Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Mary Wollstonecraft, Social Constructivism, and the Idea of Freedom

  • Nancy J. Hirschmann (a1) and Emily F. Regier (a1)
Abstract

This article considers Mary Wollstonecraft as a theorist of freedom for women through the lens of social constructivism. Previous republican readings of Wollstonecraft as promoting a vision of freedom as independence or non-domination are compromised by their underpinnings in liberal individualism. Instead, we suggest her theory displays elements of positive liberty and particularly what we call “subjectivity freedom.” Reading Wollstonecraft as an early social constructivist, we show her grappling with how women's subjectivity is constructed in patriarchal societies such that they desire the conditions of their own subordination. This troubles the very notion of domination and its putative opposite, freedom-as-independence. Paradoxically, while noting how women's sense of self was profoundly and intimately shaped by the patriarchal structures they inhabited, Wollstonecraft's own argument was limited by these same constructions. Nonetheless, she struggled to conceive a radically emancipatory vision of women's lives, aspirations, and desires from within the confines of a context and discourse premised on their devaluation. A social constructivist approach shows that Wollstonecraft sought not simply to change women or specific structures of male dominance, but rather the processes within which men and women defined gender, the family, and personal identity: in short, their subjectivity.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All

This essay was first presented at the 2017 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. Thanks to the conference participants, and particularly Eileen Hunt Botting and Alan Coffee for their comments and suggestions. Thanks also to Mary Caputi. Nancy Hirschmann also wishes to thank the American Council of Learned Societies, the National Humanities Center, and the European University Institute, for support at various points in this article's composition.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Abbey, Ruth. 1999. “Back to the Future: Marriage as Friendship in the Thought of Mary Wollstonecraft.” Hypatia 14 (3): 7895.
Astell, Mary. 1986. “Reflections on Marriage.” In The First English Feminist: Reflections Upon Marriage and other writings by Mary Astell, ed. Hill, Bridget. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Benn, Stanley. 1988. A Theory of Freedom. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Berges, Sandrine. 2017. “Wet-Nurses and Political Participation: The Republican Approaches to Motherhood of Mary Wollstonecraft and Sophie de Grouchy.” In The Social and Political Philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft, ed. Berges, Sandrine and Coffee, Alan M. S. J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Berlin, Isaiah. 1971. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” In Four Essays on Liberty. New York: Oxford University Press.
Botting, Eileen Hunt. 2006. Family Feuds: Wollstonecraft, Burke and Rousseau on the Transformation of the Family. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Botting, Eileen Hunt. 2016. Wollstonecraft, Mill, and Human Rights. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Brown, Wendy. 1995. States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Coffee, Alan. 2013. “Mary Wollstonecraft, Freedom and the Enduring Power of Social Domination,” European Journal of Political Theory 12 (2): 116–35.
Coffee, Alan. 2014. “Freedom as Independence: Mary Wollstonecraft and the Grand Blessing of Life.” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 29 (4): 908–24.
Ferguson, Kathy E. 1993. The Man Question: Visions of Subjectivity in Feminist Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Ferguson, Moira. 1992. “Mary Wollstonecraft and the Problematic of Slavery,” Feminist Review, 42 (Autumn): 82102.
Flathman, Richard E. 1987. The Philosophy and Politics of Freedom, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. 1898. Women and Economics: A Study of the Economic Relation Between Men and Women as a Factor in Social Evolution. Boston: Small, Maynard & Co.
Gunther-Canada, Wendy. 1996. “Mary Wollstonecraft's ‘Wild Wish:’ Confounding Sex in the Discourse of Political Rights.” In Feminist Interpretations of Mary Wollstonecraft, ed. Falco, Maria J.. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Gunther-Canada, Wendy. 1999. “Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Mary Wollstonecraft on the Sexual Politics of Republican Motherhood.” Southeastern Political Review 27 (3): 469–90.
Halldenius, Lena. 2007. “The Primacy of Right: On the Triad of Liberty, Equality and Virtue in Wollstonecraft's Political Thought.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 15 (1):7599.
Halldenius, Lena. 2015. Mary Wollstonecraft and Feminist Republicanism. London: Pickering & Chatto.
Hill, Bridget. 1994. Women, Work and Sexual Politics in Eighteenth Century England. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 2003. The Subject of Liberty: Toward a Feminist Theory of Freedom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 2008. Gender, Class, & Freedom in Modern Political Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kerber, Linda K. 1986. Women of the Republic: Intellect and Ideology in Revolutionary America. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
Landes, Joan B. 1988. Women and the Public Sphere in the Age of the French Revolution. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Mill, John Stuart. 1991. The Subjection of Women in On Liberty and Other Essays, ed. Grey, John. New York: Oxford University Press.
Muller, Virginia L. 1996. “What Can Liberals Learn from Mary Wollstonecraft?” In Feminist Interpretations of Mary Wollstonecraft, ed. Falco, Maria J.. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pettit, Philip. 2017. “Republican Elements in the Thought of Mary Wollstonecraft.” In The Social and Political Philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft, ed. Berges, Sandrine and Coffee, Alan M. S. J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sapiro, Virginia. 1992. A Vindication of Political Virtue: The Political Theory of Mary Wollstonecraft. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sapiro, Virginia. 1996. “Wollstonecraft, Feminism and Democracy: ‘Being Bastilled.’” In Feminist Interpretations of Mary Wollstonecraft, ed. Falco, Maria J.. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Taylor, Barbara. 2003. Mary Wollstonecraft and the Feminist Imagination. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, Charles. 1979. “What's Wrong with Negative Liberty.” In The Idea of Freedom: Essays in Honor of Isaiah Berlin, ed. Ryan, Alan. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wollstonecraft, Mary. 1975. Maria: or, The Wrongs of Woman, ed. Ferguson, Moira. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
Wollstonecraft, Mary. 2008a. A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. In A Vindication of the Rights of Woman and A Vindication of the Rights of Men, ed. Todd, Janet, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wollstonecraft, Mary. 2008b. A Vindication of the Rights of Men. In A Vindication of the Rights of Woman and A Vindication of the Rights of Men, ed. Todd, Janet. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wollstonecraft, Mary. 2009. Letters Written in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark, ed. Brekke, and Mee, . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed