Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Can metabotyping help deliver the promise of personalised nutrition?

  • Clare B. O'Donovan (a1), Marianne C. Walsh (a1), Michael J. Gibney (a1), Eileen R. Gibney (a1) and Lorraine Brennan (a1) (a2)...

Abstract

Over a decade since the completion of the human genome sequence, the promise of personalised nutrition available to all has yet to become a reality. While the definition was originally very gene-focused, in recent years, a model of personalised nutrition has emerged with the incorporation of dietary, phenotypic and genotypic information at various levels. Developing on from the idea of personalised nutrition, the concept of targeted nutrition has evolved which refers to the delivery of tailored dietary advice at a group level rather than at an individual level. Central to this concept is metabotyping or metabolic phenotyping, which is the ability to group similar individuals together based on their metabolic or phenotypic profiles. Applications of the metabotyping concept extend from the nutrition to the medical literature. While there are many examples of the metabotype approach, there is a dearth in the literature with regard to the development of tailored interventions for groups of individuals. This review will first explore the effectiveness of personalised nutrition in motivating behaviour change and secondly, examine potential novel ways for the delivery of personalised advice at a population level through a metabotyping approach. Based on recent findings from our work, we will demonstrate a novel strategy for the delivery of tailored dietary advice at a group level using this concept. In general, there is a strong emerging evidence to support the effectiveness of personalised nutrition; future work should ascertain if targeted nutrition can motivate behaviour change in a similar manner.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Can metabotyping help deliver the promise of personalised nutrition?
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Can metabotyping help deliver the promise of personalised nutrition?
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Can metabotyping help deliver the promise of personalised nutrition?
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

* Corresponding author: L. Brennan, email lorraine.brennan@ucd.ie

References

Hide All
1. Williams, RJ (1950) Concept of genetotrophic disease. Nutr Rev 8, 257260.
2. Bickel, H, Gerrard, J & Hickmans, EM (1953) Influence of phenylalanine intake on phenylketonuria. Lancet 265, 812813.
3. Utermann, G, Hees, M & Steinmetz, A (1977) Polymorphism of apolipoprotein E and occurrence of dysbetalipoproteinaemia in man. Nature 269, 604607.
4. Minihane, AM, Khan, S, Leigh-Firbank, EC et al. (2000) ApoE polymorphism and fish oil supplementation in subjects with an atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 20, 19901997.
5. Department of Health (1991) Dietary Reference Values for Food Energy and Nutrients for the United Kingdom: Report of the Panel on Dietary Reference Values of the Committee on Medical Aspects of Food Policy. London: the Stationary Office.
6. Venter, JC, Adams, MD, Myers, EW et al. (2001) The sequence of the human genome. Science 291, 13041351.
7. Lander, ES, Linton, LM, Birren, B et al. (2001) Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860921.
8. Ronteltap, A, van Trijp, H, Berezowska, A et al. (2013) Nutrigenomics-based personalised nutritional advice: in search of a business model? Genes Nutr 8, 153163.
9. Gibney, MJ & Walsh, MC (2013) The future direction of personalised nutrition: my diet, my phenotype, my genes. Proc Nutr Soc 72, 219225.
10. Hamburg, MA & Collins, FS (2010) The path to personalized medicine. N Engl J Med 363, 301304.
11. Celis-Morales, C, Lara, J & Mathers, JC (2014) Personalising nutritional guidance for more effective behaviour change. Proc Nutr Soc 12, 19.
12. Kroeze, W, Oenema, A, Dagnelie, PC et al. (2008) Examining the minimal required elements of a computer-tailored intervention aimed at dietary fat reduction: results of a randomized controlled dismantling study. Health Educ Res 23, 880891.
13. Alexander, GL, McClure, JB, Calvi, JH et al. (2010) A randomized clinical trial evaluating online interventions to improve fruit and vegetable consumption. Am J Public Health 100, 319326.
14. Wright, JL, Sherriff, JL, Dhaliwal, SS et al. (2011) Tailored, iterative, printed dietary feedback is as effective as group education in improving dietary behaviours: results from a randomised control trial in middle-aged adults with cardiovascular risk factors. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 8, 43.
15. Hutchesson, MJ, Collins, CE, Morgan, PJ et al. (2014) Changes to dietary intake during a 12-week commercial web-based weight loss program: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Clin Nutr 68, 6470.
16. Ambeba, EJ, Ye, L, Sereika, SM et al. (2015) The use of mHealth to deliver tailored messages reduces reported energy and fat intake. J Cardiovasc Nurs 30, 3543.
17. Springvloet, L, Lechner, L, de Vries, H et al. (2015) Short- and medium-term efficacy of a Web-based computer-tailored nutrition education intervention for adults including cognitive and environmental feedback: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 17, e23.
18. Tate, DF, Jackvony, EH & Wing, RR (2006) A randomized trial comparing human e-mail counseling, computer-automated tailored counseling, and no counseling in an internet weight loss program. Arch Intern Med 166, 16201625.
19. Hunter, CM, Peterson, AL, Alvarez, LM et al. (2008) Weight management using the internet a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med 34, 119126.
20. Bennett, GG, Herring, SJ, Puleo, E et al. (2010) Web-based weight loss in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Obesity 18, 308313.
21. Kraschnewski, JL, Stuckey, HL, Rovniak, LS et al. (2011) Efficacy of a weight-loss website based on positive deviance. A randomized trial. Am J Prev Med 41, 610614.
22. Burke, LE, Styn, MA, Sereika, SM et al. (2012) Using mHealth technology to enhance self-monitoring for weight loss: a randomized trial. Am J Prev Med 43, 2026.
23. Collins, CE, Morgan, PJ, Jones, P et al. (2012) A 12-week commercial web-based weight-loss program for overweight and obese adults: randomized controlled trial comparing basic versus enhanced features. J Med Internet Res 14, e57.
24. Chambliss, HO, Huber, RC, Finley, CE et al. (2011) Computerized self-monitoring and technology-assisted feedback for weight loss with and without an enhanced behavioral component. Patient Educ Couns 85, 375382.
25. Morgan, PJ, Callister, R, Collins, CE et al. (2013) The SHED-IT community trial: a randomized controlled trial of internet- and paper-based weight loss programs tailored for overweight and obese men. Ann Behav Med 45, 139152.
26. Sternfeld, B, Block, C, Quesenberry, CP et al. (2009) Improving diet and physical activity with ALIVE: a worksite randomized trial. Am J Prev Med 36, 475483.
27. Winett, RA, Anderson, ES, Wojcik, JR et al. (2011) Guide to health: a randomized controlled trial of the effects of a completely WEB-based intervention on physical activity, fruit and vegetable consumption, and body weight. Transl Behav Med 1, 165174.
28. Broekhuizen, K, van Poppel, MN, Koppes, LL et al. (2012) Can multiple lifestyle behaviours be improved in people with familial hypercholesterolemia? Results of a parallel randomised controlled trial. PLoS ONE 7, e50032.
29. Mouttapa, M, Robertson, TP, McEligot, AJ et al. (2011) The personal nutrition planner: a 5-week, computer-tailored intervention for women. J Nutr Educ Behav 43, 165172.
30. Jacobs, N, Clays, E, De Bacquer, D et al. (2011) Effect of a tailored behavior change program on a composite lifestyle change score: a randomized controlled trial. Health Educ Res 26, 886895.
31. Arkadianos, I, Valdes, AM, Marinos, E et al. (2007) Improved weight management using genetic information to personalize a calorie controlled diet. Nutr J 6, 29.
32. Chao, S, Roberts, JS, Marteau, TM et al. (2008) Health behavior changes after genetic risk assessment for Alzheimer disease: the REVEAL study. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 22, 9497.
33. Bloss, CS, Schork, NJ & Topol, EJ (2011) Effect of direct-to-consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk. N Engl J Med 364, 524534.
34. Bloss, CS, Wineinger, NE, Darst, BF et al. (2013) Impact of direct-to-consumer genomic testing at long term follow-up. J Med Genet 50, 393400.
35. Grant, RW, O'Brien, KE, Waxler, JL et al. (2013) Personalized genetic risk counseling to motivate diabetes prevention: a randomized trial. Diabetes Care 36, 1319.
36. Nielsen, DE & El-Sohemy, A (2014) Disclosure of genetic information and change in dietary intake: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE 9, e112665.
37. Frankwich, KA, Egnatios, J, Kenyon, ML et al. (2015) Differences in weight loss between persons on standard balanced vs nutrigenetic diets in a randomized controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, Epublication ahead of print version.
38. Vernarelli, JA, Roberts, JS, Hiraki, S et al. (2010) Effect of Alzheimer disease genetic risk disclosure on dietary supplement use. Am J Clin Nutr 91, 14021407.
39. Marteau, TM, French, DP, Griffin, SJ et al. (2010) Effects of communicating DNA-based disease risk estimates on risk-reducing behaviours. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 10, Cd007275.
40. Celis-Morales, C, Livingstone, KM, Marsaux, CF et al. (2015) Design and baseline characteristics of the Food4Me study: a web-based randomised controlled trial of personalised nutrition in seven European countries. Genes Nutr 10, 450.
41. Brennan, L (2008) Session 2: personalised nutrition. Metabolomic applications in nutritional research. Proc Nutr Soc 67, 404408.
42. Kaput, J (2008) Nutrigenomics research for personalized nutrition and medicine. Curr Opin Biotechnol 19, 110120.
43. Nicholson, JK, Holmes, E, Kinross, JM (2012) Metabolic phenotyping in clinical and surgical environments. Nature 491, 384–92.
44. Morris, C, O'Grada, C, Ryan, M et al. (2013) Identification of differential responses to an oral glucose tolerance test in healthy adults. PLoS ONE 8, e72890.
45. Holmes, E, Wilson, ID & Nicholson, JK (2008) Metabolic phenotyping in health and disease. Cell 134, 714717.
46. Castaldi, PJ, Dy, J, Ross, J et al. (2014) Cluster analysis in the COPDGene study identifies subtypes of smokers with distinct patterns of airway disease and emphysema. Thorax 69, 415422.
47. Erro, R, Vitale, C, Amboni, M et al. (2013) The heterogeneity of early Parkinson's disease: a cluster analysis on newly diagnosed untreated patients. PLoS ONE 8, e70244.
48. Moore, WC, Meyers, DA, Wenzel, SE et al. (2010) Identification of asthma phenotypes using cluster analysis in the severe asthma research program. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 181, 315323.
49. Lee, JH, Cho, MH, McDonald, ML et al. (2014) Phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity among subjects with mild airflow obstruction in COPDGene. Respir Med 108, 14691480.
50. Cho, MH, Washko, GR, Hoffmann, TJ et al. (2010) Cluster analysis in severe emphysema subjects using phenotype and genotype data: an exploratory investigation. Respir Res 11, 30.
51. Ma, LY, Chan, P, Gu, ZQ (2015) Heterogeneity among patients with Parkinson's disease: cluster analysis and genetic association. J Neurol Sci, Epub ahead of print.
52. Richette, P, Clerson, P, Perissin, L et al. (2013) Revisiting comorbidities in gout: a cluster analysis. Ann Rheum Dis 74, 142147.
53. Viniol, A, Jegan, N, Hirsch, O et al. (2013) Chronic low back pain patient groups in primary care – A cross sectional cluster analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14, 294.
54. Penrod, JD, Litke, A, Hawkes, WG et al. (2007) Heterogeneity in hip fracture patients: age, functional status, and comorbidity. J Am Geriatr Soc 55, 407413.
55. Eastwood, EA, Magaziner, J, Wang, J et al. (2002) Patients with hip fracture: subgroups and their outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc 50, 12401249.
56. van Bochove, K, van Schalkwijk, DB, Parnell, LD et al. (2012) Clustering by plasma lipoprotein profile reveals two distinct subgroups with positive lipid response to fenofibrate therapy. PLoS ONE. 7, e38072.
57. O'Sullivan, A, Gibney, MJ, Connor, AO et al. (2011) Biochemical and metabolomic phenotyping in the identification of a vitamin D responsive metabotype for markers of the metabolic syndrome. Mol Nutr Food Res 55, 679690.
58. O'Donovan, CB, Walsh, MC, Nugent, AP et al. (2014) Use of metabotyping for the delivery of personalised nutrition. Mol Nutr Food Res 59, 377385.
59. Brotons, C, Drenthen, AJ, Durrer, D et al. (2012) Beliefs and attitudes to lifestyle, nutrition and physical activity: the views of patients in Europe. Fam Pract 29, i49i55.
60. Brotons, C, Bjorkelund, C, Bulc, M et al. (2005) Prevention and health promotion in clinical practice: the views of general practitioners in Europe. Prev Med 40, 595601.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
  • ISSN: 0029-6651
  • EISSN: 1475-2719
  • URL: /core/journals/proceedings-of-the-nutrition-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed