Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-s82fj Total loading time: 0.475 Render date: 2022-09-30T06:52:27.386Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Measuring Evangelicals: Practical Considerations for Social Scientists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2018

Ryan P. Burge
Affiliation:
Eastern Illinois University
Andrew R. Lewis*
Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Andrew R. Lewis, Department of Political Science, University of Cincinnati, USA. E-mail: Andrew.Lewis@uc.edu

Abstract

Evangelicals garner much attention in polling and public opinion research, yet measuring white evangelicals remains elusive, even opaque. This paper provides practical guidance to researchers who want to measure or analyze evangelicals. In the social sciences, many have adopted a detailed religious affiliation approach that categorizes evangelicals based on the religious tradition of the denominations to which they belong. Others have used a simpler self-identification scheme, which asks respondents if they consider themselves “born-again or evangelical”. While the affiliation and self-identification schemes are predominant, a practical examination of these approaches has been absent. Using several waves of the General Social Survey and the Cooperative Congressional Election Study, we compare them. We find almost no statistical differences between the two measurements in prominent demographic, political, or religious factors. Thus, we suggest that for most a simple question about broad religious affiliation followed by a born-again or evangelical self-identification question will suffice.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alwin, Duane F., Felson, Jacob L., Walker, Edward T., and Tufis, Paula. 2006. “Measuring Religious Identities in Surveys.” International Journal of Public Opinion Quarterly 70(4):530564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Sarah Pulliam. 2016. “White Evangelicals Voted Overwhelmingly for Donald Trump, Exit Polls Show.” Washington Post. November 6, 2016, sec. Acts of Faith. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2016/11/09/exit-polls-show-white-evangelicals-voted-overwhelmingly-for-donald-trump/?utm_term=.5502298b9887.Google Scholar
Bebbington, David W. 1988. Evangelicalism in Modern Britain: A History From the 1730s to the 1980s. Revised ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burge, Ryan P. 2017. “The 2016 Religious Vote (for More Groups than You Thought Possible).” Religion in Public (blog). March 10, 2017. https://religioninpublic.blog/2017/03/10/the-2016-religious-vote-for-more-groups-than-you-thought-possible/.Google Scholar
Dougherty, Kevin D., Johnson, Byron R., and Polson, Edward C.. 2007. “Recovering the Lost: Remeasuring U.S. Religious Affiliation.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 46(4):483499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskridge, Larry. 2006. “Defining Evangelicalism.” http://www2.wheaton.edu/isae/defining_evangelicalism.html.Google Scholar
Evans, John H. 2002. “Polarization in Abortion Attitudes in U.S. Religious Traditions, 1972–1998.” Sociological Forum 17:397422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frendreis, John, and Raymond, Tatalovich. 2011. “Validating Protestant Denominational Classifications Using the Chaves Inerrancy Scale.” Politics and Religion 4(2):355365. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048311000150.Google Scholar
Green, John C., Guth, James L., Smidt, Corwin E., and Kellstedt, Lyman E.. 1996. Religion and the Culture Wars: Dispatches from the Front. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Hackett, Conrad, and Lindsay, D. Michael. 2008. “Measuring Evangelicalism: Consequences of Different Operationalization Strategies.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 47(3):499514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, James Davison. 1981. “Operationalizing Evangelicalism: A Review, Critique & Proposal.” Sociology of Religion 42(4):363372. https://doi.org/10.2307/3711547.Google Scholar
Jelen, Ted G., and Wilcox, Clyde. 2003. “Causes and Consequences of Public Attitudes Toward Abortion: A Review and Research Agenda.” Political Research Quarterly 56(4):489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellstedt, Lyman, and Smidt, Corwin. 1991. “Measuring Fundamentalism: An Analysis of Different Operational Strategies.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 30(3):259278. https://doi.org/10.2307/1386972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Andrew R., and De Bernardo, Dana Huyser. 2010. “Belonging Without Belonging: Utilizing Evangelical Self-Identification to Analyze Political Attitudes and Preferences.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 49(1):112126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01495.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipka, Michael. 2016. “U.S. Religious Groups and Their Political Leanings.” Pew Research Center (blog). February 23, 2016. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/02/23/u-s-religious-groups-and-their-political-leanings/.Google Scholar
Markoe, Lauren. 2016. “White Evangelicals, Catholics and Mormons Carried Trump.” Religion News Service. November 9, 2016. http://religionnews.com/2016/11/09/white-evangelicals-white-catholics-and-mormons-voted-decisively-for-trump/.Google Scholar
Marsden, George. 1990. Understanding Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism. Grand Rapids, Mich: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Mattingly, Terry. 2013. “Defining Evangelical, or Not, in 2013.” Uexpress. January 11, 2013. http://www.uexpress.com/on-religion/2013/1/11/defining-evangelical-or-not-in-2013.Google Scholar
Noll, Mark A. 2010. The Rise of Evangelicalism: The Age of Edwards, Whitefield and the Wesleys. Downer's Grove, IL: IVP Academic.Google Scholar
Schmalzbauer, John. 2002. People of Faith: Religious Conviction in American Journalism and Higher Education. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Shellnutt, Kate. 2016. “Trump Elected President, Thanks to 4 in 5 White Evangelicals.” Gleanings|ChristianityToday.Com. November 9, 2016. http://www.christianitytoday.com/gleanings/2016/november/trump-elected-president-thanks-to-4-in-5-white-evangelicals.html.Google Scholar
Smidt, Corwin. 1988. “Evangelicals within Contemporary American Politics: Differentiating between Fundamentalist and Non-Fundamentalist Evangelicals.” Western Political Quarterly 41(3):601620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smietana, Bob. 2015. “What Is an Evangelical? Four Questions Offer New Definition.” Gleanings|ChristianityToday.Com. November 19, 2015. http://www.christianitytoday.com/gleanings/2015/november/what-is-evangelical-new-definition-nae-lifeway-research.html.Google Scholar
Smith, Christian S. 1998. American Evangelicalism: Embattled and Thriving. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Gregory A., and Martinez, Jessica. 2016. “How the Faithful Voted: A Preliminary 2016 Analysis.” Pew Research Center (blog). November 9, 2016. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/09/how-the-faithful-voted-a-preliminary-2016-analysis/.Google Scholar
Smith, Tom W. 1990. “Classifying Protestant Denominations.” Review of Religious Research 31(3):225245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steensland, Brian, , Park, Jerry Z., Regnerus, Mark D., Robinson, Lynn D., Wilcox, W. Bradford, and Woodberry, Robert D.. 2000. “Measure of American Religion: Toward Improving the State of the Art, The.” Social Forces 79:291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stetzer, Ed, and Burge, Ryan P.. 2016. “Reltrad Coding Problems and A New Repository.” Politics and Religion 9(1):187190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048315000929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stouffer, Samuel A. 1955. Communism, Conformity, and Civil Liberties: A Cross-Section of the Nation Speaks Its Mind. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Vavreck, Lynn, and Rivers, Douglas. 2008. “The 2006 Cooperative Congressional Election Study.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 18(4):355366. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457280802305177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wald, Kenneth D., and Calhoun-Brown, Allison. 2006. Religion and Politics in the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Whalin, W. Terry. 2014. Billy Graham: A Biography of America's Greatest Evangelist. Garden City, NY: Morgan James Faith.Google Scholar
“What Is an Evangelical?” n.d. National Association of Evangelicals. Accessed March 14, 2017. https://www.nae.net/what-is-an-evangelical/.Google Scholar
Woodberry, Robert D., Park, Jerry Z., Kellstedt, Lyman A., Regnerus, Mark D., and Steensland, Brian. 2012. “The Measure of American Religious Traditions: Theoretical and Measurement Considerations.” Social Forces 91(1):6573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Burge and Lewis supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Burge and Lewis supplementary material(File)
File 353 KB
17
Cited by

Linked content

Please note a has been issued for this article.

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Measuring Evangelicals: Practical Considerations for Social Scientists
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Measuring Evangelicals: Practical Considerations for Social Scientists
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Measuring Evangelicals: Practical Considerations for Social Scientists
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *