Skip to main content Accessibility help

More is Better: The Influence of Collective Female Descriptive Representation on External Efficacy

  • Lonna Rae Atkeson (a1) and Nancy Carrillo (a1)


This study tests the hypothesis that collective descriptive representation has important benefits for strengthening and legitimizing democratic society. Specifically, we test whether increased proportions of collective female descriptive representation in the statehouse and the presence of a female state executive are important to female citizens' attitudes toward government responsiveness, or external efficacy. We hypothesize that an increase in female collective descriptive representation in the legislative and state executive branches of government will increase female citizens' external efficacy but will be unimportant to males. We pooled American National Election Studies (ANES) data from 1988 to 1998 and used ordered probit techniques to test the hypothesis. In addition to our main independent variable of interest, our model includes state political culture, dyadic descriptive representation, dyadic substantive representation, sociodemographics, political participation, strength of partisanship, and electoral dummy variables as controls. Our results confirm that higher levels of collective female descriptive representation promote higher values of external efficacy for female citizens, suggesting that collective female descriptive representation has important benefits to a democratic society.An earlier version of this article was presented at the American Political Science Association's Annual Meeting in San Francisco, California, August 30–September 2, 2001, and the International Society of Political Psychology, Seattle, Washington, July 1–4, 2000. We would like to thank the following people for their comments and support: Anthony Coveny, Randall Partin, and Cherie Maestas.



Hide All


Abramson, Paul R. 1983. Political Attitudes in America. San Francisco: Freeman.
Abramson, Paul R., and John H. Aldrich. 1982. “The Decline of Electoral Participation in America.” American Political Science Review 76 (3): 50221.
Alvarez, Michael R., and Edward J. McCaffery. 2000. “Gender and Tax.” In Gender and American Politics: Women, Men and the Political Process, ed. Sue Tolleson-Rinehart and Jyl J. Josephson. Armonk, NY: Sharpe, 91113.
Atkeson, Lonna Rae. 2003. “Not All Cues Are Created Equal: The Conditional Impact of Female Candidates on Political Engagement.” Journal of Politics 65 (4): 104061.
Balch, George I. 1974. “Multiple Indicators in Survey Research: The Concept ‘Sense of Political Efficacy.’Political Methodology 1 (1): 143.
Barrett, Edith. 1995. “The Policy Priorities of African-American Women in State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20 (2): 22347.
Berkman, Michael B., and Robert E. O'Connor. 1993. “Do Women Legislators Matter? Female Legislators and State Abortion Policy.” American Politics Quarterly 21 (1): 10224.
Bratton, Kathleen A., and Kerry L. Haynie. 1999. “Agenda Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race.” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 65879.
Burns, Nancy, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Sidney Verba. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality and Political Participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Burrell, Barbara. 1997. “The Political Leadership of Women and Public Policymaking.” Policy Studies Journal 25 (4): 56568.
Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
Carey, John M., Richard G. Niemi, and Lynda W. Powell. 1998. “Are Women State Legislators Different?” In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present and Future, ed. Sue Thomas and Clyde Wilcox. New York: Oxford University Press, 87102.
Carroll, Susan J. 1984. “Feminist Scholarship on Political Leadership.” In Leadership: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, ed. Barbara Kellerman. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 13956.
Citrin, J., and D. P. Green. 1986. “Presidential Leadership and the Resurgence of Trust in Government.” British Journal of Political Science 16 (4): 43153.
Claibourn, Michele, and Virginia Sapiro. 2001. “Gender Differences in Citizen-Level Democratic Citizenship: Evidence from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems.” Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Convention, Chicago.
Clarke, Harold D., and A. C. Acock. 1989. “National Elections and Political Attitudes: The Case of Political Efficacy.” British Journal of Political Science 19 (4): 55162.
Converse, Philip E. 1972. “Change in the American Electorate.” In The Human Meaning of Social Change, ed. Angus Campbell and Philip E. Converse. New York: Sage, 263337.
Craig, Steven C., Richard G. Niemi, G. E. Silver. 1990. “Political Efficacy and Trust: A report on the NES Pilot Study Items.” Political Behavior 12 (3): 289314.
Crowley, Jocelyn Elise. 2004. “When Tokens Matter.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (1): 10936.
Darcy, R., Susan Welch, and Janet Clark. 1994. Women, Elections, and Representation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Day, Christine L. 1994. “State Legislative Voting Patterns on Abortion Restrictions in Louisiana. Women and Politics 14 (1): 4563.
Delli Carpini, Michael, and Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why it Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Diamond, Irene. 1977. Sex Roles in the State House. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dodson, Debra L., and Susan J. Carroll. 1991. Reshaping the Agenda: Women in State Legislatures. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for American Women and Politics.
Dovi, Suzanne. 2002. “Preferable Descriptive Representatives: Will Just Any Woman, Black or Latino Do?American Political Science Review 96 (4): 72943.
Elazar, Danile J. 1984. American Federalism: A View from the States. 3d ed. New York: Harper & Row.
Erber, R., and Rick R. Lau. 1990. “Political Cynicism Revisited: An Information Processing Reconciliation of Policy-Based and Incumbency-Based Interpretations of Changes in Trust in Government.” American Journal of Political Science 34 (1): 23653.
Finkel, Steven E. 1985. “Reciprocal Effects of Participation and Political Efficacy: A Panel Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 29 (4): 891913.
Finkel, Steven E. 1987. “The Effects of Participation of Political Efficacy and Political Support: Evidence from a West German Panel.” Journal of Politics 49 (2): 44164.
Fox, Richard L., and Jennifer L. Lawless. 2004. “Entering the Arena? Gender and the Decision to Run for Office.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (2): 26480.
Ginsberg, Benjamin. 1982. The Consequences of Consent: Elections, Citizen Control and Popular Acquiescence. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Ginsberg, Benjamin, and R. Weissberg. 1978. “Elections and the Mobilization of Popular Support.” American Journal of Political Science 22 (1): 3155.
Gordon, Stacy Burnett, and Gary M. Segura. 2002. “Looking Good … Feeling Good! Assessing Whether Dyadic and Collective Descriptive Representation Shape Latino Attitudes Towards Government.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August 28–September 1.
Hansen, Susan B. 1997. “Talking about Politics: Gender and Contextual Effects on Political Proselytizing.” Journal of Politics 59 (1): 73103.
Hayes, Bernadette C., and Clive S. Bean. 1993. “Political Efficacy: A Comparative Study of the United States, West Germany, Great Britain and Australia.” European Journal of Political Research 23 (2): 26180.
Hero, Rodney E., and Caroline J. Tolbert. 1995. “Latinos and Substantive Representation in the US House of Representatives: Direct, Indirect or Nonexistent.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (3): 64052.
Hill, David B. 1981. “Political Culture and Female Political Representation.” Journal of Politics 43 (1): 15968.
Hinckley, Barbara, Richard Hofstetter, and John Kessel. 1974. “Information and the Vote: A Comparative Election Study.” American Politics Quarterly 2 (1): 13158.
Hougland, James G. Jr., and James A. Christenson. 1983. “Religion and Politics: The Relationship of Religious Participation to Political Efficacy and Involvement.” Sociology and Social Research 67 (4): 40620.
Huddy, Leonie, and Nayda Terkildsen. 1993. “The Consequences of Gender Stereotypes for Women Candidates at Different Levels and Types of Office.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (3): 50325.
Keiser, Lael R., Vicky M. Wilkins, Kenneth J. Meier, and Catherine A. Holland. 2002. “Lipstick and Logarithms: Gender, Institutional Context and Representative Bureaucracy.” American Political Science Review 96 (3): 55364.
Koch, Jeffrey, 1997. “Women's Engagement in Politics in the Year of the Woman.” American Politics Quarterly 25 (1): 11833.
Lawless, Jennifer L. 2004. “Politics of Presence? Congresswomen and Symbolic Representation.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (1): 8199.
Leader, Shelah Gilber. 1977. “The Policy Impact of Elected Women Officials.” In The Impact of the Electoral Process, ed. Louis Maisel and Joseph Cooper. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 26584.
Leeper, Mark S. 1991. “The Impact of Prejudice on Female Candidates: An Experimental Look at Voter Inference.” American Politics Quarterly 19 (2): 24861.
Mandel, Ruth B., and Debra L. Dodson. 1992. “Do Women Officeholders Make a Difference?” In The American Woman, 1992–95, ed. Sara E. Rix. New York: Norton, 14977.
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’Journal of Politics 61 (3): 62857.
Morrell, Michael E. 2003. “Survey and Experimental Evidence or a Reliable and Valid Measure of Internal Political Efficacy.” Public Opinion Quarterly 67 (4): 589602.
Mueller, Carol M. 1986. “Nurturance and Mastery: Competing Qualifications for Women's Access to High Public Office?” In Women and Politics: Activism, Attitudes and Office-Holding. Research in Politics and Society, Vol. 2, ed. Gwen Moore and Glenna Spitze. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 21132.
Murphy, Patricia. 1997. Domestic Violence Legislation and the Police: The Role of Socio-Economic Indicators, Political Factors and Women's Political Activism on State Policy Adoption.” Women and Politics 18 (2): 2750.
Nechemias, Carol. 1985. “Geographic Mobility and Women's Access to State Legislatures.” Western Political Quarterly 38 (1): 11931.
Nechemias, Carol. 1987. “Changes in the Election of Women to US State Legislative Seats.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 12 (1): 12542.
Norrander, Barbara, and Clyde Wilcox. 1998. “The Geography of Gender Power: Women in State Legislatures.” In Women in Elective Office: Past, Present and Future, ed. Sue Thomas and Clyde Wilcox. New York: Oxford University Press, 10317.
Pantoja, Adrian D., and Gary M. Segura. 2002. “Does Ethnicity Matter? Descriptive Representation in the Statehouse and Political Alienation Among Latinos.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science association, Chicago, April 25–27.
Phillips, Anne. 1998. “Democracy and Representation: Or, Why Should It Matter Who Our Representatives Are?” In Feminism and Politics, collection of readings with introduction, Oxford: Oxford University, 22440.
Pitkin, Hanna. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Pollock, Philip H._III. 1983. “The Participatory Consequences of Internal and External Political Efficacy: A Research Note.” Western Political Quarterly 36 (3): 400409.
Reingold, Beth. 2000. Representing Women: Sex, Gender and Legislative Behavior in Arizona and California. Chapel Hill: University of North Caroline Press.
Rosenstone, Steven J., and John Mark Hansen. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: MacMillan.
Rosenthal, Cindy Simon. 1998. When Women Lead: Integrative Leadership in State Legislatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rosenwasser, Shirley M., and Jana Seale. 1988. “Attitudes Toward a Hypothetical Male or Female Candidate—A Research Note.” Political Psychology 9 (4): 59198.
Saint-Germain, Michelle A. 1989. “Does Their Difference Make a Difference? The Impact of Women on Public Policy in the Arizona Legislature.” Social Science Quarterly 70 (4): 95668.
Saltzstein, Grace H. 1979. “Black Mayors and Police Policies.” Journal of Politics 51 (3): 52544.
Sapiro, Virginia. 1981. “When Are Interests Interesting?American Political Science Review 75 (3): 70121.
Sapiro, Virginia. 1981/82. “If US Senator Baker Were a Woman: An Experimental Study of Candidate Images.” Political Psychology 2 (1): 6183.
Sapiro, Virginia. 1983. The Political Integration of Women: Roles, Socialization and Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Sapiro, Virginia, and Pamela Johnston Conover. 1997. “The Variable Gender Basis of Electoral Politics: Gender and Context in the 1992 US Election. British Journal of Political Science 27 (4): 497523.
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., and William Mishler. 2005. “The Nexus of Representation: An Integrated Model of Women's Representation.” Journal of Politics 67 (2): 40728.
Shapiro, Robert Y., and Harpreet Mahajan. 1986. “Gender Differences in Policy Preferences: A Summary of Trends from the 1960s to the 1980s.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50 (1): 4261.
Sharkansky, Ira. 1969. “The Utility of Elazar's Political Culture.” Polity 2 (1): 6683.
Shingles, Richard D. 1981. “Black Consciousness and Political Participation: The Missing Link.” American Political Science Review 75 (1): 7691.
Soss, Joe. 1999. “Lessons of Welfare: Policy Design, Political Learning and Political Action.” American Political Science Review 93 (2): 36378.
Squire, Peverill, and Christina Fastnow. 1994. “Comparing Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 47 (3): 70520.
Stenner-Day, Karen, and Mark Fischle. 1992. “The Effects of Political Participation of Political Efficacy: A Simultaneous Equations Model.” Australian Journal on Political Science 27 (2): 282305.
Stewart, Marianne C., Allan Kornberg, Harold D. Clarke, and Alan Acock. 1992. “Arenas and Attitudes: A Note on Political Efficacy in a Federal System.” Journal of Politics 54 (1): 17996.
Tate, Katherine. 2001. “The Political Representation of Blacks in Congress: Does Race Matter?Legislative Studies Quarterly 26 (4): 62338.
Tate, Katherine. 2003. Black Faces in the Mirror: African Americans and Their Representatives in the U.S. Congress. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Thomas, Sue. 1991. “The Impact of Women on State Legislative Policies.” Journal of Politics 53 (4): 95876.
Thomas, Sue. 1994. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.
Thomas, Sue, and Susan Welch. 1991. “The Impact of Gender on Activities and Priorities of State Legislators.” Western Political Quarterly 44 (2): 44556.
Thompson, Frank J. 1976. “Minority Groups in Public Bureaucracies: Are Passive and Active Representation Linked?Administration and Society 8 (August): 20126.
Tidmarch, Charles M., Lisa J. Hyman, and Jill E. Sorkin. 1984. “Press Issue Agendas in the 1982 Congressional and Gubernatorial Election Campaigns.” Journal of Politics 46 (4): 122642.
Tolbert, Caroline, and Trudy A. Steuernagel. 2001. “Women Lawmakers, State Mandates and Women's Health.” Women and Politics 22 (2): 139.
Tomz, Michael, Jason Wittenberg, and Gary King. 2000. “CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results.” Version 1.2.2. March 3. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. (July 15, 2006).
Verba, Sidney, Nancy Burns, and Kay Lehman Schlozman. 1997. “Knowing and Caring about Politics: Gender and Political Engagement.” Journal of Politics 59 (4): 105172.
Weissberg, Robert. 1978. “Collective vs. Dyadic Representation in Congress.” American Political Science Review 72 (2): 53547.
Weldon, S. Laurel. 2002. “Beyond Bodies: Institutional Sources of Representation for Women in Democratic Policymaking.” Journal of Politics 64 (4): 115374.
Whicker, Marcia Lynn, and Malcolm Jewell. 1998. “The Feminization of Leadership in State Legislatures.” In Women in Elective Office: Past, Present and Future, ed. Sue Thomas and Clyde Wilcox. New York: Oxford University Press, 16374.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

More is Better: The Influence of Collective Female Descriptive Representation on External Efficacy

  • Lonna Rae Atkeson (a1) and Nancy Carrillo (a1)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.