Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Moving beyond Categorical Gender in Studies of Risk Aversion and Anxiety

  • Lena Wängnerud (a1), Maria Solevid (a1) and Monika Djerf-Pierre (a1)
Abstract

Concepts such as risk aversion and anxiety have received renewed attention in various strands of gender and politics research. Most contemporary scholars suggest that gender gaps in this area are related to social norms and stem from social learning rather than from inherent gender traits. Very few, however, elaborate on the gender variable to reach a fuller understanding of the dynamics at work. In this study, we examined gender gaps in levels of anxiety, an area closely related to risk aversion, and we applied a combination of categorical measures of gender distinguishing between “woman, “man,” and “other” and scales capturing grades of femininity and masculinity in individuals. We label this approach fuzzy gender, and we suggest that it can be used to advance research in our field. The key finding is an interaction effect between categorical measures of gender and fuzzy gender: The more female characteristics in women, the higher the levels of anxiety. Moreover, there is no difference in levels of anxiety between men and women with few female characteristics. The data used draw from a large-scale survey among Swedish citizens in 2013.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Arch, E. C. 1993. “Risk-Taking: A Motivational Basis for Sex Differences.” Psychological Reports 73 (1): 611.
Barlow, D. H. 2000. “Unraveling the Mysteries of Anxiety and Its Disorders from the Perspective of Emotion Theory.” American Psychologist 55: 1247–63.
Booth, A. L., Cardona-Sosa, L., and Nolen, P.. 2014. “Gender Differences in Risk Aversion: Do Single-Sex Environments Affect Their Development?Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 99: 126–54.
Bord, R. J., and O'Connor, R. E.. 1997. “The Gender Gap in Environmental Attitudes: The Case of Perceived Vulnerability to Risk.” Social Science Quarterly 78: 830–40.
Ciccia, R., and Verloo, M.. 2012. “Parental Leave Regulations and the Persistence of the Male Breadwinner Model: Using Fuzzy-Set Ideal Type Analysis to Assess Gender Equality in an Enlarged Europe.” Journal of European Social Policy 22 (5): 507–28.
Connell, R. W. 1995. Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Djerf-Pierre, M., and Wängnerud, L.. 2016. “Gender and Sociotropic Anxiety: Explaining Gender Differences in Anxiety to Social Risks and Threats.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 28 (2): 217–40.
Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., Schroeder, D. A., and Penner, L.. 2006. The Social Psychology of Prosocial Behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Eagly, A. H. 2009. “The His and Her of Prosocial Behavior: An Examination of the Social Psychology of Gender.” American Psychologist 64 (8): 644–58.
Eagly, A. H., and Steffen, V. J.. 1984. “Gender Stereotypes Stem from the Distribution of Women and Men into Social Roles.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46 (4): 735–54.
Edström, M., and Jacobsson, M.. 2015. “Räkna med kvinnor” [Count on women]. Global Media Monitoring Project 2015. University of Gothenburg: JMG, Work report no. 73.
Egan, S. K., and Perry, D. G.. 2001. “Gender Identity: A Multidimensional Analysis with Implications for Psychosocial Adjustment.” Development Psychology 37 (4): 451–63.
Ellemers, N. 2018. “Gender Stereotypes.” Annual Review of Psychology. 69: 275298.
Esarey, J., and Chirillo, G.. 2013. “‘Fairer Sex’ or Purity Myth? Corruption, Gender and Institutional Context.” Politics & Gender 9 (4): 361–89.
Esarey, J., and Schwindt-Bayer, L.. 2017. “Women's Representation, Accountability, and Corruption in Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science, published online January 26, 2017.
Flynn, J., Slovic, P., and Mertz, C. K.. 1994. “Gender, Race, and Perception of Environmental Health Risks.” Risk Analysis 14: 1101–8.
Gill, S., Stockrad, J., Johnson, M., and Williams, S.. 1987. “Measuring Gender Differences: The Expressive Dimension and Critique of Androgyny Scales.” Sex Roles 17 (7): 375400.
Gustafson, P. E. 1998. “Gender Differences in Risk Perception: Theoretical and Methodological Perspectives.” Risk Analysis 18 (6): 805–11.
Hancock, A.-M. 2007. “When Multiplication Doesn't Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Program.” Perspectives on Politics 5 (1): 6379.
Hatemi, P. K., McDermott, R., Bailey, J. M., and Martin, N. G.. 2012. “The Different Effects of Gender and Sex on Vote Choice.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (1): 7692.
Hoffman, R. M., and Borders, L. D.. 2001. “Twenty-Five Years after the Bem Sex-Role Inventory: A Reassessment and New Issues Regarding Classification Variability.” Measuring and Evaluation in Counseling and Development 34 (1): 3955.
Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. J., and White, K. M.. 1995. “A Tale of Two Theories: A Critical Comparison of Identity Theory with Social Identity Theory.” Social Psychology Quarterly 58 (4): 255–69.
Hollander, J. A. 2001. “Vulnerability and Dangerousness: The Construction of Gender Through Conversation about Violence.” Gender and Society 15: 83109.
Hollander, J. A. 2002. “Resisting Vulnerability: The Social Reconstruction of Gender in Interaction.” Social Problems 49: 474–96.
Huddy, L. 2001. “From Social to Political Identity: A Critical Examination of Social Identity Theory.” Political Psychology 22 (1): 127–56.
Hunt, K., Lewars, H., Emslie, C., and Batty, G. D.. 2007. “Decreased Risk of Death from Coronary Heart Disease Amongst Men with Higher ‘Femininity’ Scores: A General Population Cohort Study.” International Journal of Epidemiology 36 (3): 612–20.
Lilliefeldt, E. 2012. “Party and Gender in Western Europe: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Gender-Balanced Parliamentary Parties.” Party Politics 18 (2): 193214.
Magliozzi, D., Saperstein, A., and Westbrook, L.. 2016. “Scaling Up: Representing Gender Diversity in Survey Research.” Socius (2): 111.
McLaughlin, H., Uggen, C., and Blackstone, A.. 2012. “Sexual Harassment, Workplace Authority, and the Paradox of Power.” American Sociological Review 7 (4): 624–47.
Mutz, D. C. 1994. “Contextualizing Personal Experience: The Role of Mass Media.” The Journal of Politics 56: 689714.
Neuman, R. W., Marcus, G. E., Crigler, A. N., and MacKuen, M., eds. 2007. The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Niederle, M., and Vesterlung, L.. 2007. “Do Women Shy Away from Competition? Do Men Compete Too Much?Quarterly Journal of Economics 122 (3): 10671101.
Nilsson, Å., and Holmberg, S.. 2006. “Könsidentitet.” In Nya gränser Västsverige, ed. Nilsson, L.. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg: Rapport 37, SOM Institute.
Palan, K. M., Areni, C. S., and Kiecker, P.. 1999. “Reexamining Masculinity, Femininity, and Gender Identity Scales.” Marketing Letters 10 (4): 363–77.
Satterfield, T. A., Mertz, C. K., and Slovic, P.. 2004. “Discrimination, Vulnerability, and Justice in the Face of Risk.” Risk Analysis 24: 115–29.
Slovic, P. 1999. “Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk-Assessment Battlefield.” Risk Analysis 19: 689701.
Swamy, A., Knack, S., Lee, Y., and Azfar, O.. 2001. “Gender and Corruption.” Journal of Development Economics 64 (1): 2555.
Tauchert, A. 2002. “Fuzzy Gender: Between Female-Embodiment and Intersex.” Journal of Gender Studies 11 (1): 2938.
University of Gothenburg, SOM Institute. 2015. National SOM 2013. Version 1.0. Swedish National Data Service. http://dx.doi.org/10.5878/002630
Verge, T. 2012. “Institutionalising Gender Equality in Spain: From Party Quotas to Electoral Gender Quotas.” West European Politics 35 (2): 395414.
Verge, T., Guinjoan, M., and Rodon, T.. 2015. “Risk Aversion, Gender, and Constitutional Change.” Politics & Gender 11: 499521.
Vernersdotter, F. 2014. “Den nationella SOM-undersökningen 2013.” In Mittfåra & marginal, eds. Annika Bergström and Henrik Oscarsson. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg: SOM Institute. http://som.gu.se/digitalAssets/1487/1487725_531-560-frida-vernersdotter--metod.pdf
Westbrook, L., and Saperstein, A.. 2015. “New Categories Are Not Enough: Rethinking the Measurement of Sex and Gender in Social Surveys.” Gender & Society 29 (4): 534–60.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Wängnerud et al. supplementary material
Wängnerud et al. supplementary material 1

 Word (295 KB)
295 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed