Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Personalised nutrition: ready for practice?

  • Baukje de Roos (a1)
Abstract

The efficacy by which dietary interventions influence risk markers of multi-factorial diseases is mainly determined by taking population-based approaches. However, there exists considerable inter-individual variation in response to dietary interventions, and some interventions may benefit certain individuals or population subgroups more than others. This review evaluates the application of nutrigenomic technologies to further the concept of personalised nutrition, as well as the process to take personalised nutrition to the marketplace. The modulation of an individual's response is influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. Many nutrigenetics studies have attempted to explain variability in responses based on a single or a few genotypes so that a genotype may be used to define personalised dietary advice. It has, however, proven very challenging to define an individual's responsiveness to complex diets based on common genetic variations. In addition, there is a limited understanding of what constitutes an optimal response because we lack key health biomarkers and signatures. In conclusion, advances in nutrigenomics will undoubtedly further the understanding of the complex interplay between genotype, phenotype and environment, which are required to enhance the development of personalised nutrition in the future. At the same time, however, issues relating to consumer acceptance, privacy protection as well as marketing and distribution of personalised products need to be addressed before personalised nutrition can become commercially viable.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Personalised nutrition: ready for practice?
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Personalised nutrition: ready for practice?
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Personalised nutrition: ready for practice?
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Corresponding author: Dr Baukje de Roos, fax +44 1224 438629, email b.deroos@abdn.ac.uk
References
Hide All
1. Department of Health (1991) Dietary reference values for food energy and nutrients for the United Kingdom. No. 41. London: The Stationery Office.
2. WHO (2009) Global Health Risks. Mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. Available at: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/GlobalHealthRisks_report_full.pdf
3. Cooney, MT, Dudina, A, Whincup, P et al. (2009) Re-evaluating the Rose approach: comparative benefits of the population and high-risk preventive strategies. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 16, 541549.
4. Rose, G (1985) Sick individuals and sick populations. Int J Epidemiol 14, 3238.
5. Nizel, AE (1972) Personalized nutrition counseling. ASDC J Dent Child 39, 353360.
6. Minihane, AM, Khan, S, Leigh-Firbank, EC et al. (2000) ApoE polymorphism and fish oil supplementation in subjects with an atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 20, 19901997.
7. Minihane, AM (2010) Fatty acid-genotype interactions and cardiovascular risk. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 82, 259264.
8. Caslake, MJ, Miles, EA, Kofler, BM et al. (2008) Effect of sex and genotype on cardiovascular biomarker response to fish oils: the FINGEN Study. Am J Clin Nutr 88, 618629.
9. Madden, J, Williams, CM, Calder, PC et al. (2011) The impact of common gene variants on the response of biomarkers of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk to increased fish oil fatty acids intakes. Annu Rev Nutr 31, 203234.
10. Olano-Martin, E, Anil, E, Caslake, MJ et al. (2010) Contribution of apolipoprotein E genotype and docosahexaenoic acid to the LDL-cholesterol response to fish oil. Atherosclerosis 209, 104110.
11. Bouchard, C, Tremblay, A, Despres, JP et al. (1990) The response to long-term overfeeding in identical twins. N Engl J Med 322, 14771482.
12. Williams, PT, Blanche, PJ, Rawlings, R et al. (2005) Concordant lipoprotein and weight responses to dietary fat change in identical twins with divergent exercise levels 1. Am J Clin Nutr 82, 181187.
13. Hesketh, J, Wybranska, I, Dommels, Y et al. (2006) Nutrient-gene interactions in benefit-risk analysis. Br J Nutr 95, 12321236.
14. Matthews, SB, Waud, JP, Roberts, AG et al. (2005) Systemic lactose intolerance: a new perspective on an old problem. Postgrad Med J 81, 167173.
15. Rimbach, G & Minihane, AM (2009) Nutrigenetics and personalised nutrition: how far have we progressed and are we likely to get there? Proc Nutr Soc 68, 162172.
16. van Ommen, B (2007) Personalized nutrition from a health perspective: luxury or necessity? Genes Nutr 2, 34.
17. Kaput, J, Ordovas, JM, Ferguson, L et al. (2005) The case for strategic international alliances to harness nutritional genomics for public and personal health. Br J Nutr 94, 623632.
18. O'Sullivan, A, Gibney, MJ, Connor, AO et al. (2011) Biochemical and metabolomic phenotyping in the identification of a vitamin D responsive metabotype for markers of the metabolic syndrome. Mol Nutr Food Res 55, 679690.
19. Phillips, CM, Goumidi, L, Bertrais, S et al. (2009) Complement component 3 polymorphisms interact with polyunsaturated fatty acids to modulate risk of metabolic syndrome. Am J Clin Nutr 90, 16651673.
20. Joost, HG, Gibney, MJ, Cashman, KD et al. (2007) Personalised nutrition: status and perspectives. Br J Nutr 98, 2631.
21. Curtis, PJ, Adamson, AJ & Mathers, JC (2012) Effects on nutrient intake of a family-based intervention to promote increased consumption of low-fat starchy foods through education, cooking skills and personalised goal setting: the Family Food and Health Project. Br J Nutr 107, 18331844.
22. Bouwman, LI & Koelen, MA (2007) Communication on personalised nutrition: individual–environment interaction. Genes Nutr 2, 8183.
23. Caulfield, T, Ries, NM, Ray, PN et al. (2010) Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: good, bad or benign? Clin Genet 77, 101105.
24. Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2010) Medical Profiling and Online Medicine: The Ethics of ‘Personalised Healthcare’ in a Consumer Age. Available at: http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/sites/default/files/Medical
25. Tamir, S (2010) Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: ethical-legal perspectives and practical considerations. Med Law Rev 18, 213238.
26. Department of Health (2004) Choosing Health: Making Healthy Choices Easier. Public Health White Paper. Available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4094559)
27. Phillips, CM, Goumidi, L, Bertrais, S et al. (2010) Additive effect of polymorphisms in the IL-6, LTA, and TNF-{alpha} genes and plasma fatty acid level modulate risk for the metabolic syndrome and its components. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95, 13861394.
28. Ferguson, JF, Phillips, CM, Tierney, AC et al. (2010) Gene-nutrient interactions in the metabolic syndrome: single nucleotide polymorphisms in ADIPOQ and ADIPOR1 interact with plasma saturated fatty acids to modulate insulin resistance. Am J Clin Nutr 91, 794801.
29. Stewart-Knox, BJ, Bunting, BP, Gilpin, S et al. (2009) Attitudes toward genetic testing and personalised nutrition in a representative sample of European consumers. Br J Nutr 101, 982989.
30. Ronteltap, A, van Trijp, JC & Renes, RJ (2009) Consumer acceptance of nutrigenomics-based personalised nutrition. Br J Nutr 101, 132144.
31. Ronteltap, A, van Trijp, JC, Renes, RJ et al. (2007) Consumer acceptance of technology-based food innovations: lessons for the future of nutrigenomics. Appetite 49, 117.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
  • ISSN: 0029-6651
  • EISSN: 1475-2719
  • URL: /core/journals/proceedings-of-the-nutrition-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed