Skip to main content
×
Home

A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of intravenous fluid therapy in major elective open abdominal surgery: getting the balance right

  • Krishna K. Varadhan (a1) and Dileep N. Lobo (a1)
Abstract

The terminology used for describing intervention groups in randomised controlled trials (RCT) on the effect of intravenous fluid on outcome in abdominal surgery has been imprecise, and the lack of standardised definitions of the terms ‘standard’, ‘restricted’ and ‘liberal’ has led to some confusion and difficulty in interpreting the literature. The aims of this paper were to clarify these definitions and to use them to perform a meta-analysis of nine RCT on primarily crystalloid-based peri-operative intravenous fluid therapy in 801 patients undergoing elective open abdominal surgery. Patients who received more or less fluids than those who received a ‘balanced’ amount were considered to be in a state of ‘fluid imbalance’. When ‘restricted’ fluid regimens were compared with ‘standard or liberal’ fluid regimens, there was no difference in post-operative complication rates (risk ratio 0·96 (95% CI 0·56, 1·65), P=0·89) or length of hospital stay (weighted mean difference (WMD) −1·77 (95% CI −4·36, 0·81) d, P=0·18). However, when the fluid regimens were reclassified and patients were grouped into those who were managed in a state of fluid ‘balance’ or ‘imbalance’, the former group had significantly fewer complications (risk ratio 0·59 (95% CI 0·44, 0·81), P=0·0008) and a shorter length of stay (WMD −3·44 (95% CI −6·33, −0·54) d, P=0·02) than the latter. Using imprecise terminology, there was no apparent difference between the effects of fluid-restricted and standard or liberal fluid regimens on outcome in patients undergoing elective open abdominal surgery. However, patients managed in a state of fluid balance fared better than those managed in a state of fluid imbalance.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of intravenous fluid therapy in major elective open abdominal surgery: getting the balance right
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of intravenous fluid therapy in major elective open abdominal surgery: getting the balance right
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of intravenous fluid therapy in major elective open abdominal surgery: getting the balance right
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Mr Dileep N. Lobo, fax +44 115 8231160, email dileep.lobo@nottingham.ac.uk
References
Hide All
1.Lobo DN, Dube MG, Neal KR et al. (2001) Problems with solutions: drowning in the brine of an inadequate knowledge base. Clin Nutr 20, 125130.
2.Lobo DN, Dube MG, Neal KR et al. (2002) Peri-operative fluid and electrolyte management: a survey of consultant surgeons in the UK. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 84, 156160.
3.Callum KG, Gray AJG, Hoile RW et al. (1999) Extremes of Age: The 1999 Report of the National Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Deaths. London: National Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Deaths.
4.Shafiee MA, Bohn D, Hoorn EJ et al. (2003) How to select optimal maintenance intravenous fluid therapy. QJM 96, 601610.
5.Stoneham MD & Hill EL (1997) Variability in post-operative fluid and electrolyte prescription. Br J Clin Pract 51, 8284.
6.Walsh SR & Walsh CJ (2005) Intravenous fluid-associated morbidity in post-operative patients. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 87, 126130.
7.Lobo DN, Stanga Z, Simpson JAD et al. (2001) Dilution and redistribution effects of rapid 2-litre infusions of 0·9% (w/v) saline and 5% (w/v) dextrose on haematological parameters and serum biochemistry in normal subjects: a double-blind crossover study. Clin Sci (Lond) 101, 173179.
8.Lobo DN (2004) Sir David Cuthbertson medal lecture. Fluid, electrolytes and nutrition: physiological and clinical aspects. Proc Nutr Soc 63, 453466.
9.Lobo DN, Stanga Z, Aloysius MM et al. (2010) Effect of volume loading with 1 liter intravenous infusions of 0·9% saline, 4% succinylated gelatine (Gelofusine) and 6% hydroxyethyl starch (Voluven) on blood volume and endocrine responses: a randomized, three-way crossover study in healthy volunteers. Crit Care Med 38, 464470.
10.Reid F, Lobo DN, Williams RN et al. (2003) (Ab)normal saline and physiological Hartmann's solution: a randomized double-blind crossover study. Clin Sci (Lond) 104, 1724.
11.Williams EL, Hildebrand KL, McCormick SA et al. (1999) The effect of intravenous lactated Ringer's solution versus 0·9% sodium chloride solution on serum osmolality in human volunteers. Anesth Analg 88, 999–1003.
12.Veech RL (1986) The toxic impact of parenteral solutions on the metabolism of cells: a hypothesis for physiological parenteral therapy. Am J Clin Nutr 44, 519551.
13.Wilcox CS (1983) Regulation of renal blood flow by plasma chloride. J Clin Invest 71, 726735.
14.Awad S, Allison SP & Lobo DN (2008) The history of 0·9% saline. Clin Nutr 27, 179188.
15.Rahbari NN, Zimmermann JB, Schmidt T et al. (2009) Meta-analysis of standard, restrictive and supplemental fluid administration in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 96, 331341.
16.Moore FD & Shires G (1967) Moderation. Ann Surg 166, 300301.
17.Lobo DN, Macafee DA & Allison SP (2006) How peri-operative fluid balance influences post-operative outcomes. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 20, 439455.
18.Lobo DN (2009) Fluid overload and surgical outcome: another piece in the jigsaw. Ann Surg 249, 186188.
19.Bellamy MC (2006) Wet, dry or something else? Br J Anaesth 97, 755757.
20.Powell-Tuck J, Gosling P, Lobo DN et al. (2008) British consensus guidelines on intravenous fluid therapy for adult surgical patients. GIFTASUP. Available from http://www.bapen.org.uk/pdfs/bapen_pubs/giftasup.pdf (accessed 1 April 2010).
21.Lentner C (editor) ( 1981) Geigy Scientific Tables. Vol. 1. Units of Measurement, Body Fluids, Composition of the Body, Nutrition. 8th ed. Basle: Ciba-Geigy Ltd.
22.Moore FD (1959) Metabolic Care of the Surgical Patient. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders.
23.Turner DAB (1996) Fluid, electrolyte and acid-base balance. In Textbook of Anaesthesia, pp. 361375 [Aitkenhead AR and Smith G]. New York: Churchill Livingstone.
24.Rose BD & Post TW (2001) Clinical Physiology of Acid-base and Electrolyte Disorders. New York: McGraw-Hill.
25.Lobo DN & Allison SP (2005) Fluid, electrolyte and nutrient replacement. In The New Aird's Companion in Surgical Studies, pp. 2041 [Burnand KG, Young AE, Lucas J et al. editors]. London: Churchill Livingstone.
26.Jequier E & Constant F (2010) Water as an essential nutrient: the physiological basis of hydration. Eur J Clin Nutr 64, 115123.
27.Lobo DN, Bostock KA, Neal KR et al. (2002) Effect of salt and water balance on recovery of gastrointestinal function after elective colonic resection: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 359, 18121818.
28.Brandstrup B, Tonnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R et al. (2003) Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on post-operative complications: comparison of two peri-operative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg 238, 641648.
29.Vermeulen H, Hofland J, Legemate DA et al. (2009) Intravenous fluid restriction after major abdominal surgery: a randomized blinded clinical trial. Trials 10, 50.
30.Holte K, Foss NB, Andersen J et al. (2007) Liberal or restrictive fluid administration in fast-track colonic surgery: a randomized, double-blind study. Br J Anaesth 99, 500508.
31.Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D et al. (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17, 112.
32.Higgins JPT & Green S (2008) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.0.1 (updated September 2008). The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from http://www.cochrane.org/training/cochrane-handbook (accessed 1 April 2010).
33.Gonzalez-Fajardo JA, Mengibar L, Brizuela JA et al. (2009) Effect of post-operative restrictive fluid therapy in the recovery of patients with abdominal vascular surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 37, 538543.
34.Kabon B, Akca O, Taguchi A et al. (2005) Supplemental intravenous crystalloid administration does not reduce the risk of surgical wound infection. Anesth Analg 101, 15461553.
35.MacKay G, Fearon K, McConnachie A et al. (2006) Randomized clinical trial of the effect of post-operative intravenous fluid restriction on recovery after elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 93, 14691474.
36.McArdle GT, McAuley DF, McKinley A et al. (2009) Preliminary results of a prospective randomized trial of restrictive versus standard fluid regime in elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Surg 250, 2834.
37.Nisanevich V, Felsenstein I, Almogy G et al. (2005) Effect of intraoperative fluid management on outcome after intra-abdominal surgery. Anesthesiology 103, 2532.
38.Walsh SR, Tang TY, Farooq N et al. (2008) Perioperative fluid restriction reduces complications after major gastrointestinal surgery. Surgery 143, 466468.
39.Abbas SM & Hill AG (2008) Systematic review of the literature for the use of oesophageal Doppler monitor for fluid replacement in major abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia 63, 4451.
40.Drummer C, Gerzer R, Heer M et al. (1992) Effects of an acute saline infusion on fluid and electrolyte metabolism in humans. Am J Physiol 262, F744F754.
41.Hansen PB, Jensen BL & Skott O (1998) Chloride regulates afferent arteriolar contraction in response to depolarization. Hypertension 32, 10661070.
42.Mayberry JC, Welker KJ, Goldman RK et al. (2003) Mechanism of acute ascites formation after trauma resuscitation. Arch Surg 138, 773776.
43.Balogh Z, McKinley BA, Cocanour CS et al. (2003) Supranormal trauma resuscitation causes more cases of abdominal compartment syndrome. Arch Surg 138, 637642; discussion 642–633.
44.Wilkes NJ, Woolf R, Mutch M et al. (2001) The effects of balanced versus saline-based hetastarch and crystalloid solutions on acid-base and electrolyte status and gastric mucosal perfusion in elderly surgical patients. Anesth Analg 93, 811816.
45.Shandall A, Lowndes R & Young HL (1985) Colonic anastomotic healing and oxygen tension. Br J Surg 72, 606609.
46.Sheridan WG, Lowndes RH & Young HL (1987) Tissue oxygen tension as a predictor of colonic anastomotic healing. Dis Colon Rectum 30, 867871.
47.Cotton BA, Guy JS & Morris JA Jr ( 2006) The cellular, metabolic, and systemic consequences of aggressive fluid resuscitation strategies. Shock 26, 115121.
48.Marjanovic G, Villain C, Juettner E et al. (2009) Impact of different crystalloid volume regimes on intestinal anastomotic stability. Ann Surg 249, 181185.
49.Plank LD, Connolly AB & Hill GL (1998) Sequential changes in the metabolic response in severely septic patients during the first 23 days after the onset of peritonitis (see comments). Ann Surg 228, 146158.
50.Lobo DN, Bjarnason K, Field J et al. (1999) Changes in weight, fluid balance and serum albumin in patients referred for nutritional support. Clin Nutr 18, 197201.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
  • ISSN: 0029-6651
  • EISSN: 1475-2719
  • URL: /core/journals/proceedings-of-the-nutrition-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 54
Total number of PDF views: 418 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 643 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.