Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Gender Quotas and Women's Substantive Representation: Lessons from Argentina

  • Susan Franceschet (a1) and Jennifer M. Piscopo (a2)
Abstract

This article integrates the comparative literature on gender quotas with the existing body of research on women's substantive representation. Quota laws, which bring greater numbers of women into parliaments, are frequently assumed to improve women's substantive representation. We use the Argentine case, where a law mandating a 30% gender quota was adopted in 1991, to show that quotas can affect substantive representation in contradictory and unintended ways. To do so, we disaggregate women's substantive representation into two distinct concepts: substantive representation as process, where women change the legislative agenda, and substantive representation as outcome, where female legislators succeed in passing women's rights laws in the Argentine Congress. We argue that quota laws complicate both aspects of substantive representation. Quotas generate mandates for female legislators to represent women's interests, while also reinforcing negative stereotypes about women's capacities as politicians. Our case combines data from bill introduction and legislative success from 1989 to 2007 with data from 54 interviews conducted in 2005 and 2006. We use this evidence to demonstrate that representation depends on the institutional environment, which is itself shaped by quotas. Institutions and norms simultaneously facilitate and obstruct women's substantive representation.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Lisa Baldez . 2004. “Elected Bodies: The Gender Quota Law for Legislative Candidates in Mexico.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (2): 231–58.

Kathleen A. Bratton , and Leonard P. Ray . 2002. “Descriptive Representation, Policy Outcomes, and Municipal Day Care Coverage in Norway.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (2): 428–37.

Sarah Childs . 2006. “The Complicated Relationship between Sex, Gender and the Substantive Representation of Women.” European Journal of Women's Studies 13 (1): 721.

Michael Coppedge . 1998. “The Dynamic Diversity of Latin American Party Systems.” Party Politics 4 (4): 547–68.

Drude Dahlerup , and Lenita Freidenvall . 2005. “Quotas as a ‘Fast Track’ to Equal Representation for Women: Why Scandinavia Is No Longer the Model.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 7 (1): 2648.

Debra L. Dodson 2006. The Impact of Women in Congress. New York: Oxford University Press.

Mala Htun , and J. Power Timothy . 2006. “Gender, Parties, and Support for Equal Rights in the Brazilian Congress.” Latin American Politics and Society 48 (4): 83104.

Mark P Jones . 1997. “Legislator Gender and Legislator Policy Priorities in the Argentine Chamber of Deputies and the United States House of Representatives.” Policy Studies Journal 25 (4): 613–29.

Mona Lena Krook . 2007. “Candidate Gender Quotas: a Framework for Analysis.” European Journal of Political Research 46 (3): 367–94.

Jane Mansbridge . 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’ ” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.

Sarah Poggione . 2004. “Exploring Gender Differences in State Legislators’ Policy Preferences.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (2): 305–14.

Leslie A. Schwindt-Bayer 2006. “Still Supermadres? Gender and Policy Priorities of Latin American Legislators.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 570–85.

Michelle Swers . 2005. “Connecting Descriptive and Substantive Representation: An Analysis of Sex Differences in Cosponsorship Activity.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 30 (3): 407–33.

Michelle Taylor-Robinson , and Roseanna Michelle Heath . 2003. “Do Women Legislators Have Different Policy Priorities Than Their Male Colleagues? A Critical Test.” Women & Politics 24 (4): 77101.

Sue Thomas . 1994. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.

Manon Tremblay , and Rejean Pelletier . 2000. “More Feminists or More Women? Descriptive and Substantive Representation of Women in the 1997 Canadian Federal Election.” International Political Science Review 21 (4): 381405.

Arturo Vega , and Juanita M. Firestone . 1995. “The Effects of Gender on Congressional Behavior and the Substantive Representation of Women.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20 (2): 213–22.

Louise Vincent . 2004. “Changing the Way Things Look without Changing the Way Things Are.” Journal of Legislative Studies 10 (1): 7196.

Georgina Waylen . 2000. “Gender and Democratic Politics: A Comparative Analysis of Consolidation in Argentina and Chile.” Journal of Latin American Studies 32 (3): 765–93.

S. Laurel Weldon . 2002. “Beyond Bodies: Institutional Sources of Representation for Women in Democratic Policymaking.” Journal of Politics 64 (4): 1153–74.

Rosemary Whip . 1991. “Representing Women: Australian Female Parliamentarians on the Horns of a Dilemma.” Women & Politics 11 (3): 122.

Pär Zetterberg . 2008. “The Downside of Gender Quotas? Institutional Constraints on Women in Mexican State Legislatures.” Parliamentary Affairs 61 (3): 442460.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 46
Total number of PDF views: 518 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1241 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.