Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Political Mobilization in American Congregations: A Religious Economies Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2018

Paul A. Djupe
Affiliation:
Denison University
Jacob R. Neiheisel
Affiliation:
University at Buffalo
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

It has become an article of faith that congregations in America play an important role in the political mobilization of the faithful, but the reasons why congregations themselves provide political opportunities are not well understood. We unite various strands of work about congregational political engagement under the canopy of the religious economies model. Using the 2001 U.S. Congregational Life Study and 1998 National Congregations Study datasets, we show that market forces shape churches’ provision of political goods, suggesting that the congregational embrace of political activities should be understood not as a politically strategic exercise, but as another way to reach out to new members and retain current ones.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Baldassarri, Delia, and Diani, Mario. 2007. “The Integrative Power of Civic Networks.” American Journal of Sociology 113:735780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellin, Eva R. 2008. “Faith in Politics: New Trends in the Study of Religion and Politics.” World Politics 60(1):315347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyerlein, Kraig, and Chaves, Mark. 2003. “The Political Activities of Religious Congregations in the United States.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 42(2):229246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyerlein, Kraig, and Hipp, John. 2006. “From Pews to Participation: The Effect of Congregational Activity and Context on Bridging Civil Engagement.” Social Problems 53(1):97117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Pazit Ben-Nun, and Arikan, Gizem. 2012. “Priming Religious Belief and Religious Social Behavior Affects Support for Democracy.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 25(3):368382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breault, Kevin. 1989. “New Evidence on Religious Pluralism, Urbanism, and Religious Participation.” American Sociological Review 54(6):10481053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Stephanie M., Jozefowicz, James J., and Stonebraker, Robert J.. 2006. “Religious Free Riders: The Impact of Market Share.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 45(3):389396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calfano, Brian R. 2009. “Choosing Constituent Cues: Reference Group Influence on Clergy Political Speech.” Social Science Quarterly 90(1):88102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun-Brown, Allison. 1996. “African-American Churches and Political Mobilization: The Psychological Impact of Organizational Resources.” Journal of Politics 58:935953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun-Brown, Allison. 2010. “This Far by Faith: Religion, Gender, and Efficacy.” In Religion and Democracy in the United States: Danger or Opportunity, eds. Wolfe, Alan and Katznelson, Ira. New York: Russell Sage, 279307.Google Scholar
Campbell, David E. 2004. “Acts of Faith: Churches and Political Engagement.” Political Behavior 26(2):155180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Ernest Q., and Pettigrew, Thomas F.. 1959. Christians in Racial Crisis: A Study of Littlerock's Ministry. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.Google Scholar
Chaves, Mark. 2004. Congregations in America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chaves, Mark, and Anderson, Shawna. 2008. National Congregations Study. Cumulative data file and codebook. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University, Department of Sociology.Google Scholar
Chaves, Mark, Ellen Konieczny, Mary, Beyerlein, Kraig, and Barman, Emily. 1999. “The National Congregations Study: Background, Methods, and Selected Results.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 38(4):458476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaves, Mark, Geisel, Helen M., and Tsitsos, William. 2002. “Religious Variation in Public Presence: Evidence From the National Congregations Study.” In The Quiet Hand of God, eds. Wuthnow, Robert and Evans, John H.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 108128.Google Scholar
Chaves, Mark, and Gorski, Philip S.. 2001. “Religious Pluralism and Religious Participation.” Annual Review of Sociology 27:261281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dallas, Kelsey. 2014. “Churches Proceed Carefully when Encouraging Members to Get Politically Involved.” Deseret News, 28 October.Google Scholar
Djupe, Paul A., Burge, Ryan P., and Calfano, Brian R.. 2016. “The Delegational Pulpit? Clergy Identifying as Congregational Political Representatives.” Representation 52(1):4369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djupe, Paul A., and Calfano, Brian R.. 2012. “The Deliberative Pulpit: The Democratic Norms and Practices of the PCUSA.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 51(1):90109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djupe, Paul A., and Calfano, Brian R.. 2013. God Talk: Experimenting with the Religious Causes of Public Opinion. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Djupe, Paul A., and Gilbert, Christopher P.. 2003. The Prophetic Pulpit: Clergy, Churches, and Communities in American Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Djupe, Paul A., and Gilbert, Christopher P.. 2008. “Politics and Church: Byproduct or Central Mission?Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 47(1):4562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djupe, Paul A., and Gilbert, Christopher P.. 2009. The Political Influence of Churches. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Djupe, Paul A., Neiheisel, Jacob R., and Sokhey, Anand E.. 2018. “Reconsidering the Role of Politics in Leaving Religion—The Importance of Affiliation.” American Journal of Political Science 62(1):161175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finke, Roger, and Scheitle, Christopher P.. 2013. “Sources of Religious Pluralism: Revisiting the Relationship Between Pluralism and Participation.” In Religions as Brands: The Marketization of Religion and Spirituality, eds. Stolz, Jörg and Usunier, Jean-Claude. New York: Oxford University Press, 177190.Google Scholar
Fernandez, Roberto M., and McAdam, Doug. 1988. “Social Networks and Social Movements: Multiorganizational Fields and Recruitment to Mississippi Freedom Summer.” Sociological Forum 3(3):257282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finke, Roger, and Stark, Rodney. 1988. “Religious Economies and Sacred Canopies: Religious Mobilization in American Cities, 1906.” American Sociological Review 53:4149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finke, Roger, and Stark, Rodney. 1989. “How the Upstart Sects Won America: 1776–1850.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 28(1):2744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finke, Roger, and Stark, Rodney. 2005. The Churching of America 1776–2005: Winners and Losers in Our Religious Economy. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathan, and Tabory, Ephraim. 2008. “Contemporary Evidence Regarding the Impact of State Regulation of Religion on Religious Participation and Belief.” Sociology of Religion 69(3):245271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedland, Michael B. 1998. Lift up Your Voice Like a Trumpet: White Clergy and the Civil Rights and Antiwar Movements, 1954–1973. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., Gruber, Jonathan, and Hungerman, Daniel M.. 2016. “Does Church Attendance Cause People to Vote? Using Blue Laws’ Repeal to Estimate the Effect of Religiosity on Voter Turnout.” British Journal of Political Science 46(3):481500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, John, Hoffman, Michael, and Zarecki, Dominic. 2018. “The Diverse Effects of Diversity on Democracy.” British Journal of Political Science 48(2):283314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Christopher P. 1993. The Impact of Churches on Political Behavior. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Gill, Anthony. 1998. Rendering Unto Caesar: The Catholic Church and the State in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gill, Anthony. 2001. “Religion and Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 4:117138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glock, Charles Y., and Stark, Rodney. 1965. Religion and Society in Tension. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Gray, Virginia, and Lowery, David. 1996. “A Niche Theory of Interest Representation.” The Journal of Politics 58(1):91111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guth, James L. 1996. “The Bully Pulpit: Southern Baptist Clergy and Political Activism 1980–1992.” In Religion and the Culture Wars: Dispatches From the Front, eds. Green, John C., Guth, James L., Smidt, Corwin E. and Kellstedt, Lyman A.. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 146173.Google Scholar
Guth, James L., Green, John C., Smidt, Corwin E., Kellstedt, Lyman A., and Poloma, Margaret. 1997. The Bully Pulpit: The Politics of Protestant Clergy. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Guttmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge: Belknap.Google Scholar
Hadden, Jeffrey K. 1969. The Gathering Storm in the Churches. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Hannan, Michael T., and Carroll, Glenn R.. 1992. Dynamics of Organizational Populations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Fredrick C. 1999. Something Within: Religion in African-American Political Activism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hatch, Nathan O. 1989. The Democratization of American Christianity. New Haven: Yale UP.Google Scholar
Hill, Jonathan P., and Olson, Daniel V.A.. 2009. “Market Share and Religious Competition: Do Small Market Share Congregations and Their Leaders Try Harder?Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 48(4):629649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hougland, James, and Christenson, James. 1983. “Religion & Politics: The Relationship of Religious Participation to Political Efficacy and Involvement.” Sociology & Social Research 67:405420.Google Scholar
Iannaconne, Laurence R. 1988. “A Formal Model of Church and Sect.” American Journal of Sociology 94(Supplement):S241-S268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iannaconne, Laurence R. 1992. “Religious Markets and the Economics of Religion.” Social Compass 39(1):121131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iannaconne, Laurence R. 1994. “Why Strict Churches Are Strong.” American Journal of Sociology 99(5):11801211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jelen, Ted G., and Wilcox, Clyde. 1998. “Context and Conscience: The Catholic Church as an Agent of Political Socialization in Western Europe.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 37(1):2840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Benton. 1963. “On Church and Sect.” American Sociological Review 28:539549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones-Correa, Michael A., and Leal, David L.. 2001. “Political Participation: Does Religion Matter?Political Research Quarterly 54(4):751770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Dean M. 1972. Why Conservative Churches Are Growing. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Kitts, James A. 1999. “Not in our Backyard: Solidarity, Social Networks, and the Ecology of Environmental Mobilization.” Sociological Inquiry 69:551574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leege, David C. 1988. “Catholics and the Civic Order: Parish Participation, Politics, and Civic Participation.” The Review of Politics 50(4):704737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, C. Eric, and Mamiya, Lawrence H.. 1990. The Black Church in the African American Experience. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masket, Seth E. 2009. “Did Obama's Ground Game Matter? The Influence of Local Field Offices During the 2008 Presidential Election.” Public Opinion Quarterly 73(5):10231039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCleary, Rachel M., and Barro, Robert J.. 2006. “Religion and Political Economy in an International Panel.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 45(2):149175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, Eric L. 2008. Politics in the Pews: The Political Mobilization of Black Churches. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, J. Miller. 1982. “Hyper-network Sampling: Duality and Differentiation Among Voluntary Associations.” Social Networks 3:225249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McRoberts, Omar M. 2003. Streets of Glory: Church and Community in a Black Urban Neighborhood. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Morris, Aldon D. 1984. The Origins of the Civil Rights Movement: Black Communities Organizing for Change. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Hart M., and Kanagy, Conrad L.. 1993. “Churched and Unchurched Black Americans.” In Church and Denominational Growth: What Does (and Does Not) Cause Growth or Decline, eds. Roozen, David A. and Kirk Hadaway, C.. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 311323.Google Scholar
Nelson, Hart M., and Nelson, Anne Kusener. 1975. Black Church in the Sixties. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, H. Richard. 1951. Christ and Culture. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa, and Inglehart, Ronald. 2004. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Mancur Jr. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Daniel V.A. 1998. “Religious Pluralism in Contemporary U.S. Counties.” American Sociological Review 63:759761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Laura R. 2000. Filled with Spirit and Power: Protestant Clergy in Politics. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Laura R., Djupe, Paul A., and Cadge, Wendy. 2011. “Mainline Protestantism and Deliberation About Homosexuality.” In Faith, Politics, and Sexual Diversity in Canada and the United States, eds. Rayside, David and Wilcox, Clyde. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Owens, Michael L. 2007. God and Government in the Ghetto: The Politics of Church-State Collaboration in Black America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payton, Mark E., Greenstone, Matthew H., and Schenker, Nathaniel. 2003. “Overlapping Confidence Intervals or Standard Errors: What Do They Mean in Terms of Statistical Significance?Journal of Insect Science 3:34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perl, Paul, and Daniel, V.A. Olson. 2000. “Religious Market Share and Intensity of Church Involvement in Five Denominations.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 39(1):1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Steven A. 1992. “Church Participation and Political Participation: The Spillover Effect.” American Politics Quarterly 20(1):123139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philpott, Daniel. 2007. “Explaining the Political Ambivalence of Religion.” American Political Science Review 101(3):505525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, Liston. 1942. Millhands and Preachers: A Study of Gastonia. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Price, Vincent, Cappella, Joseph N., and Nir, Lilach. 2002. “Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion?Political Communication 19:95112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert, and Campbell, David. 2010. American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Quinley, Harold. 1974. The Prophetic Clergy: Social Activism among Protestant Ministers. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J., and Hansen, John Mark. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, Lawrence. 1988. “Organizational Maintenance and the Retention Decision in Groups.” American Political Science Review 82:11291152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwadel, Philip. 2005. “Individual, Congregational, and Denominational Effects on Church Members’ Civic Participation.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 44(2):159171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwadel, Philip, and Dougherty, Kevin D.. 2010. “Assessing Key Informant Methodology in Congregational Research.” Review of Religious Research 51(4):366379.Google Scholar
Sherkat, Darren E. 2014. Changing Faith: The Dynamics and Consequences of Americans’ Shifting Religious Identities. New York: NYU Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherkat, Darren E., and Wilson, John. 1995. “Preferences, Constraints, and Choices in Religious Markets: An Examination of Religious Switching and Apostasy.” Social Forces 73(3):9931026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Amy Erica. 2016. “When Clergy are Threatened: Catholic and Protestant Leaders and Political Activism in Brazil.” Politics and Religion 9(3):431455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Rodney. 1998. “Catholic Contexts: Competition, Commitment, and Innovation.” Review of Religious Research 39(2):197208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Rodney, and Finke, Roger. 2000. Acts of Faith: Explaining the Human Side of Religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Stark, Rodney, and McCann, James C.. 1993. “Market Forces and Catholic Commitment: Exploring the New Paradigm.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 32(2):111124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stedman, Murray S. Jr. 1964. Religion and Politics in America. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar
Tate, Katherine. 1991. “Black Political Participation in the 1984 and 1988 Presidential Elections.” American Political Science Review 85(4):11591176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thumma, Scott. 2001. “Megachurches Today 2000.” http://hirr.hartsem.edu/org/faith_megachurches_FACTsummary.html.(Accessed on December 22, 2012).Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis De. 1994 [1840]. Democracy in America. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Toft, Monica Duffy, Philpott, Daniel, and Shah, Timothy S.. 2011. God's Century: Resurgent Religion and Global Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Trejo, Guillermo. 2009. “Religious Competition and Ethnic Mobilization in Latin America: Why the Catholic Church Promotes Indigenous Movements in Mexico.” American Political Science Review 103(3):323342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troeltsch., Ernst. 1931. The Social Teaching of the Christian Churches. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Trueheart, Charles. 1996. “Welcome to the Next Church.” The Atlantic Monthly 278(2): 3758.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Lehman Schlozman, Kay, and Brady, Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Voas, David, Crockett, Alasdair, and Olson, Daniel V.A.. 2002. “Religious Pluralism and Participation: Why Previous Research is Wrong.” American Sociological Review 67(2):212230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wald, Kenneth D., Owen, Dennis, and Hill, Samuel. 1990. “Political Cohesion in Churches.” Journal of Politics 52:197215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, R. Stephen. 1993. “Work in Progress Toward a New Paradigm for the Sociological Study of Religion in the United States.” American Journal of Sociology 98(5):10441093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, James R., and Bloch, Jon P.. 1995. “The Role of Church Assemblies in Building a Civil Society: The Case of the United Methodist General Conference on Homosexuality.” Sociology of Religion 56(2):121136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolever, Cynthia, and Bruce, Deborah. 2002. A Field Guide to U.S. Congregations: Who's Going Where and Why. Westminster: John Knox Press.Google Scholar
Wuthnow, Robert. 1999. “Mobilizing Civic Engagement: The Changing Impact of Religious Involvement.” In Civic Engagement in American Democracy, eds. Skocpol, Theda and Fiorina, Morris P.. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Djupe and Neiheisel supplementary material

Djupe and Neiheisel supplementary material 1

File 320 KB

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 16
Total number of PDF views: 195 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 04th September 2018 - 17th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-77fc7d77f9-xbf5p Total loading time: 0.332 Render date: 2021-01-17T19:50:02.253Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Sun Jan 17 2021 18:53:21 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": true, "languageSwitch": true, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Political Mobilization in American Congregations: A Religious Economies Perspective
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Political Mobilization in American Congregations: A Religious Economies Perspective
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Political Mobilization in American Congregations: A Religious Economies Perspective
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *