Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Access
  • Cited by 17
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Bouchard-Mercier, Annie Desroches, Sophie Robitaille, Julie and Vohl, Marie-Claude 2016. Factors Associated with the Intention of Registered Dietitians to Discuss Nutrigenetics with their Patients/Clients. Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research, p. 1.

    Carlberg, Carsten Ulven, Stine Marie and Molnár, Ferdinand 2016. Nutrigenomics.

    Forster, Hannah Walsh, Marianne C. Gibney, Michael J. Brennan, Lorraine and Gibney, Eileen R. 2016. Personalised nutrition: the role of new dietary assessment methods. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, Vol. 75, Issue. 01, p. 96.

    Loria-Kohen, Viviana Espinosa-Salinas, Isabel Marcos-Pasero, Helena Lourenço-Nogueira, Thais Herranz, Jesús Molina, Susana Reglero, Guillermo and Ramirez de Molina, Ana 2016. Polymorphism in the CLOCK gene may influence the effect of fat intake reduction on weight loss. Nutrition, Vol. 32, Issue. 4, p. 453.

    Rizzi, Federica Conti, Costanza Dogliotti, Elena Terranegra, Annalisa Salvi, Erika Braga, Daniele Ricca, Flavia Lupoli, Sara Mingione, Alessandra Pivari, Francesca Brasacchio, Caterina Barcella, Matteo Chittani, Martina D’Avila, Francesca Turiel, Maurizio Lazzaroni, Monica Soldati, Laura Cusi, Daniele and Barlassina, Cristina 2016. Interaction between polyphenols intake and PON1 gene variants on markers of cardiovascular disease: a nutrigenetic observational study. Journal of Translational Medicine, Vol. 14, Issue. 1,

    2016. Pharmaceuticals to Nutraceuticals.

    Martínez, J. Alfredo and Milagro, Fermin I. 2015. Genetics of weight loss: A basis for personalized obesity management. Trends in Food Science & Technology, Vol. 42, Issue. 2, p. 97.

    Ryan, N. M. O'Donovan, C. B. Forster, H. Woolhead, C. and Walsh, M. C. 2015. New tools for personalised nutrition: The Food4Me project. Nutrition Bulletin, Vol. 40, Issue. 2, p. 134.

    Sun, Jie Zhou, Weibiao Huang, Dejian Fuh, Jerry Y. H. and Hong, Geok Soon 2015. An Overview of 3D Printing Technologies for Food Fabrication. Food and Bioprocess Technology, Vol. 8, Issue. 8, p. 1605.

    Yang, Fan Zhang, Min and Bhandari, Bhesh 2015. Recent Development in 3D Food Printing. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, p. 00.

    DeBusk, Ruth 2014. Nutrigenetic Testing: Considerations for Clinicians. Alternative and Complementary Therapies, Vol. 20, Issue. 2, p. 80.

    Ferguson, Lynnette Bishop, Karen and Karunsinghe, Nishi 2014. Clinical Aspects of Functional Foods and Nutraceuticals.

    Hurlimann, T. Menuz, V. Graham, J. Robitaille, J. Vohl, M.-C. and Godard, B. 2014. Risks of nutrigenomics and nutrigenetics? What the scientists say. Genes & Nutrition, Vol. 9, Issue. 1,

    Ibáñez, Elena and Cifuentes, Alejandro 2014. Applications of Advanced Omics Technologies: From Genes to Metabolites.

    Martinez, J. Alfredo Navas-Carretero, Santiago Saris, Wim H. M. and Astrup, Arne 2014. Personalized weight loss strategies—the role of macronutrient distribution. Nature Reviews Endocrinology, Vol. 10, Issue. 12, p. 749.

    Mosconi, L. Murray, J. Davies, M. Williams, S. Pirraglia, E. Spector, N. Tsui, W. H. Li, Y. Butler, T. Osorio, R. S. Glodzik, L. Vallabhajosula, S. McHugh, P. Marmar, C. R. and de Leon, M. J. 2014. Nutrient intake and brain biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease in at-risk cognitively normal individuals: a cross-sectional neuroimaging pilot study. BMJ Open, Vol. 4, Issue. 6, p. e004850.

    Schwartz, Betty 2014. New criteria for supplementation of selected micronutrients in the era of nutrigenetics and nutrigenomics. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, Vol. 65, Issue. 5, p. 529.


Personalised nutrition: ready for practice?

  • Baukje de Roos (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 12 November 2012

The efficacy by which dietary interventions influence risk markers of multi-factorial diseases is mainly determined by taking population-based approaches. However, there exists considerable inter-individual variation in response to dietary interventions, and some interventions may benefit certain individuals or population subgroups more than others. This review evaluates the application of nutrigenomic technologies to further the concept of personalised nutrition, as well as the process to take personalised nutrition to the marketplace. The modulation of an individual's response is influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. Many nutrigenetics studies have attempted to explain variability in responses based on a single or a few genotypes so that a genotype may be used to define personalised dietary advice. It has, however, proven very challenging to define an individual's responsiveness to complex diets based on common genetic variations. In addition, there is a limited understanding of what constitutes an optimal response because we lack key health biomarkers and signatures. In conclusion, advances in nutrigenomics will undoubtedly further the understanding of the complex interplay between genotype, phenotype and environment, which are required to enhance the development of personalised nutrition in the future. At the same time, however, issues relating to consumer acceptance, privacy protection as well as marketing and distribution of personalised products need to be addressed before personalised nutrition can become commercially viable.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Personalised nutrition: ready for practice?
      Available formats
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Personalised nutrition: ready for practice?
      Available formats
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Personalised nutrition: ready for practice?
      Available formats
Corresponding author
Corresponding author: Dr Baukje de Roos, fax +44 1224 438629, email
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

3.MT Cooney , A Dudina , P Whincup (2009) Re-evaluating the Rose approach: comparative benefits of the population and high-risk preventive strategies. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 16, 541549.

4.G Rose (1985) Sick individuals and sick populations. Int J Epidemiol 14, 3238.

6.AM Minihane , S Khan , EC Leigh-Firbank (2000) ApoE polymorphism and fish oil supplementation in subjects with an atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 20, 19901997.

7.AM Minihane (2010) Fatty acid-genotype interactions and cardiovascular risk. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 82, 259264.

9.J Madden , CM Williams , PC Calder (2011) The impact of common gene variants on the response of biomarkers of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk to increased fish oil fatty acids intakes. Annu Rev Nutr 31, 203234.

10.E Olano-Martin , E Anil , MJ Caslake (2010) Contribution of apolipoprotein E genotype and docosahexaenoic acid to the LDL-cholesterol response to fish oil. Atherosclerosis 209, 104110.

11.C Bouchard , A Tremblay , JP Despres (1990) The response to long-term overfeeding in identical twins. N Engl J Med 322, 14771482.

14.SB Matthews , JP Waud , AG Roberts (2005) Systemic lactose intolerance: a new perspective on an old problem. Postgrad Med J 81, 167173.

16.B van Ommen (2007) Personalized nutrition from a health perspective: luxury or necessity? Genes Nutr 2, 34.

18.A O'Sullivan , MJ Gibney , AO Connor (2011) Biochemical and metabolomic phenotyping in the identification of a vitamin D responsive metabotype for markers of the metabolic syndrome. Mol Nutr Food Res 55, 679690.

19.CM Phillips , L Goumidi , S Bertrais (2009) Complement component 3 polymorphisms interact with polyunsaturated fatty acids to modulate risk of metabolic syndrome. Am J Clin Nutr 90, 16651673.

22.LI Bouwman & MA Koelen (2007) Communication on personalised nutrition: individual–environment interaction. Genes Nutr 2, 8183.

23.T Caulfield , NM Ries , PN Ray (2010) Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: good, bad or benign? Clin Genet 77, 101105.

25.S Tamir (2010) Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: ethical-legal perspectives and practical considerations. Med Law Rev 18, 213238.

27.CM Phillips , L Goumidi , S Bertrais (2010) Additive effect of polymorphisms in the IL-6, LTA, and TNF-{alpha} genes and plasma fatty acid level modulate risk for the metabolic syndrome and its components. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95, 13861394.

28.JF Ferguson , CM Phillips , AC Tierney (2010) Gene-nutrient interactions in the metabolic syndrome: single nucleotide polymorphisms in ADIPOQ and ADIPOR1 interact with plasma saturated fatty acids to modulate insulin resistance. Am J Clin Nutr 91, 794801.

31.A Ronteltap , JC van Trijp , RJ Renes (2007) Consumer acceptance of technology-based food innovations: lessons for the future of nutrigenomics. Appetite 49, 117.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
  • ISSN: 0029-6651
  • EISSN: 1475-2719
  • URL: /core/journals/proceedings-of-the-nutrition-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *