Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Speaking for the Underrepresented in the House of Representatives: Voicing Women's Interests in a Partisan Era

  • Kathryn Pearson (a1) and Logan Dancey (a2)

We ask whether women's descriptive representation in Congress enhances women's substantive representation through speechmaking on the House floor. Much of the research on women's substantive representation has focused on members' votes for and sponsorship of “women's issues” legislation. We depart from this research by systematically analyzing how members' gender and partisan identities affect gendered rhetoric in their floor speeches. In an era marked by significant increases in the number of congresswomen and partisan polarization, understanding the interactive effect of gender and partisanship on women's representation is particularly important. In an analysis of more than 30,000 speeches from 1993 to 2008, we find that when members speak about issues of their choosing during one-minute speeches, and during specific legislative debates over the most important policies considered on the House floor, congresswomen in both parties are significantly more likely than men to discuss women, enhancing women's representation.

Hide All
Burrell Barbara C. 1994. A Woman's Place Is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Carroll Susan J. 1994. Women as Candidates in American Politics. 2d ed.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Carroll Susan J. 2002. “Representing Women: Congresswomen's Perceptions of their Representational Roles.” In Women Transforming Congress, ed. Simon Rosenthal Cindy. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Cranford John. 2006. “Key Votes 2005: Power Plays and Polarization.” CQ Weekly. January 9, 108–10. (accessed May 24, 2011).
Dodson Debra L. 1998. “Representing Women's Interests in the U.S. House of Representatives.” In Women and Elective Office, ed. Thomas Sue and Wilcox Clyde. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dodson Debra L. 2006. The Impact of Women in Congress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dreier David. 1999. “One Minute Speeches.” Parliamentary Outreach Program. U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Rules Majority Office, Vol. 106, no. 16.
Duerst-Lahti Georgia. 2002. “Knowing Congress as a Gendered Institution: Manliness and the Implications of Women in Congress.” In Women Transforming Congress, ed. Simon Rosenthal Cindy. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Frederick Brian. 2009. “Are Female House Members Still More Liberal in a Polarized Era? The Conditional Nature of the Relationship Between Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” Congress & the Presidency 36 (2): 181202.
Gelb Joyce, and Lief Palley Marian. 1996. Women and Public Policies: Reassessing Gender Politics. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
Gerrity Jessica C., Osborn Tracy, and Morehouse Mendez Jeanette. 2007. “Women and Representation: A Different View of the District?Politics & Gender 3 (2): 179200.
Gertzog Irwin N. 2004. Women and Power on Capitol Hill: Reconstructing the Congressional Women's Caucus. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Hall Richard. 1996. Participation in Congress. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Harris Douglas B. 2005. “Orchestrating Party Talk: A Party-Based View of One-Minute Speeches in the House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 30 (1): 127–41.
Kathlene Lyn. 1995. “Alternative Views of Crime: Legislative Policymaking in Gendered Terms.” Journal of Politics 57 (3): 696723.
Kaufmann Karen M., and Petrocik John R.. 1999. “The Changing Politics of American Men: Understanding the Sources of the Gender Gap.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (3): 864–87.
Kedrowski Karen M, and Stine Sarow Marilyn. 2002. “The Gendering of Cancer Policy: Media Advocacy and Congressional Policy Attention.” In Women Transforming Congress, ed. Simon Rosenthal Cindy. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Koch Jeffrey W. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Citizens' Impressions of House Candidates' Ideological Orientations.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (2): 453–62.
Levy Dena, Tien Charles, and Aved Rachelle. 2001. “Do Differences Matter? Women Members of Congress and the Hyde Amendment.” Women & Politics 23(1/2): 105–27.
Long J. Scott. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Long J. Scott, and Freese Jeremy. 2006. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata.
Mansbridge Jane J. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes’” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.
Matlzman Forrest, and Sigelman Lee. 1996. “The Politics of Talk: Unconstrained Floor Time in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Journal of Politics 58 (3): 819–30.
Mayhew David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
McDermott Monika L. 1997. “Voting Cues in Low-Information Elections: Candidate Gender as a Social Information Variable in Contemporary US Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 270–83.
Mezey Susan Gluck. 1994. “Increasing the Number of Women in Office: Does It Matter?” In The Year of the Woman: Myths and Realities, ed. Adell Cook Elizabeth, Thomas Sue, and Wilcox Clyde. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Morris Jonathan S. 2001. “Reexamining the Politics of Talk: Partisan Rhetoric in the 104th House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26 (1): 101–21.
Norton Noelle H. 1999. “Uncovering the Dimensionality of Gender Voting in Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 24 (1): 6586.
Osborn Tracy, and Morehouse Mendez Jeanette. 2010. “Speaking as Women: Women and Floor Speeches in the Senate.” Journal of Women, Politics, and Policy 31 (1): 121.
Palmer Barbara, and Simon Dennis. 2008. Breaking the Political Glass Ceiling: Women in Congressional Elections. 2nd ed.New York: Routledge.
Pearson Kathryn, and Dancey Logan. 2011. “Elevating Women s Voice in Congress: Speech Participation in the House of Representatives.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (4): 910–23.
Pennebaker J. W., Booth R. J., and Francis M. E.. 2007. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC 2007. Austin, TX: LIWC. Available at
Pitkin Hanna. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Poole Keith T, and Rosenthal Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
Reingold Beth Ann. 2000. Representing Women: Gender Differences Among Arizona and California State Legislators. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Rocca Michael S. 2007. “Nonlegislative Debate in the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Politics Research 35 (4): 489505.
Rohde David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Rosenthal Cindy Simon, ed. 2002. Women Transforming Congress. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Sanbonmatsu Kira. 2002. “Political Parties and the Recruitment of Women to State Legislatures.” Journal of Politics 64 (3): 791809.
Sapiro Virginia. 1981. “When Are Interests Interesting? The Problem of Political Representation of Women.” American Political Science Review 75 (3): 701–16.
Shogan Colleen. 2002. “Speaking Out: An Analysis of Democratic and Republican Woman-Invoked Rhetoric in the 105th Congress.” Women & Politics 23 (1): 129–46.
Swers Michele L. 1998. “Are Women More Likely to Vote for Women's Issues Bills Than Their Male Colleagues?Legislative Studies Quarterly 23 (3): 435–48.
Swers Michele L. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Theriault Sean M. 2008. Party Polarization in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thomas Sue. 1994. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.
Walsh Katherine Cramer. 2002. “Enlarging Representation: Women Bringing Marginalized Perspectives to Floor Debate in the House of Representatives.” In Women Transforming Congress, ed. Simon Rosenthal Cindy Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Wolbrecht Christina. 2000. The Politics of Women's Rights: Parties, Positions, and Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 68 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 501 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.