Skip to main content Accessibility help

Digital and social media opportunities for dietary behaviour change

  • Aileen F. McGloin (a1) and Sara Eslami (a1)


The way that people communicate, consume media and seek and receive information is changing. Forty per cent of the world's population now has an internet connection, the average global social media penetration is 39 % and 1·5 billion people have internet access via mobile phone. This large-scale move in population use of digital, social and mobile media presents an unprecedented opportunity to connect with individuals on issues concerning health. The present paper aims to investigate these opportunities in relation to dietary behaviour change. Several aspects of the digital environment could support behaviour change efforts, including reach, engagement, research, segmentation, accessibility and potential to build credibility, trust, collaboration and advocacy. There are opportunities to influence behaviour online using similar techniques to traditional health promotion programmes; to positively affect health-related knowledge, skills and self-efficacy. The abundance of data on citizens’ digital behaviours, whether through search behaviour, global positioning system tracking, or via demographics and interests captured through social media profiles, offer exciting opportunities for effectively targeting relevant health messages. The digital environment presents great possibilities but also great challenges. Digital communication is uncontrolled, multi-way and co-created and concerns remain in relation to inequalities, privacy, misinformation and lack of evaluation. Although web-based, social-media-based and mobile-based studies tend to show positive results for dietary behaviour change, methodologies have yet to be developed that go beyond basic evaluation criteria and move towards true measures of behaviour change. Novel approaches are necessary both in the digital promotion of behaviour change and in its measurement.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Digital and social media opportunities for dietary behaviour change
      Available formats

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Digital and social media opportunities for dietary behaviour change
      Available formats

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Digital and social media opportunities for dietary behaviour change
      Available formats


Corresponding author

* Corresponding author: A. F. McGloin, fax +35314480699, email


Hide All
1. The Irish Times (2014) Newspaper sales down across the daily and Sunday markets. The Irish Times, February 21st, 2014. Available at (accessed 2 August 2014)
2. Shaw, H, Picard, R & Spanik, HA. (2010) Irish Boradcasting Landscape: Economic and environmental review for the Broadcasting Authority of Ireland.
3. Nielsen Ireland (2013) Update on Time-shiften Viewing.
4. Internet Live Stats. Available at (accessed 7 August 2014)
5. Kemp, S (2014) Social, Digital and Mobile Worldwide in 2014. Available at (accessed 10 August 2014)
6. Jones, S & Fox, S (2009) Generations online in 2009. Pew Internet and American Life Project. (accessed 10 August 2014)
7. Fox, S & Duggan, M. (2013) Health Online. Available at (accessed 3 August 2014)
8. Fox, S. (2011) Health Topics. Available at (accessed 5 August 2014)
9. Verasoni. Mobile Health Applications: 2012 study. Available at (accessed 8 August 2014)
10. Ofcom (2013) The Communications Market Report: Northern Ireland. Available at (accessed 30 May 14)
11. Central Statistics Office (2013) Information Society Statistics – Households. Available at (accessed 30 May 2014)
12. Google (2012) Our Mobile Plant. Understanding the Mobile Consumer Available at (accessed 2 July 2014)
13. O'Leary, S. (2013) The Irish Digital Consumer Report. Available at (accessed 7 June 2014)
14. Ipsos, MORI (2014) Social Networking Quarterly. Available at (accessed 15 July 2014)
15. Gibbons, MC, Fleisher, L, Slamon, RE et al. (2011) Exploring the potential of Web 2·0 to address health disparities. J Health Commun 16, Suppl. 1, 7789.
16. Glasgow, RE, Lichtenstein, E & Marcus, AC (2003) Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. Am J Public Health 93, 12611267.
17. Erk, S, Kiefer, M, Grothe, Jo et al. (2003) Emotional context modulates subsequent memory effect. NeuroImage 18, 439447.
18. Gray, JR, Braver, TS & Raichle, ME. (2002) Integration of emotion and cognition in the lateral prefrontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99, 41154120.
19. Svirko, E & Mellanby, J (2008) Attitudes to e-learning, learning style and achievement in learning neuroanatomy by medical students. Med Teach 30, e219e27.
20. Chapman, B, Raymond, B & Powell, D (2014) Potential of social media as a tool to combat foodborne illness. Perspect Public Health 134, 225230.
21. Chapman, B, MacLaurin, T & Powell, D (2011) Food safety infosheets: design and refinement of a narrative-based training intervention. Br Food J 113.
22. Noar, SM & Grant Harrington, N (2012) eHealth Applications: Promising Strategies for Behaviour Change. London: Routeledge.
23. Cassell, MM, Jackson, C & Cheuvront, B (1998) Health communication on the Internet: an effective channel for health behavior change? J Health Commun 3, 7179.
24. Zichermann, G & Linder, J (2010) Game-based Marketing: Inspire Customer Loyalty through Rewards, Challenges and Contests, 1st ed., USA: Wiley.
25. Luke, DA & Harris, JK (2010) Network analysis in public health: history, methods, and applications. Annu Rev Public Health 28, 6993.
26. Samoocha, D, Bruinvels, DJ, Elbers, NA et al. (2010) Effectiveness of web-based interventions on patient empowerment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res 12, e23.
27. Slovic, P (1999) Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Anal 19, 689701.
28. De Brun, A, McCarthy, M, McKenzie, K et al. (2014) Weight stigma and narrative resistance evident in online discussions of obesity. Appetite 72, 7381.
29. Kuttschreuter, M, Rutsaert, P, Hilverda, F et al. (2014) Seeking information about food-related risks: the contribution of social media. Food Qual Pref 37, 1018.
30. Rutsaert, P, Pieniak, Z, Regan, Á et al. (2014) Social media as a useful tool in food risk and benefit communication? A strategic orientation approach. Food Policy 46, 8493.
31. Diaz, E & Steward, AI (2012) Tracking twitter for epicemic intelligence. Web Science 2012, Proc 4th Annual ACM Web Science Conf; Illinois, USA.
32. Rutter, T. (2013) #Barf – how Twitter can Reduce the Spread of Norovirus. Available at (accessed 11 August 2014)
33. Krebs, P, Prochaska, JO & Rossi, JS (2010) A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. Prev Med 51, 214221.
34. Michie, S, Ashford, S, Sniehotta, FF et al. (2011) A refined taxonomy of behaviour change techniques to help people change their physical activity and healthy eating behaviours: the CALO-RE taxonomy. Psychol Health 26, 14791498.
35. Webb, TL, Joseph, J, Yardley, L et al. (2010) Using the internet to promote health behaviour change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behaviour change techniques and mode of delivery on efficacy. J Med Internet Res 12 (1) e4.
36. Shaw, R & Bosworth, H (2012) Short message service (SMS) text messaging as an intervention medium for weight loss: a literature review. Health Inf J 18, 235250.
37. Cugelman, B, Thelwall, M & Dawes, P (2011) Online interventions for social marketing health behaviour change campaigns: a meta-analysis of psychological architectures and adherence factors. J Med Internet Rese 13.
38. Bandura, A (1997) Social Learning Theory [Cliffs, E, editor]. New York: Prentice-Hall.
39. Barak, A, Klein, B & Proudfoot, JG (2009) Defining internet-supported therapeutic interventions. Ann Behav Med 38, 417.
40. Bennett, GG, Herring, SJ, Puleo, E et al. (2010) Web-based weight loss in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Obesity 18, 308313.
41. Wieland, LS, Falzon, L, Sciamanna, CN et al. (2012) Interactive computer-based interventions for weight loss or weight maintenance in overweight or obese people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8, CD007675.
42. Reed, VA, Schifferdecker, KE, Rezaee, ME et al. (2012) The effect of computers for weight loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. J Gen Int Med 27, 99108.
43. Kodama, S, Saito, K, Tanaka, S et al. (2012) Effect of Web-based lifestyle modification on weight control: a meta-analysis. Int J Obes (Lond) 36, 675685.
44. Grunenberg, E, Lin, J & Baumeister, H (2013) Effectiveness of web-based psychological interventions for weight loss-a systematic review. Die Rehabil 52, 182187.
45. Neve, M, Morgan, PJ, Jones, PR et al. (2010) Effectiveness of web-based interventions in achieving weight loss and weight loss maintenance in overweight and obese adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Obes Rev 11, 306321.
46. Manzoni, GM, Pagnini, F, Corti, S et al. (2011) Internet-based behavioral interventions for obesity: an updated systematic review. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health 7, 1928.
47. Arem, H & Irwin, M (2011) A review of web-based weight loss interventions in adults. Obes Rev 12, e236e243.
48. Krukowski, RA, Tilford, JM, Harvey-Berino, J et al. (2012) Comparing behavioural weight loss modalities: incremental cost-effectiveness of an internet-based versus an in-person condition. Obes 19, 16291635.
49. Free, C, Phillips, G, Watson, L et al. (2013) The effectiveness of mobile health technologies to improve health care service delivery processes: a systematic review and meta analysis. PLoS Med 10 (1), e1001363.
50. Patrick, K, Griswold, WG, Raab, F et al. (2008) Health and the mobile phone. Am J Prev Med 35, 177181.
51. Stephens, J & Allen, J (2013) Mobile phone interventions to increase physical activity and reduce weight: a systematic review. J Cardiovasc Nurs 28, 320329.
52. Woo, J, Chen, J, Ghanavati, V et al. (2013) Effectiveness of cellular phone based interventions for weight loss in overweight and obese adults: a systematic review. Ortho Musc Syst 3, 141.
53. Carter, MC, Burley, VJ & Cade, JE (2013) Development of ‘My Meal Mate’ – A smartphone intervention for weight loss. Nutr Bull 38, 8084.
54. Korda, H & Itani, Z (2013) Harnessing social media for health promotion and behavior change. Health Promot Pract 14, 1523.
55. Murray, E, Burns, J, See, TS et al. (2005) Interactive health communication applications for people with chronic disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD004274.
56. Napolitano, MA, Hayes, S, Bennett, GG et al. (2013) Using Facebook and text messaging to deliver a weight loss program to college students. Obesity (Silver Spring) 21, 2531.
57. Woolley, P & Peterson, M (2012) Efficacy of a health-related facebook social network site on health-seeking behaviors. Soc Mar Q 18, 2939.
58. Rote, A. (2013) Examining the efficacy of a Facebook mediated intervention to increase steps per day in college freshmen: University of Wisconsin Milwaukee.
59. Mychasiuk, R & Benzies, K (2012) Facebook: an effective tool for participant retention in longitudinal research. Child Care Health Dev 38, 753756.
60. Fry, JP & Neff, RA (2009) Periodic prompts and reminders in health promotion and health behavior interventions: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 11, e16.
61. Glasgow, RE (2007) eHealth evaluation and dissemination research. Am J Prev Med 32, Suppl. 5, S119S26.
62. O'Grady, L, Witteman, H, Bender, JL et al. (2009) Measuring the impact of a moving target: towards a dynamic framework for evaluating collaborative adaptive interactive technologies. J Med Internet Res 11.
63. Burke-Garcia, A & Scally, G (2014) Trending now: future directions in digital media for the public health sector. J Public Health 26 January, 1–8.
64. Groves, P, Kayyali, B, Knott, D et al. (2013) The Big-data Revolution in US Health Care: Accelerating Value and Innovation. Available at (accessed 13 August 2014)
65. Barr, A. (2014) Google's new Moonshot Project: The Human Body. Available at (accessed 13 August 2014)
66. Vodafone. (2013) Help is at Hand: Vodafone and Moshi Monsters team up to teach kids ‘Digital Facts of Life’, Available at (accessed 11 August 2014)
67. Currie, C, Zanotti, C, Morgan, A et al. (2012) Social determinants of health and well-being among young people. Health behaviour in school aged children (HBSC) study: International report from the 2009/2010 survey. Copenhagen.
68. Fesenmainer, J. (2003) Executive Summary: Measuring Outcomes of Digital Divide Investment to Community Technology Centers. Available at (accessed 13 August 2014)
69. Liang, TH (2014) Matrix analysis of the digital divide in eHealth services using awareness, want, and adoption gap. J Med Internet Res 14, e11.
70. Liff, S, Shepard, A, Wajcman, J et al. (2004) An evolving gender divide? OII Internet Issue, Brief No 2.
71. Aqili, SV & Isfandyari Moghaddam, A (2008) Bridging the digital divite: the role of librarians and information professionals in the third millennium. Electron Libr 26, 226237.
72. Roy, S & Ghose, S (2006) Internet adoption as a two-stage transition: converting internet non-users to internet users and to online buyers. Int J Mark Res 48, 321349.
73. Livingstone, S & Helsper, E (2010) Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers’ use of the internet: the role of online skills and internet self-efficacy. New Media Soc 12, 309329.
74. Bert, F, Giacometti, M, Gualano, M et al. (2014) Smartphones and health promotion: a review of the evidence. J Med Syst 38, 111.
75. Whitehead, S (2014) 360 of Health Data: Harnessing Big Data for Better Health. Available at (accessed 14 August 2014).
76. Zimmer, M (2012) Research Ethics in the 2·0 Era: New Challenges for Researchers and IRBS. Available at (accessed 14 August 2014).
77. Chung, IJ (2011) Social amplification of risk in the internet environment. Risk Anal 31, 18831896.
78. Kasperson, RE, Renn, O, Slovic, P et al. (1998) The social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework. Risk Anal 8, 177187.
79. Scullard, P, Peacock, C & Davies, P (2010) Googling children's health: reliability of medical advice on the internet. Arch Dis Child 95, 580582.
80. Sillence, E, Briggs, P, Harris, PR et al. (2007) How do patients evaluate and make use of online health information? Soc Sci Med 64, 18531862.
81. Neiger, BL, Thackeray, R, Van Wagenen, SA et al. (2012) Use of social media in health promotion: purposes, key performance indicators, and evaluation metrics. Health Promot Pract 13, 159164.
82. Post, SD, Taylor, SC, Sanders, AE et al. (2013) If you build (and moderate) it, they will come: the Smokefree Women Facebook page. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2013, 206208.


Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

McGloin and Eslami Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material

 Word (17 KB)
17 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed