Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T08:04:19.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Earthen Long Barrows and Timber Structures: Aspects of the Early Neolithic Mortuary Practice in Denmark

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2014

Torsten Madsen
Torsten Madsen
Affiliation:
Institut for forhistorisk arkaeologi, Moesgård, DK-8270, Højbjerg, Denmark
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

More than twenty years have elapsed since Stuart Piggott suggested the possibility of a connection between the primary Neolithic cultures of Britain and the early phases of the Funnel necked Beaker (TRB) Culture of northern Europe (Piggott 1956). What appeared at that time to many scholars, not least in Denmark, to be a very far fetched idea, must today in the light of the many new Danish excavations be considered seriously. Piggott pointed to three categories of finds which could possibly be advanced as indicators of contact: Pottery, causewayed camps and ‘unchambered’ earthen long barrows. In all three areas decisive new results have been obtained, and although this paper deals with the earthen long barrows, both the pottery and the causewayed camps will be briefly commented upon.

C. J. Becker's division of the Danish early Neolithic pottery into four major classes, the A, B, non-megalithic and megalithic C types of pottery, is still useable for the general categorization of site inventories (Becker 1948). The neat derivative system that he built, with A originating somewhere in eastern Europe, followed by B, and terminating with two contemporary C-groups, is however no longer warranted, and especially not with reference to the radiocarbon dates. Nor can the clear-cut typological division of the pottery into the four groups be maintained, since many types of pots and ornamentation occur in more than one group. For instance the B type beaker, with lines of twisted cord beneath the rim, is an integral part of the inventory of non-megalithic C sites, and also occurs in connection with megalithic C pottery.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 45 , December 1979 , pp. 301 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Albrectsen, E., 1941. Nogle yngre Stenalders Grave i Rinds Herred. Fra Viborg Amt.Google Scholar
Andersen, N. H., 1975. ‘Die neolithische Befestigungsanlage in Sarup auf Fünen (Dänemark)’, Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt 5, 1975.Google Scholar
Andersen, N. H. 1977. ‘Sarup: Keramikgruber fra to bebyggelsesfaser’, Kuml 1977.Google Scholar
Aner, E., 1963. ‘Die Stellung der Dolmen Schleswig-Holsteins in der nordischen Megalithkultur’, Offa.Google Scholar
Ashbee, P., 1970. The Earthen Longbarrow in Britain.Google Scholar
Atkinson, R. J. C., 1965. ‘Wayland's Smithy’, Antiquity 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, C. J., 1948. ‘Mosefunde Lerkar fra yngre Stenalder’, Aarbøger for nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie 1947.Google Scholar
Becker, C. J. 1960. ‘Stendyngegrave fra mellem-neolitisk tid’, Aarbøger for nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie 1959.Google Scholar
Brøndsted, J., 1957. Danmarks Oldtid 1Google Scholar
Chmielewski, W., 1952. Zagadnienie Grobowcow kujawskich W swietle ostatnich Badan.Google Scholar
Clarke, D. L., 1968. Analytical archaeology.Google Scholar
Faber, O., 1976. ‘Hus eller grav?’, Mark og Montre.Google Scholar
Fischer, C., 1976. ‘Tidlig-neolitiske anlaeg ved Rustrup’, Kuml 1975.Google Scholar
Glob, P. V., 1949. ‘Barkaer: Danmarks aeldste Landsby’, Fra Nationalmuseets Arbejdsmark 1949.Google Scholar
Glob, P. V. 1975. ‘De dødes lange huse’, Skalk 1975, no. 6.Google Scholar
Hansen, F., 1917. ‘Några Enmansgravar från Stenålderen’, Fornvänen 12.Google Scholar
Hansen, U. L., 1974. ‘Mellem-neolitiske jordgrave fra Vindinge på Sjaelland’, Aarbøger for nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie 1972.Google Scholar
Hingst, H., 1971. ‘Ein Befestigtes Dorf aus der Jungsteinzeit in Büdelsdorf (Holstein)’, Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt 1.Google Scholar
Hingst, H. 1972. ‘Eine Befestigte jungsteinzeitliche Siedlung in Büdelsdorf, Kr. Rendsburg-Eckernförde’, Offa 28.Google Scholar
Hingst, H. 1976. ‘Neolithische Erdgräber auf der Tannenbergskoppel in Bordersholm, Kreis Rendsburg’, Jahresschrift für mitteldeutsche Vorgeschichte 60.Google Scholar
Jazdzewski, K., 1973. ‘The relations between Kujavian Barrows in Poland and Megalithic Tombs in northern Germany, Denmark and western European Countries’. In Daniel, G. and Kjaerum, P. (eds), Megalithic Graves and Ritual.Google Scholar
Johansen, K. F., 1917. ‘Jordgrave fra Dyssetid’, Aarbøger for nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie 1917.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, E., 1977. ‘Braendende langdysser’, Skalk 1977, no. 5.Google Scholar
Kjaerum, P., 1970. ‘Jaettestuen Jordhøj’, Kuml 1969.Google Scholar
Kjaerum, P. 1971. ‘Skavangedyssen’, Brudstykker.Google Scholar
Kjaerum, P. 1977. ‘En langhøjs tilblivelse’, Antikvariske studier tilegnet Knud Thorvildsen.Google Scholar
Lichardus, J., 1976. Rössen - Gartersleben - Baalberge. Ein Beitrag zur Chronologie des mitteldeutchen Neolithikums und zur Entstehung der Trichterbecher-Kulturen.Google Scholar
Liversage, D., 1970. ‘Stendyssens forløber’, Skalk 1970, no. 1.Google Scholar
Madsen, B., and Nielsen, P. O., 1977. ‘To tidlig-neolitiske jordgrave’, Antikvariske studier tilegnet Knud Thorvildsen.Google Scholar
Madsen, T., 1972. ‘Grave med teltformet overbygning fra tidlig-neolitisk tid’, Kuml 1971.Google Scholar
Madsen, T. 1975. ‘Tidlig neolitiske anlaeg ved Tolstrup’, Kuml 1973/74.Google Scholar
Madsen, T. 1978a. ‘Toftum ved Horsens: Et “befaestet” anlaeg tilhørende tragtbaegerkulturen’, Kuml 1977.Google Scholar
Madsen, T. 1978b. ‘Toftum - Ein neues neolithisches Erdwerk bei Horsens, Ostjütland (Dänemark)’, Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt 8.Google Scholar
Madsen, T. 1980. ‘En tidligneolitisk langhøj ved Rude i Østjylland’, Kuml 1979.Google Scholar
Mathiassen, T., 1936. ‘En vestjysk Megalitbygd’, Aarbøger for nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie 1936.Google Scholar
Morgan, F. de M., 1959. ‘The Excavation of a Long Barrow at Nutbane, Hants’, PPS 25.Google Scholar
Petersen, E. B., 1974. ‘Gravene fra Dragsholm: Fra jaegere til bender for 6000 aar siden’, Nationalmuseets Arbejdsmark 1974.Google Scholar
Phillips, C. W., 1936. ‘The Excavation of the Giants' Hills Long Barrow, Skendleby, Lincolnshire’, Archaeologia 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piggott, S., 1956. ‘Windmill Hill—East or West?’, PPS 21.Google Scholar
Piggott, S. 1967. ‘“Unchambered” Long Barrows in neolithic Britain’, Palaeohistoria 12, 1966.Google Scholar
Piggott, S. 1974. ‘Excavation of the Dalladies long barrow, Fettercairn, Kincardineshire’, Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 104, 1971–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skaarup, J., 1975. Stengade. Ein langeländischer Wohnplatz mit Hausreste aus der frühneolithischen Zeit.Google Scholar
Smith, I. F., and Evans, J. G., 1968. ‘Excavation of two long barrows in North Wiltshire’, Antiquity 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterum, N., 1979. ‘Søgaard Søndermark: En stenaldergrav med teltformet overbygning’, Løgumkloster Studier 2.Google Scholar
Stürup, B., 1966. ‘En ny jordgrav fra tidlig-neolitisk tid’, Kuml 1965.Google Scholar
Thorvildsen, K., 1941. ‘Dyssetidens Gravfund i Danmark’, Aarbøger for nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie 1941.Google Scholar
Vatcher, F. de M., 1965. ‘East Heslerton long barrow, Yorkshire: The eastern half’, Antiquity 39.Google Scholar