Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Access
  • Cited by 11
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Bødker, Malene Pisinger, Charlotta Toft, Ulla and Jørgensen, Torben 2015. The Danish fat tax—Effects on consumption patterns and risk of ischaemic heart disease. Preventive Medicine, Vol. 77, p. 200.


    Mantziki, Krystallia Vassilopoulos, Achilleas Radulian, Gabriella Borys, Jean-Michel Du Plessis, Hugues Gregório, Maria João Graça, Pedro De Henauw, Stefaan Handjiev, Svetoslav Visscher, Tommy LS and Seidell, Jacob C 2015. Inequities in energy-balance related behaviours and family environmental determinants in European children: baseline results of the prospective EPHE evaluation study. BMC Public Health, Vol. 15, Issue. 1,


    McGill, Rory Anwar, Elspeth Orton, Lois Bromley, Helen Lloyd-Williams, Ffion O’Flaherty, Martin Taylor-Robinson, David Guzman-Castillo, Maria Gillespie, Duncan Moreira, Patricia Allen, Kirk Hyseni, Lirije Calder, Nicola Petticrew, Mark White, Martin Whitehead, Margaret and Capewell, Simon 2015. Are interventions to promote healthy eating equally effective for all? Systematic review of socioeconomic inequalities in impact. BMC Public Health, Vol. 15, Issue. 1,


    Michels, Nathalie Van den Bussche, Karen Vande Walle, Johan and De Henauw, Stefaan 2015. Belgian primary school children’s hydration status at school and its personal determinants. European Journal of Nutrition,


    Niebylski, Mark L. Redburn, Kimbree A. Duhaney, Tara and Campbell, Norm R. 2015. Healthy food subsidies and unhealthy food taxation: A systematic review of the evidence. Nutrition, Vol. 31, Issue. 6, p. 787.


    Ranjit, Nalini Wilkinson, Anna V Lytle, Leslie M Evans, Alexandra E Saxton, Debra and Hoelscher, Deanna M 2015. Socioeconomic inequalities in children’s diet: the role of the home food environment. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Vol. 12, Issue. Suppl 1, p. S4.


    Mantziki, Krystallia Vassilopoulos, Achilleas Radulian, Gabriella Borys, Jean-Michel du Plessis, Hugues Gregório, Maria João Graça, Pedro de Henauw, Stefaan Handjiev, Svetoslav Visscher, Tommy LS and Seidell, Jacob C 2014. Promoting health equity in European children: Design and methodology of the prospective EPHE (Epode for the Promotion of Health Equity) evaluation study. BMC Public Health, Vol. 14, Issue. 1,


    Requillart, V. and Soler, L.-G. 2014. Is the reduction of chronic diseases related to food consumption in the hands of the food industry?. European Review of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 41, Issue. 3, p. 375.


    Wakai, Kenji Naito, Mariko Date, Chigusa Iso, Hiroyasu and Tamakoshi, Akiko 2014. Dietary intakes of fat and total mortality among Japanese populations with a low fat intake: the Japan Collaborative Cohort (JACC) Study. Nutrition & Metabolism, Vol. 11, Issue. 1, p. 12.


    Cobiac, Linda J. Veerman, Lennert and Vos, Theo 2013. The Role of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Developing Nutrition Policy. Annual Review of Nutrition, Vol. 33, Issue. 1, p. 373.


    Rosenbloom, Christine 2013. Handbook of Nutrition and Food, Third Edition.


    ×
  • Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, Volume 71, Issue 1
  • February 2012, pp. 105-111

Inequalities in diet and nutrition

  • Richard Tiffin (a1) and Matthew Salois (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0029665111003284
  • Published online: 07 November 2011
Abstract

The inequality of nutrition and obesity re-focuses concern on who in society is consuming the worst diet. Identification of individuals with the worst of dietary habits permits for targeting interventions to assuage obesity among the population segment where it is most prevalent. We argue that the use of fiscal interventions does not appropriately take into account the economic, social and health circumstances of the intended beneficiaries of the policy. This paper reviews the influence of socio-demographic factors on nutrition and health status and considers the impacts of nutrition policy across the population drawing on methodologies from both public health and welfare economics. The effects of a fat tax on diet are found to be small and while other studies show that fat taxes saves lives, we show that average levels of disease risk do not change much: those consuming particularly bad diets continue to do so. Our results also suggest that the regressivity of the policy increases as the tax becomes focused on products with high saturated fat contents. A fiscally neutral policy that combines the fat tax with a subsidy on fruit and vegetables is actually more regressive because consumption of these foods tends to be concentrated in socially undeserving households. We argue that when inequality is of concern, population-based measures must reflect this and approaches that target vulnerable populations which have a shared propensity to adopt unhealthy behaviours are appropriate.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Inequalities in diet and nutrition
      Your Kindle email address
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Inequalities in diet and nutrition
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Inequalities in diet and nutrition
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Professor Richard Tiffin, fax +44 118 975 6467, email j.r.tiffin@reading.ac.uk
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

1.M Marmot , S Friel , R Bell (2008) Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Lancet 372, 16611669.

7.LD Howe , K Tilling , B Galobardes (2011) Socioeconomic disparities in trajectories of adiposity across childhood. Int J Pediatr Obes 6, e144e153.

8.M Stafford , EJ Brunner , J Head & NA Ross (2010) Deprivation and the development of obesity. Am J Prev Med 39, 130139.

9.J Wardle & D Boniface (2004) Changes in the distributions of body mass index and waist circumference in English adults, 1993/1994 to 2002/2003. Int J Obes 32, 527532.

10.R Tiffin & M Arnoult (2010) The demand for a healthy diet: Estimating the almost ideal demand system with infrequency of purchase. Eur Rev Agr Econ 37, 501521.

11.G Rose (1981) Strategy of prevention: lessons from cardiovascular disease. Br Med J 282, 18471851.

12.G Rose (1985) Sick individuals and sick populations. Int J Epidemiol 30, 427432.

13.G Rose , K Khaw & M Marmot (2008) Rose's Strategy of Preventive Medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

14.K Frohlich & L Potvin (2008) The inequality paradox: the population approach and vulnerable populations. Am J Public Health 98, 216221.

16.H Walls , A Peeters , J Proietto & J McNeil (2011) Public health campaigns and obesity – a critique. BMC Public Health 11, 136.

17.S Friel , M Chopra & D Satcher (2007) Unequal weight: Equity oriented policy responses to the global obesity epidemic. Br Med J 335, 12411243.

18.R Tiffin , W Traill & S Mortimer (2006) Food choice in an interdisciplinary context. J Agric Econ 57, 213220.

19.RL Scharff (2009) Obesity and hyperbolic discounting: evidence and implications. J Consum Policy 32, 3–21.

20.S Ikeda , MI Kang & F Ohtake (2010) Hyperbolic discounting, the sign effect, and the body mass index. J Health Econ 29, 268284.

21.R Tiffin & M Arnoult (2011) The public health impacts of a fat tax. Eur J Clin Nutr 65, 427433.

23.K Esrey , L Joseph & S Grover (1996) Relationships between dietary intake and coronary heart disease mortality. J Clin Epidemiol 49, 211216.

25.H Hung , K Joshipura , R Jiang (2004) Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of major chronic disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 96, 15771584.

26.K Joshipura , F Hu , J Manson (2001) The effect of fruit and vegetable intake on risk for coronary heart disease. Ann Intern Med 134, 11061114.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
  • ISSN: 0029-6651
  • EISSN: 1475-2719
  • URL: /core/journals/proceedings-of-the-nutrition-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: