Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-x64cq Total loading time: 0.448 Render date: 2022-05-20T23:16:42.199Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

The Domestic Politics of International Religious Defamation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2013

Peter S. Henne*
Affiliation:
Georgetown University
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Peter S. Henne, Georgetown University, Department of Government, 37th and O Street, Washington, DC 20057. E-mail: psh22@georgetown.edu

Abstract

From 2005 to 2010, the Organization for Islamic Cooperation attempted to ban the defamation of religion internationally through a series of United Nations resolutions. Although many opposed the resolutions for their potential effects on political rights, numerous non-Muslim states supported them. What explains the dynamic of this support, especially the resolutions' religious nature and significant non-Muslim backing? I argue that non-democratic states that restrict religion have an incentive to take action on contentious international issues — such as the religious defamation resolutions — to gain support from religious groups and justify their restrictive policies, even though Muslim religious defamation concerns and developing country solidarity also contributed to support. I demonstrate this through a mixed-method study, with a quantitative analysis of states' votes on the resolutions and case studies of Belarus and Pakistan. The article contributes to the study of religion and politics, as well as studies on the dynamics of United Nations voting.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

The Globe and Mail. 2006. “Action against Blasphemy Urged by EU, Islamic Group.” February 14.Google Scholar
Barry, Ellen. 2012. “Russian Church is a Strong Voice Opposing Intervention in Syria.” The New York Times, May 31, A14.Google Scholar
BosNewsLife News Agency. 2006. “Belarus Imprisons Prominent Activist for Illegal Religious Activity.” http://www.bosnewslife.com/1946-1946-belarus-imprisons-prominent-activist-for-ille (Accessed August 2, 2012).Google Scholar
BBC Monitoring Kiev Unit. 2009. “Belarusian TV Says Minor Opposition Party Based on ‘Sectarian Principles.”’ September 28.Google Scholar
Bellin, Eva. 2008. “Faith in Politics: New Trends in the Study of Religion and Politics.” World Politics 60:315347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boockmann, Bernhard, and Dreher, Axel. 2011. “Do Human Rights Offenders Oppose Human Rights Resolutions in the United Nations?” Public Choice 146:443467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boone, Jon. 2012. “Pakistan Blocks Twitter Amid Blasphemy Fears.” The Guardian, May 20.Google Scholar
Blum, Douglas W. 2006. “Beyond Blood and Belief: Culture and Foreign Policy Conduct.” In The Limits of Culture: Islam and Foreign Policy, ed., Shaffer, Brenda, 6583. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brambor, Thomas, Clark, William Roberts, and Golder, Matt. 2005. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses.” Political Analysis 13:120.Google Scholar
Brathwaite, Robert, and Bramsen, Andrew. 2011. “Reconceptualizing Church and State: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Separation of Religion and State on Democracy.” Politics and Religion 4:229263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busby, Joshua. 2007. “Bono Made Jesse Helms Cry.” International Studies Quarterly 51:247275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheibub, Jose Antonio, Gandhi, Jennifer, and Vreeland, James Raymond. 2009. “Democracy and Dictatorship revisited.” Public Choice 143:67101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, David, Brady, Henry E., and Seawright, Jason. 2004. “Source of Leverage in Causal Inference: Toward an Alternative View of Methodology.” In Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, ed., Brady, H. E., and Collier, D.. Berkeley, CA: Rowman & Littlefield and Berkeley Public Policy Press.Google Scholar
Danchin, Peter. 2008. “Suspect Symbols: Value Pluralism as a Theory of Religious Freedom in International Law.” Yale Journal of International Law 33:161.Google Scholar
Driessen, Michael D. 2010. “Religion, State, and Democracy: Analyzing Two Dimensions of Church-State Arrangements.” Politics and Religion 3:5580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dynok, Andrej. 2012. “Europe's Last Dictatorship.” The New York Times, July 16.Google Scholar
Edwards, Steven. 2008. “UN Anti-Blasphemy Measure May Prove Sinister, Observers Warn.” The Gazette, November 25.Google Scholar
Farr, Thomas. 2008. World of Faith and Freedom: Why International Religious Liberty Is Vital to American National Security. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52:887917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Jonathan. 2008. A World Survey of Religion and the State. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Jonathan, and Sandal, Nukhet. 2010. “State Religious Exclusivity and International Crises between 1990 and 2002.” In Religion, Identity and Global Governance: Theory, Evidence, and Practice, ed., James, Patrick. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathan, and Sandler, Shmuel. 2004. Bringing Religion into International Relations. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartzke, Erik. 1998. “Kant We All Just Get Along? Opportunity, Willingness and the Democratic Peace.” American Journal of Political Science 42:127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Alexander, and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gill, Anthony. 2008. The Political Origins of Religious Liberty. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goemans, H.E. 2000. War and Punishment: The Causes of War Termination and the First World War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grim, Brian J., and Finke, Roger. 2011. The Price of Freedom Denied: Religious Persecution and Conflict in the Twenty-First Century. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grim, Brian J., and Wike, Richard. 2010. “Cross-Validating Measures of Global Religious Intolerance: Comparing Coded State Department Reports with Survey Data and Expert Opinion.” Politics and Religion 3:102129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagan, Joe D. 1989. “Domestic Political Regime Changes and Third World Voting Realignments in the United Nations: 1946–1984.” International Organization 43:505541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haqqani, Hussein. 2005. Pakistan: Between Mosque and Military. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Hassner, Ron E. 2011. “Blasphemy and Violence.” International Studies Quarterly 55:2347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henne, Peter S. 2012. “The Two Swords: Religion-State Connections and Interstate Disputes.Journal of Peace Research 49:753768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, Arye L., and Potrafke, Niklas. 2011. “Voting without Ethical Restraint: Decoys and Dissonance in the United Nations.” Paper presented at The Political Economy of International Organizations conference, ETH and University Zurich.Google Scholar
Iida, Keisuke. 1988. “Third World Solidarity: The Group of 77 in the United Nations General Assembly.” International Organization 42:375395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Alaistair Iain. 2005. “Conclusions and Extensions: Toward Mid-Range Theorizing and Beyond Europe.” International Organization 59:10131044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, David D., and Myers, Steven Lee. 2012. “Libya Attack Brings Challenges for U.S.” The New York Times, September 12, A1.Google Scholar
Kim, Soo Yeon, and Russett, Bruce. 1996. “The New Politics of Voting Alignments in the United Nations General Assembly.” International Organization 50:629652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klapper, Bradley. 2012. “Arabs Seek Blasphemy Ban: US, Russia Spar on Syria.” Associated Press, September 27.Google Scholar
Kuru, Ahmet T. 2008. Secularism and State Policies Toward Religion: The United States, France and Turkey. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laitin, David. 2002. “Comparative Politics: The State of the Sub-discipline.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, ed., Katznelson, I., and Milner, H. V.. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Evan. 2005. “Nested analysis as a mixed-method strategy.” American Political Science Review 99:435452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Goertz, Gary. 2006. “A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research.” Political Analysis 14:227249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Paul. 2009. “Another Long March through the UN: The Islamic Conference's 20-Year Campaign against Free Speech.” The Weekly Standard, April 16.Google Scholar
Marshall, Paul, and Shea, Nina. 2011. Silenced: How Apostasy and Blasphemy Codes Are Choking Freedom Worldwide. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehta, Pratap Bhanu. 2008. “On the Possibility of Religious Pluralism.” In Religious Pluralism, Globalization and World Politics, ed., Banchoff, Thomas. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moon, Bruce E. 1985. “Consensus or Compliance? Foreign Policy Change and External Dependence.” International Organization 39:297329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasr, S.V.R. 2001. Islamic Leviathan: Islam and the Making of State Power. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nexon, Daniel H. 2009. The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe: Religious Conflict, Dynastic Empires and International Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlez, Jane. 2011. “Extremists Are Suspected in Killing of Pakistani Minister.” The New York Times, March 2.Google Scholar
Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. 2011a. The Future of the Global Muslim Population: Projections for 2010–2030. Washington, DC: Pew Foundation.Google Scholar
Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. 2011b. Rising Restrictions on Religion. Washington, DC: Pew Foundation.Google Scholar
Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. 2012. Rising Tide of Religious Restrictions. Washington, DC: Pew Foundation.Google Scholar
Philpott, Daniel. 2007. “Explaining the Political Ambivalence of Religion.” American Political Science Review 101:505525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philpott, Daniel. 2000. “The Religious Roots of Modern International Relations.” World Politics 52:206245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piscatori, James P. 1983. “Ideological Politics in Saudi Arabia.” In Islam in the Political Process, ed., Piscatori, James P.New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Potrafke, Niklas. 2009. “Does Government Ideology Influence Political Alignment with the U.S.? An Empirical Analysis of Voting in the UN General Assembly.” Review of International Organizations 4:245268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prud'homme, Jo-anne. 2010. Policing Belief: The Impact of Blasphemy Laws on Human Rights. Washington, DC: Freedom House.Google Scholar
Schriefer, Paula. 2009. “The new threat to freedom of expression.” Christian Science Monitor, March 30.Google Scholar
Schriefer, Paula. 2010. “The Wrong Way to Combat ‘Islamophobia.” International Herald Tribune, November 10.Google Scholar
Schwirtz, Michael. 2012. “Belarus Warns European Union over Withdrawal of Envoys.” The New York Times, February 29.Google Scholar
Shea, Nina. 2011. “An Anti-Blasphemy Measure Laid to Rest.” National Review Online, March 31.Google Scholar
Shah, Timothy Samuel. 2012. Religious Freedom: Why Now? Defending an Embattled Human Right. Princeton, NJ: The Witherspoon Institute.Google Scholar
Siddiqa, Ayesha. 2011. “Pakistan's Counter-terrorism Strategy: Separating Friends from Enemies.” The Washington Quarterly, Winter.Google Scholar
Smith, Christian. 1996. “Correcting a Curious Neglect, or Bringing Religion Back In.” In Disruptive Religion: The Force of Faith in Social-Movement Activism, ed., Smith, Christian. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tahir-Khelli, Shirin. 1983. “In Search of an Identity: Islam and Pakistan's Foreign Policy.” In Islam in Foreign Policy, ed., Dawisha, Adeed, 6883. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Toft, Monica, Philpott, Daniel, and Shah, Timothy Samuel. 2011. God's Century: Resurgent Religion and Global Politics. New York, NY: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly. 2012. “UN General Assembly Denounces Syria Crackdown.” Associated Press, August 3.Google Scholar
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom. 2010. “USCIRF Urges Continued Opposition to UN Anti-Blasphemy Resolution” Washington, DC: United States Commission on International Religious Freedom.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 2012. “International Religious Freedom Report.” Washington, DC: United States Department of State.Google Scholar
BBC Monitoring World Media. 2007. “USA: Press Freedom Suffered Continued Global Decline in 2006.” May 1.Google Scholar
Voeten, Erik. 2000. “Clashes in the Assembly.” International Organization 54:185215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voeten, Erik. 2005. “The Political Origins of the UN Security Council's Ability to Legitimize the Use of Force.” International Organization 59: 525557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voeten, Erik. 2004. “Resisting the Lonely Superpower: Responses of States in the United Nations to U.S. Dominance.” The Journal of Politics 66:729754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vreeland, James Raymond. 2008. “Political Institutions and Human Rights: Why Dictatorships Enter into the United Nations Convention against Torture.” International Organization 62:65101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wan, William. 2009. “Clinton Speaks against Anti-Defamation Laws.” The Washington Post, October 27.Google Scholar
Wang, T. Y. 1999. “US Foreign Aid and UN Voting: An Analysis of Important Issues.” International Studies Quarterly 43:199210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, Jessica. 2008. “Autocratic Audience Costs: Regime Type and Signaling Resolve.” International Organization 62:3564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witte, John Jr. 2008. “The Rights and Limits of Proselytism in the New Religious World Order.” In Religious Pluralism, Globalization and World Politics, ed., Banchoff, Thomas. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 105125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zurn, Michael, and Checkel, Jeffrey T.. 2005. “Getting Socialized to Build Bridges: Constructivism and Rationalism, Europe and the Nation-State.” International Organization 59:10451079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Domestic Politics of International Religious Defamation
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Domestic Politics of International Religious Defamation
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Domestic Politics of International Religious Defamation
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *