This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.
1. PJ Friedman (2002) The impact of conflict of interest on trust in science. Sci Eng Ethics 8, 413–420.
2. CD DeAngelis (2000) Conflict of interest and the public trust. JAMA 284, 2237–2238.
3. JJ Cohen (2001) Trust us to make a difference: Ensuring public confidence in the integrity of clinical research. Acad Med 76, 209–214.
4. CL Rock (1999) Conflict of interest: An important issue in nutrition research and communications. J Am Diet Assoc 99, 31–32.
5. JP Kassirer (2005) On the Take: How Medicine's Complicity with Big Business Can Endanger Your Health. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (1993) Conflict of interest. Lancet 341, 742–743.
7. K McNutt (1999) Conflict of interest. J Am Diet Assoc 99, 29–30.
8. DE Barnes & LA Bero (1996) Industry-funded research and conflict of interest: An analysis of research sponsored by the tobacco industry through the Center for Indoor Air Research. J Health Polit Policy Law 21, 515–542.
9. S Sismondo (2008) How pharmaceutical industry funding affects trial outcomes: Causal structures and responses. Soc Sci Med 66, 1909–1914.
10. M Nestle (1993) Food lobbies, the food pyramid, and U.S. nutrition policy. Int J Health Serv 23, 483–496.
14. LI Lesser , CB Ebbeling , M Goozner , D Wypij & DS Ludwig (2007) Relationship between funding source and conclusion among nutrition-related scientific articles. Plos Med 4, 41–46.
15. MB Katan (2007) Does industry sponsorship undermine the integrity of nutrition research? Plos Med 4, 3–4.
19. DK Berlo , JB Lemert & RJ Mertz (1969) Dimensions for evaluating the acceptability of message sources. Public Opin Q 33, 563–576.
20. JL Whitehead (1968) Factors of source credibility. Q J Speech 54, 59–63.
21. C Gaziano & K McGrath (1986) Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism Q 63, 451–462.
22. P Meyer (1988) Defining and measuring credibility of newspapers. Journalism Q 65, 567–574. 588.
23. MD West (1994) Validating a scale for the measurement of credibility: A covariance structure approach. Journalism Q 71, 159–168.
24. KA McComas & CW Trumbo (2001) Source credibility in environmental health-risk controversies: Application of Meyer's credibility index. Risk Anal 21, 467–480.
25. CW Trumbo & KA McComas (2003) The function of credibility in information processing for risk perception. Risk Anal 23, 343–353.
26. C Trumbo & K McComas (2008) Institutional trust, information processing and perception of environmental cancer risk. Int J Glob Environ Issues 8, 61–76.
27. O Renn & D Levine (1991) Credibility and trust in risk communication. In Communicating Risks to the Public: International Perspectives, pp. 175–218 [ RE Kasperson and PJM Stallen editors]. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
28. RG Peters , VT Covello & DB McCallum (1997) The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: An empirical study. Risk Anal 17, 43–54.
29. RE Kasperson , D Golding & S Tuler (1992) Social distrust as a factor in siting hazardous facilities and communicating risks. J Soc Issues 48, 161–187.
31. G Cronkhite & J Liska (1976) A critique of factor analytic approaches to the study of credibility. Commun Monogr 43, 92–107.
32. A Tversky & D Kahneman (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185, 1124–1131.
33. LJ Frewer , C Howard , D Hedderley & R Shepherd (1996) What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Underlying psychological contructs. Risk Anal 16, 473–500.
34. JV Mitchell (1992) Perception of risk and credibility at toxic sites. Risk Anal 12, 19–26.
36. M Siegrist , G Cvetkovich & C Roth (2000) Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception. Risk Anal 20, 353–362.
37. M Siegrist , GT Cvetkovich & H Gutscher (2001) Shared values, social trust, and the perception of geographic cancer clusters. Risk Anal 21, 1047–1053.
39. KJ Rothman (1993) Conflict of interest: The new McCarthyism in science. JAMA 269, 2782–2784.
40. SE Bennett , SL Rhine , RS Flickinger & LLM Bennett (1999) ‘Video malaise’ revisited – Public trust in the media and government. Harv Int J Press-Polit 4, 8–23.
41. J Levine , JD Gussow , D Hastings & A Eccher (2003) Authors' financial relationships with the food and beverage industry and their published positions on the fat substitute olestra. Am J Public Health 93, 664–669.
44. B Margetts & L Arab (2001) Sponsorship of research in Public Health Nutrition. Public Health Nutr 4, 933.
45. B Als-Nielsen , WD Chen , C Gluud & LL Kjaergard (2003) Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials – A reflection of treatment effect or adverse events? JAMA 290, 921–928.
47. DM Cook , EA Boyd , C Grossmann & LA Bero (2007) Reporting science and conflicts of interest in the lay press. PLoS ONE 2, e1266.
48. R Moynihan , L Bero , D Ross-Degnan , D Henry , K Lee , J Watkins , C Mah & SB Soumerai (2000) Coverage by the news media of the benefits and risks of medications. New Engl J Med 342, 1645–1650.
49. KA McComas & LM Simone (2003) Media coverage of conflicts of interest in science. Sci Commun 24, 395–419.
50. K McComas , LS Tuite , L Waks & LA Sherman (2007) Predicting satisfaction and outcome acceptance with advisory committee meetings: The role of procedural justice. J Appl Soc Psychol 37, 905–927.
51. ML Hecht (1978) The conceptualization and measurement of interpersonal communication satisfaction. Hum Commun Res 4, 253–264.
55. G Cvetkovich , M Siegrist , R Murray & S Tragesser (2002) New information and social trust: Asymmetry and perseverance of attributions about hazard managers. Risk Anal 22, 359–367.