Skip to main content

Evolutionary institutionalism: New perspectives

  • Kai Fürstenberg (a1)

Background. Institutions are hard to define and hard to study. Long prominent in political science have been two theories: Rational Choice Institutionalism (RCI) and Historical Institutionalism (HI). Arising from the life sciences is now a third: Evolutionary Institutionalism (EI). Comparative strengths and weaknesses of these three theories warrant review, and the value-to-be-added by expanding the third beyond Darwinian evolutionary theory deserves consideration.

Question. Should evolutionary institutionalism expand to accommodate new understanding in ecology, such as might apply to the emergence of stability, and in genetics, such as might apply to political behavior?

Methods. Core arguments are reviewed for each theory with more detailed exposition of the third, EI. Particular attention is paid to EI’s gene-institution analogy; to variation, selection, and retention of institutional traits; to endogeneity and exogeneity; to agency and structure; and to ecosystem effects, institutional stability, and empirical limitations in behavioral genetics.

Findings. RCI, HI, and EI are distinct but complementary.

Conclusions. Institutional change, while amenable to rational-choice analysis and, retrospectively, to critical-juncture and path-dependency analysis, is also, and importantly, ecological. Stability, like change, is an emergent property of institutions, which tend to stabilize after change in a manner analogous to allopatric speciation. EI is more than metaphorically biological in that institutional behaviors are driven by human behaviors whose evolution long preceded the appearance of institutions themselves.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Evolutionary institutionalism
      Available formats
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Evolutionary institutionalism
      Available formats
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Evolutionary institutionalism
      Available formats
Corresponding author
Correspondence: Dr. Kai Fürstenberg, Department of Political Science, South Asia Institute, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany. Email:
Hide All
1Jepperson, Ronald, “Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism,” in The New Institutionalism in Organization Analysis, Powell, Walter and DiMaggio, Paul, eds. (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1991), p. 144.
2Meadwell, Hudson, “Institutions and political rationality,” in New Institutionalism. Theory and Analysis, Lecours, André, ed. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press), p. 86.
3Shepsle, Kenneth A., “Studying institutions some lessons from the rational choice approach,” Journal of Theoretical Politics, 1989, 1(2): 131147.
4Calvert, Randall, “The rational choice theory of social institutions: cooperation, coordination, and communication,” in Modern Political Economy, Banks, Jeffrey S. and Hanushek, Eric Allen, eds. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), p. 217.
5Kato, Junko, “Institutions and rationality in politics: three varieties of Neo-institutionalists,” British Journal of Political Science, 1996, 26(4): 553582.
6Ostrom, Elinor, “A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: presidential address, American political science association, 1997,” The American Political Science Review, 1998, 92(1): 122 at p. 4.
7Peters, B. Guy, Institutional Theory: Problems and Prospects (Vienna: Reihe Politikwissenschaft/Institut Für Höhere Studien, Abt. Politikwissenschaft, 2000), p. 19,, accessed March 8, 2016.
8Bernheim, B. Douglas, Peleg, Bezalel, and Whinston, Michael D., “Coalition-proof nash equilibria I. Concepts,” Journal of Economic Theory, 1987, 42(1): 112.
9Roberts, Peter W. and Greenwood, Royston, “Integrating transaction cost and institutional theories: Toward a constrained-efficiency framework for understanding organizational design adoption,” The Academy of Management Review, 1997, 22(2): 346373.
10Weyland, Kurt, “Limitations of rational-choice institutionalism for the study of latin American politics,” Studies in Comparative International Development, 2002, 37(1): 5785.
11Peters, p. 18.
12Steinmo, Sven, “Historical institutionalism,” in Approaches and Methodologies in Social Sciences, Porta, Donatella Della and Keating, Michael, eds. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 118141.
13Hall, Peter A. and Taylor, Rosemary C. R., “Political science and the three new institutionalisms,” Political Studies, 1996, 44(5): 936957.
14Immergut, E. M., “The rules of the game: The logic of health policy-making in France, Switzerland, and Sweden,” in Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, Steinmo, Sven and Thelen, Kathleen, eds. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).
15Steinmo, Sven and Thelen, Kathleen, eds., Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).
16Collier, Ruth Berins and Collier, David, Shaping the Political Arena (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002).
17Mahoney, James, “Path-dependent explanations of regime change: Central America in comparative perspective,” Studies in Comparative International Development, 2001, 36(1): 111141.
18Mahoney, p. 113.
19Peters, B. Guy, Pierre, Jon, and King, Desmond S., “The politics of path dependency: Political conflict in historical institutionalism,” The Journal of Politics, 2005, 67(4): 12751300 at p. 1283.
20Peters et al., p. 1286.
21Lewis, Orion A. and Steinmo, Sven, “How institutions evolve: Evolutionary theory and institutional change,” Polity, 2012, 44(3): 314339.
22Freeman, Scott and Herron, Jon, Evolutionary Analysis, 4th ed. (Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall), p. 401.
23Mayr, Ernst, What Evolution Is (Basic Books, 2001).
24Gould, Stephen Jay, The Structure of Evolutionary Theory (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002).
25Charlesworth, Brian and Charlesworth, Deborah, Elements of Evolutionary Genetics (Greenwood Village, CO: Roberts and Company Publishers, 2010).
26Dawkins, Richard, The Selfish Gene, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).
27Wilson, Edward O., Sociobiology: The New Synthesis, 25th anniversary edition (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2000).
28Werner Patzelt, ed., Evolutorischer Institutionalismus. Theorie Und Exemplarische Studien Zu Evolution, Institutionalität Und Geschichtlichkeit (Würzburg, Germany: Ergon, 2007).
29Lewis, Orion and Steinmo, Sven, Taking Evolution Seriously (Arena Working Papers, 2007).
30Lewis, Orion A. and Steinmo, Sven, “How institutions evolve: evolutionary theory and institutional change,” Polity, 2012, 44(3): 314339.
31Lustick, Ian S., “Taking evolution seriously: Historical institutionalism and evolutionary theory,” Polity, 2011, 43(2): 179209.
32Blyth, Mark, Hodgson, Geoffrey, Lewis, Orion, and Steinmo, Sven, “Introduction to the special issue on the evolution of institutions,” Journal of Institutional Economics, 2011, 7(3): 299315.
33Dawkins, p. 189.
34Lewis and Steinmo, 2007, p. 34.
35Blyth et al., p. 300.
36Lustick, p. 190.
37Lewis and Steinmo, 2012, p. 322.
38Lewis and Steinmo, 2012, p. 334.
39Patzelt, Werner, “Institutionalität Und Geschichtlichkeit,” in Evolutorischer Institutionalismus, pp. 287374.
40Strassberg, Maura I., “Distinctions of form or substance: Monogamy, polygamy and same-sex marriage,” North Carolina Law Review, 1996, 75: 15011624.
41Mayr, p. 73.
42Blyth and others, p. 305.
43Lewis and Steinmo, 2012, p. 332.
44Lewis and Steinmo, 2007, p. 33.
45Gupta, M. P., “Tracking the evolution of E-governance in India,” in Technology Enabled Transformation of the Public Sector: Advances in E-Government, Weerakkody, Vishant, ed. (Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, 2012), p. 52.
46Wilson, Helen, “The D’Hondt Method Explained,”∼ucahhwi/dhondt.pdf, accessed March 23, 2016.
47“Hare/Niemeyer,” Der Bundeswahleiter,, accessed on March 7, 2016.
48Bomsdorf, Eckart, “Ein Neues Verfahren Zur Umsetzung von Wählerstimmen in Mandate,” Zeitschrift Für Parlamentsfragen, 1987, 18(2): 221228.
49Hibbert, Christopher, The French Revolution (London: Penguin Books, 1982).
50Ludwig, Kirk, “Rationality, language, and the principle of charity,” in The Oxford Handbook of Rationality, Mele, Alfred R. and Rawling, Piers, eds. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), pp. 343362.
51de Mesquita, Bruce Bueno and McDermott, Rose, “Crossing no man’s land: Cooperation from the trenches,” Political Psychology, 2004, 25(2): 271287.
52Blyth et al., p. 306.
53Lewis and Steinmo, 2012, p. 330.
54Shepsle, Kenneth, “Rational choice institutionalism,” in The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, Rhodes, R. A. W., Binder, Sarah A., and Rockman, Bert A., eds. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), pp. 2339.
55Lewis and Steinmo, 2007, p. 4.
56Odum, Eugene Pleasants, Fundamentals of Ecology (Philadelphia: Saunders, 1971), p. 8.
57Lewis and Steinmo, 2012, p. 336.
58Diamond, Jared, Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed (New York: Penguin, 2007).
59Flannery, Kent V., “The cultural evolution of civilizations,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1972, 3: 399426.
60Trigger, Bruce G., Understanding Early Civilizations: A Comparative Study (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), p. 395.
61Diamond, p. 157.
62Medina-Elizalde, Martín and Rohling, Eelco J., “Collapse of classic Maya civilization related to modest reduction in precipitation,” Science, 2012, 335(6071): 956959.
63Diamond, p. 368.
64Fürstenberg, Kai Fabian, Panchayati Raj in India. The Evolution Between 1947 and 1992. Dissertation (Heidelberg: Department of Political Science, South Asia Institute, Heidelberg University, 2015), p. 173.
65Fürstenberg, p. 153.
66Demuth, Christian, “Institutionen Und Ihre Stabilität,” in Evolutorischer Institutionalismus, pp. 449480.
67Mayr, p. 219.
68Fürstenberg, pp. 122, 153, 170, 199.
69Fürstenberg, pp. 115, 136.
70Panchayati Raj at a Glance (New Delhi: Government of India, 1990), p. 12.
71Gould, p. 745.
72Lewis and Steinmo, 2012, p. 337.
73Bollen, Kenneth A. and Jackman, Robert W., “Democracy, stability, and dichotomies,” American Sociological Review, 1989, 54(4): 612621.
74Hatemi, Peter K., Hibbing, John R., Medland, Sarah E., Keller, Matthew C., Alford, John R., Smith, Kevin B., Martin, Nicholas G., and Eaves, Lindon J., “Not by twins alone: Using the extended family design to investigate genetic influence on political beliefs,” American Journal of Political Science, 2010, 54(3): 798814.
75Alford, John R. and Hibbing, John R., “The origin of politics: An evolutionary theory of political behavior,” Perspectives on Politics, 2004, 2(4): 707723.
76Fowler, James H., Baker, Laura A., and Dawes, Christopher T., “Genetic variation in political participation,” American Political Science Review, 2008, 102(2): 233248.
77Bernstein, Robert, Chadha, Anita, and Montjoy, Robert, “Overreporting voting: Why it happens and why it matters,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 2001, 65(1): 2244.
78Charney, Evan and English, William, “Candidate genes and political behavior,” American Political Science Review, 2012, 106(1): 134.
79Deppe, Kristen Diane, Stoltenberg, Scott F., Smith, Kevin B., and Hibbing, John R., “Candidate genes and voter turnout: Further evidence on the role of 5-HTTLPR,” American Political Science Review, 2013, 107(2): 375381.
80Birney, Ewan, Why I’m skeptical about the idea of genetically inherited trauma,” Guardian,, accessed October 15, 2015.
81Ridley, Matt, Nature via Nurture: Genes, Experience, and What Makes Us Human (New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 2003).
83Levi, Margaret, “Reconsiderations of rational choice in comparative and historical analysis,” in Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture and Structure, Lichbach, Mark Irving, ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 117133.
84Greif, Avner and Laitin, David D., “A theory of endogenous institutional change,” American Political Science Review, 2004, 98(4): 633652.
85Peters et al., p. 1283.
86Lewis and Steinmo, 2012, p. 323.
87Kelley, Colin P., Mohtadi, Shahrzad, Cane, Mark A., Seager, Richard, and Kushnir, Yochanan, “Climate change in the fertile crescent and implications of the recent Syrian drought,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2015, 112(11): 32413246.
88Steinmo, Sven, The Evolution of Modern States: Sweden, Japan, and the United States (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics and the Life Sciences
  • ISSN: 0730-9384
  • EISSN: 1471-5457
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-the-life-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 102
Total number of PDF views: 185 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 558 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th March 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.