Skip to main content Accesibility Help

Speaking for the Underrepresented in the House of Representatives: Voicing Women's Interests in a Partisan Era

  • Kathryn Pearson (a1) and Logan Dancey (a2)

We ask whether women's descriptive representation in Congress enhances women's substantive representation through speechmaking on the House floor. Much of the research on women's substantive representation has focused on members' votes for and sponsorship of “women's issues” legislation. We depart from this research by systematically analyzing how members' gender and partisan identities affect gendered rhetoric in their floor speeches. In an era marked by significant increases in the number of congresswomen and partisan polarization, understanding the interactive effect of gender and partisanship on women's representation is particularly important. In an analysis of more than 30,000 speeches from 1993 to 2008, we find that when members speak about issues of their choosing during one-minute speeches, and during specific legislative debates over the most important policies considered on the House floor, congresswomen in both parties are significantly more likely than men to discuss women, enhancing women's representation.

Hide All
Burrell, Barbara C. 1994. A Woman's Place Is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Carroll, Susan J. 1994. Women as Candidates in American Politics. 2d ed.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Carroll, Susan J. 2002. “Representing Women: Congresswomen's Perceptions of their Representational Roles.” In Women Transforming Congress, ed. Simon Rosenthal, Cindy. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Cranford, John. 2006. “Key Votes 2005: Power Plays and Polarization.” CQ Weekly. January 9, 108–10. (accessed May 24, 2011).
Dodson, Debra L. 1998. “Representing Women's Interests in the U.S. House of Representatives.” In Women and Elective Office, ed. Thomas, Sue and Wilcox, Clyde. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dodson, Debra L. 2006. The Impact of Women in Congress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dreier, David. 1999. “One Minute Speeches.” Parliamentary Outreach Program. U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Rules Majority Office, Vol. 106, no. 16.
Duerst-Lahti, Georgia. 2002. “Knowing Congress as a Gendered Institution: Manliness and the Implications of Women in Congress.” In Women Transforming Congress, ed. Simon Rosenthal, Cindy. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Frederick, Brian. 2009. “Are Female House Members Still More Liberal in a Polarized Era? The Conditional Nature of the Relationship Between Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” Congress & the Presidency 36 (2): 181202.
Gelb, Joyce, and Lief Palley, Marian. 1996. Women and Public Policies: Reassessing Gender Politics. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
Gerrity, Jessica C., Osborn, Tracy, and Morehouse Mendez, Jeanette. 2007. “Women and Representation: A Different View of the District?Politics & Gender 3 (2): 179200.
Gertzog, Irwin N. 2004. Women and Power on Capitol Hill: Reconstructing the Congressional Women's Caucus. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Hall, Richard. 1996. Participation in Congress. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Harris, Douglas B. 2005. “Orchestrating Party Talk: A Party-Based View of One-Minute Speeches in the House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 30 (1): 127–41.
Kathlene, Lyn. 1995. “Alternative Views of Crime: Legislative Policymaking in Gendered Terms.” Journal of Politics 57 (3): 696723.
Kaufmann, Karen M., and Petrocik, John R.. 1999. “The Changing Politics of American Men: Understanding the Sources of the Gender Gap.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (3): 864–87.
Kedrowski, Karen M, and Stine Sarow, Marilyn. 2002. “The Gendering of Cancer Policy: Media Advocacy and Congressional Policy Attention.” In Women Transforming Congress, ed. Simon Rosenthal, Cindy. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Koch, Jeffrey W. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Citizens' Impressions of House Candidates' Ideological Orientations.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (2): 453–62.
Levy, Dena, Tien, Charles, and Aved, Rachelle. 2001. “Do Differences Matter? Women Members of Congress and the Hyde Amendment.” Women & Politics 23(1/2): 105–27.
Long, J. Scott. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Long, J. Scott, and Freese, Jeremy. 2006. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata.
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes’” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.
Matlzman, Forrest, and Sigelman, Lee. 1996. “The Politics of Talk: Unconstrained Floor Time in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Journal of Politics 58 (3): 819–30.
Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
McDermott, Monika L. 1997. “Voting Cues in Low-Information Elections: Candidate Gender as a Social Information Variable in Contemporary US Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 270–83.
Mezey, Susan Gluck. 1994. “Increasing the Number of Women in Office: Does It Matter?” In The Year of the Woman: Myths and Realities, ed. Adell Cook, Elizabeth, Thomas, Sue, and Wilcox, Clyde. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Morris, Jonathan S. 2001. “Reexamining the Politics of Talk: Partisan Rhetoric in the 104th House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26 (1): 101–21.
Norton, Noelle H. 1999. “Uncovering the Dimensionality of Gender Voting in Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 24 (1): 6586.
Osborn, Tracy, and Morehouse Mendez, Jeanette. 2010. “Speaking as Women: Women and Floor Speeches in the Senate.” Journal of Women, Politics, and Policy 31 (1): 121.
Palmer, Barbara, and Simon, Dennis. 2008. Breaking the Political Glass Ceiling: Women in Congressional Elections. 2nd ed.New York: Routledge.
Pearson, Kathryn, and Dancey, Logan. 2011. “Elevating Women s Voice in Congress: Speech Participation in the House of Representatives.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (4): 910–23.
Pennebaker, J. W., Booth, R. J., and Francis, M. E.. 2007. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC 2007. Austin, TX: LIWC. Available at
Pitkin, Hanna. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Poole, Keith T, and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
Reingold, Beth Ann. 2000. Representing Women: Gender Differences Among Arizona and California State Legislators. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Rocca, Michael S. 2007. “Nonlegislative Debate in the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Politics Research 35 (4): 489505.
Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Rosenthal, Cindy Simon, ed. 2002. Women Transforming Congress. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002. “Political Parties and the Recruitment of Women to State Legislatures.” Journal of Politics 64 (3): 791809.
Sapiro, Virginia. 1981. “When Are Interests Interesting? The Problem of Political Representation of Women.” American Political Science Review 75 (3): 701–16.
Shogan, Colleen. 2002. “Speaking Out: An Analysis of Democratic and Republican Woman-Invoked Rhetoric in the 105th Congress.” Women & Politics 23 (1): 129–46.
Swers, Michele L. 1998. “Are Women More Likely to Vote for Women's Issues Bills Than Their Male Colleagues?Legislative Studies Quarterly 23 (3): 435–48.
Swers, Michele L. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Theriault, Sean M. 2008. Party Polarization in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thomas, Sue. 1994. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.
Walsh, Katherine Cramer. 2002. “Enlarging Representation: Women Bringing Marginalized Perspectives to Floor Debate in the House of Representatives.” In Women Transforming Congress, ed. Simon Rosenthal, CindyNorman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Wolbrecht, Christina. 2000. The Politics of Women's Rights: Parties, Positions, and Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed