Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-65tv2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-05T10:02:26.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Choppers and the Clactonian: A Reinvestigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

N. Ashton ,
J. McNabb  and
S. Parfitt
N. Ashton
Affiliation:
Department of Prehistoric and Romano-British Antiquities, The British Museum, Franks House, 38–46 Orsman Road, London N1 5QJ
J. McNabb
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 31–34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY
S. Parfitt
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 31–34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Choppers and chopping tools have long been associated with the Clactonian industries of Britain. They have either been dismissed as cores, or often described as woodworking tools, but have rarely been studied from a functional perspective. The purpose of this paper is to publish the results of a series of experiments which has been carried out to investigate the functional efficiency of choppers or chopping tools as compared to other alternative tools. These results are then reviewed in the light of the archaeological information from Clactonian and other Lower and Middle Pleistocene sites.

Due to the problems of definition, for the purposes of the experiments both chopping tools and choppers have been taken to be small nodules of pebbles which have had several flakes removed bifacially along at least one edge. The morphology of the working edge is identical to that found on the edges of many of the Clactonian cores. For this reason, chopping tools, choppers and cores are regarded as artefacts with potentially an identical function. In the experiments they are termed simply as chopping tools.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , 1992 , pp. 21 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Ashton, N.M. 1992. The High Lodge flint industries. In Ashton, N. M. Cook, J. Lewis, S. G. & Rose, J. (eds), High Lodge. Excavations by G. de G. Sieveking, 1962–8 and J. Cook 1988. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Barton, R. N. E. 1986. Experiments with long blades from Sproughton, near Ipswich, Suffolk. In Roe, D.A. (ed.), Studies in the Upper Palaeolithic of Britain and Northwest Europe, 129–41. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
Binford, L. R. 1981. Bones: Ancient Men and Modern Myths. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bordes, F. 1967. Considerations sur la typologie et les techniques dans le Paléolithique. Quatar 18, 25–55.Google Scholar
Bordes, F. 1981. Essai de préhistoire experimentale: fabrication d'un épieu de bois. Mélanges de Préhistoire, Archéocivilisation, et d'Éthnologie Offerts à André Varagnac. (Ecole Practique des Hautes Etudes VIème Section, Centre de Recherches Historique.) Paris: SEVPEN.Google Scholar
Bunn, H. T. 1981. Archaeological evidence for meat-eating by Plio-Pleistocene hominids from Koobi Fora and Olduvai Gorge. Nature 291, 574–77.10.1038/291574a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunn, H. T., Harris, J. W. K., Isaac, G., Kafulu, Z., Kroll, E., Schick, K., Toth, N. & Behrensmeyer, A. K. 1980. FXJj50: an early Pleistocene site in northern Kenya. World Archaeology 12, 109–36.10.1080/00438243.1980.9979787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, J. D. & Haynes, C. V. 1970. An elephant butchery site at Mwanganda's village, Karonga, Malawi, and it's relevance for Palaeolithic archaeology. World Archaeology 1, 390–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, D. 1969. Culture traditions and environment of early man. Current Anthropology 10, 267–316.10.1086/201019Google Scholar
Dawkins, W. B. 1876. On the mammalia and traces of man found in the Robin Hood Cave. The Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society 32, 245–58.Google Scholar
Dawkins, W. B. 1877. On the mammal fauna of the caves of Cresswell Crags. The Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society 33, 589–612.10.1144/GSL.JGS.1877.033.01-04.35Google Scholar
de Terra, H. & Paterson, T. T. 1939. Studies on the Ice-Age in India and Associated Human Cultures. Washington: Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication no. 493.Google Scholar
Frison, G. C. 1974. The Casper Site: A Hell Gap Bison Kill on the High Plains. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Isaac, G. 1986. Foundation stones: early artefacts as indicators of activities and abilities. In Bailey, G. N. & Callow, P. (eds), Stone Age Prehistory, 221–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, P. R. 1980. Experimental butchery with modern stone tools and its relevance for Palaeolithic archaeology. World Archaeology 12, 153–65.10.1080/00438243.1980.9979789Google Scholar
Keeley, L. H. 1980. Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lartet, E. & Christy, H. 1875. Reliquae Aquitanicae. London: Williams & Norgate.Google Scholar
Leakey, L. S. B. 1951. Olduvai Gorge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leakey, L. S. B. 1953. Adam's Ancestors (4th edition). New York: Harrap.Google Scholar
Leakey, M. D. 1971. Olduvai Gorge. Volume 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morrison, A. 1980. Early Man in Britain and Ireland. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Movius, H. L. 1948. The Lower Palaeolithic cultures of southern and eastern Asia. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 38, 329–420.10.2307/1005632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Movius, H. L. 1950. A wooden spear of Third Interglacial age from Lower Saxony. South Western Journal of Anthropology 6 (2), 139–42.10.1086/soutjanth.6.2.3628638Google Scholar
Newcomer, M., Grace, R. & Unger-Hamilton, R. 1986. Investigating microwear polishes with blind tests. Journal of Archaeological Science 13, 203–18.Google Scholar
Oakley, K. P. 1965. Man the Tool-Maker. London: British Museum (Natural History).Google Scholar
Oakley, K. P. & Leakey, M. D. 1937. Report on excavations at Jaywick Sands, Essex (1934), with some observations on the Clactonian industry and on the fauna and geological significance of the Clacton Channel. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 3, 217–60.10.1017/S0079497X00021435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, K. P., Andrews, P., Keeley, L. H. & Clark, J. D. 1977. A reappraisal of the Clacton spearpoint. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 43, 13–30.10.1017/S0079497X00010343Google Scholar
Potts, R. 1988. Early Hominid Activities at Olduvai. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Potts, R. & Shipman, P. 1981. Cutmarks made by stone tools on bones from Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. Nature 291, 577–80.10.1038/291577a0Google Scholar
Roberts, M. 1986. Excavation of the Lower Palaeolithic site at Amey's Eartham Pit, Boxgrove, West Sussex: a preliminary report. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 52, 215–45.10.1017/S0079497X00006666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, D. A. 1981. The Lower and Middle Palaeolithic Periods in Britain. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Sadek-Kooros, H. 1972. Primitive bone fracturing: a method of research. American Antiquity 37, 369–82.10.2307/278436Google Scholar
Singer, R., Wymer, J. J., Gladfelter, B. G. & Wolff, R. 1973. Excavations of the Clactonian industry at the Golf Course, Clacton-on-Sea, Essex. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 39, 6–74.Google Scholar
Smith, W. G. 1894. Man the Primeval Savage. London: Stanford.Google Scholar
Toth, N. 1985. The Oldowan reassessed: a close look at early stone artefacts. Journal of Archaeological Science 12, 101–21.10.1016/0305-4403(85)90056-1Google Scholar
Waechter, J.d'A. 1968. Swanscombe 1968. Proceedings of the Royal Anthropological Institute 1968, 53–58.Google Scholar
Waechter, J.d'A., Hubbard, R. N. L. B. & Conway, B. W. 1971. Swanscombe 1971. Proceedings of the Royal Anthropological Institute 1971, 73–85.Google Scholar
Waechter, J.d'A., Newcomber, M. H. & Conway, B. W. 1969. Swanscombe 1969. Proceedings of the Royal Anthropological Institute 1969, 83–94.Google Scholar
Waechter, J.d'A., Newcomer, M. H. & Conway, B. W. 1970. Swanscombe 1970. Proceedings of the Royal Anthropological Institute 1970, 43–64.Google Scholar
Warren, S. H. 1911. Palaeolithic wooden spear from Clacton. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 67, cxix.Google Scholar
Warren, S. H. 1922. The Mesvinian industry of Clacton-on-Sea, Essex. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society of East Anglia 3, 597–602.10.1017/S0958841800024765Google Scholar
Warren, S. H. 1926. The classification of the Lower Palaeolithic with especial reference to Essex. Transactions of the South Eastern Union Scientific Societies 31, 38–51.Google Scholar
Warren, S. H. 1951. The Clacton flint industry: a new interpretation. Proceedings of the Geological Association 62 (2), 107–35.10.1016/S0016-7878(51)80003-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, S.H. 1958. The Clacton flint industry: a supplementary note. Proceedings of the Geological Association 69, 123–29.10.1016/S0016-7878(58)80048-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, W. 1968. Flint Implements. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
Wymer, J.J. 1968. Lower Palaeolithic Archaeology in Britain as Represented by the Thames Valley. London: John Baker.Google Scholar
Wymer, J.J. 1982. The Palaeoloithic Age. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Wymer, J.J. 1985. Palaeolithic Sites of East Anglia. Norwich: Geo Books.Google Scholar