Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Debating restrictions on embryonic stem cell research: An experimental study of online deliberation and political emotion

  • Colleen McClain (a1)
Abstract

This study investigates the emotional and behavioral effects of interpersonal online communication, focusing on the controversy surrounding the loosening of restrictions on human embryonic stem cell research. The issue, central to national and statewide elections in 2008, generated heated debate among candidates and voters and evoked strong emotional sentiments among partisans. Using the theory of affective intelligence, this study proposes a predictive model connecting levels of enthusiasm and anxiety with behavioral and information-seeking outcomes. Cognitive appraisal theory is also employed to provide a role for political emotion in accounting for interactive media effects. To investigate the ways that online deliberation may influence discussions surrounding stem cell research, a between-subjects experimental study was conducted that systematically varied the tone of feedback received (reinforcing or challenging) and type of interaction (synchronous or asynchronous) experienced by users. Results indicate that emotional responses play a significant role in predicting behavioral intentions arising from the user-to-user interactive experience.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

1. Eileen Burgin , “Deciding on human embryonic stem cell research: Evidence from Congress's first showdown with President George W. Bush,” Politics and the Life Sciences 2009, 28(1): 1225.

11. Jennifer Stromer-Galley , “On-line interaction and why candidates avoid it,” Journal of Communication 2000, 50(4): 111132.

15. Vincent Price , Lilach Nir , and Joseph N. Cappella , “Normative and informational influences in online political discussions,” Communication Theory 2006, 16(1): 4774.

26. Elisabeth Joyce and Robert E. Kraut , “Predicting continued participation in newsgroups,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2006, 11(3), article 3: paragraph 3.

39. Erik P. Bucy and Kimberly S. Gregson , “Media participation: A legitimizing mechanism of mass democracy,” New Media Society 2001, 3(3): 357380.

40. Jennifer S. Lerner and Dacher Keltner , “Fear, anger, and risk,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001, 81(1): 146159.

41. John E. Newhagen , “TV news images that induce anger, fear, and disgust: Effects on approach-avoidance and memory,” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42(2): 265276.

44. Klaus R. Scherer , Elise S. Dan , and Anders Flykt , “What determines a feeling's position in affective space? A case for appraisal,” Cognition and Emotion 2006, 20(1): 92113.

47. James R. Averill , Anger and Aggression: An Essay on Emotion (New York: Springer-Verlag, 1982).

51. Denis G. Sullivan and Roger D. Masters , “Happy warriors: Leaders' facial displays, viewers emotions, and political support,” American Journal of Political Science, 1988, 32(2): 345368.

53. David O. Sears , “College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 51(3): 515530.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics and the Life Sciences
  • ISSN: 0730-9384
  • EISSN: 1471-5457
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-the-life-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 55 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.