. 1981. “When Are Interests Interesting? The Problem of Political Representation of Women.” American Political Science Review 75 (3): 701–16.
Schmidt, Gregory D. 2003. “The Implementation of Gender Quotas in Peru: Legal Reform, Discourses, and Impacts.” Paper presented at the Regional Workshop, “Implementation of Quotas: Latin American Experiences,” Lima, Peru.
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2006. “Still Supermadres? Gender and Policy Priorities of Latin American Legislators.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 570–85.
Swers, Michelle. 2005. “Connecting Descriptive and Substantive Representation: An Analysis of Sex Differences in Cosponsorship Activity.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 30 (3): 407–33.
Tamerius, Karin L. 1995. “Sex, Gender, and Leadership in the Representation of Women.” In Gender, Power, Leadership, and Governance, ed. Duerst-Lahti, Georgia and Kelly, Rita Mae. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 93112.
Taylor-Robinson, Michelle, and Heath, Roseanna Michelle. 2003. “Do Women Legislators Have Different Policy Priorities Than Their Male Colleagues? A Critical Test.” Women & Politics 24 (4): 77101.
Thomas, Sue. 1994. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.
Towns, Ann. 2003 “Women Governing for Modernity: International Hierarchy and Legislature Sex Quotas.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.
Tremblay, Manon, and Pelletier, Rejean. 2000. “More Feminists or More Women? Descriptive and Substantive Representation of Women in the 1997 Canadian Federal Election.” International Political Science Review 21 (4): 381405.
Trimble, Linda. 2006. “When Do Women Count? Substantive Representation of Women in the Canadian Legislature.” In Representing Women in Parliament: A Comparative Study, ed. Sawer, Marian, Tremblay, Manon, and Trimble, Linda. London and New York: Routledge, 120–33.
Tripp, Aili Mari. 2003. “The Changing Face of Africa's Legislatures: Women and Quotas.” Paper presented at the Regional Workshop, “Implementation of Quotas: African Experiences,” Pretoria, South Africa.
Tripp, Aili Mari. 2006. “Uganda: Agents of Change for Women's Advancement?” In Women in African Parliaments, ed. Bauer, Gretchen and Britton, Hannah E.. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 111–32.
Vega, Arturo, and Firestone, Juanita M.. 1995. “The Effects of Gender on Congressional Behavior and the Substantive Representation of Women.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20 (2): 213–22.
Vincent, Louise. 2004. “Changing the Way Things Look without Changing the Way Things Are.” Journal of Legislative Studies 10 (1): 7196.
Wängnerud, Lena. 2005. “Testing the Politics of Presence Empirically: The Case of Women's Representation in the Swedish Riksdag.” Paper presented at the Third European Consortium for Political Research Conference Budapest, Hungary.
Waylen, Georgina. 2000. “Gender and Democratic Politics: A Comparative Analysis of Consolidation in Argentina and Chile.” Journal of Latin American Studies 32 (3): 765–93.
Weldon, S. Laurel. 2002. “Beyond Bodies: Institutional Sources of Representation for Women in Democratic Policymaking.” Journal of Politics 64 (4): 1153–74.
Whip, Rosemary. 1991. “Representing Women: Australian Female Parliamentarians on the Horns of a Dilemma.” Women & Politics 11 (3): 122.
Wolbrecht, Christina. 2002. “Female Legislators and the Women's Rights Agenda: From Feminine Mystique to Feminist Era.” In Women Transforming Congress, ed. Rosenthal, Cindy Simon. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 170–97.
Ybarra, Gustvo. 2005. “Todo quedará en familia en el futuro Senado” [All stays within the family in the future Senate.] La Nación, 28 August 1985.
Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Democracy and Inclusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zetterberg, Pär. 2008. “The Downside of Gender Quotas? Institutional Constraints on Women in Mexican State Legislatures.” Parliamentary Affairs 61 (3): 442460.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed