Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-2qt69 Total loading time: 0.215 Render date: 2022-08-13T07:04:13.187Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Article contents

The walkman effect*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2008


The walkman – a cassette recorder for headphone listening. This gadget, originally invented and marketed by Sony in the spring of 1980 in Japan, and soon exported, has become known throughout the West, however awkward its Japanese-made English may sound. As its use has proliferated, so have the arguments about its effects. One example, a report in Nouvel Observateur, was cited by Philippe Sollers (Sollers 1981, p. 50). The interviewer, apparently, asks young people (eighteen to twenty-two years old) the following: whether men with the walkman are human or not; whether they are losing contact with reality; whether the relations between eyes and ears are changing radically; whether they are psychotic or schizophrenic; whether they are worried about the fate of humanity. One of the interviewees replies: your question is out-of-date. All of these problems of communication and incommunicability, according to him, belong to the sixties and the seventies. The eighties are not the same at all. They are the years of autonomy, of an intersection of singularities in the construction of discourses. Soon, he says, you will have every kind of film on video at home, every kind of classical music on only one tape. This is what gives me pleasure.

Part 3. Modes of Listening
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Augoyard, J. -F. 1979. Pas à pas. Essai sur le cheminement quotidien en milieu urbain (Paris)Google Scholar
Barthes, R. 1982. L'Obvie et l'obtus (Paris)Google Scholar
Baudrillard, J. 1972. Pour une critique de l'économie politique du signe (Paris)Google Scholar
Bollnow, O. F. 1963. Mensch und Raum (Stuttgart)Google Scholar
Bosseur, J.-Y. 1977. ‘Geographie musicale de la vile’, Revue d'Esthétique, special number: La Ville n'est pas en lieu, pp. 207–14Google Scholar
de Certeau, M. 1980 a. La Culture au pluriel (Paris)Google Scholar
de Certeau, M. 1980 b. L'Invention du quotidien (Paris)Google Scholar
Charles, D. 1979. ‘Flux de marche avec piétinement’, Traverses, 14–15, pp. 8192Google Scholar
Deleuze, C. 1969. Logique du sens (Paris)Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. 1980. Mille plateaux (Paris)Google Scholar
Dufrenne, M. 1979. ‘Le champ de l'esthétisable’, Revue d'Esthétique, special number: Pour l'object, pp. 131–43Google Scholar
Fabbri, F. 1980. ‘Du secret’, Traverses, 18, pp. 7683Google Scholar
Greimas, A. J. 1976. Sémiotique et sciences sociales (Paris)Google Scholar
Hosokawa, S. 1981 a. Walkman no Shûjigaku (Rhetoric of Walkman) (Tokyo)Google Scholar
Hosokawa, S. 1981 b. ‘Considérations sur la musique mass-médiatisée’, International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music, XII: 1, pp. 2150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyotard, J.-F. 1979. La Condition postmoderne (Paris)Google Scholar
Musique en Jeu. 1976. 24 (La Musique, les Sons et la ville)Google Scholar
Norberg-Schultz, C. 1971. Existence, Space and Architecture (London)Google Scholar
Parret, H. 1983. ‘Postface’, in Tarasti, E., De l'Interprétation musicale, Actes semiotiques – documents, 42, EHESS (Paris), pp. 2331Google Scholar
Prato, P. 1983. ‘La fenomenologia della musica di Alfred Schutz’, Rivista di Estetica, 11, pp. 129–40Google Scholar
Sansot, P. 1973. Póetique de la ville (Paris)Google Scholar
Sansot, P. 1983. Variations paysagères (Paris)Google Scholar
Sbisà, M. and Fabbri, P. 1980. Models for a Pragmatic Analysis (Urbano)Google Scholar
Schafer, M. 1977. The Tuning of the World (New York)Google Scholar
Schutz, A. 1964. ‘Making music together’, in Collected Papers vol. 2 (The Hague), pp. 159–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutz, A. 1976. ‘Fragments on the phenomenology of musicMusic and Man, 2: 1/2, pp. 2371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sollers, P. 1981. ‘Seul contre tous …! Entretien avec Philippe Sollers’, Magazine littéraire, 171 (04), pp. 50–2Google Scholar
Tibon-Cornillot, M. 1982. ‘Du maquillage aux prothèses’, Confrontation, 7 (Spring), pp. 119–36Google Scholar
Traverses, 1979. 14/15 (Panoplies du corps)Google Scholar
Traverses 1984. 30/31 (Le secret)Google Scholar
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The walkman effect*
Available formats

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The walkman effect*
Available formats

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The walkman effect*
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *