Skip to main content Accessibility help

Login Alert

Cancel
Log in
×
×
Register
Log In
(0) Cart
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.

Cited by
  • Crossref logo 67
  • Google Scholar logo
Crossref Citations
Crossref logo
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Praino, Rodrigo Stockemer, Daniel and Moscardelli, Vincent G. 2013. The Lingering Effect of Scandals in Congressional Elections: Incumbents, Challengers, and Voters. Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 94, Issue. 4, p. 1045.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Basinger, Scott J. 2013. Scandals and Congressional Elections in the Post-Watergate Era. Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 66, Issue. 2, p. 385.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Vonnahme, Beth Miller 2014. Surviving Scandal: An Exploration of the Immediate and Lasting Effects of Scandal on Candidate Evaluation. Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 95, Issue. 5, p. 1308.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Grover, Steven L. and Hasel, Marcus C. 2015. How Leaders Recover (or Not) from Publicized Sex Scandals. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 129, Issue. 1, p. 177.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

McDermott, Monika L. Schwartz, Douglas and Vallejo, Sebastian 2015. Talking the Talk but Not Walking the Walk. American Politics Research, Vol. 43, Issue. 6, p. 952.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Cobb, Michael D. and Taylor, Andrew J. 2015. An Absence of Malice. American Politics Research, Vol. 43, Issue. 6, p. 923.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Kauder, Björn and Potrafke, Niklas 2015. Just hire your spouse! Evidence from a political scandal in Bavaria. European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 38, Issue. , p. 42.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Weschle, Simon 2016. Punishing personal and electoral corruption: Experimental evidence from India. Research & Politics, Vol. 3, Issue. 2,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Clementson, David E. Pascual‐Ferrá, Paola and Beatty, Michael J. 2016. When Does a Presidential Candidate Seem Presidential and Trustworthy? Campaign Messages Through the Lens of Language Expectancy Theory. Presidential Studies Quarterly, Vol. 46, Issue. 3, p. 592.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Doherty, David Dowling, Conor M. and Miller, Michael G. 2016. When is Changing Policy Positions Costly for Politicians? Experimental Evidence. Political Behavior, Vol. 38, Issue. 2, p. 455.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Klašnja, Marko 2017. Uninformed Voters and Corrupt Politicians. American Politics Research, Vol. 45, Issue. 2, p. 256.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Clifford, Scott 2018. Reassessing the structure of presidential character. Electoral Studies, Vol. 54, Issue. , p. 240.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Ramanujam, Padmanabha Goyal, Yugank and Sridhar, Sriya 2018. Internet Infidelity. p. 45.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Mendenhall, Slade 2018. Scandal. SSRN Electronic Journal ,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Johnson, Tyler 2018. Deny and Attack or Concede and Correct? Image Repair and the Politically Scandalized. Journal of Political Marketing, Vol. 17, Issue. 3, p. 213.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Walter, Annemarie S. and Redlawsk, David P. 2019. Voters’ Partisan Responses to Politicians’ Immoral Behavior. Political Psychology, Vol. 40, Issue. 5, p. 1075.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Gaskins, Ben Seljan, Ellen Lochner, Todd Kowal, Katie Dundon, Zane and Gold, Maya 2019. From the FEC to the Ballot Box: Voter Accountability for Campaign Finance Law Violations. American Politics Research, Vol. 47, Issue. 5, p. 1000.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Darr, Joshua P. Kalmoe, Nathan P. Searles, Kathleen Sui, Mingxiao Pingree, Raymond J. Watson, Brian K. Bryanov, Kirill and Santia, Martina 2019. Collision with Collusion: Partisan Reaction to the Trump-Russia Scandal. Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 17, Issue. 3, p. 772.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Stockemer, Daniel and Praino, Rodrigo 2019. The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: Do Attractive Politicians Get a ‘Break’ When They are Involved in Scandals?. Political Behavior, Vol. 41, Issue. 3, p. 747.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Pereira, Miguel M. and Waterbury, Nicholas W. 2019. Do Voters Discount Political Scandals over Time?. Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 72, Issue. 3, p. 584.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Download full list
Google Scholar Citations

View all Google Scholar citations for this article.

×
Cambridge University Press

Our Site

  • Accessibility
  • Contact & Help
  • Legal Notices
  • Cancel your order

Quick Links

  • Cambridge Core
  • Cambridge Open Engage
  • Cambridge Aspire website

Our Products

  • Journals
  • Books
  • Elements
  • Textbooks
  • Courseware

Join us online

Please choose a valid location.

  • Rights & Permissions
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Notice
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies Policy
Cambridge University Press 2026

Cancel
Confirm
×

Save article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Are Financial or Moral Scandals Worse? It Depends.
  • Volume 44, Issue 4
  • David Doherty (a1), Conor M. Dowling (a2) and Michael G. Miller (a3)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511001247
Please provide your Kindle email.
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Are Financial or Moral Scandals Worse? It Depends.
  • Volume 44, Issue 4
  • David Doherty (a1), Conor M. Dowling (a2) and Michael G. Miller (a3)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511001247
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Are Financial or Moral Scandals Worse? It Depends.
  • Volume 44, Issue 4
  • David Doherty (a1), Conor M. Dowling (a2) and Michael G. Miller (a3)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511001247
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Contents help
Close Contents help

- No HTML tags allowed
- Web page URLs will display as text only
- Lines and paragraphs break automatically
- Attachments, images or tables are not permitted

Please enter your response.

Your details

Email help
Close Email help

Your email address will be used in order to notify you when your comment has been reviewed by the moderator and in case the author(s) of the article or the moderator need to contact you directly.

Please enter a valid email address.

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? * Conflicting interests help

Close Conflicting interests help

Please list any fees and grants from, employment by, consultancy for, shared ownership in or any close relationship with, at any time over the preceding 36 months, any organisation whose interests may be affected by the publication of the response. Please also list any non-financial associations or interests (personal, professional, political, institutional, religious or other) that a reasonable reader would want to know about in relation to the submitted work. This pertains to all the authors of the piece, their spouses or partners.