5U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “U.S. public health service recommendation for fluoride concentration in drinking water for the prevention of dental caries,” Public Health Reports, 2015, 130(4): 318–331.
8Kata, A., “Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm—An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement,” Vaccine, 2012, 30(25): 3778–3789, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.112. 9Bauer, M., Allum, N., and Miller, S., “What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda,” Public Understanding of Science, 2007, 16: 79–95, https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506071287. 10National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, Science Literacy: Concepts, Contexts, and Consequences (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2016), https://doi.org/10.17226/23595. 11Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., Braman, D., and Mandel, G., “The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks,” Nature Climate Change, 2012, 2: 732–735, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1547.
12Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Dawson, E. C., and Slovic, P., “Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government,” Behavioural Public Policy, 2017, 1(1): 54–86.
14Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., and Cichocka, A., “The psychology of conspiracy theories,” Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2017, 26(6): 538–42, https://doi.org/10.1177/096372147718261. 16Abalakina-Paap, M., Stephan, W. G., Craig, T., and Gregory, W. L., “Beliefs in conspiracies,” Political Psychology, 1999, 20 (3), 637–647, https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00160. 19Butler, L. D., Koopman, C., and Zimbardo, P., “The psychological impact of viewing the film ‘JFK’: Emotions, beliefs, and political behavioral intentions,” Political Psychology, 1995, 16(2): 237–257, https://doi.org/10.2307/3791831.
21Hofstadter, R., The Paranoid Style in American Politics: And Other Essays (New York: Knopf, 1965).
22Radnitz, S. and Underwood, P., “Is belief in conspiracy theories pathological? A survey experiment on the cognitive roots of extreme suspicion,” British Journal of Political Science, 2017, 47(1): 113–129, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123414000556. 25Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., and Gignac, G. E., “NASA faked the moon landing—Therefore, (climate) science is a hoax: An anatomy of the motivated rejection of science,” Psychological Science, 2013, 24(5): 622–633, https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457686.
26Sussman, B., Climategate: A Veteran Meteorologist Exposes the Global Warming Scam (Washington, DC: WND Books, 2010).
29Landrum, A. R., Eaves, B., and Shafto, P., “Learning to trust and trusting to learn: A theoretical framework,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2015, 19(3): 109–111, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.007. 30Kahan, D. M., Jenkins-Smith, H., and Braman, D., “Cultural cognition of scientific consensus,” Journal of Risk Research, 2011, 14(2): 147–174, https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.511246. 31Miller, J. M., Saunders, K. L., and Farhart, C. E., “Conspiracy endorsement as motivated reasoning: The moderating roles of political knowledge and trust,” American Journal of Political Science, 2016, 60(4): 824–844, https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12234. 32Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., and Imhoff, R., “Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire,” Frontiers in Psychology, 2013, 4: Article ID 225, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225. 33Darwin, H., Neave, N., and Holmes, J., “Belief in conspiracy theories: The role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation and schizotypy,” Personality and Individual Differences, 2011, 50(8): 1289–1293, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.027. 35Wood, M. J., Douglas, K. M., and Sutton, R. M., “Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories,” Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2012, 3(6): 767–773, https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611434786. 36Swami, V., Coles, R., Stieger, S., Pietsching, J., Furnham, A., Rehim, S., and Voracek, M., “Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real-world and fictitious conspiracy theories,” British Journal of Psychology, 2011, 102(3): 443–463, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02004.x. 37Imhoff, R. and Bruder, M., “Speaking (un-)truth to power: conspiracy mentality as a generalised political attitude,” European Journal of Personality, 2014, 28(1), 25–43, https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1930. 39Swami, V., Chamorro‐Premuzic, T., and Furnham, A., “Unanswered questions: A preliminary investigation of personality and individual difference predictors of 9/11 conspiracist beliefs,” Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2010, 24(6): 749–761, https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1583. 41Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., and Oberauer, K., “The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science,” PLOS ONE, 2013, 10(8): e75637, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134773. 42Dixon, R. M. and Jones, J. A., “Conspiracist ideation as a predictor of climate-science rejection: An alternative analysis,” Psychological Science, 2015, 26(5): 664–666, https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614566469. 43Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., and Oberauer, K., “The robust relationship between conspiracism and denial of (climate) science,” Psychological Science, 2015, 26(5): 667–670, https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614568432. 44Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., et al., “The science of fake news: Addressing fake news requires a multidisciplinary effort,” Science, 2018, 359(6380): 1094–1096, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aa02998.
46Valkenburg, P. M. and Peter, J., “The differential susceptibility to media effects model,” Journal of Communication, 2013, 63: 221–243.
47Pennycook, G. and Rand, D. G., “Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning,” Cognition, 2019, 188: 39–50, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011. 48Bronstein, M. V., Pennycook, G., Bear, A., Rand, D. G., and Cannon, T. D., “Belief in fake news is associated with delusionality, dogmatism, religious fundamentalism and reduced analytical thinking. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2019, 8(1): 108–117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.09.005. 50National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine, Genetically Engineered Crops: Experiences and Prospects (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2016), https://doi.org/10.17226/23596. 56Kalkbrenner, A., Schmidt, R. J., and Penlesky, A. C., “Environmental chemical exposures and Autism spectrum disorders: A review of the epidemiological evidence,” Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care, 2014, 44(10): 277-318, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cppeds.2014.06.001. 57Adams, M., “Autism, mercury, thimerosal and vaccines: Natural News releases large collection of scientific knowledge that’s been suppressed by the FDA, CDC, and pharma-controlled media,” Natural News, March 5, 2017, https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-03-05-autism-mercury-thimerosal-and-vaccines-natural-news-releases-collection-of-scientific-knowledge-thats-been-suppressed.html, accessed June 21, 2019. 59Kahan, D. M., “‘Ordinary science intelligence’: A science-comprehension measure for study of risk and science communication, with notes on evolution and climate change,” Journal of Risk Research, 2017, 20(8): 995–1016, https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2016.1148067. 60Rizopoulos, D., “ltm: A package for latent variable modeling and item response analysis,” Journal of Statistical Software, 2006, 17(5): 1–25, http://www.jstatsoft.org/v17/i05/.
61Lindeman, R. H. Merenda, P. F. and Gold, R. Z., Introduction to Bivariate and Multivariate Analysis (Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, 1980).