Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T06:25:05.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Framing Effects and Group Differences in Public Opinion about Prison Pell Grants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2021

Travis M. Johnston
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Boston
Kevin H. Wozniak
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Boston

Abstract

After years of gridlock on the issue, a bipartisan group of members of Congress struck a deal in 2020 to restore eligibility for inmates to access Pell Grants. Evidence indicates that college education programs in prison reduce recidivism and, consequently, state corrections expenditures, but legislators in prior decades feared that voters would resent government subsidy of college classes for criminals. To assess the contemporary politics of the issue, we analyze data from a framing experiment embedded in the 2016 Cooperative Congressional Election Study. We find that Americans, on average, neither support nor oppose the proposal to restore inmates’ Pell Grant eligibility; however, exposure to arguments about the proposal’s benefits to inmates in particular and American society more broadly both increased subjects’ support. We further explore how this framing effect varies across political partisanship and racial resentment. We find that both frames elicited a positive response from subjects, especially among Democrats and subjects with low or moderate racial resentment.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Rivers, Douglas. 2013. “Cooperative Survey Research.” Annual Review of Political Science 16:307–29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-022811-160625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Schaffner, Brian F.. 2017. “Cooperative Congressional Election Study, 2016: Common Content.” https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/GDF6Z0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandara, Sachini N., McGinty, Emma E., and Barry, Colleen L.. 2020. “Message Framing to Reduce Stigma and Increase Support for Policies to Improve the Well-Being of People with Prior Drug Convictions.” International Journal of Drug Policy 76 (February). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.102643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benjamini, Yoav, and Hochberg, Yosef. 1995. “Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. ” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Society B (Methodological) 57 (1): 289300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x.Google Scholar
Bozick, Robert, Steele, Jennifer, Davis, Lois, and Turner, Susan. 2018. “Does Providing Inmates with Education Improve Post-Release Outcomes? A Meta-Analysis of Correctional Education Programs in the United States.” Journal of Experimental Criminology 14 (3): 389428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-018-9334-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Elizabeth K., and Socia, Kelly M.. 2017. “Twenty-First Century Punitiveness: Social Sources of Punitive American Views Reconsidered.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 33 (4): 935–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9319-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chudy, Jennifer. 2021. “Racial Sympathy and Its Political Consequences.” Journal of Politics 83 (1). https://doi.org/10.1086/708953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clear, Todd R. 1994. Harm in American Penology: Offenders, Victims, and Their Communities. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Dagan, David, and Teles, Steven. 2016. Prison Break: Why Conservatives Turned Against Mass Incarceration. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Lois M., Bozick, Robert, Steele, Jennifer L., Saunders, Jessica, and Miles, Jeremy N. V.. 2013. “Evaluating the Effectiveness of Correctional Education.” Product Page. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR266.html.Google Scholar
Douglas-Gabriel, Danielle. 2020. “Education Dept. Expands Pell Grant Initiative for Inmates to Take College Classes.” Washington Post, April 24. www.washingtonpost.com/education/2020/04/24/education-dept-expands-pell-grant-initiative-inmates-take-college-classes.Google Scholar
Enns, Peter K. 2016. Incarceration Nation: How the United States Became the Most Punitive Democracy in the World. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, Brett, Wodahl, Eric, and Cota, Lisa. 2016. “Measuring Public Support for Prisoner Reentry Options.” International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 60 (12): 1406–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X15578438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garland, Brett, Wodahl, Eric, and Schuhmann, Robert. 2013. “Value Conflict and Public Opinion Toward Prisoner Reentry Initiatives.” Criminal Justice Policy Review 24 (1): 2748. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403411424081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottlieb, Aaron. 2017. “The Effect of Message Frames on Public Attitudes Toward Criminal Justice Reform for Nonviolent Offenses.” Crime & Delinquency 63 (5): 636–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128716687758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gottschalk, Marie. 2006. The Prison and the Gallows: The Politics of Mass Incarceration in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heumann, Milton, Pinaire, Brian K., and Clark, Thomas. 2005. “Beyond the Sentence: Public Perceptions of Collateral Consequences for Felony Offenders.” Criminal Law Bulletin 41 (1): 2446.Google Scholar
Immerwahr, John, and Johnson, Jean. 2002. “The Revolving Door: Exploring Public Attitudes toward Prisoner Reentry.” Washington, DC: Working discussion paper for the Urban Institute’s Reentry Roundtable.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Thomas. 2014. “Cuomo Drops Plan to Use State Money to Pay for College Classes for Inmates.” New York Times, April 3.Google Scholar
Kim, Ryang Hui, and Clark, David. 2013. “The Effect of Prison-Based College Education Programs on Recidivism: Propensity Score Matching Approach.” Journal of Criminal Justice 41 (3): 196204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miratrix, Luke W., Sekhon, Jasjeet S., Theodoridis, Alexander G., and Campos, Luis F.. 2018. “Worth Weighting? How to Think About and Use Weights in Survey Experiments. ” Political Analysis 26 (3): 275–91. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2018.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muhammad, Khalil Gibran. 2011. The Condemnation of Blackness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Murakawa, Naomi. 2014. The First Civil Right: How Liberals Built Prison America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
National District Attorneys Association. 2019. “Nation’s Largest Prosecutor Organization Endorses Pell Grant Restoration for Incarcerated Students.” August 1. https://ndaa.org/wp-content/uploads/NDAA-Press-Release-on-Pell-Grants_Final-1.pdf.Google Scholar
Oakford, Patrick, Brumfield, Cara, Goldvale, Casey, Tatum, Laura, diZerega, Margaret, and Patrick, Fred. 2019. “Investing in Futures: Economic and Fiscal Benefits of Postsecondary Education in Prison.” New York: Vera Institute of Justice. www.vera.org/publications/investing-in-futures-education-in-prison.Google Scholar
Ouellette, Heather M., Applegate, Brandon K., and Vuk, Mateja. 2017. “The Public’s Stance on Prisoner Reentry: Policy Support and Personal Acceptance.” American Journal of Criminal Justice 42 (4): 768–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-016-9382-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peffley, Mark, and Hurwitz, Jon. 2010. Justice in America: The Separate Realities of Blacks and Whites. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Percival, Garrick L. 2015. Smart on Crime : The Struggle to Build a Better American Penal System. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b18693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, Justin T., Ivanov, Stefan, and Wozniak, Kevin H.. 2020. “Selling Effective Violence-Prevention Policies to the Public: A Nationally Representative Framing Experiment.” Journal of Experimental Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-020-09447-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, Nora C., and Presser, Stanley. 2003. “The Science of Asking Questions.” Annual Review of Sociology 29:6588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoenfeld, Heather. 2018. Building the Prison State: Race and the Politics of Mass Incarceration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimson, James. 2018. Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings. Second Edition. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stratford, Michael. 2020. “Congress Clinches Deal to Restore Pell Grants for Prisoners 26 Years After Ban.” Politico, December 20. www.politico.com/news/2020/12/20/congress-pell-grant-prisoners-449364?fbclid=IwAR0BKGns2bWZrIFsbKhAdwJDCj-KIupJuZ5IsvpRPiPhg76dJHKmSDNBSS4.Google Scholar
Unnever, James D., and Cullen, Francis T.. 2010. “The Social Sources of Americans’ Punitiveness: A Test of Three Competing Models.” Criminology 48 (1): 99129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Department of Education. 2016. “12,000 Incarcerated Students to Enroll in Postsecondary Educational and Training Programs Through Education Department’s New Second Chance Pell Pilot Program. ” June 24. www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/12000-incarcerated-students-enroll-postsecondary-educational-and-training-programs-through-education-departments-new-second-chance-pell-pilot-program.Google Scholar
Wozniak, Kevin H. 2020. “Public Discussion about Critical Issues in Criminal Justice Reform.” Journal of Qualitative Criminal Justice & Criminology 8 (4): 401–29.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Johnston and Wozniak Dataset

Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Johnston and Wozniak supplementary material

Appendix

Download Johnston and Wozniak supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 81.1 KB