Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Are press depictions of Affordable Care Act beneficiaries favorable to policy durability?

  • Jacqueline Chattopadhyay (a1)
Abstract

Background: If successfully implemented and enduring, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) stands to expand health insurance access in absolute terms, reduce inter-group disparities in that access, and reduce exposure to the financial vulnerabilities illness entails. Its durability—meaning both avoidance of outright retrenchment and fidelity to its policy aims—is thus of scholarly interest. Past literature suggests that social constructions of a policy’s beneficiaries may impact durability.

Questions: This paper first describes media portrayals of ACA beneficiaries with an eye toward answering three descriptive questions: (1) Do portrayals depict beneficiaries as economically heterogeneous? (2) Do portrayals focus attention on groups that have acquired new political relevance due to the ACA, such as young adults? (3) What themes that have served as messages about beneficiary “deservingness” in past social policy are most frequent in ACA beneficiary portrayals? The paper then assesses how the portrayal patterns that these questions uncover may work both for and against the ACA’s durability, finding reasons for confidence as well as caution.

Methods: Using manual and automated methods, this paper analyzes newspaper text from August 2013 through January 2014 to trace portrayals of two ACA “target populations” before and during the new law’s first open-enrollment period: those newly eligible for Medicaid, and those eligible for subsidies to assist in the purchase of private health insurance under the ACA. This paper also studies newspaper text portrayals of two groups informally crafted by the ACA in this timeframe: those gaining health insurance and those losing it.

Results: The text data uncover the following answers to the three descriptive questions for the timeframe studied: (1) Portrayals may underplay beneficiaries’ economic heterogeneity. (2) Portrayals pay little attention to young adults. (3) Portrayals emphasize themes of workforce participation, economic self-sufficiency, and insider status. Health status, age, gender, and race/ethnicity appear to receive little attention.

Implications and Conclusions: Existing literature suggests that these portrayal patterns may both support and limit ACA durability. In favor of durability is that ACA beneficiaries are depicted in terms that have been associated with deservingness in past American social policy—particularly being cast as workers and insiders. Yet, the results also give three reasons for caution. First, ACA insurance-losers are also portrayed as deserving. Second, it is unclear how the portrayal patterns found may impact the durability of the ACA’s efforts to cut insurance disparities by age, health status, and especially race/ethnicity. Third, portrayals’ strong casting of beneficiaries as workers, and limited attention to beneficiaries’ economic heterogeneity and to young adults, may do little to help cultivate beneficiary political engagement around the ACA.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Are press depictions of Affordable Care Act beneficiaries favorable to policy durability?
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Are press depictions of Affordable Care Act beneficiaries favorable to policy durability?
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Are press depictions of Affordable Care Act beneficiaries favorable to policy durability?
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence: Department of Political Science and Public Administration, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28223. Email: jchattop@uncc.edu
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Lawrence R. Jacobs , “America’s critical juncture: The Affordable Care Act and its reverberations,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 2011, 36(3): 625631, at p. 626.

Paul Pierson , Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), as discussed by Andrea Louise Campbell, “The durability of Pierson’s theory about the durability of the welfare state,” PS: Political Science & Politics, 2015, 48(2): 284–288.

Paul Pierson , “Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics,” American Political Science Review, 2000, 94(2): 251267, at p. 251.

Thomas E. Nelson  and Donald R. Kinder , “Issue frames and group-centrism in American public opinion,” Journal of Politics, 1996, 58(4): 10551078, at p. 1074.

Lawrence R. Jacobs , “Health reform and the future of American politics,” Perspectives on Politics, 2014, 12(3): 631642, at p. 632.

Nicholas Winter , “Beyond welfare: Framing and the racialization of white opinion on Social Security,” American Journal of Political Science, 2006, 50(2): 400420.

Sean Nicholson-Crotty , “Leaving money on the table: Learning from recent refusals of federal grants in the American states,” Publius, 2012, 42(3): 449466.

William G. Jacoby , “Issue framing and public opinion on government spending,” American Journal of Political Science, 2000, 44(4): 750767, at p. 752.

Martin Gilens , Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999).

Hector P. Rodriguez , Mariam J. Laugesen , and Carolyn A. Watts , “A randomized experiment of issue framing and voter support of tax increases for health insurance expansion,” Health Policy, 2010, 98(2–3): 245255, at p. 245.

Max Rose  and Frank R. Baumgartner , “Framing the poor: Media coverage and U.S. poverty policy, 1960–2008,” Policy Studies Journal, 2013, 41(1): 2253, at p. 22.

James N. Druckman , “The implications of framing effects for citizen competence,” Political Behavior, 2001a, 23(3): 225256, at pp. 227–228.

Dennis Chong  and James N. Druckman , “Framing theory,” Annual Review of Political Science, 2007a, 10(1): 103126, at pp. 105–106.

Dennis Chong  and James N. Druckman , “A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments,” Journal of Communication, 2007b, 57(1): 99118, at pp. 100–101.

Thomas E. Nelson , Zoe M. Oxley , and Rosalee A. Clawson , “Toward a psychology of framing effects,” Political Behavior, 1997, 19(3): 221246, at p. 221.

James N. Druckman , “On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame?,” Journal of Politics, 2001b, 63(4): 10411066, at p. 1042.

Michael Binder , Matthew Childers , and Natalie Johnson , “Campaigns and the mitigation of framing effects on voting behavior: A natural and field experiment,” Political Behavior, 2015, 37(3): 703722, at p. 704.

Helen Ingram  and Anne L. Schneider , “Social construction (continued): Response,” American Political Science Review, 1995, 89(2): 441446, at p. 443.

Shanto Iyengar , Mark D. Peters , and Donald R. Kinder , “Experimental demonstrations of the ‘not-so-minimal’ consequences of television news programs,” American Political Science Review, 1982, 76(4): 848858, at p. 848.

W. Lance Bennett  and Shanto Iyengar , “A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication,” Journal of Communication, 2008, 58(4): 707731, at p. 725.

Benjamin D. Sommers , Thomas Buchmueller , Sandra L. Decker , Colleen Carey , and Richard Kronick , “The Affordable Care Act has led to significant gains in health insurance and access to care for young adults,” Health Affairs, 2013, 32(1): 165174.

Claire Jean Kim , “The racial triangulation of Asian Americans,” Politics & Society, 1999, 27(1): 105138.

Joshua L. Rabinowitz , David O. Sears , Jim Sidanius , and Jon A. Krosnick , “Why do white Americans oppose race-targeted policies? Clarifying the impact of symbolic racism,” Political Psychology, 2009, 30(5): 805828, at pp. 805, 819, 825.

Christopher D. DeSante , “Working twice as hard to get half as far: Race, work ethic, and America’s deserving poor,” American Journal of Political Science, 2013, 57(2): 342356.

Jennifer Hochschild , Jacqueline Chattopadhyay , Claudine Gay , and Michael Jones-Correa , eds., Outsiders No More? Models of Immigrant Political Incorporation (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013).

James N. Druckman , “Media matter: How newspapers and television news cover campaigns and influence voters,” Political Communication, 2005, 22(4): 463481, at p. 463.

Lloyd Chiasson , “Japanese-American relocation during World War II: A study of California editorial reactions,” Journalism Quarterly, 1991, 68(1–2): 263268, as cited by DiAlto, p. 85.

Marianne Bertrand  and Sendhil Mullainathan , “Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination,” The American Economic Review, 2004, 94(4): 9911013.

Shanna Rose , Financing Medicaid: Federalism and the Growth of America’s Health Care Safety Net (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2013), as cited in Campbell, 2015, p. 284.

Thomas R. Oliver , “The dilemmas of incrementalism: Logical and political constraints in the design of health insurance reforms,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1999, 18(4): 652683.

Laura S. Hussey  and Shanna Pearson-Merkowitz , “The changing role of race in social welfare attitude formation: Partisan divides over undocumented immigrants and social welfare policy,” Political Research Quarterly, 2013, 66(3): 572584.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics and the Life Sciences
  • ISSN: 0730-9384
  • EISSN: 1471-5457
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-the-life-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Chattopadhyay Supplementary Material
Appendix

 Word (54 KB)
54 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 13 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 186 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th April 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.