Skip to main content Accessibility help

Gender Trouble at Abu Ghraib?

  • Timothy Kaufman-Osborn (a1)


This essay explores the controversy spawned by the release, in April, 2004, of the photographs taken by U.S. military personnel at the Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad. Its particular concern is with photographs that depict American servicewomen engaged in various forms of abusive conduct against Iraqi prisoners. In its opening half, the essay examines and criticizes the responses to these photographs offered, first, by right-wing commentators and, second, by American feminists, most notably Barbara Ehrenreich. All read these photographs as a referendum on feminism and, more particularly, its commitment to the cause of gender equality; and all do so, I argue, on the basis of a naive understanding of gender. In its latter half, accordingly, the essay offers a more adequate understanding of gender, one loosely grounded in the work of Judith Butler and the concept of performativity. Referencing various official interrogation manuals, as well as the investigative reports released in the wake of this scandal, the essay employs this concept in offering a more adequate account of the gendered import of the deeds depicted in the Abu Ghraib photographs. It concludes by arguing that what is important about these photographs is neither whether the perpetrators of the exploitation they depict are male or female, nor whether the deeds they portray somehow compromise the feminist quest for gender equality. Rather, what is important are the multiple ways in which specifically gendered practices, which can be detached from the bodies they conventionally regulate, are deployed as elements within a more comprehensive network of technologies aimed at disciplining prisoners and so confirming their status as abject subjects of U.S. military power.This essay has its origins in a roundtable titled “Gender Relations in the Age of Neo-Liberalism,” which was conducted in conjunction with the 2005 meeting of the Western Political Science Association. I wish to thank the other participations on that roundtable, Jane Bayes, Mary Hawkesworth, and Judith Hicks Stiehm, as well as Paul Apostolidis, Renee Heberle, Jinee Lokaneeta, Jeannie Morefield, Aaron Perrine, Kari Tupper, and three anonymous reviewers for their comments on earlier drafts of the essay.



Hide All


Abu Ghraib Was ‘Animal House’ at Night.” 2004. (August 25, 2005).
Bowden, Mark. 2003. “The Dark Art of Interrogation.” Atlantic Monthly, October, 5176.
Brison, Susan. 2004. “Torture, or ‘Good Old American Pornography’?The Chronicle of Higher Education 50, 4 June, sec. B.
Brown, Michelle. 2005. “‘Setting the Conditions’ for Abu Ghraib: The Prison Nation Abroad.” American Quarterly 57 (3): 97397.
Burke, Carol. 1996. “Pernicious Cohesion.” In It's Our Military, Too!: Women and the U.S. Military, ed. Judith Hicks Stiehm. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 20519.
Bush, George W. 2004. “President Outlines Steps to Help Iraq Achieve Democracy and Freedom.” (May 24, 2005).
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble. New York: Routledge.
Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies That Matter. New York: Routledge.
Chavez, Linda. 2004. “Sexual Tension in the Military.” (June 4, 2005).
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). 1963. KUBARK Counterintelligence Interrogation.∼nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB122/#kubark (October 28, 2005).
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). 1983. Human Resource Exploitation Training Manual.∼nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB122/#kubark (October 28, 2005).
Danner, Mark. 2004. Torture and Truth. New York: New York Review of Books.
Department of the Army. 1987. “Intelligence Interrogation.” Field Manual 34-52. (October 28, 2005).
Department of the Army. 1992. “Intelligence Interrogation.” Field Manual 34-52. (October 28, 2005).
Eisenstein, Zillah. 2004. “Sexual Humiliation, Gender Confusion and the Horrors at Abu Ghraib.” (June 4, 2005).
Enloe, Cynthia. 2004. “Wielding Masculinity Inside Abu Ghraib: Making Feminist Sense of an American Military Scandal.” Asian Journal of Women's Studies 10 (3): 89102.
Faludi, Susan. 1994. “The Naked Citadel.” New Yorker, September 5, 6281.
Faramarzi, Scheherezade. 2004. “Former Iraqi Prisoner Says U.S. Jailers Humiliated Him.” Associated Press Online. (May 2, 2005).
Giroux, Henry. 2004. “What Might Education Mean After Abu Ghraib?Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 24 (1): 322.
Greenberg, Karen J., and Joshua L. Dratel, eds. 2005. The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hong, Cathy. 2004. “How Could Women Do That? (November 9, 2005).
Joint Chiefs of Staff. 2005. “Joint Doctrine for Detainee Operations.” Joint Publication 3-63. (March 23, 2005).
Kaufman-Osborn, Timothy. 1997. Creatures of Prometheus: Gender and the Politics of Technology. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Neumayr, George. 2004. “Thelma and Louise in Iraq.” American Spectator. (May 5, 2005).
Noonan, Peggy. 2004. “A Humiliation for America.” (May 6, 2005).
Puar, Jasbir K. 2004. “Abu Ghraib: Arguing against Exceptionalism.” Feminist Studies 30 (2): 52254.
Rich, Frank. 2004. “It Was the Porn that Made Them Do It.” New York Times Magazine, May 30, sec. 2, 1.
Saar, Erik, and Viveca Novak. 2005. Inside the Wire. New York: Penguin.
Schlafly, Phyllis. 2004. “Feminist Dream Becomes Nightmare.” (May 18, 2005).
Schmidt, LTG Randall M. 2005. Investigation into FBI Allegations of Detainee Abuse at Guantanámo Bay, Cuba Detention Facility (The Schmidt Report) (April 1, amended June 9). (October 28, 2005).
Snyder, R. Claire. 1999. Citizen-Soldiers and Manly Warriors. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Thibault, David. 2004. “Abu Ghraib Is a Feminist's Dream, Says Military Expert.” (May 10, 2005).
Thomas, Evan. 2004. “Explaining Lynndie England: How did a wispy tomboy behave like a monster at Abu Ghraib? (May 15, 2005).
Zeeland, Steven. 1995. Sailors and Sexuality. New York: Haworth.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed