Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Rewriting Title IX: The Department of Education's Response to Feminists' Comments in the Rulemaking Process

  • Ashley English (a1)

Copyright

References

Hide All
Binder, Sarah A. 2003. Stalemate: Causes and Consequences of Legislative Gridlock. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Center for American Women and Politics. 2015. “Women in the U.S. Congress 2015.” http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/women-us-congress-2015 (accessed February 19, 2014).
Epstein, David, and O'Halloran, Sharyn. 1999. Delegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making Under Separate Powers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Furlong, Scott R. 1997. “Interest Group Influence on Rulemaking.” Administration & Society 29 (3): 325–47.
Furlong, Scott R., and Kerwin, Cornelius M.. 2005. “Interest Group Participation in Rulemaking: A Decade of Change.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15 (3): 353–70.
Golden, Marissa Martino. 1998. “Interest Groups in the Rule-Making Process.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8 (2): 245–70.
Goss, Kristin A. 2007. “Foundations of Feminism: How Philanthropic Patrons Shaped Gender Politics.” Social Science Quarterly 88 (5): 1174–91.
Goss, Kristin A. 2013. The Paradox of Gender Equality: How American Women's Groups Gained and Lost Their Public Voice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Huber, John D., and Shipan, Charles R.. 2002. Deliberate Discretion: The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Keiser, Lael R., Wilkins, Vicky M., Meier, Kenneth J., and Holland, Catherine A.. 2002. “Lipstick and Logarithms: Gender, Institutional Context, and Representative Bureaucracy.” American Political Science Review 96 (3): 553–64.
Kerwin, Cornelius M., and Furlong, Scott R.. 2011. Rulemaking: How Government Agencies Write Law and Make Policy. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Lowi, Theodore. 1985. “The State in Politics: The Relation Between Policy and Administration.” In Regulatory Policy and the Social Sciences, ed. Noll, Roger. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 65104.
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.
Mansbridge, Jane, and Jo Martin, Cathie, eds. 2013. Negotiating Agreement in Politics. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
Meier, Kenneth J., and Nicholson-Crotty, Jill. 2006. “Gender, Representative Bureaucracy, and Law Enforcement: The Case of Sexual Assault.” Public Administration Review 66 (6): 850–60.
National Women's Law Center. 2006. “Administration's Single-Sex Regulations Violate Constitution and Title IX.” http://www.nwlc.org/details.cfm?id=2866&section=newsroom (accessed March 19, 2010).
Riccucci, Norma M., and Meyers, Marcia K.. 2004. “Linking Passive and Active Representation: The Case of Frontline Workers in Welfare Agencies.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14 (4): 585–97.
Robison, Jennifer. 2002. “Learning about Single-Sex Education.” Gallup, October 1. http://www.gallup.com/poll/6910/learning-about-singlesex-education.aspx (accessed March 17, 2016).
Rosenthal, Cindy Simon. 2008. “Sports Talk: How Gender Shapes Discursive Framing of Title IX.” Politics & Gender 4 (1): 6592.
Schreiber, Ronnee. 2002. “Injecting a Woman's Voice: Conservative Women's Organizations, Gender Consciousness, and the Expression of Women's Policy Preferences.” Sex Roles 47 (7): 331–42.
Shapiro, Stuart. 2008. “Does the Amount of Participation Matter? Public Comments, Agency Responses, and the Time to Finalize a Regulation.” Policy Sciences 41 (1): 3349.
Staggenborg, Suzanne. 1988. “The Consequences of Professionalization and Formalization in the Pro-Choice Movement.” American Sociological Review 53 (4): 585605.
Stone, Deborah. 2001. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York: W. W. Norton.
Strolovitch, Dara Z. 2007. Affirmative Advocacy: Race, Class, and Gender in Interest Group Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Theriault, Sean M. 2008. Party Polarization in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
U.S. Department of Education. 2002. “Notice of Intent to Regulate: Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance.” Federal Register 67 (89): 31098–99.
U.S. Department of Education. 2004. “Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance.” Federal Register 69 (46): 11276–85.
U.S. Department of Education. 2006. “Final Regulations: Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance.” Federal Register 71 (206): 62530–43.
U.S. Department of Justice. 2010. “Coordination and Review Section 34 C.F.R. §§ 106.1–106.71.” http://www.justice.gov/crt/about/cor/byagency/34cfr106.php (accessed March 18, 2016).
Voteview. 2014. “House Polarization 1st to 113th Congresses.” ftp://voteview.com/house_polarization46_113.xlsx (accessed August 7, 2014).
West, William F. 2004. “Formal Procedures, Informal Processes, Accountability, and Responsiveness in Bureaucratic Policy Making: An Institutional Policy Analysis.” Public Administration Review 64 (1): 6680.
West, William F. 2009. “Inside the Black Box: The Development of Proposed Rules and the Limits of Procedural Controls.” Administration & Society 41 (5): 576–99.
Wilkins, Vicky M. 2006. “Exploring the Causal Story: Gender, Active Representation, and Bureaucratic Politics.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17 (1): 7794.
Wilkins, Vicky M., and Keiser, Lael R.. 2006. “Linking Passive and Active Representation by Gender: The Case of Child Support Agencies.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16 (1): 87102.
Yackee, Jason Webb, and Yackee, Susan Webb. 2006. “A Bias Towards Business? Assessing Interest Group Influence on the U.S. Bureaucracy.” Journal of Politics 68 (1): 128–39.
Yackee, Susan Webb. 2006. “Sweet Talking the Fourth Branch: The Influence of Interest Group Comments on Federal Agency Rulemaking.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16 (1): 103–24.
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

English supplementary material
Online Appendix

 Word (18 KB)
18 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed