Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Religion and Education in Romania: Social Mobilization and the “Shadow” of the European Court of Human Rights

  • Mihai Popa (a1) and Liviu Andreescu (a2)

Abstract

In this article, we discuss the relation between the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and its jurisprudence and social mobilizations around the place of religion in the society. We focus on the struggles to define the intersection of religion and public education in Romania after the fall of communism. We show that secularist and counter-secularist civil society activists contending for the place of religion in public education in this country have made strategic use of the ECtHR and its case law, both in legal battles and in debates within the national public sphere. We argue that, since references to the ECtHR and its jurisprudence can be used in discursive battles as a form of symbolic “capital”, the strategies of mobilizing actors are at times more important than the strict doctrinal content of the ECtHR's judgments for understanding if and how the ECtHR's “shadow” is cast over religion-related mobilizations.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Religion and Education in Romania: Social Mobilization and the “Shadow” of the European Court of Human Rights
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Religion and Education in Romania: Social Mobilization and the “Shadow” of the European Court of Human Rights
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Religion and Education in Romania: Social Mobilization and the “Shadow” of the European Court of Human Rights
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Mihai Popa, Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, Advokatenweg 36, 06114, Halle/ Saale, Germany. E-mail: popa@eth.mpg.de

Footnotes

Hide All

This analysis is based on data generated in the Grassrootsmobilise research program funded by the European Research Council (GA No. 338463). The authors thank their colleagues from the Grassrootsmobilise team, Nicholas Tampio, as well as two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments on the manuscript. The first author additionally acknowledges the support granted by the Centre for Citizenship, Social Pluralism and Religious Diversity at the University of Potsdam through a visiting research fellowship during which parts of this analysis have been developed.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Andreescu, Liviu. 2008. “Romania's New Law on Religious Freedom and Religious Denominations.” Religion, State and Society 36(2):139161.
Bob, Clifford. 2012. The Global Right Wing and the Clash of World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. “The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field.” The Hastings Law Journal 38:805853.
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Wacquant, Loïc J.D.. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Byrnes, Timothy A., and Katzenstein, Peter J.. eds. 2006. Religion in an Expanding Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Calhoun, Craig. 2010. “The Public Sphere in the Field of Power.” Social Science History 34(3):301335.
Durham, Cole W. Jr., and Kirkham, David M.. 2016. “Introduction.” In Islam, Europe and Emerging Legal Issues, eds. Durham, W. Cole Jr., Torfs, Rik, Kirkham, David M. and Scott, Christine. Abington: Routledge, 117.
Enache, Smaranda. ed. 2007. Educația Religioasă în Școlile Publice [Religious Education in Public Schools]. Târgu-Mureș: Pro Europa.
Evans, Malcolm, and Petkoff, Peter. 2008. “A Separation of Convenience? The Concept of Neutrality in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights.” Religion, State and Society 36(3):205223.
Fligstein, Neil, and McAdam, Doug. 2011. “Toward a General Theory of Strategic Action Fields.” Sociological Theory 29(1):126.
Fokas, Effie. 2015. “Directions in Religious Pluralism in Europe: Mobilizations in the Shadow of European Court of Human Rights Religious Freedom Jurisprudence.” Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 4(1):5474.
Fraser, Nancy. 1990. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Social Text 25/26:5680.
Galanter, Marc. 1983. “The Radiating Effects of Courts.” In Empirical Theories About Courts, eds. Boyum, Keith O. and Mather, Lynn M.. New York: Longman, 117142.
Gülalp, Haldun. 2010. “Secularism and the European Court of Human Rights.” European Public Law 16(3):455471.
Habermas, Jürgen. [1962] 1991. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2008. Between Naturalism and Religion. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jackson, Robert. 1992. “The Misrepresentation of Religious Education.” In Ethics, Ethnicity and Education, eds. Leicester, M. and Taylor, M.. London: Kogan Page, 100113.
Karpov, Vyacheslav. 2010. “Desecularization: A Conceptual Framework.” Journal of Church and State 52(2):232270.
Kligman, Gail. 1998. The Politics of Duplicity: Controlling Reproduction in Ceausescu's Romania. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Koenig, Matthias. 2015. “The Governance of Religious Diversity at the European Court of Human Rights.” In International Approaches to Governing Ethnic Diversity, eds. Boulden, Jane and Kymlicka, Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 5178.
Koopmans, Ruud. 1999. “Political. Opportunity. Structure. Some Splitting to Balance the Lumping.” Sociological Forum 14:93105.
Lisovskaya, Elena. 2016. “Religious Education in Russia. Inter-Faith Harmony or Neo-Imperial Toleration?.” Social Inclusion 4(2):117132.
Lisovskaya, Elena, and Karpov, Vyacheslav. 2010. “Orthodoxy, Islam, and the Desecularization of Russia's State Schools.” Politics and Religion 3(2):276302.
Madsen, Mikael Rask. 2007. “From Cold War Instrument to Supreme European Court: The European Court of Human Rights at the Crossroads of International and National Law and Politics.” Law & Social Inquiry 32(1):137159.
Mancini, Susanna. 2009. “The Power of Symbols and Symbols as Power: Secularism and Religion as Guarantors of Cultural Convergence.” Cardozo Law Review 30(3):26292668.
McCann, Michael. 2004. “Law and Social Movements.” In The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society, ed. Austin Sarat. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 506522.
Meyer, David S., and Staggenborg, Suzanne. 1996. “Movements, Countermovements, and the Structure of Political Opportunity.” The American Journal of Sociology 101(6):16281660.
Patton, Michael Quinn. 2001. “Purposeful Sampling.” In Ethnography. Vol. 2, ed. Bryman, Alan. London: Sage, 106121.
Popa, Mihai, and Andreescu, Liviu. 2017. “Legal Provisions, Courts, and the Status of Religious Communities: A Socio-Legal Analysis of Inter-Religious Relations in Romania.” Religion, State and Society 45(3–4):297316.
Ringelheim, Julie. 2017. “State Religious Neutrality as a Common European Standard? Reappraising the European Court of Human Rights Approach.” Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 6(1):2447.
Romocea, Cristian. 2011. “Church-State Relations in Post-1989 Romania.” Journal of Church and State 53(2):243277.
Sampson, Steven. 1996. “The Social Life of Projects: Importing Civil Society to Albania.” In Civil Society: Challenging Western Models, eds. Dunn, Elizabeth and Hann, Chris. London & New York: Routledge, 119140.
Smith, Christian. 2003. “Introduction: Rethinking the Secularization of American Public Life.” In The Secular Revolution: Power, Interests, and Conflict in the Secularization of American Public Life, ed. Christian Smith. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 196.
Stan, Lavinia, and Turcescu, Lucian. 2005. “Religion, Politics and Sexuality in Romania.” Europe-Asia Studies 57(2):291310.
Stan, Lavinia, and Turcescu, Lucian. 2007. Religion and Politics in Post-Communist Romania. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stychin, Carl F. 2003. Governing Sexuality: The Changing Politics of Citizenship and Law Reform. Oxford & Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Popa and Andreescu supplementary material
Appendix

 Word (24 KB)
24 KB

Religion and Education in Romania: Social Mobilization and the “Shadow” of the European Court of Human Rights

  • Mihai Popa (a1) and Liviu Andreescu (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.