Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The “chicken-and-egg” development of political opinions: The roles of genes, social status, ideology, and information

  • Peter Beattie (a1)
Abstract

Twin studies have revealed political ideology to be partially heritable. Neurological research has shown that ideological differences are reflected in brain structure and response, suggesting a direct genotype-phenotype link. Social and informational environments, however, also demonstrably affect brain structure and response. This leads to a “chicken-and-egg” question: do genes produce brains with ideological predispositions, causing the preferential absorption of consonant information and thereby forming an ideology, or do social and informational environments do most of the heavy lifting, with genetic evidence the spurious artifact of outdated methodology? Or are both inextricably intertwined contributors? This article investigates the relative contributions of genetic and environmental factors to ideological development using a role-play experiment investigating the development of opinions on a novel political issue. The results support the view that the process is bidirectional, suggesting that, like most traits, political ideology is produced by the complex interplay of genetic and (social/informational) environmental influences.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The “chicken-and-egg” development of political opinions
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The “chicken-and-egg” development of political opinions
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The “chicken-and-egg” development of political opinions
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence: Peter Beattie, Department of Political Science, University of California, Irvine. Email: pbeattie@uci.edu
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

John T. Jost , Christopher M. Federico , and Jaime L. Napier , “Political ideology: its structure, functions, and elective affinities,” Annual Review of Psychology , 2009, 60: 307337, at p. 310.

John R. Hibbing , Kevin B. Smith , and John R. Alford , “Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 2014, 37: 297350.

Darren Schreiber , Greg Fonzo , Alan N. Simmons , Christopher T. Dawes , Taru Flagan , James H. Fowler , and Martin P. Paulus , “Red brain, blue brain: evaluative processes differ in Democrats and Republicans,” PLOS ONE , 2013, 8(2): e52970.

John T. Jost , Sharareh Noorbaloochi , and Jay J. Van Bavel , “The ‘chicken-and-egg’ problem in political neuroscience,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 2014, 37(3): 317318, at p. 317.

Evan Charney , “Behavior genetics and postgenomics,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 2012, 35(5): 331358.

John R. Alford , Carolyn L. Funk , and John R. Hibbing , “Are political orientations genetically transmitted? American Political Science Review , 2005, 99(2): 153167.

Peter K. Hatemi , John R. Hibbing , Sarah E. Medland , Matthew C. Keller , John R. Alford , Kevin B. Smith , Nicholas G. Martin , and Lindon J. Eaves , “Not by twins alone: using the extended family design to investigate genetic influence on political beliefs,” American Journal of Political Science , 2010, 54(3): 798814.

Christian Kandler , Wiebke Bleidorn , and Rainer Riemann , “Left or right? Sources of political orientation: the roles of genetic factors, cultural transmission, assortative mating, and personality,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 2012, 102(3): 633645.

Lindon Eaves , Nicholas Martin , Andrew Heath , Richard Schieken , Joanne Meyer , Judy Silberg , Michael Neale , and Linda Corey , “Age changes in the causes of individual differences in conservatism,” Behavior Genetics , 1997, 27(2): 121124.

Peter K. Hatemi , Carolyn L. Funk , Sarah E. Medland , Hermine M. Maes , Judy L. Silberg , Nicholas G. Martin , and Lindon J. Eaves , “Genetic and environmental transmission of political attitudes over a life time,” Journal of Politics , 2009, 71(3): 11411156.

Inga Schwabe , Wilfried Jonker , and Stéphanie M. Berg , “Genes, culture and conservatism — a psychometric-genetic approach,” Behavior Genetics , 2016, 46(4): 516528.

Peter K. Hatemi , Sarah E. Medland , Robert Klemmensen , Sven Oskarsson , Levente Littvay , Christopher T. Dawes , and Brad Verhulst , “Genetic influences on political ideologies: twin analyses of 19 measures of political ideologies from five democracies and genome-wide findings from three populations,” Behavior Genetics , 2014, 44(3): 282294.

Kevin Smith , John R. Alford , Peter K. Hatemi , Lindon J. Eaves , Carolyn Funk , and John R. Hibbing , “Biology, ideology, and epistemology: how do we know political attitudes are inherited and why should we care? American Journal of Political Science , 2012, 56(1): 1733.

Peter K. Hatemi , Lindon Eaves , and Rose McDermott , “It’s the end of ideology as we know it,” Journal of Theoretical Politics , 2012, 24(3): 345369.

Peter K. Hatemi  and Brad Verhulst , “Political attitudes develop independently of personality traits,” PLOS ONE , 2015, 10(3): e0118106.

Aleksander Ksiazkiewicz , Steven Ludeke , and Robert Krueger , “The role of cognitive style in the link between genes and political ideology,” Political Psychology , 2016, 37(6): 761776.

Emma Onraet , Alain Van Hiel , Kristof Dhont , Gordon Hodson , Mark Schittekatte , and Sarah De Pauw , “The association of cognitive ability with right-wing ideological attitudes and prejudice: a meta-analytic review,” European Journal of Personality , 2015, 29(6): 599621.

Sven Oskarsson , David Cesarini , Christopher T. Dawes , James H. Fowler , Magnus Johannesson , Patrik K. E. Magnusson , and Jan Teorell , “Linking genes and political orientations: testing the cognitive ability as mediator hypothesis,” Political Psychology , 2015, 36(6): 649665.

Peter K. Hatemi , Nathan A. Gillespie , Lindon J. Eaves , Brion S. Maher , Bradley T. Webb , Andrew C. Heath , and Sarah E. Medland , “A genome-wide analysis of liberal and conservative political attitudes,” Journal of Politics , 2011, 73(1): 271285.

Martin Reuter , Clemens Frenzel , Nora T. Walter , Sebastian Markett , and Christian Montag , “Investigating the genetic basis of altruism: the role of the COMT Val158Met polymorphism,” Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience , 2011, 6(5): 662668.

Jaime E. Settle , Christopher T. Dawes , Nicholas A. Christakis , and James H. Fowler , “Friendships moderate an association between a dopamine gene variant and political ideology,” Journal of Politics , 2010, 72(4): 11891198.

Evan Charney  and William English , “Candidate genes and political behavior,” American Political Science Review , 2012, 106(1): 134.

Evan Charney  and William English , “Genopolitics and the science of genetics,” American Political Science Review , 2013, 107(2): 382395.

Daniel J. Benjamin , David Cesarini , Matthijs J. H. M. van der Loos , Christopher T. Dawes , Philipp D. Koellinger , Patrik K. E. Magnusson , and Christopher F. Chabris , “The genetic architecture of economic and political preferences,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 2012, 109(21): 80268031.

Mark H. Davis , Carol Luce , and Stephen J. Kraus , “The heritability of characteristics associated with dispositional empathy,” Journal of Personality , 1994, 62(3): 369391.

Sara H. Konrath , Edward H. O’Brien , and Courtney Hsing , “Changes in dispositional empathy in American college students over time: a meta-analysis,” Personality and Social Psychology Review , 2011, 15(2): 180198.

Jon Beckwith  and Corey A. Morris , “Twin studies of political behavior: untenable assumptions? Perspectives on Politics , 2008, 6(4): 785791.

Christopher Ojeda , “The effect of 9/11 on the heritability of political trust,” Political Psychology , 2014, 37(1): 7388.

Doris Shultziner , “Genes and politics: a new explanation and evaluation of twin study: results and association studies in political science,” Political Analysis , 2013, 21(3): 350367.

Ilan Dar-Nimrod , “Postgenomics and genetic essentialism,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 2012, 35(5): 362363.

Evelyn Fox Keller , The Mirage of a Space between Nature and Nurture (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010).

Evan Charney , “Humans, fruit flies, and automatons,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 2012, 35(5): 381410, at p. 386.

Allan V. Horwitz , Tami M. Videon , Mark F. Schmitz , and Diane Davis , “Double vision: reply to Freese and Powell,” Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 2003, 44(2): 136141.

Jay Joseph , “The genetics of political attitudes and behavior: claims and refutations,” Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry , 2010, 12(3): 200217.

Cf., Levente Littvay , “Do heritability estimates of political phenotypes suffer from an equal environment assumption violation? Evidence from an empirical study,” Twin Research and Human Genetics , 2012, 15(1): 614.

Or Zuk , Eliana Hechter , Shamil R. Sunyaev , and Eric S. Lander , “The mystery of missing heritability: genetic interactions create phantom heritability,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 2012, 109(4): 11931198.

Wim E. Crusio , “Heritability estimates in behavior genetics: Wasn’t that station passed long ago? Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 2012, 35(5): 361362.

James H. Fowler  and Christopher T. Dawes , “In defense of genopolitics,” American Political Science Review , 2013, 107(2): 362374.

John T. Jost , Hannah Nam , David M. Amodio , and Jay J. Van Bavel , “Political neuroscience: the beginning of a beautiful friendship,” Political Psychology , 2014, 35(S1): 342.

Katherine Woollett  and Eleanor A. Maguire , “Acquiring ‘the knowledge’ of London’s layout drives structural brain changes,” Current Biology , 2011, 21(24): 21092114.

Jaime L. Napier  and John T. Jost , “The ‘antidemocratic personality’ revisited: a cross-national investigation of working-class authoritarianism,” Journal of Social Issues , 2008, 64(3): 595617.

Xiaowen Xu  and Jordan B. Peterson , “Differences in media preference mediate the link between personality and political orientation,” Political Psychology , 2017, 38(1): 5572.

John T. Jost , Brian A. Nosek , and Samuel D. Gosling , “Ideology: its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology,” Perspectives on Psychological Science , 2008, 3(2): 126136, at pp. 133–134.

Jan-Emmanuel De Neve , “Ideological change and the economics of voting behavior in the US, 1920–2008,” Electoral Studies , 2014, 34: 2738.

Brad Verhulst , Peter K. Hatemi , and Lindon Eaves , “Disentangling the importance of psychological predispositions and social constructions in the organization of American political ideology,” Political Psychology , 2012, 33(3): 375393.

Scott L. Althaus , “Information effects in collective preferences,” American Political Science Review , 1998, 92(3): 545558.

Adam J. Berinsky , Gregory A. Huber , and Gabriel S. Lenz , “Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk,” Political Analysis , 2012, 20(3): 351368.

John D. Huber , “Values and partisanship in left-right orientations: measuring ideology,” European Journal of Political Research , 1989, 17(5): 599621.

Guillem Rico  and M. Kent Jennings , “The formation of left-right identification: pathways and correlates of parental influence,” Political Psychology , 2015, 37(2): 237252.

Carolyn L. Funk , Kevin B. Smith , John R. Alford , Matthew V. Hibbing , Nicholas R. Eaton , Robert F. Krueger , Lindon J. Eaves , and John R. Hibbing , “Genetic and environmental transmission of political orientations,” Political Psychology , 2013, 34(6): 805819.

Christian Kandler , Wiebke Bleidorn , and Rainer Riemann , “Left or right? Sources of political orientation: the roles of genetic factors, cultural transmission, assortative mating, and personality,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 2012, 102(3): 633645.

Jennifer Hochschild  and Maya Sen , “Technology optimism or pessimism about genomic science: variation among experts and scholarly disciplines,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science , 2015, 658(1): 236252.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics and the Life Sciences
  • ISSN: 0730-9384
  • EISSN: 1471-5457
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-the-life-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary Materials

Beattie supplementary material
Appendix

 Unknown (553 KB)
553 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 24
Total number of PDF views: 80 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 878 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 6th April 2017 - 21st August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.