Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T13:32:46.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

External Grants and Publication: Sources, Outlets, and Implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2003

Bradley C. Canon
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
Our thanks to David Prince of the University of Kentucky for his assistance in coding the articles. This article is a revised version of a paper we presented at the 2001 Western Political Science Association Meeting in Las Vegas, Nevada.
Matthew Gabel
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
Our thanks to David Prince of the University of Kentucky for his assistance in coding the articles. This article is a revised version of a paper we presented at the 2001 Western Political Science Association Meeting in Las Vegas, Nevada.
Dana J. Patton
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
Our thanks to David Prince of the University of Kentucky for his assistance in coding the articles. This article is a revised version of a paper we presented at the 2001 Western Political Science Association Meeting in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Abstract

External funding is a common indicator of research productivity in political science. Comparing departments, university administrators often use external funding as an indication of the quality of research. While this can simply reflect administrators' desire for departments to obtain grants that provide overhead for the institution, this metric also rests on an assumption that external funding is a measure of quality research.For example, Indiana University's web site posted a discussion with President Myles Brand on October 23, 2000, in which he stresses “the ability to win competitive grants” as a measure of department and university quality. Also, e.g., while she focuses on an earlier period, see Lewin's (1997) discussion of Stanford, especially its Political Science Department at pp. 213-23. Departments themselves often use external funding as a proxy for research productivity in evaluating faculty performance. Again, the justification is generally that quality research depends on funding and that those who secure competitive funding will publish quality research.

Type
THE PROFESSION
Copyright
© 2002 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)