Hostname: page-component-784d4fb959-9bxm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-17T00:26:25.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physiological characteristics of rumen microbes and relation to diet and fermentation patterns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2007

P. N. Hobson
P. N. Hobson
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Manipulation of Rumen Fermentation
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , September 1972 , pp. 135 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1972

References

REFERENCES

Eadie, J. M., Hyldgaard-Jensen, J., Mann, S. O., Reid, R. S. & Whitelaw, F. G. (1970). Br. J. Nutr. 24, 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, A. (1971). The rumen bacteria of animals fed on a high-molasses-urea diet. PhD Thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Gylswyck, N. O. van (1970). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 74, 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gylswyck, N. O. van & Labuschagne, J. P. L. (1971). J. gen. Microbiol. 66, 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gylswyck, N. O. van & Roché, C. E. G. (1970). J. gen. Microbiol. 64, 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, C., Hobson, P. N. & Summers, R. (1969). In Continuous Culture of Microorganisms p. 189 [M´lek, I., editor]. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hishinuma, F., Kanegasaki, S. & Takahashi, H. (1968). Agric. biol. Chem. J. 32, 1325.Google Scholar
Hobson, P. N. (1965). J. gen. Microbiol. 38, 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, P. N. (1969). In Microbial Growth p. 43 [Meadow, P. and Pirt, S. J., editors]. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, P. N. (1971). Prog. ind. Microbiol. 9, 41.Google Scholar
Hobson, P. N. & Mann, S. O. (1961). J. gen. Microbiol. 24, i. (Title only.)Google Scholar
Hobson, P. N., Mann, S. O. & Oxford, A. E. (1958). J. gen. Microbiol. 19, 462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, P. N. & Stewart, C. S. (1970). J. gen. Microbiol. 63, xi.Google Scholar
Hobson, P. N. & Summers, R. (1966). Nature, Lond. 209, 736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, P. N. & Summers, R. (1967). J. gen. Microbiol. 47, 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerusalimsky, N. D. (1967). In Microbial Physiology and Continuous Culture p. 23 [Powell, E. O., editor]. London: HM Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Lysons, R. J., Alexander, T., Hobson, P. N., Mann, S. O. & Stewart, C. S. (1971). Res. vet. Sci. 12, 486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matales, R. I., Chian, S. K. & Silver, R. (1967). In Microbial Physiology and Continuous Culture p. 233 [Powell, E. O., editor]. London: HM Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Vries, W. de, Kaptcijn, W. M. C., Beek, E. G. van der & Stouthamer, A. H. (1970). J. gen. Microbiol. 63, 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar