We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project.
2001
“Voting: What Is, What Could Be,”
http://vote.caltech.edu.Google Scholar
DolanMaura, and
GuccioneJean.
2003
“Court Dates Approach for Challenges to Recall.”
Los Angeles Times,
14 August: A-21.Google Scholar
HoffmanAllison.2003
“Partial Hand-Count of Ballots Reveals Few Irregularities.”
Los Angeles Times,
16 October: B-4.Google Scholar
KrosnickJon A.,
MillerJoanne M., and
TichyMichael P..
2003
“An Unrecognized Need for Ballot Reform: The Effects of Candidate Name Order on Election Outcomes.” In
Rethinking the Vote, eds.
Ann N.Crigler,
Marion R.Just,
Edward J.McCaffery.
New York:
Oxford University Press,
51–74.Google Scholar
MuellerJohn.1970
“Choosing Among 133 Candidates.”
Public Opinion Quarterly34(3):
395–
402.Google Scholar
Partnoyet al.
2003V. Shelley, U.S. District Court,
Southern District of California,
03CV1460 BTM (JFS).Google Scholar
SteenJennifer A. and
KoppellJonathan G. S. Forthcoming.
“The Effect of Ballot Position on Election Outcomes.”
Journal of Politics.Google Scholar
WandJonathan N. A.,
ShottsKenneth W.,
SekhonJasjet S.,
MebaneWalter R.Jr.,
HerronMichael C., and
BradyHenry E..
2001
“The Butterfly Did It: The Aberrant Vote for Buchanan in Palm Beach County, Florida.”
American Political Science Review95(4):
793–
810.Google Scholar