Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The control of meal size in human subjects: a role for expected satiety, expected satiation and premeal planning

  • Jeffrey M. Brunstrom (a1)
Abstract

Unlike energy expenditure, energy intake occurs during discrete events: snacks and meals. The prevailing view is that meal size is governed by physiological and psychological events that promote satiation towards the end of a meal. This review explores an alternative and perhaps controversial proposition. Specifically that satiation plays a secondary role, and that meal size (kJ) is controlled by decisions about portion size, before a meal begins. Recently, techniques have been developed that enable us to quantify ‘expected satiation’ and ‘expected satiety’ (respectively, the fullness and the respite from hunger that foods are expected to confer). When compared on a kJ-for-kJ basis, these expectations differ markedly across foods. Moreover, in self-selected meals, these measures are remarkably good predictors of the energy content of food that ends up on our plate, even more important than palatability. Expected satiation and expected satiety are influenced by the physical characteristics of a food (e.g. perceived volume). However, they are also learned. Indeed, there is now mounting evidence for ‘expected-satiation drift’, a general tendency for a food to have higher expected satiation as it increases in familiarity. Together, these findings show that important elements of control (discrimination and learning/adaptation) are clearly evident in plans around portion size. Since most meals are eaten in their entirety, understanding the nature of these controls should be given high priority.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The control of meal size in human subjects: a role for expected satiety, expected satiation and premeal planning
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The control of meal size in human subjects: a role for expected satiety, expected satiation and premeal planning
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The control of meal size in human subjects: a role for expected satiety, expected satiation and premeal planning
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Corresponding author: Dr Jeffrey Brunstrom, fax: +44 117 928 8588, email Jeff.Brunstrom@Bristol.ac.uk
References
Hide All
1.Goris AH, Westerterp-Plantenga MS & Westerterp KR (2000) Undereating and under recording of habitual food intake in obese men: selective underreporting of fat intake. Am J Clin Nutr 71, 130134.
2.Kissileff HR & Vanitallie TB (1982) Physiology of the control of food intake. Annu Rev Nutr 2, 371418.
3.Woods SC, Benoit SC, Clegg DJ et al. (2004) Regulation of energy homeostasis by peripheral signals. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 18, 497515.
4.Norton GNM, Anderson AS & Hetherington MM (2006) Volume and variety, relative effects on food intake. Physiol Behav 87, 714722.
5.Raynor HA & Epstein LH (2001) Dietary variety, energy regulation, and obesity. Psychol Bull 127, 325341.
6.Yeomans MR, Lee MD, Gray RW et al. (2001) Effects of test-meal palatability on compensatory eating following disguised fat and carbohydrate preloads. Int J Obes 25, 12151224.
7.de Castro JM & Brewer EM (1992) The amount eaten in meals by humans is a power function of the number of people present. Physiol Behav 51, 121125.
8.Rolls BJ, Roe LS & Meengs JS (2006) Reductions in portion size and energy density of foods are additive and lead to sustained decreases in energy intake. Am J Clin Nutr 83, 1117.
9.Brunstrom JM & Mitchell GL (2006) Effects of distraction on the development of satiety. Br J Nutr 96, 761769.
10.Mitchell GL & Brunstrom JM (2005) Everyday dietary behaviour and the relationship between attention and meal size. Appetite 45, 344355.
11.Herman CP & Mack D (1975) Restrained and unrestrained eating. J Pers 43, 647660.
12.Hetherington MM (2007) Cues to overeat: psychological factors influencing overconsumption. Proc Nutr Soc 66, 113123.
13.de Castro JM (1996) How can eating behavior be regulated in the complex environments of free-living humans? Neurosci Biobehav Rev 20, 119131.
14.Koebnick C, Strassner C, Hoffmann I et al. (1999) Consequences of a long-term raw food diet on body weight and menstruation: results of a questionnaire survey. Ann Nutr Metab 43, 6979.
15.Wrangham RW, James Holland J, Laden G et al. (1999) The raw and the stolen: cooking and the ecology of human origins. Curr Anthropol 40, 567594.
16.Wrangham RW (2009) Catching Fire: How Cooking made us Human. London: Profile Books Ltd.
17.Brunstrom JM, Collingwood J & Rogers PJ (2010) Perceived volume, expected satiation, and the energy content of self-selected meals. Appetite 55, 2529.
18.Brunstrom JM, Shakeshaft NG & Scott-Samuel NE (2008) Measuring ‘expected satiety’ in a range of common foods using a method of constant stimuli. Appetite 51, 604614.
19.Brunstrom JM & Shakeshaft NG (2009) Measuring affective (liking) and non-affective (expected satiety) determinants of portion size and food reward. Appetite 52, 108114.
20.Brunstrom JM & Rogers PJ (2009) How many calories are on our plate? Expected fullness, not liking, determines meal-size selection. Obesity 17, 18841890.
21.O'Sullivan HL, Alexander E, Ferriday D et al. (2010) Effects of repeated exposure on liking for a reduced-energy-dense food. Am J Clin Nutr 92, 15841589.
22.Ferriday D & Brunstrom JM (2008) How does food-cue exposure lead to larger meal sizes? Br J Nutr 9, 18.
23.Cooke LJ & Wardle J (2005) Age and gender differences in children's food preferences. Br J Nutr 93, 741746.
24.Drewnowski A & Specter SE (2004) Poverty and obesity: the role of energy density and energy costs. Am J Clin Nutr 79, 6–16.
25.Yeomans MR (1996) Palatability and the micro-structure of feeding in humans: the appetizer effect. Appetite 27, 119133.
26.Lowe MR & Butryn ML (2007) Hedonic hunger: a new dimension of appetite? Physiol Behav 91, 432439.
27.Bell EA, Castellanos VH, Pelkman CL et al. (1998) Energy density of foods affects energy intake in normal-weight women. Am J Clin Nutr 67, 412420.
28.Fisher J, Liu Y, Birch LL et al. (2007) Effects of portion size and energy density on young children's intake at a meal. Am J Clin Nutr 86, 174179.
29.Stubbs RJ, Johnstone AM, O'Reilly LM et al. (1998) The effect of covertly manipulating the energy density of mixed diets on ad libitum food intake in ‘pseudo free-living’ humans. Int J Obes 22, 980987.
30.Chuah YML & Maybery MT (1999) Verbal and spatial short-term memory: common sources of developmental change? J Exp Child Psychol 73, 7–44.
31.Carbonnel F, Lemann M, Rambaud J et al. (1994) Effect of the energy density of a solid-liquid meal on gastric emptying and satiety. Am J Clin Nutr 60, 307311.
32.Le Magnen J (1956) Effets sur la prise alimentaire du rat blanc des administrations postprandiales d'insuline et le mecanisme des appetits caloriques. J Physiol 48, 789802.
33.Stunkard AJ (1975) Satiety is a conditioned reflex. Psychosom Med 37, 383387.
34.Brunstrom JM (2007) Associative learning and the control of human dietary behavior. Appetite 49, 268271.
35.Brunstrom JM (2005) Dietary learning in humans: directions for future research. Physiol Behav 85, 5765.
36.Wilkinson LL & Brunstrom JM (2009) Conditioning ‘fullness expectations’ in a novel dessert. Appetite 52, 780783.
37.Brunstrom JM, Shakeshaft NG & Alexander E (2010) Familiarity changes expectations about fullness. Appetite 54, 587590.
38.Irvine MA, Brunstrom JM & Rogers PJ (2008) Perceptions of the satiating efficacy of a range of common foods. Appetite 51, 761.
39.Hogenkamp PS, Brunstrom JM, Stafleu AMM et al. (2011). Changes in expected satiation after repeated consumption of a low or high-energy soup. Appetite (In the Press).
40.Shaffer SE & Tepper BJ (1994) Effects of learned flavor cues on single meal and daily food-intake in humans. Physiol Behav 55, 979986.
41.Rolls BJ, Roe LS & Meengs JS (2007) The effect of large portion sizes on energy intake is sustained for 11 days. Obesity 15, 15351543.
42.Rolls BJ, Roe LS & Meengs JS (2006) Larger portion sizes lead to a sustained increase in energy intake over 2 days. J Am Diet Assoc 106, 543549.
43.Vermeer WM, Steenhuis IHM & Seidell JC (2009) From the point-of-purchase perspective: a qualitative study of the feasibility of interventions aimed at portion-size. Health Policy 90, 7380.
44.Le Bow MD, Chipperfield JG & Magnusson J (1985) Leftovers, body weight and sex of eater. Behav Res Ther 23, 217.
45.Fay SH, Ferriday D, Hinton EC et al. (2011) What determines real-world meal size? Evidence for pre-meal planning. Appetite (In the Press).
46.Pilgrim FJ & Kamen JM (1963) Predictors of human food consumption. Science 139, 501502.
47.Berry DC & Broadbent DE (1984) On the relationship between task-performance and associated verbalizable knowledge. Q J Exp Psychol Sect A Hum Exp Psychol 36, 209231.
48.Reber AS (1989) Implicit leaning and tacit knowledge. J Exp Psychol – Gen 118, 219235.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
  • ISSN: 0029-6651
  • EISSN: 1475-2719
  • URL: /core/journals/proceedings-of-the-nutrition-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 28
Total number of PDF views: 166 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 306 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.