Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T16:11:07.333Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Focus-group interview and data analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2007

Fatemeh Rabiee*
School of Health and Policy Studies, University of Central England, Birmingham, B42 2SU, UK
Corresponding author: Professor Fatemeh Rabiee, fax +44 121 331 5498, email
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]


Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In recent years focus-group interviews, as a means of qualitative data collection, have gained popularity amongst professionals within the health and social care arena. Despite this popularity, analysing qualitative data, particularly focus-group interviews, poses a challenge to most practitioner researchers. The present paper responds to the needs expressed by public health nutritionists, community dietitians and health development specialists following two training sessions organised collaboratively by the Health Development Agency, the Nutrition Society and the British Dietetic Association in 2003. The focus of the present paper is on the concepts and application of framework analysis, especially the use of Krueger's framework. It provides some practical steps for the analysis of individual data, as well as focus-group data using examples from the author's own research, in such a way as to assist the newcomer to qualitative research to engage with the methodology. Thus, it complements the papers by Draper (2004) and Fade (2004) that discuss in detail the complementary role of qualitative data in researching human behaviours, feelings and attitudes. Draper (2004) has provided theoretical and philosophical bases for qualitative data analysis. Fade (2004) has described interpretative phenomenology analysis as a method of analysing individual interview data. The present paper, using framework analysis concentrating on focus-group interviews, provides another approach to qualitative data analysis.

Workshop on ‘Developing qualitative research method skills: analysing and applying your results’
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2004


Basch, C (1987) Focus group interview: an under-utilised research technique for improving theory and practice in health education. Health Education Quarterly 14, 411418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrows, D & Kendall, S (1997) Focus groups: What are they and how can they be used in nursing and health care research. Social Sciences in Health 3, 244253Google Scholar
Draper, AK (2004) The principles and application of qualitative research. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 63, 641646CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duke, SS, Gordon-Sosby, K, Reynolds, KD & Gram, IT (1994) A study of breast cancer detection practices and beliefs in black women attending public health clinics. Health Education Research 9, 331342CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fade, S (2004) Using interpretative phenomenological analysis for public health nutrition and dietetic research: a practical guide. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 63, 647653CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, J & Thorogood, N (2004) Qualitative Methods in Health Research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Green, JM, Draper, AK & Dowler, EA (2003) Short cuts to safety: risk and ‘rules of thumb’ in accounts of food choice. Health, Risk and Society 5, 3352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, S & McKie, L (1991) The smear test: listening to women's views. Nursing Standard 5, 3236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higingbottom, G (1998) Focus groups: their use in Health Promotion research. Community Practitioner 72, 360363Google Scholar
Kitzinger, J (1994) The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interactions between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness 16, 103121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitzinger, J (1995) Qualitative research: introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal 311, 299302CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krueger, RA (1994) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Krueger, RA & Casey, MA (2000) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Y & Guba, E (1989) Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Rabiee, F (1999) Evidence based practice: its relevance to nutritional intervention programmes. Proceedings of Nutrition Society 58, 50A.Google Scholar
Rabiee, F & Thompson, D (2000) Widening Participation – Increasing Access to Higher Education for Muslim Women Birmingham University of Central England and Birmingham UniversityGoogle Scholar
Richards, L (1998) Qualitative Solution and Research (QSR) NUT*IST Introductory Handbook Melbourne, Australia QSRGoogle Scholar
Richardson, CA & Rabiee, F (2001) ‘A Question of Access’ – an exploration of the factors influencing the health of young males aged 15–19 living in Corby and their use of health care services. Health Education Journal 60, 36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, J & Spencer, L (1994) Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research Analysing Qualitative Data 173 – 194 Bryman A Burgess RG London RoutledgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, C (1993) The Real World Research – A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-researchers Oxford Blackwell PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Secker, J, Wimbush, E, Watson, J & Milburn, K (1995) Qualitative methods in health promotion research: some criteria for quality. Health Education Journal 54, 7487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, A & Corbin, J (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research, Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA Sage PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Thomas, L, MacMillan, J, McColl, E, Hale, C & Bond, S (1995) Comparison of focus group and individual interview methodology in examining patient satisfaction with nursing care. Social Sciences in Health 1, 206219Google Scholar
Yin, RK (1989) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar