Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Religion and Self-Governance: Catholicism, Islam, and the Issue of Censorship

  • Ted G. Jelen (a1)
Abstract

Two aspects of democratic self-governance are analyzed: Collective self-governance, or the authority of citizens over one another, and individual self-governance, referring to the ability of each citizen to govern her/his own beliefs and actions. Individual self-governance is thought to require some level of autonomy on the part of individual citizens, and authenticity of personal preferences and desires. Beliefs about autonomy and authenticity in Roman Catholic and Islamic theology are considered, and these perspectives are applied to the problem of restricting certain types of discourse, based on the content of that discourse. While censorship if usually considered to be incompatible with democratic governance, Catholic and Islamic perspectives on individual self-governance suggest the possibility that some forms of censorship may enhance, rather than detract from citizen autonomy and authenticity, and enhance the possibility of positive collective self-governance.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Ted G. Jelen, Department of Political Science, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 4505 Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, NV 89154-5029. E-mail: jelent@unlv.nevada.edu.
Footnotes
Hide All

A version of this paper was presented at the Symposium on Democratization, Religion, and Governance, Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, December 4–5, 2015.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Akyol, Mustafa. 2011. Islam without Extremes: A Muslim Case for Liberty. New York, NY: Norton.
Armstrong, Karen. 2002. Islam: A Short History. New York, NY: Modern Library.
Barry, Brian. 1990. “How Not to Defend Liberal Institutions.” British Journal of Political Science 20:114.
Barry, Ellen. 2017. “India's Top Court Bars Campaigns Based on Identity Politics.” New York Times, www.nytimes.ms/2iXPZRU (Accessed on January 30, 2017).
Benson, Peter L., and Williams, Dorothy L.. 1986. Religion on Capitol Hill: Myths and Realities. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Berlin, Isaiah. 1958. “Two Conceptions of Liberty.” In Four Essays on Liberty, ed. Berlin, Isaiah. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 118172.
Berman, Marshall. 1970. The Politics of Authenticity. New York, NY: Antheneum.
Betten, F.S. 1935. The Roman Index of Forbidden Books Briefly Explained. Chicago, IL: Loyola University Press.
Brettschneider, Corey. 2012. When the State Speaks, What Should It Say? How Democracies can Protecxt Expression and Promote Equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Cesari, Jocelyne. 2014. The Awakening of Muslim Democracy: Religion, Modernity and the State. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Chandler, Marthe. 2015 “Confucian, Western, Islamic: Will the ‘Real Democracy’ Stand Up?” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Asian and Comparative Philosophy, Monterey.
Council of Europe High Commissioner Report for Human Rights. 2010. “European Muslims are Stigmatized by Populist Rhetoric.” www.commissioner.cws.coe.int/tiki-view_blog_post.php?postId=99 (Accessed on November 12, 2015).
Dahl, Robert. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Dahl, Robert. 1961. Who Governs? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
“Declaration on Religious Liberty” (“Dignitatis Humanae”). [1965] 2007. In The Basic Sixteen Documents Vatican Council II, ed. Flannery, Austin. Northport, NY: Costello Publishing Company, 551568.
Devlin, Patrick. 1965. The Enforcement of Morals. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Dworkin, Andrea. 1981. Pornography: Men Possessing Women. New York, NY: Perigree Trade.
Feldman, Noah. 2003. After Jihad: America and the Struggle for Islamic Democracy. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
Gardiner, H.C. 1958. The Catholic Viewpoint on Censorship. Garden City, NY: Hanover House.
George, Cherian. 2016. Hate Spin: The Manufacture of Religious Offense and Its Threat to Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Grubo, Darara Timotewos. 2015. Blasphemy and Defamation of Religions in a Polarized World. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
Hamilton, Alexander. 1836 (1937). quoted in Jonathan Elliot, The Debate in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution. www.bartleby.com/73/762.html (Accessed on November 18, 2015).
Hartz, Louis. 1955. The Liberal Tradition in America. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1993. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late 20th Century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1996. The Clash of Civilization and the Remaking of the World Order. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Jelen, Ted G. 1996. “Catholicism, Conscience, and Censorship.” In Religion and Mass Media: Audiencs and Adaptations, ed. Stout, Daniel A., and Buddenbaum, Judith M.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 3950.
Jelen, Ted G. 2010. “Religious Liberty as a Democratic Institution.” In Oxford Handbook on Church and State in the United States, ed. Davis, Derek H. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 311329.
Jelen, Ted G. 2015. “An Outsider's View of the Hizmet Movement in Comparative Perspective: Weaving the Sacred Canopy.” University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Typescript.
Jelen, Ted G., and Segers, Mary C.. 1998. A Wall of Separation? Debating the Public Role of Religion. Lanham, MD: Rowman-Littlefield.
Paul, John II 1993. The Splendor of Truth. Washington, DC: US Catholic Conference.
Johnson, James Turner. 2002. The Holy War Idea in Western and Islamic Traditions. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David P.. 1997. “Voting Correctly.” American Political Science Review 91:585598.
MacKinnon, Katherine. 1993. Only Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Madison, James. 1937. “Federalist # 10.” In The Federalist. New York, NY: Modern Library.
McGraw, Barbara. 2003. Rediscovering America's Sacred Ground: Public Religion and the Pursuit of the Good in a Pluralistic America. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Mendelberg, Tali. 2001. The Race Card: Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mill, John Stuart. 1965. On the Logic of the Moral Sciences. New York, NY: Bobbs-Merrill.
Mill, John Stuart. 1969. Autobiography. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
Mill, John Stuart. 1975. On Liberty. London: Oxford University Press.
Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth. 1993. The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion – Our Social Skin. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Peters, Rudolph. 1996. Jihad in Classical and Modern Islam. Princeton, NJ: Markus Wiener.
Rakauskas, Robert. 2007. “Censorship.” In Encyclopedia of Catholic Social Thought, Social Science, and Social Policy, eds. Coulter, Michael L., Krason, Stephen M., Myers, Richard S., and Varacalli, Joseph A.. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, 1:158161.
Rawls, John 2005. Political Liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1967. The Social Contract. New York, NY: Washington Square Press.
Safi, Michael. 2017. “India's Top Court Bans Religion and Caste from Election Campaigns.” The Guardian, www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jan/03/indias-top-court-bans-religion-and-caste-from-election-campaigns (Accessed on January 30, 2017).
Sezer, L. Kent. 1995. “The Constitutional Underpinnings of the Abortion Debate.” In Perspectives on the Politics of Abortion, ed. Jelen, Ted G. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Stepan, Alfred C. 2000. “Religion, Democracy, and the ‘Twin Tolerations.’Journal of Democracy 11:3757.
Tamadonfar, Mehran. 2015. Islamic Governance in Contemporary Iran: Transcending Islam for Social, Economic, and Political Order. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
Tamadonfar, Mehran, and Jelen, Ted G.. 2014a. “Religion and Regime Change in Iran and Poland.” In Religion and Regimes: Support, Separation, and Opposition, eds. Tamadonfar, Mehran, and Jelen, Ted G.. Lanham, MD: Lexington, 213240.
Tamadonfar, Mehran, and Jelen, Ted G.. 2014b. “Conclusion: Quasi-Establishment and Its Alternatives: Notes for a General Theory of Religious Identity and Religion/Regime Relations.” In Religion and Regimes: Support, Separation, and Opposition, eds. Tamadonfar, Mehran, and Jelen, Ted G.. Lanham, MD: Lexington, 241252.
Tinder, Glenn. 2000. The Political Meaning of Christianity: An Interpretation. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock.
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1945. Democracy in America. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
Walsh, Frank. 1996. Sin and Censorship: The Catholic Church and the Motion Picture Industry. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Warner, R. Stephen. 1993. “Work in Progress toward a New Paradigm for the Sociological Study of Religion in the United States.” American Journal of Sociology 98:10441093.
Wilcox, Clyde, Wald, Kenneth D., and Jelen, Ted G.. 2008. “Religious Preferences and Social Science: A Second Look.” Journal of Politics 70:874979.
Wills, Garry. 1971. Nixon Agonistes. New York, NY: New American Library.
Woodberry, Robert D. 2012. “The Missionary Roots of Liberal Democracy.” American Political Science Review 106:244274.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics and Religion
  • ISSN: 1755-0483
  • EISSN: 1755-0491
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-religion
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 17
Total number of PDF views: 120 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 348 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 24th April 2017 - 20th April 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.