Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Speaking for the Underrepresented in the House of Representatives: Voicing Women's Interests in a Partisan Era

  • Kathryn Pearson (a1) and Logan Dancey (a2)

We ask whether women's descriptive representation in Congress enhances women's substantive representation through speechmaking on the House floor. Much of the research on women's substantive representation has focused on members' votes for and sponsorship of “women's issues” legislation. We depart from this research by systematically analyzing how members' gender and partisan identities affect gendered rhetoric in their floor speeches. In an era marked by significant increases in the number of congresswomen and partisan polarization, understanding the interactive effect of gender and partisanship on women's representation is particularly important. In an analysis of more than 30,000 speeches from 1993 to 2008, we find that when members speak about issues of their choosing during one-minute speeches, and during specific legislative debates over the most important policies considered on the House floor, congresswomen in both parties are significantly more likely than men to discuss women, enhancing women's representation.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Barbara C. Burrell 1994. A Woman's Place Is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Debra L. Dodson 2006. The Impact of Women in Congress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Brian Frederick . 2009. “Are Female House Members Still More Liberal in a Polarized Era? The Conditional Nature of the Relationship Between Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” Congress & the Presidency 36 (2): 181202.

Douglas B. Harris 2005. “Orchestrating Party Talk: A Party-Based View of One-Minute Speeches in the House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 30 (1): 127–41.

Lyn Kathlene . 1995. “Alternative Views of Crime: Legislative Policymaking in Gendered Terms.” Journal of Politics 57 (3): 696723.

Karen M. Kaufmann , and John R. Petrocik . 1999. “The Changing Politics of American Men: Understanding the Sources of the Gender Gap.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (3): 864–87.

Dena Levy , Charles Tien , and Rachelle Aved . 2001. “Do Differences Matter? Women Members of Congress and the Hyde Amendment.” Women & Politics 23(1/2): 105–27.

Jane J. Mansbridge 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes’” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.

Monika L. McDermott 1997. “Voting Cues in Low-Information Elections: Candidate Gender as a Social Information Variable in Contemporary US Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 270–83.

Jonathan S. Morris 2001. “Reexamining the Politics of Talk: Partisan Rhetoric in the 104th House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26 (1): 101–21.

Noelle H. Norton 1999. “Uncovering the Dimensionality of Gender Voting in Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 24 (1): 6586.

Tracy Osborn , and Jeanette Morehouse Mendez . 2010. “Speaking as Women: Women and Floor Speeches in the Senate.” Journal of Women, Politics, and Policy 31 (1): 121.

Kathryn Pearson , and Logan Dancey . 2011. “Elevating Women s Voice in Congress: Speech Participation in the House of Representatives.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (4): 910–23.

Michael S. Rocca 2007. “Nonlegislative Debate in the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Politics Research 35 (4): 489505.

David W. Rohde 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Kira Sanbonmatsu . 2002. “Political Parties and the Recruitment of Women to State Legislatures.” Journal of Politics 64 (3): 791809.

Colleen Shogan . 2002. “Speaking Out: An Analysis of Democratic and Republican Woman-Invoked Rhetoric in the 105th Congress.” Women & Politics 23 (1): 129–46.

Michele L. Swers 1998. “Are Women More Likely to Vote for Women's Issues Bills Than Their Male Colleagues?Legislative Studies Quarterly 23 (3): 435–48.

Jeffrey W. Koch 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Citizens' Impressions of House Candidates' Ideological Orientations.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (2): 453–62.

Sue Thomas . 1994. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 50 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 363 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.