Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Communicating in Good Faith? Dynamics of the Christian Right Agenda

  • Angelia R. Wilson (a1) and Paul A. Djupe (a2)

Abstract

It is an article of faith that organized interests represent members to elected officials making use of synchronized communication channels. Rarely, if at all, have researchers had access to multiple, internal, and external channels to test this notion. We mine a trove of nearly 2,500 emails the Family Research Council (FRC) sent to list subscribers from 2007 to 2018. Text tools allow us to depict message flexibility of the FRC. We then consider how internal and external messages may be linked by examining the issue content of emails in relation to press releases. Finally, we note the bills lobbied by FRC and the frequency these are mentioned in the internal email messages. Our findings are twofold. First, they support the conditional independence of communication channels in ways that appear to conform to the requisites of the different audiences: elected officials are likely mobilized by different signals than members are. Second, our evidence shows that the flexibility organized interests have in composing their communications can mean that different audiences are presented with considerably different political agendas. While FRC has significant sophisticated message flexibility, our data set indicates that such flexibility can raise serious concerns about good faith representation.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Paul A. Djupe, Department of Political Science, Denison University, Granville, Ohio43023. E-mail: djupe@denison.edu.

Footnotes

Hide All

The authors wish to thank Ken Wald, Anthony Nownes, and Jennifer Wolak for their helpful feedback.

We wish to thank Tony Nownes, Steven Kettell, Rachel Gibson, Ken Wald, Andrea Hatcher, and David Buckley for their helpful feedback on earlier versions of this paper, in addition to our thanks to the guest editor Bethany Albertson and the two anonymous reviewers for their help in honing the arguments and presentation.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Achen, Christopher H., and Bartels, Larry M.. 2017. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ainsworth, Scott, and Sened, Itai. 1993. “The Role of Lobbyists: Entrepreneurs with Two Audiences.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (3): 834866.
Andrews, Kenneth T., and Edwards, Bob. 2004. “Advocacy Organizations in the U.S. Political Process.” Annual Review of Sociology 30: 479506.
Andsager, Julie. 2000. “How Interest Groups Attempt to Shape Public Opinion with Competing New Frames.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 77 (3): 577592.
Bauer, Raymond A., de Sola Pool, Ithiel, and Dexter, Lewis A.. 1963. American Business and Public Policy. New York: Atherton.
Baumgartner, Frank R., Berry, Jeffrey M., Hojnacki, Marie, Kimball, David C., and Leech, Beth L.. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D.. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Leech, Beth L.. 1998. Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Baumgartner, Frank R., Linn, Suzanna, and Boydstun, Amber E.. 2009. “The Decline of the Death Penalty.” In Winning with Words: The Origins and Impact of Political Framing. New York: Routledge, 159184.
Bentley, Arthur F. 1995[1908]. The Process of Government: A Study of Social Pressures. New Brunswick: Transaction.
Beyers, Jan. 2004. “Voice and Access: Political Practices of European Interest Associations.” European Union Politics 5 (2): 211240.
Brader, Ted. 2006. Campaigning for Hearts and Minds: How Emotional Appeals in Political Ads Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Brader, Ted, and Marcus, George. 2013. “Emotion and Political Psychology.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, eds. Huddy, Leonie, Sears, David O., and Levy, Jack S.. 2nd ed.New York: Oxford University Press, 165204.
Browne, William P. 1998. “Lobbying the Public: All Directional Advocacy.” In Interest Group Politics, eds. Cigler, Allan J. and Loomis, Burdett. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 343363.
Calfano, Brian R. 2010. “Prophetic At Any Price? Clergy Political Behavior and Utility Maximization.” Social Science Quarterly 90 (1): 88102.
Calfano, Brian R., and Djupe, Paul A.. 2009. “God Talk: Religious Cues and Electoral Support.” Political Research Quarterly 62 (2): 329339.
Campbell, David E., and Quin, Monson J.. 2008. “The Religion Card: Gay Marriage and the 2004 Presidential Election.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72 (3): 399419.
Carnes, Nicholas, and Holbein, John B.. N.D. “Do Public Officials Exhibit Social Class Biases when they Handle Casework? Evidence from Multiple Correspondence Experiments.” Unpublished manuscript. http://people.duke.edu/~nwc8/carnes_and_holbein.pdf.
Chalmers, Adam W., and Shotton, Paul A.. 2016. “Changing the Face of Advocacy? Explaining Interest Organizations’ Use of Social Media Strategies.” Political Communication 33: 374391.
Chong, Dennis, and Druckman, James N.. 2008. “Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies.” American Political Science Review 101: 637655.
Cooper, Betsy, Cox, Daniel, Lienesch, Rachel, and Jones, Robert P.. 2016. “Beyond Same-Sex Marriage: Attitudes on LGBT Nondiscrimination Laws and Religious Exemptions from the 2015 American Values Atlas.” Public Religion Research Institute, February 18. Available at http://www.prri.org/research/poll-same-sex-gay-marriage-lgbt-nondiscrimination-religious-liberty.
Davis, Darren W., and Silver, Brian D.. 2004. “Civil Liberties vs. Security: Public Opinion in the Context of the Terrorist Attacks on America.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (1): 2846.
Diamant, Jeff, and Alper, Becka A.. 2017. “Though Still Conservative, Young Evangelicals are More Liberal Than Their Elders on Some Issues.” http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/05/04/though-still-conservative-young-evangelicals-are-more-liberal-than-their-elders-on-some-issues/.
Drake, Bruce. 2013a. “Fewer Americans Have Negative Views of More Gays Raising Children.” http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/06/25/fewer-americans-have-negative-views-of-more-gays-raising-children/.
Drake, Bruce. 2013b. “As More Americans Have Contacts with Gays and Lesbians, Social Acceptance Rises.” http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/06/18/as-more-americans-have-contacts-with-gays-and-lesbians-social-acceptance-rises/.
Dür, Andreas, and Mateo, Gemma. 2013. “Gaining Access or Going Public? Interest Group Strategies in Five European Countries.” European Journal of Political Research 52: 660686.
Farrell, Justin. 2011. “The Young and the Restless? The Liberalization of Young Evangelicals.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 50 (3): 517532.
Godwin, R. Kenneth. 1988. One Billion Dollars of Influence: The Direct Marketing of Politics. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Godwin, Erik K., Kenneth Godwin, R., and Ainsworth, Scott. 2007. “Is corporate lobbying rational or just a waste of money?” In Interest Group Politics, eds. Cigler, Allan J. and Loomis, Burdett A., 7th ed. Washington DC: CQ Press, 256278.
Gray, Virginia, and Lowery, David. 1996. “A Niche Theory of Interest Representation.” Journal of Politics 58 (1): 91111.
Gray, Virginia, and Lowery, David. 1998. “To Lobby Alone or in a Flock: Foraging Behavior Among Organized Interests.” American Politics Quarterly 26: 534.
Green, John C., Rozell, Mark J., and Wilcox, Clyde, eds. 2006. The Values Campaign? The Christian Right and the 2004 Elections. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Hadden, Jeffrey K. 1969. The Gathering Storm in the Churches. New York: Doubleday.
Hall, Richard L., and Wayman, Frank M.. 1990. “Buying Time: Moneyed Interests and the Mobilization of Bias in Congressional Committees.” American Political Science Review 84 (3): 797820.
Heinz, John P., Laumann, Edward O., Nelson, Robert L., and Salisbury, Robert H.. 1993. The Hollow Core: Private Interests in National Policy Making. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hofrenning, Daniel J. 1995. In Washington but not of it: The Prophetic Politics of Religious Lobbyists. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Hojnacki, Marie. 1997. “Interest Groups’ Decisions to Join Alliances or Work Alone.” American Journal of Political Science 41: 6187.
Hojnacki, Marie, and Kimball, David C.. 1998. “Organized Interests and the Decision of Whom to Lobby in Congress.” American Political Science Review 92 (4): 775790.
Hojnacki, Marie, and Kimball, David C.. 2001. “PAC Contributions and Lobbying Contacts in Congressional Committees.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (1): 161180.
Holyoke, Thomas T. 2003. “Choosing Battlegrounds: Interest Group Lobbying Across Multiple Venues.” Political Research Quarterly 56 (3): 325336.
Huddy, Leonie, Feldman, Stanley, Taber, Charles, and Lahav, Gallya. 2005. “Threat Anxiety and Support of Antiterrorism Policies.” American Journal of Political Science 49: 593608.
Jelen, Ted G. 2005. “Political Esperanto: Rhetorical Resources and Limitations of the Christian Right in the United States.” Sociology of Religion 66: 303321.
Jerit, Jennifer. 2008. “Issue Framing and Engagement: Rhetorical Strategy in Public Policy Debates.” Political Behavior 30: 124.
Jones, Bryan D., Baumgartner, Frank R., and Talbert, Jeffery C.. 1993. “The Destruction of Issue Monopolies in Congress.” American Political Science Review 87 (3): 657671.
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.” Econometrica 47 (2): 263.
Kalla, Joshua, Rosenbluth, Frances, and Teele, Dawn. 2018. “Are You My Mentor? A Field Experiment on Gender, Ethnicity, and Political Self-Starters.” Journal of Politics 80 (1): 337341.
Knutson, Katherine E. 2011. “Breaking the Chains?: Constraint and the Political Rhetoric of Religious Interest Groups.” Politics and Religion 4 (2): 312337.
Knutson, Katherine E. 2013. Interfaith Advocacy: The Role of Religious Coalitions in the Political Process. New York: Routledge.
Kollman, Kenneth. 1998. Outside Lobbying: Public Opinion and Interest Group Strategies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Langbein, Laura I., and Lotwis, Mark A.. 1990. “The Political Efficacy of Lobbying and Money: Gun Control in the U.S. House, 1986.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 15 (3): 413440.
Leifeld, Philip, and Schneider, Volker. 2012. “Information Exchange in Policy Networks.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (3): 731744.
Lewis, Andrew R. 2014. “Staffing the Front Lines of the Culture War: Constituency Religious Effects on Assignment to the Senate Judiciary Committee.” Congress & the Presidency 41 (2): 167189.
Lewis, Andrew R. 2017. The Rights Turn in Conservative Christian Politics: How Abortion Transformed the Culture Wars. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Loomis, Burdett A., and Cigler, Allan J.. 2007. Interest Group Politics, 7th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Lowery, David, and Brasher, Holly. 2004. Organized Interests and American Government. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
Lowery, David, and Marchetti, Kathleen. 2012. “You Don't Know Jack: Principals, Agents, and Lobbying.” Interest Groups & Advocacy 1 (2): 139170.
Margolis, Michele F. 2018. From Politics to the Pews: How Partisanship and the Political Environment Shape Religious Identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McCrain, Joshua. Forthcoming. “Revolving Door Lobbyists and the Value of Congressional Staff Connections.” Journal of Politics 80 (4): 13691383.
McFarland, Andrew S. 1984. Common Cause: Lobbying in the Public Interest. Chatham: Chatham House.
Miller, Joanne M., and Krosnick, Jon A.. 2004. “Threat as a Motivator of Political Activism: A Field Experiment.” Political Psychology 25 (4): 507523.
Moe, Terry. 1980. The Organization of Interests. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Moen, Matthew C. 1994. “From Revolution to Evolution: The Changing Nature of the Christian Right.” Sociology of Religion 55 (3): 345357.
Nash, Elizabeth, Gold, Rachel B., Mohammed, Lizamarie, Ansari-Thomas, Zohra, and Cappello, Olivia. 2018. “Policy Trends in the States, 2017.” https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2018/01/policy-trends-states-2017 (Accessed on 2-12-19).
Neiheisel, Jacob R., and Djupe, Paul A.. 2008. “Intra-Organizational Constraints on Churches' Public Witness.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 47 (3): 427441.
Nownes, Anthony J. 1999. “Solicited Advice and Lobbyist Power: Evidence from Three American States.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 24 (1): 113123.
Nownes, Anthony J., and Freeman, Patricia. 1998. “Interest Group Activity in the States.” The Journal of Politics 60 (1): 86112.
Olson, Laura O. 2002. “Mainline Protestant Washington Offices and the Political Lives of Clergy.” In The Quiet Hand of God, eds. Wuthnow, Robert and Evans, John H.. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 5479.
Pew. 2011. “The Generation Gap and the 2012 Election; Section 8: Domestic and Foreign Policy Views.” http://www.people-press.org/2011/11/03/section-8-domestic-and-foreign-policy-views/.
Pew. 2013. “Changing Attitudes on Same Sex Marriage, Gay Friends and Family.” http://www.people-press.org/2013/06/06/changing-attitudes-on-same-sex-marriage-gay-friends-and-family/.
Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Putnam, Robert D., and Campbell, David E.. 2010. American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Ray, John. 2018. “Walk This way, Talk This way: Legislator Speech and Lobbying.” Interest Groups & Advocacy 7 (2): 150172.
Rohlinger, Deana A. 2002. “Framing the Abortion Debate: Organizational Resources, Media Strategies, and Movement-Countermovement Dynamics.” Sociological Quarterly 43 (4): 479507.
Rose, Max, and Baumgartner, Frank R. 2013. “Framing the Poor: Media Coverage and US Poverty Policy, 1960–2008.” Policy Studies Journal 41 (1): 2253.
Rothenberg, Lawrence. 1988. “Organizational Maintenance and the Retention Decision in Groups.” American Political Science Review 82 (4): 11291152.
Rozell, Mark J., and Wilcox, Clyde. 1996. “Second Coming: The Strategies of the New Christian Right.” Political Science Quarterly 111 (2): 271294.
Saad, Lydia. 2017. “U.S. Abortion Attitudes Stable; No Consensus on Legality.” https://news.gallup.com/poll/211901/abortion-attitudes-stable-no-consensus-legality.aspx
Salisbury, Robert H. 1969. “An Exchange Theory of Interest Groups.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 13:132.
Schattschneider, Elmer E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Tierney, John T.. 1983. “More of the Same: Washington Pressure Activity in a Decade of Change.” Journal of Politics 45 (2): 351377.
Shields, Jon A. 2009. The Democratic Virtues of the Christian Right. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Silge, Julia, and Robinson, David. 2016. “tidytext: Text Mining and Analysis Using Tidy Data Principles in R.” Journal of Open Source Software 1 (3): 37. doi: 10.21105/joss.00037.
Skocpol, Theda. 2004. Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Smith, Christian. 1998. American Evangelicalism: Embattled and Thriving. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Smith, Christopher. 2014. Disruptive Religion: The Force of Faith in Social Movement Activism. New York: Routledge.
Snow, David A, Burke Rochford, E., Worden, Steven K., and Benford, Robert D.. 1986. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation.” American Sociological Review 51 (5): 464481.
Sullivan, John L., Piereson, James, and Marcus, George E.. 1982. Political Tolerance and American Democracy. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Tajfel, Henri. 1970. “Experiments in Intergroup Discrimination.” Scientific American 232: 96102.
Terkildsen, Nayda, Schnell, Frauke I., and Ling, Cristina. 1998. “Interest Groups, the media and Policy Debate Formation: An Analysis of Message Structure, Rhetoric and Source Cues.” Political Communication 15: 4561.
Trapp, N. Leila, and Laursen, Bo. 2017. “Inside Out: Interest Groups’ ‘Outside’ Media Work as a Means to Manage ‘Inside’ Lobbying Efforts and Relationships with Politicians.” Interest Groups & Advocacy 6 (2): 143160.
Victor, Jennifer N., and Koger, Gregory. 2016. “Financing Friends: How Lobbyists Create a Web of Relationships among Members of Congress.” Interest Groups & Advocacy 5 (3): 224262.
Wilcox, Clyde. 1994. “Premillennialists at the Millennium: Some Reflections on the Christian Right in the Twenty-First Century.” Sociology of Religion, 55 (3): 243261.
Wilcox, Clyde, and Robinson, Carin. 2010. Onward Christian Soldiers? The Religious Right in American Politics. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Williams, Daniel K. 2012. God's Own Party: The Making of the Christian Right. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wilson, Angelia R., and Burack, Cynthia. 2012. “‘Where Liberty Reigns and God is Supreme’: The Christian Right and the Tea Party Movement.” New Political Science 34 (2): 172190.
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Wilson and Djupe supplementary material
Supplemental Information Appendix

 Word (2.1 MB)
2.1 MB

Communicating in Good Faith? Dynamics of the Christian Right Agenda

  • Angelia R. Wilson (a1) and Paul A. Djupe (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed