Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T12:06:06.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Religious Nones” in the United Kingdom: How Atheists and Agnostics Think about Religion and Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2016

Ben Clements  and
Peter Gries
Ben Clements*
Affiliation:
University of Leicester
Peter Gries
Affiliation:
The University of Oklahoma
*
Address correspondences and reprint requests to: Ben Clements, School of History, Politics and International Relations, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom. E-mail: bc101@leicester.ac.uk; or to: Peter Gries, Institute for US-China Issues, The University of Oklahoma, 729 Elm Avenue, Farzaneh Hall, Room 227, Norman, OK 73019. E-mail: gries@ou.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The decline in religious identification and corresponding increase in the unaffiliated has been one of the most important religious changes in the United Kingdom (UK). The emergence of the “religious nones” is the most obvious sign of continuing secularization and the declining social and cultural relevance of religion. Yet while the religiously-unaffiliated often form the plurality — if not sometimes the majority — in many surveys, there has been little scholarly investigation into atheists, agnostics, and others who do not identify with a particular religion. This article uses a 2014 survey of UK adults to examine how those who identify as atheist or agnostic differ from the religiously-affiliated in terms of religiosity, ideology, and policy preferences. Findings reveal secular groups in the UK to be more to the ideological left than the religiously affiliated, and that atheists and agnostics differ from each other and especially the religiously affiliated on public policy.

Type
Articles
Information
Politics and Religion , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , March 2017 , pp. 161 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Rivers, Douglas. 2013. “Cooperative Survey Research.” Annual Review of Political Science 16:307–329.Google Scholar
Baker, Joseph P., and Smith, Buster G.. 2015. American Secularism: Cultural Contours of Nonreligious Belief Systems. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Joseph O., and Smith, Buster G.. 2009a. “The Nones: Social Characteristics of the Religiously Unaffiliated.” Social Forces 87:1251–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Joseph O., and Smith, Buster G.. 2009b. “None Too Simple: Examining Issues of Religious Nonbelief and Nonbelonging in the United States.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 48:719–733.Google Scholar
Bruce, Steve. 2014. “Late Secularization and Religion as Alien.” Open Theology 1:13–23.Google Scholar
Bruce, Steve. 2013. “Post-Secularity and Religion in Britain: An Empirical Assessment.” Journal of Contemporary Religion 28:369–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, Ben. 2015. Religion and Public Opinion in Britain: Continuity and Change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Clements, Ben. 2014. “Christian Affiliation in Britain’, British Religion in Numbers.” www.brin.ac.uk/news/2014/christianaffiliation-in-britain (Accessed on April 8, 2016).Google Scholar
Clements, Ben. 2009. “The Sociological and Psychological Influences on Public Support for the European Union in Britain, 1983–2005.” British Politics 4:47–82.Google Scholar
Crockett, Alisdair, and Voas, David. 2006. “Generations of Decline: Religious Change in 20th-Century Britain.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 45:567–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davie, Grace. 2015. Religion in Britain: A Persistent Paradox. London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Davie, Grace. 1994. Religion in Britain since 1945: Believing without Belonging. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Field, Clive D. 2001. “‘The Haemorrhage of Faith?’ Opinion Polls as Sources for Religious Practices, Beliefs and Attitudes in Scotland since the 1970s.” Journal of Contemporary Religio 16:157–175.Google Scholar
Francis, Leslie J., Robbins, Mandy, and Astley, Jeff. 2005. Fragmented Faith? Exposing the Fault-Lines in the Church of England. Carlisle: Paternoster Press.Google Scholar
Gries, Peter H. 2016. “Does Ideology Matter?” Social Science Quarterly, doi: 10.1111/ssqu.12276.Google Scholar
Gries, Peter H. 2015. “How Ideology Divides American Liberals and Conservatives over Israel.” Political Science Quarterly 130:51–78.Google Scholar
Gries, Peter H. 2014. The Politics of American Foreign Policy: How Ideology Divides Liberals and Conservatives over Foreign Affairs. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bernadette C. 2000. “Religious Independents within Western Industrialized Nations: A Socio-Demographic Profile.” Sociology of Religion 61:191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bernadette C., and Dowds, Lizanne. 2013. “Religion and Attitudes towards Gay Rights in Northern Ireland: The God Gap Revisited.” In The Changing World Religion Map: Sacred Places, Identities, Practices and Politics, ed. Brunn, D. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bernadette. C. 1995. “Religious Identification and Moral Attitudes: The British Case.” British Journal of Sociology 46:457–474.Google Scholar
Heath, Anthony, Jowell, Roger, Curtice, John, Evans, Geoff, Field, Julia, and Witherspoon, Sharon. 1991. Understanding Political Change. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Kettell, Steven 2013. “I Do, Thou Shalt Not: Religious Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage in Britain.” The Political Quarterly 84:247–255.Google Scholar
Kosmin, Barry Ariela, Keysar, A., Cragun, Ryan, and Navarro-Rivera, Juhem. 2011. “American Nones: A Profile of the No Religion Population. A Report Based on the American Religious Identification Survey 2008.” www.commons.trincoll.edu/aris/files/2011/08/NONES_08.pdf (Accessed on April 12, 2016).Google Scholar
Lee, Lois. 2015. Recognizing the Non-religious. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Lois. 2014. “Secular or Nonreligious? Investigating and Interpreting Generic ‘Not Religious’ Categories and Populations.” Religion 44:466–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, David. 1978. A General Theory of Secularization. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
McAndrew, Siobhan. 2010. “Religious Faith and Contemporary Attitudes.” In British Social Attitudes: 2009–2010. The 26th Report, eds. Park, Alison, Curtice, John, Thomson, Katarina, Phillips, Miranda, Clery, Elizabeth, and Butt, Sarah. London: Sage, 88–113.Google Scholar
McAnulla, Stuart D. 2014. “Secular Fundamentalists? Characterising the New Atheist Approach to Secularism, Religion and Politics.” British Politics 9:124–145.Google Scholar
NatCen. 2015. “British Social Attitudes: Church of England Decline Has Accelerated in Past Decade.” www.natcen.ac.uk/news-media/press-releases/2015/may/british-social-attitudes-church-of-england-decline-has-accelerated-in-past-decade (Accessed on April 8, 2016).Google Scholar
Nelsen, Brent F., Guth, James L., and Highsmith, Brian. 2011. “Does Religion Still Matter? Religion and Public Attitudes toward Integration in Europe.” Politics and Religion 4:1–26.Google Scholar
Nelsen, Brent F., and Guth, James L.. 2015. Religion and the Struggle for Europe. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2015. “From Telephone to the Web: The Challenge of Mode of Interview Effects in Public Opinion Polls.” www.pewresearch.org/2015/05/13/from-telephone-to-the-web-the-challenge-of-mode-of-interview-effects-in-public-opinion-polls (Accessed on April 8, 2016).Google Scholar
Sanders, David. 1999. “The Impact of Left-Right Ideology.” In Critical Elections: British Parties and Voters in Long Term Perspective, eds. Evans, Geoff, and Norris, Pippa. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Smith, Buster G., and Baker, Joseph O.. 2015. “Atheism, Agnosticism, and Irreligion.” Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource 1–9.Google Scholar
Steven, Martin. 2011. Christianity and Party Politics: Keeping the Faith. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Voas, David, and Crockett, Alistair. 2005. “Religion in Britain: Neither believing nor belonging.” Sociology 39:11–28.Google Scholar
Voas, David, and Day, Abby. 2007. “Secularity in Great Britain.” In Secularism and Secularity: Contemporary International Perspectives, eds. Kosmin, Barry A., and Keysar, Ariela. Hartford, CT: Institute for the Study of Secularism in Society and Culture, 95–112.Google Scholar
Voas, David, and Ling, Rodney. 2010. “Religion in Britain and the United States.” In British Social Attitudes: 2009–2010. The 26th Report, eds. Park, Alison, Curtice, John, Thomson, Katarina, Phillips, Miranda, Clery, Elizabeth, and Sarah, Butt. London: Sage, 65–86.Google Scholar
Voas, David, and McAndrew, Siobhan. 2012. “Three Puzzles of Non-religion in Britain.” Journal of Contemporary Religion 27:29–48.Google Scholar
Vollard, Hans. 2006. “Protestantism and Euro-Scepticism in the Netherlands.” Perspective on European Politics and Society 7:276–297.Google Scholar
Wilson, Brian. 1966. Religion in Secular Society: A Sociological Comment. London: Watts.Google Scholar
Woodhead, Linda. 2014. “The ‘Fuzzy’ Nones.” www.blog.nsrn.net/2014/03/07/launch-series-the-fuzzy-nones (Accessed on April 4, 2016).Google Scholar
Woodhead, Linda. 2013. “A Gap is Growing within the Church.” www.churchtimes.co.uk/articles/2013/20-september/comment/opinion/a-gap-is-growing-within-the-church (Accessed on April 4, 2016).Google Scholar
Wuthnow, Robert. 2015. Inventing American Religion: Polls, Surveys, and the Tenuous Quest for a Nation's Faith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, Phil, Galen, Luke W., and Pasquale, Frank L.. 2016. The Nonreligious: Understanding Secular People and Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar