Skip to main content

My Heart Says One Thing but My Head Says Another? Men, Women, and the Psychology of Partisanship in Britain

  • Robert Johns (a1), Kristi Winters (a2) and Rosie Campbell (a2)

The point of departure for this study is the recent work of Burden (2008) on the “gender gap” in partisanship in the United States. He shows that the preponderance of Democratic identification among women is partly a function of the measurement of party identification. When respondents were asked “Do you feel that you are” rather than, more traditionally, “Do you think of yourself as” a Democrat or Republican, the sex gap narrowed to statistical nonsignificance. Burden's explanation for this result lies in the psychology of partisanship. The traditional “think of yourself as” (or cognitive) question primes women to consider their partisanship as a social identity, which in turn activates the stereotypical association between women and the Democratic Party. The “feel that you are” (or affective) question encourages a deeper, more personalized response, rendering social identity less relevant and thereby nullifying the effect of that stereotype.

Hide All
Abelson, Robert P., Dasgupta, Nilanjana, Park, Jaihyun, and Banaji, Mahzarin. 1998. “Perceptions of the Collective Other.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 2 (4): 243–50.
Abelson, Robert P., Kinder, Donald R., Peters, Mark D., and Fiske, Susan T.. 1982. “Affective and Semantic Components in Political Person Perception.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 424 (4): 619–30.
Abrams, Dominic. 1994. “Political Distinctiveness: An Identity Optimizing Approach.” European Journal of Social Psychology 24 (3): 357–65.
Alvarez, R. Michael, and Brehm, John. 2002. Hard Choices, Easy Answers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Atkeson, Lonna Rae, and Rapoport, Ronald B.. 2003. “The More Things Change the More They Stay the Same: Examining Gender Differences in Political Attitude Expression, 1952—2000.” Public Opinion Quarterly 67 (4): 495521.
Bartle, John. 2001. “The Measurement of Party Identification in Britain: Where Do We Stand Now?British Elections & Parties Review 11: 114 .
Bartle, John. 2003. “Focus Groups and Measures of Party Identifications: An Explanatory Study.” Electoral Studies 22 (2): 217–37.
Bassili, John N. 1995. “On the Psychological Reality of Party Identification.” Political Behavior 17 (4): 339–58.
Belenky, Mary Field, Clinchy, Blythe M., Goldberger, Nancy R., and Tarule, Jill M.. 1986. Women's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind. New York: Basic Books.
Belknap, George, and Campbell, Angus. 1952. “Political Party Identification and Attitudes toward Foreign policy.” Public Opinion Quarterly 15 (4): 601–23.
Bennett, Linda L., and Bennett, Stephen E.. 1989. “Enduring Gender Differences in Political Behavior.” American Politics Quarterly 17 (1): 105–22.
Blais, André, Gidengil, Elisabeth, Nadeau, Richard, and Nevitte, Neil. 2001. “Measuring Party Identification: Britain, Canada, and the United States.” Political Behavior 23 (1): 522.
Brewer, Marilyn. 2001. “The Many Faces of Social Identity: Implications for Political Psychology.” Political Psychology 22 (1): 115–25.
Brewer, Marilyn, and Brown, Rupert J.. 1998, “Intergroup Relations.” In Handbook of Social Psychology (vol. 2, 4th ed.), ed. Gilbert, Daniel T., Fiske, Susan T., and Lindzey, Gardner. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 554–94.
Brody, Leslie R. 2000. “The Socialisation of Gender Differences in Emotional Expression.” In Gender and Emotion, ed. Fischer, Agneta. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2447.
Burden, Barry C. 2005. “The Social Roots of the Partisan Gender Gap.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Miami.
Burden, Barry C. 2008. “The Social Roots of the Partisan Gender Gap.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72 (1): 5575.
Burden, Barry C., and Greene, Stephen. 2000. “Party Attachments and State Election Laws.” Political Research Quarterly 53 (1): 5770.
Burden, Barry C., and Klofstad, Casey A.. 2005. “Affect and Cognition in Party Identification.” Political Psychology 26 (6): 869–86.
Burns, Nancy, Schlozman, Kay L., and Verba, Sidney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Campbell, A., Converse, P., et al. 1960. The American Voter. New York, John Wiley & Sons.
Campbell, Donald T. 1958. “Common Fate, Similarity, and Other Indices of the Status of Aggregates of Persons as Social Entities.” Behavioural Science 3 (1): 1425.
Campbell, Rosie. 2004. “Gender, Ideology and Issue Preference.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6 (1): 2044.
Campbell, Rosie. 2006. Gender and the Vote in Britain. Colchester: ECPR.
Campbell, Rosie, and Lovenduski, Joni. 2005. “Winning Women's Votes? The Incremental Track to Equality.” In Britain Votes 2005, ed. Norris, Pippa and Wlezien, Christopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 181–97.
Campbell, Rosie, and Winters, Kristi. 2008. “Understanding Men's and Women's Political Interests: Evidence from a Study of Gendered Political Attitudes.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 18 (1): 5374.
Chaiken, Shelley, Pomerantz, Eva, and Giner-Sorolla, Roger. 1995. “Structural Consistency and Attitude Strength.” In Attitude Strength, ed. Krosnick, Jon and Petty, Richard. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 387412.
Chaney, Carole, Alvarez, R. Michael, and Nagler, Jonathan. 1998. “Explaining the Gender Gap in US Presidential Elections, 1980—92.” Political Research Quarterly 51 (2): 311–39.
Childs, Sarah. 2005. “Feminizing British Politics: Sex and Gender in the 2005 General Election.” In Britain Decides: The UK General Election 2005, ed. Geddes, Andrew and Tonge, Jon. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 150–67.
Chodorow, Nancy. 1978. The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Clarke, Harold D., Sanders, David, Stewart, Marianne C., and Whiteley, Paul. 2004. Political Choice in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Conway, Margaret M., Steuernagel, Gertrude A., and Ahern, David W.. 1997. Women and Political Participation. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Crites, Stephen L., Fabrigar, Leandre R., and Petty, Richard E.. 1994. “Measuring the Affective and Cognitive Properties of Attitudes: Conceptual and Methodological Issues.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20 (6): 619–34.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 2000. “Gender and Political Knowledge.” In Gender and American Politics, ed. Tolleson-Rinehart, Sue and Josephson, Jyl J.. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 2147.
Eagly, Alice H. 1983. “Gender and Social Influence: A Social Psychological Analysis,American Psychologist 38 (9): 971–91.
Edwards, Kari. 1990. “The Interplay of Affect and Cognition in Attitude Formation and Change.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59 (2): 202–16.
Erikson, Robert S., MacKuen, Michael and Stimson, James A.. 2002. The Macro Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fiorina, Morris P. 1977. “An Outline for a Model of Party Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 21 (3): 601–26.
Franklin, Charles, and Jackson, John E.. 1983. “The Dynamics of Party Identification.” American Political Science Review 77 (4): 957–73.
Frazer, Elizabeth, and MacDonald, Kenneth. 2003. “Sex Differences in Political Knowledge in Britain.” Political Studies 51 (1): 6783.
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Green, Donald, Palmquist, Bradley, and Schickler, Eric. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identity of Voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Greene, Steven. 1999. “Exploring the Structure of Party Identification: The Cognitive, Affective, and Social Identity Components of Partisanship.” Unpublished Ph.D. diss. Ohio State University.
Greene, Steven. 2002. “The Social-Psychological Measurement of Partisanship.” Political Behavior 24 (3): 171–97.
Greene, Steven. 2004. “Social Identity Theory and Party Identification.” Social Science Quarterly 85 (1): 136–53.
Greene, Steven, and Elder, Laurel. 2001. “Gender and the Psychological Structure of Partisanship.” Women & Politics 22 (1): 6384.
Grossman, Michele, and Wood, Wendy. 1993. “Sex Differences in Intensity of Emotional Experience: A Social Role Interpretation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65 (5): 1010–22.
Hagenaars, Jacques A. 1990. Categorical Longitudinal Data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Heath, Anthony, Jowell, Roger, and Curtice, John. 2001. The Rise of New Labour: Party Policies and Voter Choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Herrmann, Richard K., Tetlock, Philip E., and Visser, Penny S.. 1999. “Mass Public Decisions to Go to War: A Cognitive-Interactionist Framework.” American Political Science Review 93 (3): 553–73.
Malhotra, N. and Krosnick, J. 2007. “The Effect of Survey Mode and Sampling on Inferences about Political Attitudes and Behavior: Comparing the 2000 and 2004 ANES to Internet Surveys with Nonprobability Samples.” Political Analysis 15 (3): 286323.
Kam, Cindy D. 2009. “Gender and Economic Voting, Revisited.” Electoral Studies 28 (4): 615–24.
Kaufmann, Karen M., and Petrocik, John R.. 1999. “The Changing Politics of American Men: Understanding the Sources of the Gender Gap.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (3): 864–87.
Kelly, Caroline. 1988. “Intergroup Differentiation in a Political Context.” British Journal of Social Psychology 27 (4): 319–32.
Kelly, Caroline. 1989. “Political Identity and Perceived Intragroup Homogeneity.” British Journal of Social Psychology 28 (3): 239–50.
Key, V. O. 1966. The Responsible Electorate. New York: Vintage.
Kinder, Donald. 1994. “Reason and Emotion in American Political Life.” In Beliefs, Reasoning and Decision Making, ed. Shank, Roger C. and Langer, Ellen. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 277314.
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, and Wattenberg, Martin. 1992. “Decaying versus Developing Party systems.” British Journal of Political Science 22 (2): 131–50.
Krosnick, Jon A., and Schuman, Howard. 1988. “Attitude Intensity, Importance, and Certainty and Susceptibility to Response effects.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 (6): 940–52.
Lodge, Milton, and Hamill, Ruth. 1986. “A Partisan Schema for Information processing.” American Political Science Review 80 (2): 505–19.
Marcus, George E. 1988. “The Structure of Emotional Response: 1984 Presidential Candidates.” American Political Science Review 83 (3): 737–62.
Millar, Murray G., and Tesser, Abraham. 1986. “Effects of Affective and Cognitive Focus on the Attitude-Behavior Relation.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 51 (2): 270–76.
Miller, Dale T., Taylor, Brian, and Buck, Michelle L.. 1991. “Gender Gaps: Who Needs to Be Explained?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61 (1): 512.
Mondak, Jeffrey J., and Anderson, Mary R.. 2004. “The Knowledge Gap: A Reexamination of Gender-Based Differences in Political knowledge.” Journal of Politics 66 (2): 492512.
Mueller, Carol, ed. 1988. The Politics of the Gender Gap. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
Neely, Francis. 2007. “Party Identification in Emotional and Political Context: A Replication.” Political Psychology 28 (6): 667–88.
Norrander, Barbara. 1997. “The Independence Gap and the Gender Gap.” Public Opinion Quarterly 61 (3): 464–76.
Norris, Pippa. 1993. “The Gender-Generation Gap in British Elections.” In British Elections and Parties Yearbook 1993, ed. Denver, D., Norris, P., Broughton, D., and Rallings, C.. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 129–42.
Norris, Pippa. 1999. “Gender, a Gender-Generation Gap?” In Critical Elections, ed. Evans, Geoff and Norris, Pippa. London: Sage, 148–63.
Popkin, Samuel L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Rahn, Wendy. 1993. “The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (2): 472–96.
Robinson, Michael D., and Clore, Gerald L.. 2002. “Belief and Feeling: Evidence for an Accessibility Model of Emotional Self-Report.” Psychological Bulletin, 128 (6): 934–60.
Sanders, David, Burton, Jonathan, and Kneeshaw, Jack. 2002. “Identifying the True Identifiers: A Question Wording Experiment.” Party Politics 8 (2): 193205.
Sanders, David, Clarke, Harold D., Stewart, Marianne C., , M. and Whiteley, Paul. 2007. “Does Mode Matter for Modeling Political Choice? Evidence from the 2005 British Election Study.” Political Analysis 15 (3): 257–85.
Sapiro, Virginia. 1983. The Political Integration of Women. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Schuman, Howard, and Presser, Stanley. 1981. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys. New York: Academic Press.
Schwarz, Norbert, and Böhner, Gerd. 2002. “The Construction of Attitudes.” In Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology (vol. 1), ed. Tesser, Abraham and Schwarz, Norbert. Oxford: Blackwell, 436–57.
Tajfel, Henri. 1981. Human Groups and Social Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tourangeau, Roger, Rips, Lance, and Rasinski, Kenneth. 2000. The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van der Eijk, Cees. 2002. “Design Issues in Electoral Research: Taking Care of Core Business.” Electoral Studies 21 (2): 189206.
Weisberg, Herbert F., and Greene, Steven. 2003. “The Political Psychology of Party Identification.” In Electoral Democracy, ed. Mackuen, Michael B. and Rabinowitz, George. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 83124.
Welch, Susan, and Hibbing, John. 1992. “Financial Conditions, Gender, and Voting in American National Elections.” Journal of Politics 54 (1): 197213.
Winters, Kristi, and Campbell, Rosie. 2007. “Measuring Gender: Moving Beyond Sex as a Proxy. Presented at the Annual Conference of the PSA Women and Politics Specialist Group, Birkbeck College, London.
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed