Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-vkn6t Total loading time: 0.497 Render date: 2022-08-15T13:06:20.910Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Dropping the Curtain: The Religious-Secular Party Cleavage in German Morality Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2018

Eva-Maria Euchner*
Affiliation:
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Caroline Preidel
Affiliation:
Coliquio, Germany
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Eva-Maria Euchner, Geschwister-Scholl-Institut für Politikwissenschaften, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Oettingenstr. 67, DE-80538 Munich, Germany. E-mail: eva-maria.euchner@gsi.lmu.de.

Abstract

This study examines the religious-secular party cleavage in German morality politics from a new perspective by tracing politicization patterns at the individual level. It builds on the idea of issue competition and explores whether conflicts between Christian Democrats and secular parties align with the traditional denominational divide between Catholics and non-Catholics or with religiosity. By means of logistic regressions of Member of Parliaments’ politicization behavior in the German Bundestag (1998–2002) with regard to three morality policies, the study provides evidence that German politics is still structured by a conflict between Catholics and non-Catholics, whereas the influence of religiosity is secondary. If party competition is at work, non-Catholics draw attention to morality policies, while Catholics refrain from doing so. This finding contradicts research pointing to a decreasing significance of Catholicism for Christian Democracy. Moreover, the study proposes an innovative way to re-examine party cleavages at the individual level and in between elections.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article is part of the research project MORAPOL (Comparative Analysis of Moral Policy Change), funded by the European Research Council Advanced Grant (Grant No. 249388) and led by Professor Christoph Knill (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München). We are very grateful for the comments from our colleagues of the MORAPOL project, Marc Debus (University of Mannheim), Christoffer Green-Pedersen (University of Aarhus), Petra Meier (University of Antwerp), and Mieke Verloo (Radboud University).

References

Asal, Victor, Sommer, Udi, and Harwood, Paul G.. 2013. “Original Sin.” Comparative Political Studies 46:320351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bale, Tim, and Krouwel, André. 2013. “Down but Not Out: A Comparison of Germany's CDU/CSU with Christian Democratic Parties in Austria, Belgium, Italy and the Netherlands.” German Politics 22:1645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumann, Markus, Debus, Marc, and Müller, Jochen. 2013. “Das legislative Verhalten von Bundestagsabgeordneten zwischen persönlichen Charakteristika, Wahlkreisinteressen und Parteilinie: Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel der Auseinandersetzung um die Präimplantationsdiagnostik (The Legislative Behavior of German Members of Parliament as Question of Personal Traits, Interests of the Constituency or Party Preferences: an Exemplary Examination of the Regulation of Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis).” Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 23:177211.Google Scholar
Van Der Brug, Wouter, Hobolt, Sara B., and de Vreese, Claes H.. 2009. “Religion and Party Choice in Europe.” West European Politics 32:12661283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budge, Ian, and Farlie, Dennis. 1983. “Party Competition — Selective Emphasis or Direct Confrontation? An Alternative View with Data.” In Western European Party Systems: Continuity & Change, eds. Daalder, Hans, and Mair, Peter. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 276305.Google Scholar
Carey, John M. 2009. “Legislative Voting and Accountability.” In Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clemens, Clay. 2009. “Modernisation or Disorientation?: Policy Change in Merkel's CDU.” German Politics 18:121139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, James S. 2000. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Debus, Marc, and Müller, Jochen. 2013. “The Programmatic Development of CDU and CSU since Reunification: Incentives and Constraints for Changing Policy Positions in the German Multi-Level System.” German Politics 22:151171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elff, Martin. 2013. “Social Divisions and Political Choices in Germany, 1980–2006.” In Political Choice Matters: Explaining the Strength of Class and Religious Cleavages in Cross-National Perspective, eds. Evans, Geoffrey, and De Graaf, Nan Dirk. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 277308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeli, Isabelle, Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, and Larsen, Lars T., eds. 2012. Morality Politics in Western Europe: Parties, Agendas and Policy Choices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Euchner, Eva-Maria. 2015a. “Politics of Dilemma: Coalition Considerations and Political Conflicts on Morality Policies in Germany and Spain.” Ph.D. Diss. Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
Euchner, Eva-Maria. 2015b. “Prostitutionsregulierung: Politische Einigung zulasten der Implementation (Prostitution Policy: Political Agreement at the Expense of Policy Implementation).” In Moralpolitik in Deutschland (Morality Policy-Making in Germany), eds. Knill, Christoph, Heichel, Stephan, Preidel, Caroline, and Nebel, Kerstin. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag, 107–26.Google Scholar
Euchner, Eva-Maria, and Knill, Christoph. 2015. “Sin, Unavoidable Evil or Recognized Profession? Prostitution Regulation Between Authority and Permissiveness.” In On the Road to Permissiveness? Change and Convergence of Moral Regulation in Europe, eds. Knill, Christoph, Adam, Christian, and Hurka, Steffen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 129157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Geoffrey, ed. 1999. The End of Class Politics. Class Voting in Comparative Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, S. 2008. “Politics as Usual or Bringing Religion Back In?: The Influence of Parties, Institutions, Economic Interests, and Religion on Embryo Research Laws.” Comparative Political Studies 41:1631–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, Simon. 2007. “Ein deutscher Sonderweg?: Die deutsche Embryonenforschungspolitik im Link international vergleichender Daten (A German Sonderweg? The German Policy on Embryo Research in Comparative Perspective).” Leviathan 35:107128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Jonathan. 2015. Political Secularism, Religion, and the State: A Time Series Analysis of Worldwide Data. Cambridge Studies in Social Theory, Religion and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heichel, Stephan, Knill, Christoph, and Schmitt, Sophie. 2013. “Public Policy Meets Morality: Conceptual and Theoretical Challenges in the Analysis of Morality Policy Change.” Journal of European Public Policy 20:318334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis N., and Van Kersbergen, Kees. 2010. “Christian Democracy.” Annual Review of Political Science 13:183209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kam, Christopher J. 2011. Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Markus. 2006. “Partizipation in politischen Parteien. Eine empirische Analyse des Mobilisierungspotenzials politischer Parteien sowie der Struktur innerparteilicher Partizipation in Deutschland (Participation in Political Parties. An Empirical Analysis of the Potential for Mobilization of Political Parties and the Structure of Participation within Parties in Germany).” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 47:3561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knill, Christoph, Heichel, Stephan, Preidel, Caroline, and Nebel, Kerstin, eds. 2015. Moralpolitik in Deutschland (Morality Policy-Making in Germany). Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.Google Scholar
Knill, Christoph, Preidel, Caroline, and Nebel, Kerstin. 2014. “Brake Rather than Barrier: The Impact of the Catholic Church on Morality Policies in Western Europe.” West European Politics 37:374390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knutsen, Oddbjørn. 2004. “Religious Denomination and Party Choice in Western Europe: A Comparative Longitudinal Study from Eight Countries, 1970–97.” International Political Science Review 25:97128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohut, Andrew. 2000. The Diminishing Divide: Religion's Changing Role in American Politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Kollman, Kelly. 2013. The Same-Sex Unions Revolution in Western Democracies: International Norms and Domestic Policy Change. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 1998. “The Transformation of Cleavage Politics: The 1997 Stein Rokkan Lecture.” European Journal of Political Research 33:165185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2010. “Restructuration of Partisan Politics and the Emergence of a New Cleavage Based on Values.” West European Politics 33:673685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laux, Annika. 2011. “Was motiviert Parteimitglieder zum Beitritt? (Which Motives Drive Party Membership?)” In Parteimitglieder in Deutschland. (Party Membership in Germany), eds. Spier, Tim, Klein, Markus, Alemann, Ulrich v., Hoffmann, Hanna, Laux, Annika, Nonnenmacher, Alexandra, and Rohrbach, Katharina. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 6178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey C., and Weaver, Christopher L.. 2016. “Religion and Secularism among American Party Activists.” Politics and Religion 9:271295.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M., and Rokkan, Stein, eds. 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., ed. 1994. The Politics of Sin: Drugs, Alcohol, and Public Policy. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Mooney, Christopher Z. 2001. “The Public Clash of Private Values.” In Public Clash of Private Values: The Politics of Morality Policy., ed. Mooney, Christopher. New York, NY: Chatham House, 318.Google Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang, and Strøm, Kaare, eds. 1999. Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nebel, Kerstin. 2015. “Embryonale Stammzellforschungspolitik (Regulation of Embryonic Stem Cell Research).” In Moralpolitik in Deutschland (Morality Policy-Making in Germany), eds. Knill, Christoph, Heichel, Stephan, Preidel, Caroline, and Nebel, Kerstin. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag, 89107.Google Scholar
Preidel, Caroline. 2015. “Das zögerliche Jawort zur Homoehe (The ‘hesitant Yes’ to Same-Sex Marriage).” In Moralpolitik in Deutschland (Morality Policy-Making in Germany), eds. Knill, Christoph, Heichel, Stephan, Preidel, Caroline, and Nebel, Kerstin. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag, 147–65.Google Scholar
Preidel, Caroline. 2016. “Zwischen Lebensschutz und Ökonomie: Parlamentarische Abstimmungen über den Embryonenschutz im Deutschen Bundestag (Protection of Life versus Economy: Legislative Voting on Embryonic Stem Cell Protection in the German Bundestag).” Ph.D. Diss. Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
Rapp, Carolin, Traunmüller, Richard, Freitag, Markus, and Vatter, Adrian. 2014. “Moral Politics: The Religious Factor in Referenda Voting.” Politics and Religion 7:418443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothmayr, Christine, and Ramjoué, Celina. 2004. “Germany: ART Policies as Embryo Protection.” In Comparative Biomedical Policy: Governing Assisted Reproductive Technologies, eds. Bleiklie, Ivar, Malcolm, L. Goggin, and Christine Rothmayr Allison. London: Routledge, 174190.Google Scholar
Timmermans, Arco, and Breeman, Gerard. 2012. “Morality Issues in the Netherlands: Coalition Politics under Pressure.” In Morality Politics in Western Europe: Parties, Agendas and Policy Choices, eds. Engeli, Isabelle, Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, and Lars, T. Larsen. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 3561.Google Scholar
Van Kersbergen, Kees. 2008. “The Christian Democratic Phoenix and Modern Unsecular Politics.” Party Politics 14:259279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteley, Paul F., Seyd, Patrick, Richardson, Jeremy, and Bissell, Paul. 1994. “Explaining Party Activism: The Case of the British Conservative Party.” British Journal of Political Science 24:79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willems, Ulrich. 2007. “Kirchen.” In Interessenverbände in Deutschland, eds. Winter, Thomas, and Willems, Ulrich. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 316340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Euchner and Preidel supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Euchner and Preidel supplementary material(File)
File 88 KB
6
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Dropping the Curtain: The Religious-Secular Party Cleavage in German Morality Politics
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Dropping the Curtain: The Religious-Secular Party Cleavage in German Morality Politics
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Dropping the Curtain: The Religious-Secular Party Cleavage in German Morality Politics
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *