1. Friedman, PJ (2002) The impact of conflict of interest on trust in science. Sci Eng Ethics 8, 413–420.
2. DeAngelis, CD (2000) Conflict of interest and the public trust. JAMA 284, 2237–2238.
3. Cohen, JJ (2001) Trust us to make a difference: Ensuring public confidence in the integrity of clinical research. Acad Med 76, 209–214.
4. Rock, CL (1999) Conflict of interest: An important issue in nutrition research and communications. J Am Diet Assoc 99, 31–32.
5. Kassirer, JP (2005) On the Take: How Medicine's Complicity with Big Business Can Endanger Your Health. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (1993) Conflict of interest. Lancet 341, 742–743.
7. McNutt, K (1999) Conflict of interest. J Am Diet Assoc 99, 29–30.
8. Barnes, DE & Bero, LA (1996) Industry-funded research and conflict of interest: An analysis of research sponsored by the tobacco industry through the Center for Indoor Air Research. J Health Polit Policy Law 21, 515–542.
9. Sismondo, S (2008) How pharmaceutical industry funding affects trial outcomes: Causal structures and responses. Soc Sci Med 66, 1909–1914.
10. Nestle, M (1993) Food lobbies, the food pyramid, and U.S. nutrition policy. Int J Health Serv 23, 483–496.
11. Nestle, M (2001) Food company sponsorship of nutrition research and professional activities: a conflict of interest? Public Health Nutr 4, 1015–1022.
12. Waymack, MH (2003) Ethical conflicts of interest. J Am Diet Assoc 103, 555–557.
13. Kjaernes, U (2003) Food and nutrition policies of Nordic countries: how have they been developed and what evidence substantiates the development of these policies? Proc Nutr Soc 62, 563–570.
14. Lesser, LI, Ebbeling, CB, Goozner, M, Wypij, D & Ludwig, DS (2007) Relationship between funding source and conclusion among nutrition-related scientific articles. Plos Med 4, 41–46.
15. Katan, MB (2007) Does industry sponsorship undermine the integrity of nutrition research? Plos Med 4, 3–4.
16. Fessenden-Raden, J, Fitchen, JM & Heath, JS (1987) Providing risk information in communities: Factors influencing what is heard and accepted. Sci Technol Human Values 12, 94–101.
17. Hovland, CI, Janis, IL & Kelley, HH (1953) Communication and Persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18. Petty, RE & Cacioppo, JT (1981) Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches. Dubuque, IA: Brown.
19. Berlo, DK, Lemert, JB & Mertz, RJ (1969) Dimensions for evaluating the acceptability of message sources. Public Opin Q 33, 563–576.
20. Whitehead, JL (1968) Factors of source credibility. Q J Speech 54, 59–63.
21. Gaziano, C & McGrath, K (1986) Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism Q 63, 451–462.
22. Meyer, P (1988) Defining and measuring credibility of newspapers. Journalism Q 65, 567–574. 588.
23. West, MD (1994) Validating a scale for the measurement of credibility: A covariance structure approach. Journalism Q 71, 159–168.
24. McComas, KA & Trumbo, CW (2001) Source credibility in environmental health-risk controversies: Application of Meyer's credibility index. Risk Anal 21, 467–480.
25. Trumbo, CW & McComas, KA (2003) The function of credibility in information processing for risk perception. Risk Anal 23, 343–353.
26. Trumbo, C & McComas, K (2008) Institutional trust, information processing and perception of environmental cancer risk. Int J Glob Environ Issues 8, 61–76.
27. Renn, O & Levine, D (1991) Credibility and trust in risk communication. In Communicating Risks to the Public: International Perspectives, pp. 175–218 [Kasperson, RE and Stallen, PJM editors]. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
28. Peters, RG, Covello, VT & McCallum, DB (1997) The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: An empirical study. Risk Anal 17, 43–54.
29. Kasperson, RE, Golding, D & Tuler, S (1992) Social distrust as a factor in siting hazardous facilities and communicating risks. J Soc Issues 48, 161–187.
30. Frewer, LJ, Howard, C, Hedderley, D & Shepherd, R (1996) What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Underlying psychological constructs. Risk Anal 16, 473–486.
31. Cronkhite, G & Liska, J (1976) A critique of factor analytic approaches to the study of credibility. Commun Monogr 43, 92–107.
32. Tversky, A & Kahneman, D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185, 1124–1131.
33. Frewer, LJ, Howard, C, Hedderley, D & Shepherd, R (1996) What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Underlying psychological contructs. Risk Anal 16, 473–500.
34. Mitchell, JV (1992) Perception of risk and credibility at toxic sites. Risk Anal 12, 19–26.
35. Cvetkovich, G & Lofstedt, RE (1999) Social Trust and the Management of Risk. London: Earthscan Publications.
36. Siegrist, M, Cvetkovich, G & Roth, C (2000) Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception. Risk Anal 20, 353–362.
37. Siegrist, M, Cvetkovich, GT & Gutscher, H (2001) Shared values, social trust, and the perception of geographic cancer clusters. Risk Anal 21, 1047–1053.
38. Davis, M (2001) Introduction. In Conflict of Interest in the Professions, pp. 3–19 [Davis, M and Stark, A editors]. New York: Oxford University Press.
39. Rothman, KJ (1993) Conflict of interest: The new McCarthyism in science. JAMA 269, 2782–2784.
40. Bennett, SE, Rhine, SL, Flickinger, RS & Bennett, LLM (1999) ‘Video malaise’ revisited – Public trust in the media and government. Harv Int J Press-Polit 4, 8–23.
41. Levine, J, Gussow, JD, Hastings, D & Eccher, A (2003) Authors' financial relationships with the food and beverage industry and their published positions on the fat substitute olestra. Am J Public Health 93, 664–669.
42. Uauy, R (2007) Academic-industry partnerships in addressing nutrition – Infection-immunity-inflammation interactions. Br J Nutr 98, S17–S23.
43. Calder, PC (2008) Increasing transparency in the British Journal of Nutrition. Br J Nutr 99, 217–218.
44. Margetts, B & Arab, L (2001) Sponsorship of research in Public Health Nutrition. Public Health Nutr 4, 933.
45. Als-Nielsen, B, Chen, WD, Gluud, C & Kjaergard, LL (2003) Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials – A reflection of treatment effect or adverse events? JAMA 290, 921–928.
46. National Science Board (2008) Science and Engineering Indicators 2008. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
47. Cook, DM, Boyd, EA, Grossmann, C & Bero, LA (2007) Reporting science and conflicts of interest in the lay press. PLoS ONE 2, e1266.
48. Moynihan, R, Bero, L, Ross-Degnan, D, Henry, D, Lee, K, Watkins, J, Mah, C & Soumerai, SB (2000) Coverage by the news media of the benefits and risks of medications. New Engl J Med 342, 1645–1650.
49. McComas, KA & Simone, LM (2003) Media coverage of conflicts of interest in science. Sci Commun 24, 395–419.
50. McComas, K, Tuite, LS, Waks, L & Sherman, LA (2007) Predicting satisfaction and outcome acceptance with advisory committee meetings: The role of procedural justice. J Appl Soc Psychol 37, 905–927.
51. Hecht, ML (1978) The conceptualization and measurement of interpersonal communication satisfaction. Hum Commun Res 4, 253–264.
52. Weick, KE (1979) The Sociology of Organizing, 2nd ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
53. Dillman, DA (2000) Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
54. Covello, VT (1992) Trust and credibility in risk communication. Health Environ Dig 6, 1–3.
55. Cvetkovich, G, Siegrist, M, Murray, R & Tragesser, S (2002) New information and social trust: Asymmetry and perseverance of attributions about hazard managers. Risk Anal 22, 359–367.