American Political Science Association. 2011. “Political Science in the 21st Century.” Report of the Task Force. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association. Available at www.apsanet.org/portals/54/Files/Task%20Force%20Reports/TF_21st%20Century_AllPgs_webres90.pdf.Google Scholar

Beaulieu, Emily, Boydstun, Amber E., Brown, Nadia E., Dionne, Kim Yi, Gillespie, Andra, Klar, Samara, Krupnikov, Yanna, Michelson, Melissa R., Searles, Kathleen, and Wolbrecht, Christina. 2017. “Women Also Know Stuff: Meta-Level Mentoring to Battle Gender Bias in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 50 (3): 779–83. DOI:10.1017/S1049096517000580.Google Scholar

Beckwith, Karen. 2015. “State, Academy, Discipline: Regendering Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 48 (3): 445–49.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. “The Scholastic Point of View.” Cultural Anthropology 5 (4): 380–91.Google Scholar

Bracey, Glenn E. 2016. “Black Movements Need Black Theorizing: Exposing Implicit Whiteness in Political Process Theory.” Sociological Focus 49 (1): 11–27.Google Scholar

Brockett, Charles. 1991. “The Structure of Political Opportunities and Peasant Mobilization in Central America.” Comparative Politics 23:253–74.Google Scholar

Brown, Nadia. 2019. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 40 (1): 1–6. DOI:10.1080/1554477X.2019.1563413.Google Scholar

Carruthers, Charlene. 2018. Unapologetic: A Black, Queer, and Feminist Mandate for Radical Movements. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Edwards, Lauren Hamilton, Holmes, Maja Husar, and Sowa, Jessica E.. 2019. “Including Women in Public Affairs Departments: Diversity Is Not Enough.” Journal of Public Affairs Education 25 (2): 163–84. DOI:10.1080/15236803.2018.1565051.Google Scholar

Ferree, Myra Marx, and Roth, Silke. 1998. “Gender, Class, and the Interaction between Social Movements: A Strike of West Berlin Day Care Workers.” Gender and Society 12 (6): 626–48.Google Scholar

Ganz, Marshall. 2009. Why David Sometimes Wins: Leadership, Organization, and Strategy in the California Farm Worker Movement. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Han, Hahrie. 2014. How Organizations Develop Activists: Civic Associations and Leadership in the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Herring, Cedric, and Henderson, Loren. 2014. “The Critical Diversity Perspective.” In Diversity in Organizations, ed. Herring, Cedric and Henderson, Loren, 11–30. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Jackson, Jenn M. 2019. “Breaking Out of the Ivory Tower: (Re)Thinking Inclusion of Women and Scholars of Color in the Academy.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 40 (1): 195–203. DOI:10.1080/1554477X.2019.1565459.Google Scholar

Kenney, Sally J. 1996. “New Research on Gendered Political Institutions.” Political Research Quarterly 49 (2): 445–66.Google Scholar

Kittilson, Miki Caul. 2015. “Advancing Women in Political Science: Navigating Gendered Structures of Opportunity.” PS: Political Science & Politics 48 (3): 450–53.Google Scholar

Kriesi, Hanspeter, Koopmans, Ruud, Duyvendak, Jan Willem, and Giugni, Marco G.. 1995. The Politics of New Social Movements in Western Europe. A Comparative Analysis. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press and University College of London Press.Google Scholar

Lavariega Monforti, Jessica L., and Michelson, Melissa R.. 2020. “Building our Communities: Women of Color Workshops in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 53 (1): 141–43.Google Scholar

Casarez, Lemi, Danielle, Maricruz Osorio, and Rush, Tye. 2020. “Introducing People of Color Also Know Stuff.” PS: Political Science & Politics 53 (1): 140–41.Google Scholar

Lovenduski, Joni. 1998. “Gendering Research in Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 1 (1): 333–56.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes’.” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.Google Scholar

McAdam, Doug. 1996. “Political Opportunities: Conceptual Origins, Current Problems, Future Directions.” In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, ed. McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N., 1–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McBride, Dorothy E., and Mazur, Amy G.. 2010. The Politics of State Feminism: Innovation in Comparative Research. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

McCammon, Holly J., Campbell, Karen E., Granberg, Ellen M., and Mowery, Christine. 2001. “How Movements Win: Gendered Opportunity Structures and US Women’s Suffrage Movements, 1866 to 1919.” American Sociological Review 66 (1): 49–70.Google Scholar

Mealy, Kimberly A. 2015. “Forging Inclusive Diversity Coalitions within Associations.” Paper presented at the 2015 National Science Foundation Workshop on Coalition Building to Advance Diverse Leadership and Address Discrimination in Political Science and Law and Social Sciences. Arlington, VA, January 7–9.Google Scholar

Mealy, Kimberly A. 2018. “American Political Science Association Diversity and Inclusion Report.” Washington, DC: American Political Science Association. Available at http://betan.apsanet.org/Portals/54/diversity%20and%20inclusion%20prgms/DIV%20reports/Diversity%20Report%20Executive%20-%20Final%20Draft%20-%20Web%20version.pdf.Google Scholar

Minta, Michael D., and Sinclair-Chapman, Valeria. 2012. “Diversity in Political Institutions and Congressional Responsiveness to Minority Interests.” Political Research Quarterly 66 (1): 127–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morris, Aldon. 1984. The Origins of the Civil Rights Movement. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Rucht, Dieter. 1996. “The Impact of National Contexts on Social Movement Structures: A Cross- Movement and Cross-National Perspective.” In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, ed. McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N., 185–204. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Shames, Shauna. 2019. “Why I Do Activist Work within the Discipline.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy (40) 1: 129–30. DOI:10.1080/1554477X.2019.1563419.Google Scholar

Sinclair-Chapman, Valeria. 2015. “Leveraging Diversity in Political Science for Institutional and Disciplinary Change.” PS: Political Science & Politics 48 (3): 454–58.Google Scholar

Strolovitch, Dara. 2007. Affirmative Advocacy: Race, Class, and Gender in Interest Group Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Tarrow, Sidney. 1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tarrow, Sidney. 2005. The New Transnational Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tormos, Fernando. 2017. “Intersectional Solidarity.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 5 (4): 707–20.Google Scholar

Tormos-Aponte, Fernando. 2019. “Enacting Intersectional Solidarity in the Puerto Rican Student Movement.” In Gendered Mobilizations, ed. Irvine, Jill, Lang, Sabine, and Montoya, Celeste, 171–87. London: Rowman & Littlefield International, Ltd. Google Scholar

Tormos-Aponte, Fernando, and Velez-Serrano, Mayra. 2020. “Broadening the Pathway for Graduate Studies in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 53 (1): 145–46.Google Scholar

Watkins Liu, Callie. 2017. “The Anti-Oppressive Value of Critical Race Theory and Intersectionality in Social Movement Study.” Sociology of Race and Ethnicity 4 (3): 1–16.Google Scholar

Weldon, S. Laurel. 2006. “Inclusion, Solidarity and Social Movements: The Global Movement on Gender Violence.” Perspectives on Politics 4 (1): 55–74.Google Scholar

Willoughby-Herard, Tiffany. 2019. “Poetic Labors and Challenging Political Science: An Epistolary Poem.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 40 (1): 228–35. DOI:10.1080/1554477X.2019.1565465.Google Scholar