Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-5xszh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T08:42:10.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Should Liberal Feminists Support “Paternafare” and Welfare Reform? A Capabilities-Oriented Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2010

Anna Marie Smith
Affiliation:
Cornell University

Abstract

When policymakers invoke liberal democratic tropes while endorsing welfare reform, and, in particular, “paternafare”—the mandatory child support and paternity identification requirement—are they contradicting themselves? Can paternafare be defended in liberal democratic terms? In this article, I propose to set aside, for the sake of argument, my own radical egalitarian commitments and to speak directly to the liberal feminist in her own terms. Because the capabilities approach of Martha Nussbaum is one of the less demanding liberal democratic theories of justice, insofar as it permits a relatively large degree of inequality, it provides a particularly helpful framework for this feminist dialogue. I construct a hypothetical world in which the needy single mother has an entitlement to a basic income under the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program, and I draw up my own version of an undue burden test on the basis of Nussbaum's theory. I explore whether the paternafare rule within this hypothetical world would pass the capabilities-oriented undue burden test. Finally, I argue that Nussbaum's nonfungibility principle can yield surprisingly robust redistributive results within specific historical conditions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramovitz, Mimi. 1996. Regulating the Lives of Women: Social Welfare from Colonial Times to the Present. Boston: South End.Google Scholar
Albelda, Randy, and Tilly, Chris. 1997. Glass Ceilings and Bottomless Pits: Woman's Work, Woman's Poverty. Boston: South End.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian. 2005. Why Social Justice Matters. New York: Polity.Google Scholar
Bou-Habib, Paul, and Olsaretti, Serena. 2004. “Liberal Egalitarianism and Workfare.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (3): 257–70.Google Scholar
Brake, Elizabeth. 2005. “Fatherhood and Child Support: Do Men Have a Right to Choose?” Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1): 5573.Google Scholar
Clinton, Bill. 1996. “Statement of the President [on welfare reform legislation].” Congressional Record, 142: S9359–62.Google Scholar
Clinton, Hillary. 2003. Living History. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 1997. “Where the Action Is: On the Site of Distributive Justice.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 26 (1): 330.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 2000. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
DiQuattro, Arthur. 1998. “Liberal Theory and the Idea of Communist Justice.” American Political Science Review 9 (March): 8396.Google Scholar
Edin, Kathryn, and Lein, Laura. 1997. Making Ends Meet: How Single Mothers Survive Welfare and Low-Wage Work. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha. 1995. The Neutered Mother, The Sexual Family and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1997. Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the Postsocialist Condition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2000. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Linda. 1994. Pitied but Not Entitled: Single Mothers and the History of Welfare, 1890–1935. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Gould, Carol. 2004. Globalizing Democracy and Human Rights. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2004. The Politics of Disgust: The Public Identity of the Welfare Queen. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hays, Sharon. 2003. Flat Broke with Children: Women in the Age of Welfare Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levey, Ann. 2005. “Liberalism, Adaptive Preferences, and Gender Equality,” Hypatia 20 (4): 127–43.Google Scholar
Marchevsky, Alejandra, and Theoharis, Jeanne. 2006. Not Working: Latina Immigrants, Low-Wage Jobs, and the Failure of Welfare Reform. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Mink, Gwendolyn. 1998. Welfare's End. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
NLCHP (National Law Center on Homelessness, and Poverty). 2009. “Shortchanging Survivors: The Family Violence Option for TANF Benefits.” Washington, DC.: National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 1999. Sex and Social Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 2006a. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 2006b. Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame, and the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Peck, Jamie. 2001. Workfare States. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox, and Cloward, Richard. 1993. Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public Welfare. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas. 2008. World Poverty and Human Rights. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Quadagno, Jill. 1994. The Color of Welfare: How Racism Undermined the War on Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 2005. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Reese, Ellen. 2005. Backlash Against Welfare Mothers: Past and Present. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Seccombe, Karen. 1999. “So You Think I Drive a Cadillac?Welfare Recipients' Perspectives on the System and Its Reform. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Seltzer, Judith, McLanahan, Sara, and Hanson, Thomas. 1998. “Will Child Support Enforcement Increase Father-Child Contact and Parental Conflict after Separation?” In Fathers under Fire: The Revolution in Child Support Enforcement, ed. Garfinkel, Irwin et al. New York: Russell Sage, 157–89.Google Scholar
Smith, Anna Marie. 2007. Welfare Reform and Sexual Regulation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Anna Marie. 2009. “Reproductive Technology, Family Law, and the Post-welfare State: The California Same-Sex Parents' Rights ‘Victories’ of 2005.” Signs 34 (4): 124.Google Scholar
Sorenson, Elaine. 2003. Child Support Gains Some Ground. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Tolman, Richard, and Raphael, Jody. 2000. “A Review of Research on Welfare and Domestic Violence.” Journal of Social Issues 56 (December): 655–82.Google Scholar
Turetsky, Vicki. 2003. Child Support Trends. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy.Google Scholar
Turetsky, Vicki. 2007. Staying in Jobs and Out of the Underground: Child Support Policies That Encourage Legitimate Work. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy.Google Scholar
Waller, Maureen. 2002. My Baby's Father: Unmarried Parents and Paternal Responsibility. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Winter, Nicholas. 2008. Dangerous Frames: How Ideas About Race and Gender Shape Public Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar