Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

The 2006 Mexican Elections: Manifestation of a Divided Society?

  • Joseph L. Klesner (a1)
Extract

When the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) lost the presidency in 2000, the central cleavage that defined Mexican politics in the last 15 years of the twentieth century—pro-regime vs. anti-regime—could no longer guide voters on Election Day. With no PRI to vote out of office (or to defend), Mexicans were impelled to turn their political attention to non-regime issues, such as economic policy, social policy, relations with the United States, and crime control. As Kathleen Bruhn and Kenneth Greene make clear in their contribution to this symposium, Mexican political elites are seriously divided on these issues, while the views of their bases are not far apart.

Copyright
References
Hide All

References

Ansolabehere, Stephen, Jonathan Rodden, and James M. Snyder Jr. 2006. “Purple America.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (spring): 97118.
Bruhn, Kathleen, and Kenneth Greene. 2007. “Elite Polarization Meets Mass Moderation in Mexico's 2006 Elections.” PS: Political Science and Politics 40 (January): 3338.
Chand, Vikram K. 2001. Mexico's Political Awakening. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Consulta Mitofsky. 2006. “2 de julio de 2006, análisis de la elección: encuesta de salida.” Available at http://207.56.94.3/interiores/99_pdfs/11_elecciones_pdf/20060702_ExitPoll_PerfilVotante.pdf (last accessed on October 22, 2006).
Gimpel, James, and Kimberly Karnes. 2006. “The Rural Side of the Urban-Rural Gap.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39 (July): 46772.
Gimpel, James, and Jason Schuknecht. 2003. Patchwork Nation: Sectionalism and Political Change in American Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Klesner, Joseph L. 2001. “The End of Mexico's One-Party Regime.” PS: Political Science and Politics 34 (March): 10714.
Klesner, Joseph L. 2005. “Electoral Competition and the New Party System in Mexico.” Latin American Politics and Society 47 (summer): 10342.
Klesner, Joseph L. 2006. “Social and Regional Factors in the 2006 Presidential Election: Some County-Level Aggregate Data Findings.” August 9. Available at http://web.mit.edu/polisci/research/mexico06/KlesnerMemo.pdf.
Langston, Joy. 2007. “The PRI's 2006 Electoral Debacle.” PS: Political Science and Politics 40 (January): 2125.
Lawson, Chappell. 2006. “Preliminary Findings from the Mexico 2006 Panel Study Memo #1: Blue States and Yellow States.” July 27. Available at http://web.mit.edu/polisci/research/mexico06/Region_and_demographics8.doc.
Lawson, Chappell. 2007. “How Did We Get Here? Mexican Democracy after the 2006 Elections.” PS: Political Science and Politics 40 (January): 4548.
McKinley, James C. Jr. 2006. “Mexico's Populist Tilts at a Privileged Elite.” New York Times, 16 June.
Middlebrook, Kevin J. 1995. The Paradox of Revolution: Labor, the State, and Authoritarianism in Mexico. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Moreno, Alejandro. 2007. “The 2006 Mexican Presidential Election: The Economy, Oil Revenues, and Ideology.” PS: Political Science and Politics 40 (January): 1519.
Reforma Investigación. 2006. “Pintan en dos la República.” Reforma, 3 July, 14.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed