Skip to main content

Who Represents Women in Turkey? An Analysis of Gender Difference in Private Bill Sponsorship in the 2011–15 Turkish Parliament

  • Eda Bektas (a1) and Esra Issever-Ekinci (a2)

In this study, we examine substantive representation of women in the 2011–15 Turkish Parliament by focusing on sponsorship of private members’ bills by members of parliament (MPs) across eight major issue areas. The Turkish case offers new insights into women's representation, not only because this topic is unexplored in the Turkish context but also because it provides an opportunity to examine the tension between gender as a social identity and ideology as a political identity in a legislature characterized by disciplined political parties and low gender parity. Findings indicate that women MPs in Turkey substantively represent women by sponsoring more bills on women's rights and equality issues than their male colleagues, despite their low numbers in parliament and affiliation with highly disciplined parties. Party ideology also shapes women MPs’ issue priorities depending on the emphasis placed by the parties on different issue areas. Whereas left-wing women MPs sponsor more bills on women's rights and equality issues defined with a feminist accent, right-wing women MPs sponsor more bills on issues regarding children and family. Left-wing women also differ significantly from right-wing women in their sponsorship of bills on health and social affairs issues, as left-wing parties prioritize those issues more than right-wing parties.

Hide All

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments; Gülce Kale for her assistance in web scraping; and Selin Akyüz, Aaron Clarke, Emre Ekinci, Berk Esen, and Zeki Sarıgil for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Hide All
Aksoy, Hürcan A. 2015. “Invigorating Democracy in Turkey: The Agency of Organized Islamist Women.” Politics & Gender 11 (1): 146–70.
Aktaş, Murat. 2015. “Women's Political Representation in Turkish Political Life.” [in Turkish.] In Woman and Politics in a Global World [in Turkish], ed. Dalaman, Zeynep B.. İstanbul: İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi Türkiye Araştırmaları ve Uygulamaları Merkezi.
Altındal, Yonca. 2007. “Sociological Analysis of Women's Branches of Political Parties in terms of Women's Political Participation.” [in Turkish.] Ph.D. diss., Adnan Menderes University.
Arat, Yeşim. 1994. “Toward a Democratic Society: Women's Movement in Turkey in the 1980s.” Women's Studies International Forum 17 (2–3): 241–48.
Ayata, Ayşe G., and Tütüncü, Fatma. 2008a. “Critical Acts without a Critical Mass: The Substantive Representation of Women in the Turkish Parliament.” Parliamentary Affairs 61 (3): 461–75.
Ayata, Ayşe G., and Tütüncü, Fatma. 2008b. “Party Politics of the AKP (2002–2007) and the Predicaments of Women at the Intersection of the Westernist, Islamist, and Feminist Discourses in Turkey.” British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 35 (3): 363–84.
Ayata, Sencer, and Ayata, Ayşe G.. 2007. “The Center-Left Parties in Turkey.” Turkish Studies 8 (2): 211–32.
Bäck, Hanna, Debus, Marc, and Müller, Jochen. 2014. “Who Takes the Parliamentary Floor? The Role of Gender in Speech-Making in the Swedish Riksdag.” Political Research Quarterly 67 (3): 504–18.
Baum, Christopher F. 2008. “Modeling Proportions.” Stata Journal 8 (2): 299303.
Bird, Karen. 2005. “Gendering Parliamentary Questions.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 7 (3): 353–70.
Campbell, Rosie, Childs, Sarah, and Lovenduski, Joni. 2010. “Do Women Need Women Representatives?British Journal of Political Science 40 (1): 171–94.
Catalano, Ana. 2009. “Women Acting for Women? An Analysis of Gender and Debate Participation in the British House of Commons 2005–2007.” Politics & Gender 5 (1): 4568.
Celis, Karen. 2012. “On Substantive Representation, Diversity, and Responsiveness.” Politics & Gender 8 (4): 524–29.
Celis, Karen, and Mazur, Amy G.. 2012. “Introduction.” Politics & Gender 8 (4): 508–12.
Childs, Sarah, and Krook, Mona Lena. 2006. “Should Feminists Give Up on Critical Mass? A Contingent Yes.” Politics & Gender 2 (4): 522–30.
Childs, Sarah, Webb, Paul, and Marthaler, Sally. 2010. “Constituting and Substantively Representing Women: Applying New Approaches to a U.K. Case Study.” Politics & Gender 6 (2): 199223.
Döring, Holger, and Manow, Philip. 2016. “Parliaments and Governments Database (ParlGov): Information on Parties, Elections and Cabinets in Modern Democracies.” Development version. (accessed July 11, 2018).
Dorronsoro, Gilles, and Massicard, Élise. 2005. “Being a Member of Parliament in Contemporary Turkey.” European Journal of Turkish Studies 3. (accessed July 10, 2018).
Erdem-Akçay, Ebru. 2013. “Expanding Women's Rights versus Conserving the Traditional Family in the Civil Code Amendment Debates in Turkey.” Middle Eastern Studies 49 (1): 7691.
Grey, Sandra. 2006. “Numbers and Beyond: The Relevance of Critical Mass in Gender Research.” Politics & Gender 2 (4): 492502.
Güneş-Ayata, Ayşe and Doğangün, Gökten. 2017. “Gender Politics of the AKP: Restoration of a Religio-conservative Gender Climate.” Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 19 (6): 610–27.
Jacob, Suraj. 2014. “Gender and Legislative Performance in India.” Politics & Gender 10 (2): 236–64.
Kabasakal, Mehmet. 2014. “Factors Influencing Intra-Party Democracy and Membership Rights: The Case of Turkey.” Party Politics 20 (5): 700711.
Konda. 2011. “Research on Women's Representation in Politics.” March. (accessed July 10, 2018).
Leijenaar, Monique. 2004. Political Empowerment of Women: The Netherlands and Other Countries. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
Lovenduski, Joni, and Norris, Pippa. 1993. Gender and Party Politics. London: Sage.
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.
Musil, Pelin A. 2011. Authoritarian Party Structures and Democratic Political Setting in Turkey. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Pitkin, Hanna F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2006. “Still Supermadres? Gender and the Policy Priorities of Latin American Legislators.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 570–85.
Shields, Stephanie A. 2008. “Gender: An Intersectionality Perspective.” Sex Roles 59 (5–6): 301–11.
Swers, Michele. 2001. “Research on Women in Legislatures.” Women & Politics 23 (1–2): 167–85.
Swers, Michele. 2005. “Connecting Descriptive and Substantive Representation: An Analysis of Sex Differences in Cosponsorship Activity.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 30 (3): 407–33.
Tan, Mine, Ecevit, Yıldız, Üşür, Serpil Sancar, and Acuner, Selma. 2008. “Gender Inequality in Turkey: Challenges, Priorities and Suggestions.” [in Turkish.] (accessed July 11, 2018).
TurkStat. 2015. “Rankings and Index Values of Well-Being Index for Provinces.” (accessed June 22, 2017).
Volkens, Andrea, Lehmann, Pola, Matthieß, Theres, Merz, Nicolas, Regel, Sven, and Weßels, Bernhard. 2017. “The Manifesto Data Collection.” 2017b version. (accessed July 11, 2018).
Wängnerud, Lena. 2000. “Testing the Politics of Presence: Women's Representation in the Swedish Riksdag.” Scandinavian Political Studies 23 (1): 6791.
Weldon, S. Laurel. 2006. “The Structure of Intersectionality: A Comparative Politics of Gender.” Politics & Gender 2 (2): 235–48.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Bektas and Issever-Ekinci supplementary material
Appendices A-B

 Word (42 KB)
42 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed