Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Satiety-enhancing products for appetite control: science and regulation of functional foods for weight management

  • Jason C. G. Halford (a1) and Joanne A. Harrold (a1)
Abstract

The current review considers satiety-based approaches to weight management in the context of health claims. Health benefits, defined as beneficial physiological effects, are what the European Food Safety Authority bases their recommendations on for claim approval. The literature demonstrates that foods that target within-meal satiation and post-meal satiety provide a plausible approach to weight management. However, few ingredient types tested produce the sustainable and enduring effects on appetite accompanied by the necessary reductions in energy intake required to claim satiety/reduction in hunger as a health benefit. Proteins, fibre types, novel oils and carbohydrates resistant to digestion all have the potential to produce beneficial short-term changes in appetite (proof-of-concept). The challenge remains to demonstrate their enduring effects on appetite and energy intake, as well as the health and consumer benefits such effects provide in terms of optimising successful weight management. Currently, the benefits of satiety-enhancing ingredients to both consumers and their health are under researched. It is possible that such ingredients help consumers gain control over their eating behaviour and may also help reduce the negative psychological impact of dieting and the physiological consequences of energy restriction that ultimately undermine weight management. In conclusion, industry needs to demonstrate that a satiety-based approach to weight management, based on single-manipulated food items, is sufficient to help consumers resist the situational and personal factors that drive overconsumption. Nonetheless, we possess the methodological tools, which when employed in appropriate designs, are sufficient to support health claims.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Satiety-enhancing products for appetite control: science and regulation of functional foods for weight management
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Satiety-enhancing products for appetite control: science and regulation of functional foods for weight management
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Satiety-enhancing products for appetite control: science and regulation of functional foods for weight management
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Corresponding author: Professor Jason C. G. Halford, fax +44 151 7942945, email j.c.g.halford@liverpool.ac.uk
Footnotes
Hide All

This symposium was industrially sponsored and was supplementary to the Nutrition Society Summer meeting.

This review is not a European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) endorsed or sponsored document. It contains the authors’ comments, which are based entirely on published EFSA guidance and opinions in the context of published scientific literature. Published EFSA guidance is only available in draft form at the time of writing.

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

3. JO Hill (2006) Understanding and addressing the epidemic of obesity: an energy balance perspective. Endocr Rev 27, 750761.

4. JCG Halford , EJ Boyland , JE Blundell (2010) Pharmacological management of appetite expression in obesity. Nat Rev Endocrinol 6, 255269.

5. DA Williamson , OJ Lawson , ER Brooks (1995) Association of body mass with dietary restraint and disinhibition. Appetite 25, 3141.

8. F Bellisle , K Clément , M Le Barzic (2004) Eating inventory and body adiposity from leanness to massive obesity: a study of 2509 adults. Obes Res 12, 20232030.

9. J Wardle , S Carnell , CM Haworth (2008) Obesity associated genetic variation in FTO is associated with diminished satiety. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93, 36403643.

10. CH Llewellyn , CH van Jaarsveld , D Boniface (2008) Eating rate is a heritable phenotype related to weight in children. Am J Clin Nutr 88, 15601566.

11. JE Blundell , G Levin , NA King (2008) Over-consumption and obesity: peptides and susceptibility to weight gain. Regul Pept 149, 3238.

12. G Finlayson , N King & JE Blundell (2007) Liking vs. wanting food: importance for human appetite control and weight regulation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 31, 987–1002.

13. DJ Mela (2006) Eating for pleasure or just wanting to eat? Reconsidering sensory hedonic responses as a driver of obesity. Appetite 47, 1017.

14. EJ Bryant , NA King & JE Blundell (2008) Disinhibition: its effects on appetite and weight regulation. Obes Rev 9, 409419.

15. SK Das , E Saltzman , CH Gilhooly (2009) Low or moderate dietary energy restriction for long-term weight loss: what works best? Obesity 17, 20192024.

21. JE Blundell , S Goodson & JCG Halford (2001) Regulation of appetite: role of leptin in signalling systems for drive and satiety. Int J Obes 25, s29s34.

22. JN Crawley & RL Corwin (1994) Biological actions of cholecystokinin. Peptides 15, 731755.

23. TH Moran (2000) Cholecystokinin and satiety: current perspectives. Nutrition 16, 585865.

24. JCG Halford , GD Cooper & TM Dovey (2004) The pharmacology of human appetite expression. Curr Drug Targets 5, 221240.

25. JJ Holst (2007) The physiology of glucagon-like peptide-1. Physiol Rev 87, 14091439.

26. C Verdich , A Flint , JP Gutzwiller (2001) A meta-analysis of the effect of glucagon-like peptide 1 (7–36) amide on ad libitum energy intake in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86, 43824389.

27. CJ Small & ST Bloom (2004) Gut hormones and the control of appetite. Trends Endocrinol Metab 15, 259263.

28. RL Batterham , MA Cowley , CJ Small (2002) Gut hormone PYY3-36 physiologically inhibits food intake. Nature 418, 650654.

31. LG Womble , DA Williamson , FL Greenway (2001) Psychological and behavioral predictors of weight loss during drug treatment for obesity. Int J Obes 25, 340345.

32. K Elfhag & S Rössner (2005) Who succeeds in maintaining weight loss? A conceptual review of factors associated with weight loss maintenance and weight regain. Obes Rev 6, 6785.

33. MP Lejeune , CJ Hukshorn , WH Saris (2007) Effects of very low calorie diet induced body weight loss with or without human pegylated recombinant leptin treatment on changes in ghrelin and adiponectin concentrations. Physiol Behav. 91, 274280.

34. P Sumithran , LA Prendergast , E Delbridge (2011) Long-term persistence of hormonal adaptations to weight loss. N Engl J Med 365, 15971604.

35. LH Epstein , R Truesdale , A Wojcik (2003) Effects of deprivation on hedonics and reinforcing value of food. Physiol Behav 78, 221227.

38. C Warren & PJ Cooper (1980) Psychological effects of dieting. Br J Clin Psychol 27, 269270.

39. J Polivy (1996) Psychological consequences of food restriction. J Am Diet Assoc 96, 589592.

41. L Vreugdenburg , J Bryan & E Kemps (2003) The effect of self-initiated weight-loss dieting on working memory: the role of preoccupying cognitions. Appetite 41, 291300.

42. E Kemps , M Tiggemann & M Grigg (2008) Food cravings consume limited cognitive resources. J Exp Psychol Appl 14, 247254.

43. GM Timmerman & EK Gregg (2003) Dieting, perceived deprivation, and preoccupation with food. West J Nurs Res 25, 405418.

44. J Stockburger , R Schmälzle , T Flaisch (2009) The impact of hunger on food cue processing: an event-related brain potential study. Neuroimage 47, 18191829.

47. PJ Rogers & JE Blundell (1979) Effect of anorexic drugs on food intake and the micro-structure of eating in human subjects. Psychopharmacology 66, 159165.

48. M Mars , A Statfleu & C de Graff (2012) Use of satiety peptides in assessing the satiating capacity of foods. Physiol Behav 105, 483486.

49. TL Halton & FB Hu (2004) The effects of high protein diets on thermogenesis, satiety and weight loss: a critical review. J Am Coll Nutr 23, 373385.

51. DE Gerstein , G Woodward-Lopez , AE Evans (2004) Clarifying concepts about macronutrients’ effects on satiation and satiety. J Am Diet Assoc 104, 11511153.

56. DJ Baer , KS Stote , DR Paul (2011) Whey protein but not soy protein supplementation alters body weight and composition in free-living overweight and obese adults. J Nutr 141, 14891494.

61.EFSA Panel of Dietetic Production, Nutrition and Allergies (2010) Scientific opinion on the substantiation of health claims related to xanthan gum and increased satiety (ID 838) pursuant to Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No. 1924/2006 EFSA J 8, 1481.

64. A Lluch , N Hanet-Geisen , S Salah (2010) Short-term appetite reducing effects of a low-fat dairy product enriched with protein and fibre. Food Qual Prefer 21, 402409.

67. AA Burns , MBE Livingstone , RW Welch (2002) Dose-response effects of a novel fat emulsion (OlibraTM) on energy and macronutrient intakes up to 36 h post consumption. Eur J Clin Nutr 56, 368377.

68. A Haenii , B Sundberg , N Yazdanpanah (2009) Effect of fat emulsion (Fabuless) on orocecal transit time in healthy men. Scand J Gastroenterol 44, 11861190.

69. CM Logan , TA McCaffrey , JMV Wallace (2006) Investigation of the medium-term effects of OlibraTM fat emulsion on food intake in non-obese subjects. Eur J Clin Nutr 60, 10811091.

70. HJ Smit , E Keenan , EMR Kovacs (2011) No efficacy of processed Fabuless (Olibra) in suppressing appetite or food intake. Eur J Clin Nutr 65, 8186.

72. J Olsson , B Sundberg , A Vibert (2011) Effect of a vegetable-oil emulsion on body composition; a 12 week study in overweight women on a meal replacement therapy after an initial weight loss: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Nutr 50, 235242.

74. GM Hughes , EJ Boyland , NJ Williams (2008) A double-blind placebo-controlled experimental study to investigate the impact of Korean pine nut oil on food intake, feeding behaviour and appetite. Lipids in Health and Disease 7. Available at: http://www.lipidworld.com/content/pdf/1476-511X-7-6.pdf (accessed 20 February 2012).

75. JA Parnell & RA Reimer (2009) Weight loss during oligofructose supplementation is associated with decreases ghrelin and increased peptide YY in overweight and obese adults. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 17511759.

76. HPF Peters , HM Boers , E Haddeman (2009) No effect of added beta-glucan or of fructooligosaccharide on appetite or energy intake. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 5863.

79. GH Anderson , CE Cho , T Akhavan (2010) Relation between estimated of cornstarch digestibility by the englyst in vitro method and glycaemic response, subjective appetite, and short-term food intake in young men. Am J Clin Nutr 91, 932939.

80. DA Booth & A Nouwen (2010) Satiety: no way to slim. Appetite 55, 718721.

81. F Bellisle & A Trembley (2011) Satiety and body weight control. Promise and compromise. Comment on ‘Satiety. No way to slim’. Appetite 57, 769771.

82. PAM Smeets & LN Van der Laan (2011) Satiety. Not the problem, nor a solution. Comment on ‘Satiety. No way to slim’. Appetite 57, 772773.

83. DJ Mela (2011) Satiety. Let's put claims in the right context. Comment on ‘Satiety. No way to slim’. Appetite 57, 774777.

84. C De Graaf (2011) Trustworthy satiety claims are goof for science and society. Comment on ‘Satiety. No way to slim’. Appetite 57, 778782.

85. DA Booth & A Nouwen (2011) Weight is controlled by eating patterns, not foods or drugs: reply to comments on ‘Satiety. No way to slime’. Appetite 57, 784790.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
  • ISSN: 0029-6651
  • EISSN: 1475-2719
  • URL: /core/journals/proceedings-of-the-nutrition-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 36
Total number of PDF views: 260 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 458 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.