Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-hw7sx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T21:23:26.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nested Newness, Institutional Innovation, and the Gendered Limits of Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2014

Fiona Mackay
Fiona Mackay*
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Opportunities for innovation are created by broad restructuring processes and by the chance to be in at the start of new or substantially revised political institutions. These intuitions have animated the efforts of women's movement activists and their allies in processes of political transition and constitutional or institutional “engineering” (and reengineering) with the aim of embedding gender rights and freedoms (Banaszak, Beckwith, and Rucht 2003; Dobrowolsky and Hart 2003). Institutional theory supports these intuitions. Reformers—including feminist change agents—may take advantage of the “permissive” stage of institutional creation. By successfully intervening to insert new actors, new values, and new rules into new institutions, reformers may profoundly influence the future developments of an institution (Goodin 1996; Pierson 2004). By “locking in” elements that promote gender equality and gender justice at the stage of institutional design, the goal is to set off fledgling institutions along progressive paths, thus counteracting historic gender bias and gendered power imbalances found in most traditional political institutions.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , December 2014 , pp. 549 - 571
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Acker, Joan. 1992. “From Sex Roles to Gendered Institutions.” Sex Roles 47 (7/8): 371–88.Google Scholar
Aggarwal, Vinod K. 2006. “Reconciling Institutions: Nested, Horizontal, Overlapping and Independent Institutions.” Presented at the Nested and Overlapping Institutions Conference, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Arter, David. 2002. “On Assessing Strength and Weakness in Parliamentary Committee Systems: Some Preliminary Observations on the New Scottish Parliament.” Journal of Legislative Studies 8 (2): 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assinder, Nick. 2014. “Can Westminster Become Female Friendly?” BBC News Online, May 8. http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/uk_politics/3662577.stm (accessed May 13, 2014).Google Scholar
Banaszak, Lee Ann, Beckwith, Karen, and Rucht, Dieter, eds. 2003. Women's Movements Facing the Reconfigured State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bonney, Norman. 2003. “The Scottish Parliament and Participatory Democracy: Vision and Reality.” The Political Quarterly 74 (4): 459–67.Google Scholar
Bradbury, Jonathan, and Mitchell, James. 2001. “Devolution: New Politics for Old?” Parliamentary Affairs 54 (2): 257–75.Google Scholar
Brown, Alice. 2000. “Designing the Scottish Parliament.” Parliamentary Affairs 53 (3): 542–56.Google Scholar
Brown, Alice. 2001. “Taking Their Place in the New House: Women and the Scottish Parliament.” In Women and Contemporary Scottish Politics: An Anthology, ed. Breitenbach, Esther and Mackay, Fiona. Edinburgh: Polygon at Edinburgh, 241–47.Google Scholar
Brown, Alice, Donaghy, Tahyna B., Mackay, Fiona, and Meehan, Elizabeth. 2002. “Women and Constitutional Change in Scotland and Northern Ireland.” Parliamentary Affairs 55 (1): 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, Nancy. 2005. “Finding Gender.” Politics & Gender 1 (1): 137–14.Google Scholar
Campbell, John L. 2010. “Institutional Reproduction and Change.” In Oxford Handbook of Comparative Institutional Analysis, ed. Morgan, G., Campbell, J.L., Crouch, C., Pederson, O., and Whitley, R.. New York: Oxford University Press, 87–115.Google Scholar
Chaney, Paul. 2006. “Critical Mass, Deliberation and the Substantive Representation of Women: Evidence from the UK's Devolution Programme.” Political Studies 54 (4): 671–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, Louise. 2002. Gendering Government. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Chappell, Louise. 2006. “Comparing Political Institutions: Revealing the Gendered ‘Logic of Appropriateness.’” Politics & Gender 2 (2): 223–48.Google Scholar
Chappell, Louise. 2011. “‘Nested Newness’ and Institutional Innovation: Expanding Gender Justice in the International Criminal Court.'” In Gender, Politics, and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism, ed. Krook, Mona L. and Mackay, Fiona. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 163–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, Louise. 2014. “‘New,’ ‘Old,’ and ‘Nested’ Institutions and Gender Justice Outcomes: A View from the International Criminal Court.” Politics & Gender 10 (4): XX–XX.Google Scholar
Connell, Raewyn. 2002. Gender: A Short Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Consultative Steering Group on the Scottish Parliament (CSG). 1998. Shaping Scotland's Parliament: Report of the Consultative Steering Group of the Scottish Parliament. Edinburgh: The Scotland Office.Google Scholar
Dobrowolsky, Alexandra. 2002. “Crossing Boundaries: Exploring and Mapping Women's Constitutional Interventions in England, Scotland and Northern Ireland.” Social Politics 9 (2): 293–340.Google Scholar
Dobrowolsky, Alexandra. 2003. “‘Shifting States’: States, Strategies and Identities: Women's Constitutional Organizing across Space and Time.” In Women's Movements Facing the Reconfigured State, ed. Banaszak, L.A., Beckwith, K., and Rucht, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dobrowolsky, Alexandra, and Hart, Vivien, eds. 2003. Women Making Constitutions: New Politics and Comparative Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duerst-Lahti, Georgia. 2002. “Governing Institutions, Ideologies and Gender: Towards the Possibility of Equal Political Representation.” Sex Roles 47 (7/8): 371–88.Google Scholar
Duerst-Lahti, Georgia. 2008. “Gender Ideology: Masculinism and Feminalism.” In Politics, Gender and Concepts:Theory and Methodology, ed. Goertz, Gary and Mazur, Amy G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 159–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duerst-Lahti, Georgia, and Kelly, Rita Mae, eds. 1995. Gender Power, Leadership and Governance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Goetz, Ann Marie. 2003. “Women's Political Effectiveness: A Conceptual Framework.” In No Shortcuts to Power: African Women in Politics and Policy-making, ed. Goetz, Ann Marie. London: David Philip.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert. 1996. “Institutions and their Design.” In The Theory of Institutional Design, ed. Goodin, Robert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jeffery, Charlie. 2009. “Devolution in the UK.” In Oxford Handbook of British Politics, ed. Flinders, M., Gamble, A., Hay, C., and Kenny, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jeffery, Charlie, and Mitchell, James, eds. 2009.The Scottish Parliament 1999–2009: The First Decade. Edinburgh: Luath Press/Hansard Society.Google Scholar
Jones, Kathleeen. 1993. Compassionate Authority: Democracy and the Representation of Women. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Keating, Michael J. 2010. The Government of Scotland: Public Policy Making after Devolution, 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Kenny, Meryl. 2007. “Gender, Institutions and Power: A Critical Review.” Politics 27 (2): 91–100.Google Scholar
Kenny, Meryl. 2013. Gender and Political Recruitment: Theorizing Institutional Change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena, and Mackay, Fiona. 2011. “Introduction.” In Gender, Politics, and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism, ed. Krook, Mona Lena and Mackay, Fiona. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Leach, Steve, and Lowndes, Vivien. 2007. “Of Roles and Rules.” Public Policy and Administration 22 (2): 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni. 2005. Feminizing Politics. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni. 2011. “Foreword.” In Gender, Politics, and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism, ed. Krook, Mona Lena and Mackay, Fiona. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, vii–xi. Google Scholar
Lowndes, Vivien. 2005. “Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed ...” Policy Studies 26 (3): 291–309.Google Scholar
Lowndes, Vivien, and Wilson, David. 2001. “Social Capital and Local Governance: Exploring the Institutional Design Variable.” Political Studies 49 (4): 629–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, Fiona. 2006. “Descriptive and Substantive Representation in New Parliamentary Spaces: The Case of Scotland.” In Representing Women in Parliament: A Comparative Study, ed. Sawer, Marian, Tremblay, Manon, and Trimble, Linda. London: Routledge, 171–87.Google Scholar
Mackay, Fiona. 2009a. “Travelling the Distance? Equal Opportunities and the Scottish Parliament.” In The Scottish Parliament 1999–2009: The First Decade, ed. Jeffrey, Charlie and Mitchell, James. Edinburgh: Luath Press/Hansard Society, 49–55.Google Scholar
Mackay, Fiona. 2009b. “Institutionalising ‘New Politics’ in Post Devolution Scotland: ‘Nested Newness’ and the Gendered Limits of Change.” Presented at the First European Conference on Politics and Gender, Belfast.Google Scholar
Mackay, Fiona. 2010. “Gendering Constitutional Change and Policy Outcomes: Substantive Representation and Domestic Violence Policy in Scotland.” Policy & Politics 38 (3): 39–53.Google Scholar
Mackay, Fiona, Kenny, Meryl, and Chappell, Louise. 2010. “New Institutionalism through a Gender Lens: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism?” International Political Science Review 31 (5): 578–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, Fiona, Myers, Fiona, and Brown, Alice. 2003. “Towards a New Politics? Women and the Constitutional Change in Scotland.” In Women Making Constitutions: New Politics and Comparative Perspective, ed. Dobrowolsky, Alexandra and Hart, Vivien. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 84–98.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2010. “How Historical Institutionalists Explain Change.” In Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, ed. Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Majic, Samantha. 2014. “Teaching Equality? ‘John Schools,’ Gender and Institutional Reform. Polity 46 (1): 5–30.Google Scholar
McFadyen, Andrew. 2014. “Where are all the Women?” http://andrewmcfadyen.net/2014/08/14/where-are-all-the-women (accessed August 14, 2014).Google Scholar
McKay, Ailsa, Fitzgerald, Rona, Gillespie, Morag, and O'Hagan, Angela. 2002. “Scotland: Using Political Change to Advance Gender Issues.” In Gender Budgets Make Good Cents, ed. Budlender, D. and Hewitt, G.. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.Google Scholar
Mitchell, James. 2000. “New Parliament, New Politics in Scotland.” Parliamentary Affairs 53 (3): 605–21.Google Scholar
Moran, Michael. 2011. Politics and Governance in the UK, 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar
Nagy, Brian, and Lohrke, Franz. 2010. “Only the Good Die Young? A Review of Liability of Newness and Related Venture Mortality Research.” In Historical Foundations of Entrepreneurial Research, ed. Landstrom, Hans and Lohrke, Franz. Cheltenham, Gloucester: Edward Elgar, 185–202.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Puwar, Nirmal. 2004. Space Invaders: Race, Gender and Bodies Out of Place. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Sawer, Marian. 2000. “Parliamentary Representation: From Discourses of Justice to Strategies of Accountability.” International Political Science Review 21 (4): 361–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawer, Marian. 2007. “Australia: The Fall of the Femocrat.” In Changing State Feminism, ed. Outshoorn, Joyce and Kantola, Johanna. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 20–40.Google Scholar
Sawer, Marian, Tremblay, Manon and Trimble, Linda. 2006. “Introduction: Patterns and Practice in the Parliamentary Representation of Women.” In Representing Women in Parliament: A Comparative Study, ed. Sawer, M., Tremblay, Marian and Trimble, Linda. London and New York: Routledge, 1–23.Google Scholar
Scottish Parliament Procedures Committee. 2003. The Founding Principles of the Scottish Parliament: The Application of Access and Participation , Equal Opportunities, Accountability and Power Sharing in the Work of the Parliament. 3rd Report, SP Paper 818.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur L. 1965. “Organizations and Social Structure.” In Handbook of Organizations, ed. March, James G.. Chicago: Rand-McNally, 153–93.Google Scholar
Stivers, Camilla M. 2002. Gender Images in Public Administration: Legitimacy and the Administrative State, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, and London: Sage.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2005. “Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies.” In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–39.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2004. How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States and Japan. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tripp, Aili, Casimiro, Isabel, Kwesiga, Joy, and Mungwa, Alice. 2009. African Women's Movements: Transforming Political Landscapes. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Waylen, Georgina. 2006. “Constitutional Engineering: What Opportunities for the Enhancement of Gender Rights?” Third World Quarterly 27 (7): 1209–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waylen, Georgina. 2007. Engendering Transitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Winetrobe, Barry K. 2001. Realising the Vision: A Parliament with a Purpose. An Audit of the First Year of the Scottish Parliament. London: Constitution Unit, University College London.Google Scholar