Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T23:27:26.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Be Explicit: Identifying and Addressing Misaligned Goals in Collaborative Research Teams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2022

Nicholas Haas*
Affiliation:
Aarhus University, Denmark

Abstract

The misalignment of goals among researchers, external organizational partners (OPs), and study participants is thought to pose a challenge to the successful implementation of collaborative research projects. However, the goals of different collaborative team members almost never are elicited, making identification of misalignment and its potential consequences a difficult task. In this evaluation of a United Nations Nonviolent Communication Program conducted in Bangladesh, the Maldives, and Sri Lanka, I collected qualitative and quantitative data on OPs’ and study participants’ expected program impacts. I find that there are differences in OP and participant goals and that misalignment appears to bear some responsibility for participant dissatisfaction with the program. I also observe evidence that as the program progressed, participants’ expected program impacts began to more closely approximate those of the OPs. I conclude with thoughts on the benefits of explicitly measuring research team goals and expectations and addressing their misalignment.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barrett, Christopher B. 2021. “On Design-Based Empirical Research and Its Interpretation and Ethics in Sustainability Science.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (29): 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, Robert A., Karim, Sabrina M., and Morse, Benjamin S.. 2019. “Establishing the Rule of Law in Weak and War-Torn States: Evidence from a Field Experiment with the Liberian National Police.” American Political Science Review 113 (3): 641–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryan, Gharad, Choi, James J., and Karlan, Dean. 2021. “Randomizing Religion: The Impact of Protestant Evangelism on Economic Outcomes.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 136 (1): 293380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Daniel M. 2019. “Facilitating Field Experiments at the Subnational Level.” Journal of Politics 81 (1): 371–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cilliers, Jacobus, Dube, Oeindrila, and Siddiqi, Bilal. 2015. “The White-Man Effect: How Foreigner Presence Affects Behavior in Experiments.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 118:397414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corduneanu-Huci, Cristina, Dorsch, Michael T., and Maarek, Paul. 2022. “What, Where, Who, And Why? An Empirical Investigation of Positionality in Political Science Field Experiments.” PS: Political Science & Politics 18. DOI:10.1017/S104909652200066X.Google Scholar
Deaton, Angus. 2020. “Randomization in the Tropics Revisited: A Theme and Eleven Variations.” Technical Report. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Haas, Nicholas. 2022. “Replication Data for: ‘Be Explicit: Identifying and Addressing Misaligned Goals in Collaborative Research Teams.’” PS: Political Science & Politics. DOI: 10.7910/DVN/WINLHO.Google Scholar
Haas, Nicholas, Haenschen, Katherine, Kumar, Tanu, Panagopoulos, Costas, Peyton, Kyle, Ravanilla, Nico, and Sierra-Arévalo, Michael. 2022. “Organizational Identity and Positionality in Randomized Control Trials: Considerations and Advice for Collaborative Research Teams.” PS: Political Science & Politics 15. DOI:10.1017/S1049096522000026.Google Scholar
Herman, Biz, Panin, Amma, Wellman, Elizabeth I., Blair, Graeme, Pruett, Lindsey D., Opalo, Ken O., Alarian, Hannah M., Grossman, Allison N., Tan, Yvonne, Dyzenhaus, Alex P., and Owsley, Nicholas. 2022. “Field Experiments in the Global South: Assessing Risks, Localizing Benefits, and Addressing Positionality.” PS: Political Science & Politics 14. DOI:10.1017/S1049096522000063.Google Scholar
Levine, Adam S. 2021. “How to Form Organizational Partnerships to Run Experiments.” In Advances in Experimental Political Science, ed. Druckman, James N. and Green, Donald P., 199216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Rose, and Hatemi, Peter K.. 2010. “Emerging Models of Collaboration in Political Science: Changes, Benefits, and Challenges.” PS: Political Science & Politics 43 (1): 4958.Google Scholar
Wagner, Caroline S., Park, Han W., and Leydesdorff, Loet. 2015. “The Continuing Growth of Global Cooperation Networks in Research: A Conundrum for National Governments.” PloS One 10 (7): 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Haas supplementary material

Haas supplementary material

Download Haas supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 4.8 MB