Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

News coverage of controversial emerging technologies: Evidence for the issue attention cycle in print and online media

  • Ashley A. Anderson (a1), Dominique Brossard (a2) and Dietram A. Scheufele (a3)

Abstract

This study analyzes the issue attention cycle for print and online media coverage of a scientific publication examining the deaths of Chinese factory workers due to lung damage from chronic exposure to nanoparticles. The results of the nanoparticle study, published in 2009, embody news values that would make the study a prime candidate for press coverage, namely, novelty, negativity, controversy, and potential widespread impact. Nevertheless, mentions of the event in traditional English-language print media were nearly nonexistent. Online media, on the other hand, gave the story greater coverage. This case study exemplifies why online media may not be bound to the same issue attention cycle that print media are for controversial scientific events.

Copyright

References

Hide All
1. Mooney, Chris and Kirshenbaum, Sheril, “Unpopular science,” The Nation August 17, 2009, http://www.thenation.com/article/unpopular-science
2. Tanner, Andrea H., “Agenda building, source selection, and health news at local television stations: A nationwide survey of local television health reporters,” Science Communication 2004, 25(4): 350363.
3. Kiernan, Vincent, Embargoed Science (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2006).
4. National Nanotechnology Initiative, “FAQs: Nanotechnology,” http://www.nano.gov/.
5. Khushf, George, “An ethic for enhancing human performance through integrative technologies,” in Managing Nano-Bio-Info-Cogno Innovations: Converging Technologies in Society, Bainbridge, William Sims and Roco, Mihail C., eds. (Dordrecht: Springer, 2006), pp. 255278.
6. National Nanotechnology Initiative, “NNI budget,” http://www.nano.gov/.
7. “Nanotech-enabled consumer products continue to rise,” Nanotechproject.org, March 10, 2011, http://www.nanotechproject.org/news/archive/9231/.
8. Song, Y., Li, X., and Du, X., “Exposure to nanoparticles is related to pleural effusion, pulmonary fibrosis and granuloma,” European Respiratory Journal 2009, 34: 559567.
9. Maynard, Andrew, “Nanoparticle exposure and occupational lung disease: Six expert perspectives on a new clinical study,” 2020 Science November 2, 2009, http://2020science.org/2009/08/18/nanoparticle-exposure-and-occupational-lung-disease-six-expert-perspectives-on-a-new-clinical-study/.
10. Maynard, Andrew, “Do peer review journals need a media code of conduct?” 2020 Science October 14, 2009, http://2020science.org/2009/10/14/do-peer-review-journals-need-a-media-code-of-conduct/.
11. Brain, J. D., Kreyling, W., and Gehr, P., “To the editors,” European Respiratory Journal 2010, 35(1): 226227.
12. Inoue, K. and Takano, H., “Effects of nanoparticles on lung damage in humans,” European Respiratory Journal 2010, 35(1): 224225.
13. Song, Y., Li, X., and Du, X., “From the authors,” European Respiratory Journal 2010, 25(1): 225226.
14. European Respiratory Journal Editors, “From the editors,” European Respiratory Journal, 2010, 35(1): 227.
15. Ren, H. and Huang, X., “Polyacrylate nanoparticles: Toxicity or new nanomedine?” European Respiratory Journal 2010, 36(1): 218221.
16. Song, Yuguo and Tang, Shichuan, “Nanoexposure, unusual diseases, and new health and safety concerns,” The Scientific World Journal 2011, 11:18211828.
17. Song, Yuguo, Li, Xue, Wang, Liying, Rojanasakul, Yon, Castranova, Vincent, Li, Huiling, and Ma, Jing, “Nanomaterials in humans: Identification, characteristics, and potential damage,” Toxicologic Pathology 2011, 39(5): 841849.
18. Lyn, Tan E. “Deaths, lung damage linked to nanoparticles in China,” Reuters, August 19, 2009, http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/08/19/us-china-nanoparticles-idUSTRE57I1Y720090819
19. Galtung, Johan and Ruge, Mari Holmboe, “The structure of foreign news,” Journal of Peace Research 1965, 2(1):6491.
20. Wallis, Roger and Baran, Stanley, The Known World of Broadcast News (New York: Routledge, 1990).
21. Harcup, Tony and O'Neill, Deirdre, “What is news? Galtung and Ruge revisited,” Journalism Studies 2001, 2(2): 261280.
22. Dudo, Anthony, Dunwoody, Sharon, and Scheufele, Dietram A., “The emergence of nano news: Tracking thematic trends and changes in U.S. newspaper coverage of nanotechnology,” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 2011, 88(1): 5575.
23. Gamson, William A. and Modigliani, Andre, “Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach,” American Journal of Sociology 1989, 95(1): 137.
24. Ladwig, Peter, Anderson, Ashley A., Brossard, Dominique, Scheufele, Dietram A., and Shaw, Bret, “Narrowing the nano discourse?” Materials Today 2010, 13(5): 5254.
25. Gans, Herbert, Deciding What's News: A Study of the CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek and Time (London: Constable, 1979).
26. Bergstein, Brian, “Study: Carbon nanotubes mimic asbestos in mouse tests,” USA Today May 20, 2008, http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/nano/2008-05-20-carbon-nanotubes-asbestos_N.htm
27. Berkowitz, Dan. “Who sets the media agenda? The ability of policymakers to determine news decisions,” in Public Opinion, the Press, and Public Policy, David Kennamer, J., ed. (Westport: Praeger, 1992), pp. 81102.
28. Downs, Anthony, “Up and down with ecology: The issue attention cycle,” The Public Interest 1972, 28: 3851.
29. McComas, Katherine and Shanahan, James, “Telling stories about global climate change: Measuring the impact of narratives on issue cycles,” Communication Research 1999, 26(1): 3057.
30. Nisbet, Matthew C. and Huge, Mike, “Attention cycles and frames in the plant biotechnology debate: Managing power and participation through the press/policy connection,” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 2006, 11(2): 340.
31. Shih, Tsung-Jen, Wijaya, Rosalyna, and Brossard, Dominique, “Media coverage of public health epidemics: Linking framing and issue attention cycles toward an integrated theory of print news coverage of epidemics,” Mass Communication and Society 2008, 11(2): 141160.
32. Brossard, Dominique, Shanahan, James, and McComas, Katherine, “Are issue-cycles culturally constructed? A comparison of French and American coverage of global climate change,” Mass Communication & Society 2004, 7(3): 359377.
33. Drezner, Daniel W. and Farrell, Henry, “Web of influence,” Foreign Policy 2004 145: 3240.
34. Gillmor, Dan, We the Media: Grassroots Journalism by the People, for the People (Sepastopol: O'Reilly, 2004).
35. Wallsten, Kevin, “Agenda setting and the blogosphere: An analysis of the relationship between mainstream media and political blogs,” Review of Policy Research 2007, 24(6): 567587.
36. Lawrence, Steve and Lee Giles, C., “Searching the World Wide Web,” Science 1998, 280(5360): 98100.
37. Lewandowski, Dirk, “A three-year study on the freshness of Web search engine databases,” Journal of Information Science 2008, 34(6): 817831.
38. The Nielsen Company, “Bing overtakes Yahoo! as the #2 U.S. search engine,” September 14, 2010, http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/bing-overtakes-yahoo-as-the-2-search-engine/.
39. Horrigan, John B., “The internet as a resource for news and information about science,” Pew Internet & American Life Project November 20, 2006, http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2006/The-Internet-as-a-Resource-for-News-and-Information-about-Science.aspx
40. Stone, Gerald C. and McCombs, Maxwell E., “Tracing the time lag in agenda-setting,” Journalism Quarterly 1981, 58(1): 5155.
41. William Engdahl, F., “Nano particles used in untested H1N1 Swine Flu vaccines,” Centre for Research on Globalization September 13, 2009, http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?aid=15092&;context=va
42. Fishman, Mark, “Crime waves as ideology,” Social Problems 1978, 25(5): 531543.
43. Poland, Craig A., Duffin, Rodger, Kinloch, Ian, Maynard, Andrew, Wallace, William A. H., Seaton, Anthony, Stone, Vicki, Brown, Simon, MacNee, William, and Donaldson, Ken, “Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study,” Nature Nanotechnology 2008, 3(7): 423428.
44. Shoemaker, Pamela J., “A new gatekeeping model,” in McQuail's Reader in Mass Communication Theory, McQuail, D., ed. (London: Sage, 2002), pp. 253259.
45. Hilgartner, Stephen and Bosk, Charles L., “The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model,” American Journal of Sociology 1988, 94: 5378.

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

News coverage of controversial emerging technologies: Evidence for the issue attention cycle in print and online media

  • Ashley A. Anderson (a1), Dominique Brossard (a2) and Dietram A. Scheufele (a3)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.