Skip to main content Accessibility help

Studying Gender in U.S. Politics: Where Do We Go from Here?

  • Richard L. Fox (a1)

The prominence and acceptance of gender as an important subject of inquiry in U.S. politics has been steadily growing in political science. Indeed, in the 1960s and 1970s, small sample sizes of women in politics and disdain from the disciplinary gatekeepers made the serious study of gender in U.S. politics difficult to pursue (Flammang 1997; Tolleson-Rinehart and Carroll 2006). The world is clearly different today, as gender politics courses are finding their way into undergraduate and graduate curricula throughout the United States. While the ascension of gender analysis of U.S. politics as a critical variable for study is not complete, the future is bright. Several recent volumes have addressed the current state of the subfield, and most notably, Susan J. Carroll's (2003) edited volume Women and American Politics: New Questions, New Directions focused on the very purpose of laying out a research agenda for those studying gender in U.S. politics (see also Krook and Childs 2010; Wolbrecht, Beckwith, and Baldez 2008). In this essay, I continue the discussion of where the gender and U.S. politics subfield is headed by providing a brief overview of the state of the field and by offering suggestions for future avenues of study, primarily in the area of candidate emergence.

Hide All
Berkman, Michael B., and O'Connor, Robert E.. 1993. “Do Women Legislators Matter?American Politics Quarterly 21 (1): 102–24.
Bledsoe, Timothy and Herring, Mary. 1990. “Victims of Circumstance: Women in Pursuit of Political Science.” American Political Science Review 84 (1): 213–23.
Bratton, Kathleen A. 2005. “Critical Mass Theory Revisited: The Behavior and Success of Token Women in State Legislatures.” Politics & Gender 1 (March):97125.
Burrell, Barbara. 1994. A Woman's Place Is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Carroll, Susan J. 1985. Women as Candidates in American Politics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Carroll, Susan J., ed. 2003. Women and American Politics: New Questions, New Directions. New York: Oxford University Press.
Darcy, Robert, Welch, Susan, and Clark, Janet. 1987. Women, Elections, and Representation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Enloe, Cynthia. 2004. The Curious Feminist. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Falk, Erika. 2008. Women for President: Media Bias in Eight Campaigns. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
Flammang, Janet. 1997. Women's Political Voice: How Women Are Transforming the Practice and Study of Politics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Fox, Richard L., and Schuhmann, Robert. 1999. “Gender and Local Government: A Comparison of Women and Men City Managers?Public Administration Review 59 (3): 231–42.
Frederick, Brian. 2009. “Are Female House Members Still More Liberal in a Polarized Era? The Conditional Nature of the Relationship Between Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” Congress & the Presidency 36 (2): 181202.
Freedman, Estelle. 2002. No Turning Back. New York: Ballantine Books.
Gerrity, Jessica C., Osborn, Tracy, and Mendez, Jeanette Morehouse. 2007. “Women and Representation: A Different View of the District?Politics & Gender 3 (June):179200.
Krook, Mona Lena, and Childs, Sarah, eds. 2010. Women, Gender, and Politics: A Reader. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard L.. 2005. It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard L.. 2010. It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Pearson, Kathryn. 2008. “The Primary Reason for Women's Under-Representation: Re-Evaluating the Conventional Wisdom.” Journal of Politics 70 (1): 6782.
Rosenthal, Cindy Simon. 1998. When Women Lead. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2006. Where Women Run: Gender and Party in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., and Corbetta, Renato. 2004. “Gender Turnover and Roll-Call Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (2): 215–29.
Seltzer, R. A., Newman, J., and Leighton, M. Voorhees. 1997. Sex as a Political Variable. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Swers, Michele L. 2002. The Difference Women Make. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Thomas, Sue. 1994. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.
Weikart, Lynne A., Chen, Greg, Williams, Daniel W., and Hromic, Haris. 2007. “The Democratic Sex: Gender Differences and the Exercise of Power.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 28 (1): 119–40.
Witt, Linda, Paget, Karen, and Matthews, Glenna. 1994. Running as a Woman. New York: Free Press.
Wolbrecht, Christina, Beckwith, Karen, and Baldez, Lisa, eds. 2008. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed